Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluoride varnish as a prophylaxis method with self etching primer (SEP) and its comparison with pumice before orthodontic bonding. Thirty seven orthodontic patients participated in a prospective clinical trial. A split mouth technique was used in each...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthodontics 2012-04, Vol.34 (2), p.198-201 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 201 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 198 |
| container_title | European journal of orthodontics |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Grover, Seema Sidhu, M S Prabhakar, Mona Jena, Sanghamitra Soni, Sumeet |
| description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluoride varnish as a prophylaxis method with self etching primer (SEP) and its comparison with pumice before orthodontic bonding. Thirty seven orthodontic patients participated in a prospective clinical trial. A split mouth technique was used in each patient, one quadrant was assigned to fluoride varnish and the contralateral quadrant to pumice prophylaxis. A total of 684 teeth were bonded with SEP (Transbond plus; 3M Unitek) and monitored for 6 months for bond failures. A total of 42 (6.1%) failures were recorded, 9 (2.6%) in the pumice group and 33 (9.6%) in the fluoride varnish group. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of bracket failures between the pumice and fluoride varnish groups and the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one bond failure. Statistically significant differences were found both in total number of bond failures (P < 0.001) and in the number of patients with bond failures (P < 0.05) between both groups. A significantly lower and clinically acceptable bond failure rate was observed with Transbond Plus self etching primer after pumice prophylaxis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ejo/cjr003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_959143877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>959143877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1ae041c1b9cd64811524cb1665c67621f1d8b0bdf42e92340c51919a72d5f1703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AGSO0Goy0nTr0sZ8wMG3uh1SZPUZrRNTdLq_oM_2oxNrw6H9-HlnAehayD3QIp4qbZmKbaWkPgEzYGlJKIUyCmaE2AQJXGezdCFc1sSiJxl52hGIaYkL2COftYTb0futemxqXHdjsZqqfDEba9dg3kvsfYOC9MN3GoXsC_tGzyMnRYKD9YMza7l39rh0en-AzvV1pHyotkvg9WdsliHbusbI03vtcCV6WVIo4j3-2jSk8HOj3J3ic5q3jp1dZwL9P64fls9R5vXp5fVwyYSMaU-Aq4IAwFVIWTKcoCEMlFBmiYizVIKNci8IpWsGVUFjRkRCRRQ8IzKpIaMxAt0e-gN53-Oyvmy006otuW9MqMri6QAFrRlgbw7kMIa56yqy_1L3O5KIOVefhnklwf5Ab451o5Vp-Q_-mc7_gVsmINL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>959143877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grover, Seema ; Sidhu, M S ; Prabhakar, Mona ; Jena, Sanghamitra ; Soni, Sumeet</creator><creatorcontrib>Grover, Seema ; Sidhu, M S ; Prabhakar, Mona ; Jena, Sanghamitra ; Soni, Sumeet</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluoride varnish as a prophylaxis method with self etching primer (SEP) and its comparison with pumice before orthodontic bonding. Thirty seven orthodontic patients participated in a prospective clinical trial. A split mouth technique was used in each patient, one quadrant was assigned to fluoride varnish and the contralateral quadrant to pumice prophylaxis. A total of 684 teeth were bonded with SEP (Transbond plus; 3M Unitek) and monitored for 6 months for bond failures. A total of 42 (6.1%) failures were recorded, 9 (2.6%) in the pumice group and 33 (9.6%) in the fluoride varnish group. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of bracket failures between the pumice and fluoride varnish groups and the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one bond failure. Statistically significant differences were found both in total number of bond failures (P < 0.001) and in the number of patients with bond failures (P < 0.05) between both groups. A significantly lower and clinically acceptable bond failure rate was observed with Transbond Plus self etching primer after pumice prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21320891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Bicuspid - pathology ; Cariostatic Agents - chemistry ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Prophylaxis - instrumentation ; Dentistry ; Equipment Failure ; Fluorides, Topical - chemistry ; Humans ; Incisor - pathology ; Mandible ; Materials Testing ; Maxilla ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Prospective Studies ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Silicates - chemistry</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2012-04, Vol.34 (2), p.198-201</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1ae041c1b9cd64811524cb1665c67621f1d8b0bdf42e92340c51919a72d5f1703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1ae041c1b9cd64811524cb1665c67621f1d8b0bdf42e92340c51919a72d5f1703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21320891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grover, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakar, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Sanghamitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soni, Sumeet</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluoride varnish as a prophylaxis method with self etching primer (SEP) and its comparison with pumice before orthodontic bonding. Thirty seven orthodontic patients participated in a prospective clinical trial. A split mouth technique was used in each patient, one quadrant was assigned to fluoride varnish and the contralateral quadrant to pumice prophylaxis. A total of 684 teeth were bonded with SEP (Transbond plus; 3M Unitek) and monitored for 6 months for bond failures. A total of 42 (6.1%) failures were recorded, 9 (2.6%) in the pumice group and 33 (9.6%) in the fluoride varnish group. