An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean

Despite the recognition of the need for mitigation approaches to landslide risk in developing countries, the delivery of ‘on-the-ground’ measures is rarely undertaken. With respect to other ‘natural’ hazards, it is widely reported that mitigation can pay. However, the lack of such an evidence base i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2012-03, Vol.61 (2), p.351-385
Hauptverfasser: Holcombe, Elizabeth, Smith, Sarah, Wright, Edmund, Anderson, Malcolm G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue 2
container_start_page 351
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 61
creator Holcombe, Elizabeth
Smith, Sarah
Wright, Edmund
Anderson, Malcolm G.
description Despite the recognition of the need for mitigation approaches to landslide risk in developing countries, the delivery of ‘on-the-ground’ measures is rarely undertaken. With respect to other ‘natural’ hazards, it is widely reported that mitigation can pay. However, the lack of such an evidence base in relation to landslides in developing countries hinders advocacy amongst decision makers for expenditure on ex-ante measures. This research addresses these limitations directly by developing and applying an integrated risk assessment and cost–benefit analysis of physical landslide mitigation measures implemented in an unplanned community in the Eastern Caribbean. In order to quantify the level of landslide risk reduction achieved, landslide hazard and vulnerability were modelled (before and after the intervention), and project costs, direct and indirect benefits were monetised. It is shown that the probability of landslide occurrence has been substantially reduced by implementing surface-water drainage measures and that the benefits of the project outweigh the costs by a ratio of 2.7–1. This paper adds to the evidence base that ‘mitigation pays’ with respect to landslide risk in the most vulnerable communities—thus strengthening the argument for ex-ante measures. This integrated project evaluation methodology should be suitable for adoption as part of the community-based landslide mitigation project cycle, and it is hoped that this resource, and the results of this study, will stimulate further such programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954672446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574470731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-297c788dfb88896217f7742b6dcf8171ba8fd5490906281873ee83eaab26483d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEURoMo2M74A9wFQXRTTl6dx3JoxgcMuFFwF26lbnoyVqfapGrAxfz3SdGDgqCbZPGde7iXj5BXnL3njJmLyjnTrmOcd84J1pknZMO3RnbMKvaUbJgTvGOSfX9OXtR6yxqohduQ-8tMU55xX2DGgcLxWCYINzROheIdjAvMKe_pfIMUY8QwpzvMWCudIh0hD3VMA9KS6g9acFhaPq1CuuRji3NThulwWHKaE9Y1WE07KKnvEfI5eRZhrPjy8T8j3z5cfd196q6_fPy8u7zuQEk5d8KZYKwdYm-tdVpwE41RotdDiJYb3oONw1Y55pgWllsjEa1EgF5oZeUgz8jbk7dd93PBOvtDqgHHtiJOS_Vuq7QRSulGvvsvyaUQRiljRUNf_4XeTkvJ7Q7v2g56fRrET1AoU60Foz-WdIDyy3Pm1-b8qTnfCvFrc36defMohhpgjAVySPX3oNhqpoy2jRMnrrYo77H8WeDf8gcdj6kX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918769187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Holcombe, Elizabeth ; Smith, Sarah ; Wright, Edmund ; Anderson, Malcolm G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holcombe, Elizabeth ; Smith, Sarah ; Wright, Edmund ; Anderson, Malcolm G.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the recognition of the need for mitigation approaches to landslide risk in developing countries, the delivery of ‘on-the-ground’ measures is rarely undertaken. With respect to other ‘natural’ hazards, it is widely reported that mitigation can pay. However, the lack of such an evidence base in relation to landslides in developing countries hinders advocacy amongst decision makers for expenditure on ex-ante measures. This research addresses these limitations directly by developing and applying an integrated risk assessment and cost–benefit analysis of physical landslide mitigation measures implemented in an unplanned community in the Eastern Caribbean. In order to quantify the level of landslide risk reduction achieved, landslide hazard and vulnerability were modelled (before and after the intervention), and project costs, direct and indirect benefits were monetised. It is shown that the probability of landslide occurrence has been substantially reduced by implementing surface-water drainage measures and that the benefits of the project outweigh the costs by a ratio of 2.7–1. This paper adds to the evidence base that ‘mitigation pays’ with respect to landslide risk in the most vulnerable communities—thus strengthening the argument for ex-ante measures. This integrated project evaluation methodology should be suitable for adoption as part of the community-based landslide mitigation project cycle, and it is hoped that this resource, and the results of this study, will stimulate further such programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NAHZEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Appropriations and expenditures ; Benefits ; Caribbean region ; Civil Engineering ; Cost ; Cost benefit analysis ; Developing countries ; Drainage ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Effectiveness studies ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Management ; Environmental risk ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Landslides ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; LDCs ; Natural Hazards ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Natural resources ; Original Paper ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Risk reduction ; Surface water</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2012-03, Vol.61 (2), p.351-385</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-297c788dfb88896217f7742b6dcf8171ba8fd5490906281873ee83eaab26483d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-297c788dfb88896217f7742b6dcf8171ba8fd5490906281873ee83eaab26483d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27856,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25604768$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holcombe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Malcolm G.