Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes

► Performance of different AOP's on the degradation of phenol was compared. ► The effect of various operating parameters on the degradation was evaluated. ► Kinetics of the different methods was studied and analyzed. This study compares the performance of Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2012-02, Vol.183, p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: Babuponnusami, Arjunan, Muthukumar, Karuppan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)
container_volume 183
creator Babuponnusami, Arjunan
Muthukumar, Karuppan
description ► Performance of different AOP's on the degradation of phenol was compared. ► The effect of various operating parameters on the degradation was evaluated. ► Kinetics of the different methods was studied and analyzed. This study compares the performance of Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton treatment methods on the degradation of phenol. The effect of operating parameters such as hydrogen peroxide concentration, Fe2+ concentration, current density, initial phenol concentration and solution pH was studied. The results showed better performance with simultaneous utilization of UV irradiation and electrolysis with Fenton's reagent. Degradation efficiency was observed in the order: photo-electro-Fenton>sono-electro-Fenton>electro-Fenton>Fenton. Even though complete degradation of phenol was observed with photo-electro-Fenton and sono-electro-Fenton processes, photo-electro-Fenton process showed complete removal of phenol and 64.19% of mineralization within 30min, whereas in the case of sono-electro-Fenton process, no phenol was detected after 40min and the mineralization observed at optimum conditions was 67.93%. Fenton and electro-Fenton processes required more time for phenol degradation and mineralization. The phenol degradation kinetics was studied and compared for all the processes. The results showed higher rate constant values for sono-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0683min−1) and photo-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0934min−1) processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954648687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1385894711015282</els_id><sourcerecordid>954648687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d5e28432743e9deb4eb6bd72bac5ee2e9f631c63752dc8c8ec5d43ae618de4bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnRRB39Aa7sThe28ioFXU2Mr8TEhbomFG6VSaeMUF9L_7lMRhfGxBVw73fPJecgtEdwRTARx7PKwqyimJCK0AoTvIa2iGxYySih6_nOZF1KxZtNtJ3SDGMsFFFb6HPqXs1gwRXh3Tsz-jAUoSsWTzCE_qSYFjbMFyb6lOstjG8AQ3EBwxiGowJ6sGMM5c87M6H8XSzM4LJYGP80FjFYSAnSDtroTJ9g9_ucoIeL8_uzq_Lm9vL6bHpTWi7VWLoaqOSMNpyBctByaEXrGtoaWwNQUJ1gxArW1NRZaSXY2nFmQBDpgLeOTdDBSjdvfn6BNOq5Txb63gwQXpJWNRdciuzZBB3-S5IGq0YqJeqMkhVqY0gpQqcX0c9N_NAE62UweqZzMHoZjCZU52DyzP5qpjNBm8fsrX64y0CNc5fLZvmB0xUB2Y9XD1En62GZko_ZRO2C_0f_C5gLoco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709789965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Babuponnusami, Arjunan ; Muthukumar, Karuppan</creator><creatorcontrib>Babuponnusami, Arjunan ; Muthukumar, Karuppan</creatorcontrib><description>► Performance of different AOP's on the degradation of phenol was compared. ► The effect of various operating parameters on the degradation was evaluated. ► Kinetics of the different methods was studied and analyzed. This study compares the performance of Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton treatment methods on the degradation of phenol. The effect of operating parameters such as hydrogen peroxide concentration, Fe2+ concentration, current density, initial phenol concentration and solution pH was studied. The results showed better performance with simultaneous utilization of UV irradiation and electrolysis with Fenton's reagent. Degradation efficiency was observed in the order: photo-electro-Fenton&gt;sono-electro-Fenton&gt;electro-Fenton&gt;Fenton. Even though complete degradation of phenol was observed with photo-electro-Fenton and sono-electro-Fenton processes, photo-electro-Fenton process showed complete removal of phenol and 64.19% of mineralization within 30min, whereas in the case of sono-electro-Fenton process, no phenol was detected after 40min and the mineralization observed at optimum conditions was 67.93%. Fenton and electro-Fenton processes required more time for phenol degradation and mineralization. The phenol degradation kinetics was studied and compared for all the processes. The results showed higher rate constant values for sono-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0683min−1) and photo-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0934min−1) processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-8947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3212</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>AOPs ; Chemical engineering ; COD removal ; Degradation ; Degradation kinetics ; electrolysis ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Mineralization ; Optimization ; oxidation ; Phenol ; Phenol degradation ; Photo-electro-Fenton ; Rate constants ; ultraviolet radiation ; Utilization</subject><ispartof>Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996), 