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of bracket failures between the pumice and fluoride varnish groups and the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one bond failure. Statistically significant differences were found both in total number of bond failures (P < 0.001) and in the number of patients with bond failures (P < 0.05) between both groups. A significantly lower and clinically acceptable bond failure rate was observed with Transbond Plus self etching primer after pumice prophylaxis.</description><subject>Bicuspid - pathology</subject><subject>Cariostatic Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Prophylaxis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Fluorides, Topical - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Silicates - chemistry</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AGSO0Goy0nTr0sZ8wMG3uh1SZPUZrRNTdLq_oM_2oxNrw6H9-HlnAehayD3QIp4qbZmKbaWkPgEzYGlJKIUyCmaE2AQJXGezdCFc1sSiJxl52hGIaYkL2COftYTb0futemxqXHdjsZqqfDEba9dg3kvsfYOC9MN3GoXsC_tGzyMnRYKD9YMza7l39rh0en-AzvV1pHyotkvg9WdsliHbusbI03vtcCV6WVIo4j3-2jSk8HOj3J3ic5q3jp1dZwL9P64fls9R5vXp5fVwyYSMaU-Aq4IAwFVIWTKcoCEMlFBmiYizVIKNci8IpWsGVUFjRkRCRRQ8IzKpIaMxAt0e-gN53-Oyvmy006otuW9MqMri6QAFrRlgbw7kMIa56yqy_1L3O5KIOVefhnklwf5Ab451o5Vp-Q_-mc7_gVsmINL</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Grover, Seema</creator><creator>Sidhu, M S</creator><creator>Prabhakar, Mona</creator><creator>Jena, Sanghamitra</creator><creator>Soni, Sumeet</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study</title><author>Grover, Seema ; Sidhu, M S ; Prabhakar, Mona ; Jena, Sanghamitra ; Soni, Sumeet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1ae041c1b9cd64811524cb1665c67621f1d8b0bdf42e92340c51919a72d5f1703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bicuspid - pathology</topic><topic>Cariostatic Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Prophylaxis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Fluorides, Topical - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Silicates - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grover, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhakar, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Sanghamitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soni, Sumeet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grover, Seema</au><au>Sidhu, M S</au><au>Prabhakar, Mona</au><au>Jena, Sanghamitra</au><au>Soni, Sumeet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>198-201</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluoride varnish as a prophylaxis method with self etching primer (SEP) and its comparison with pumice before orthodontic bonding. Thirty seven orthodontic patients participated in a prospective clinical trial. A split mouth technique was used in each patient, one quadrant was assigned to fluoride varnish and the contralateral quadrant to pumice prophylaxis. A total of 684 teeth were bonded with SEP (Transbond plus; 3M Unitek) and monitored for 6 months for bond failures. A total of 42 (6.1%) failures were recorded, 9 (2.6%) in the pumice group and 33 (9.6%) in the fluoride varnish group. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the number of bracket failures between the pumice and fluoride varnish groups and the number of patients in each group experiencing at least one bond failure. Statistically significant differences were found both in total number of bond failures (P < 0.001) and in the number of patients with bond failures (P < 0.05) between both groups. A significantly lower and clinically acceptable bond failure rate was observed with Transbond Plus self etching primer after pumice prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>21320891</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/cjr003</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0141-5387 |
| ispartof | European journal of orthodontics, 2012-04, Vol.34 (2), p.198-201 |
| issn | 0141-5387 1460-2210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_959143877 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Bicuspid - pathology Cariostatic Agents - chemistry Dental Bonding - methods Dental Materials - chemistry Dental Prophylaxis - instrumentation Dentistry Equipment Failure Fluorides, Topical - chemistry Humans Incisor - pathology Mandible Materials Testing Maxilla Orthodontic Brackets Prospective Studies Resin Cements - chemistry Silicates - chemistry |
| title | Evaluation of fluoride varnish and its comparison with pumice prophylaxis using self-etching primer in orthodontic bonding--an in vivo study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20fluoride%20varnish%20and%20its%20comparison%20with%20pumice%20prophylaxis%20using%20self-etching%20primer%20in%20orthodontic%20bonding--an%20in%20vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Grover,%20Seema&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=198-201&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjr003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E959143877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=959143877&rft_id=info:pmid/21320891&rfr_iscdi=true |