</creatorcontrib><title>An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Despite the recognition of the need for mitigation approaches to landslide risk in developing countries, the delivery of ‘on-the-ground’ measures is rarely undertaken. With respect to other ‘natural’ hazards, it is widely reported that mitigation can pay. However, the lack of such an evidence base in relation to landslides in developing countries hinders advocacy amongst decision makers for expenditure on ex-ante measures. This research addresses these limitations directly by developing and applying an integrated risk assessment and cost–benefit analysis of physical landslide mitigation measures implemented in an unplanned community in the Eastern Caribbean. In order to quantify the level of landslide risk reduction achieved, landslide hazard and vulnerability were modelled (before and after the intervention), and project costs, direct and indirect benefits were monetised. It is shown that the probability of landslide occurrence has been substantially reduced by implementing surface-water drainage measures and that the benefits of the project outweigh the costs by a ratio of 2.7–1. This paper adds to the evidence base that ‘mitigation pays’ with respect to landslide risk in the most vulnerable communities—thus strengthening the argument for ex-ante measures. This integrated project evaluation methodology should be suitable for adoption as part of the community-based landslide mitigation project cycle, and it is hoped that this resource, and the results of this study, will stimulate further such programmes.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Appropriations and expenditures</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Caribbean region</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEURoMo2M74A9wFQXRTTl6dx3JoxgcMuFFwF26lbnoyVqfapGrAxfz3SdGDgqCbZPGde7iXj5BXnL3njJmLyjnTrmOcd84J1pknZMO3RnbMKvaUbJgTvGOSfX9OXtR6yxqohduQ-8tMU55xX2DGgcLxWCYINzROheIdjAvMKe_pfIMUY8QwpzvMWCudIh0hD3VMA9KS6g9acFhaPq1CuuRji3NThulwWHKaE9Y1WE07KKnvEfI5eRZhrPjy8T8j3z5cfd196q6_fPy8u7zuQEk5d8KZYKwdYm-tdVpwE41RotdDiJYb3oONw1Y55pgWllsjEa1EgF5oZeUgz8jbk7dd93PBOvtDqgHHtiJOS_Vuq7QRSulGvvsvyaUQRiljRUNf_4XeTkvJ7Q7v2g56fRrET1AoU60Foz-WdIDyy3Pm1-b8qTnfCvFrc36defMohhpgjAVySPX3oNhqpoy2jRMnrrYo77H8WeDf8gcdj6kX</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Holcombe, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Smith, Sarah</creator><creator>Wright, Edmund</creator><creator>Anderson, Malcolm G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean</title><author>Holcombe, Elizabeth ; Smith, Sarah ; Wright, Edmund ; Anderson, Malcolm G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-297c788dfb88896217f7742b6dcf8171ba8fd5490906281873ee83eaab26483d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Appropriations and expenditures</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Caribbean region</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holcombe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Malcolm G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holcombe, Elizabeth</au><au>Smith, Sarah</au><au>Wright, Edmund</au><au>Anderson, Malcolm G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>351-385</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><coden>NAHZEL</coden><abstract>Despite the recognition of the need for mitigation approaches to landslide risk in developing countries, the delivery of ‘on-the-ground’ measures is rarely undertaken. With respect to other ‘natural’ hazards, it is widely reported that mitigation can pay. However, the lack of such an evidence base in relation to landslides in developing countries hinders advocacy amongst decision makers for expenditure on ex-ante measures. This research addresses these limitations directly by developing and applying an integrated risk assessment and cost–benefit analysis of physical landslide mitigation measures implemented in an unplanned community in the Eastern Caribbean. In order to quantify the level of landslide risk reduction achieved, landslide hazard and vulnerability were modelled (before and after the intervention), and project costs, direct and indirect benefits were monetised. It is shown that the probability of landslide occurrence has been substantially reduced by implementing surface-water drainage measures and that the benefits of the project outweigh the costs by a ratio of 2.7–1. This paper adds to the evidence base that ‘mitigation pays’ with respect to landslide risk in the most vulnerable communities—thus strengthening the argument for ex-ante measures. This integrated project evaluation methodology should be suitable for adoption as part of the community-based landslide mitigation project cycle, and it is hoped that this resource, and the results of this study, will stimulate further such programmes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2012-03, Vol.61 (2), p.351-385
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954672446
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Advocacy
Appropriations and expenditures
Benefits
Caribbean region
Civil Engineering
Cost
Cost benefit analysis
Developing countries
Drainage
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Effectiveness studies
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environmental Management
Environmental risk
Exact sciences and technology
Geological hazards
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
LDCs
Natural Hazards
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Natural resources
Original Paper
Risk
Risk assessment
Risk reduction
Surface water
title An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20integrated%20approach%20for%20evaluating%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20landslide%20risk%20reduction%20in%20unplanned%20communities%20in%20the%20Caribbean&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Holcombe,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=351-385&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft.coden=NAHZEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574470731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918769187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true