2012-02, Vol.183, p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d5e28432743e9deb4eb6bd72bac5ee2e9f631c63752dc8c8ec5d43ae618de4bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d5e28432743e9deb4eb6bd72bac5ee2e9f631c63752dc8c8ec5d43ae618de4bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Babuponnusami, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthukumar, Karuppan</creatorcontrib><title>Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes</title><title>Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)</title><description>► Performance of different AOP's on the degradation of phenol was compared. ► The effect of various operating parameters on the degradation was evaluated. ► Kinetics of the different methods was studied and analyzed. This study compares the performance of Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton treatment methods on the degradation of phenol. The effect of operating parameters such as hydrogen peroxide concentration, Fe2+ concentration, current density, initial phenol concentration and solution pH was studied. The results showed better performance with simultaneous utilization of UV irradiation and electrolysis with Fenton's reagent. Degradation efficiency was observed in the order: photo-electro-Fenton&gt;sono-electro-Fenton&gt;electro-Fenton&gt;Fenton. Even though complete degradation of phenol was observed with photo-electro-Fenton and sono-electro-Fenton processes, photo-electro-Fenton process showed complete removal of phenol and 64.19% of mineralization within 30min, whereas in the case of sono-electro-Fenton process, no phenol was detected after 40min and the mineralization observed at optimum conditions was 67.93%. Fenton and electro-Fenton processes required more time for phenol degradation and mineralization. The phenol degradation kinetics was studied and compared for all the processes. The results showed higher rate constant values for sono-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0683min−1) and photo-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0934min−1) processes.</description><subject>AOPs</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>COD removal</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Degradation kinetics</subject><subject>electrolysis</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>oxidation</subject><subject>Phenol</subject><subject>Phenol degradation</subject><subject>Photo-electro-Fenton</subject><subject>Rate constants</subject><subject>ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><issn>1385-8947</issn><issn>1873-3212</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnRRB39Aa7sThe28ioFXU2Mr8TEhbomFG6VSaeMUF9L_7lMRhfGxBVw73fPJecgtEdwRTARx7PKwqyimJCK0AoTvIa2iGxYySih6_nOZF1KxZtNtJ3SDGMsFFFb6HPqXs1gwRXh3Tsz-jAUoSsWTzCE_qSYFjbMFyb6lOstjG8AQ3EBwxiGowJ6sGMM5c87M6H8XSzM4LJYGP80FjFYSAnSDtroTJ9g9_ucoIeL8_uzq_Lm9vL6bHpTWi7VWLoaqOSMNpyBctByaEXrGtoaWwNQUJ1gxArW1NRZaSXY2nFmQBDpgLeOTdDBSjdvfn6BNOq5Txb63gwQXpJWNRdciuzZBB3-S5IGq0YqJeqMkhVqY0gpQqcX0c9N_NAE62UweqZzMHoZjCZU52DyzP5qpjNBm8fsrX64y0CNc5fLZvmB0xUB2Y9XD1En62GZko_ZRO2C_0f_C5gLoco</recordid><startdate>20120215</startdate><enddate>20120215</enddate><creator>Babuponnusami, Arjunan</creator><creator>Muthukumar, Karuppan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120215</creationdate><title>Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes</title><author>Babuponnusami, Arjunan ; Muthukumar, Karuppan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d5e28432743e9deb4eb6bd72bac5ee2e9f631c63752dc8c8ec5d43ae618de4bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>AOPs</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>COD removal</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Degradation kinetics</topic><topic>electrolysis</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>oxidation</topic><topic>Phenol</topic><topic>Phenol degradation</topic><topic>Photo-electro-Fenton</topic><topic>Rate constants</topic><topic>ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Babuponnusami, Arjunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthukumar, Karuppan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Babuponnusami, Arjunan</au><au>Muthukumar, Karuppan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes</atitle><jtitle>Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)</jtitle><date>2012-02-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1385-8947</issn><eissn>1873-3212</eissn><abstract>► Performance of different AOP's on the degradation of phenol was compared. ► The effect of various operating parameters on the degradation was evaluated. ► Kinetics of the different methods was studied and analyzed. This study compares the performance of Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton treatment methods on the degradation of phenol. The effect of operating parameters such as hydrogen peroxide concentration, Fe2+ concentration, current density, initial phenol concentration and solution pH was studied. The results showed better performance with simultaneous utilization of UV irradiation and electrolysis with Fenton's reagent. Degradation efficiency was observed in the order: photo-electro-Fenton&gt;sono-electro-Fenton&gt;electro-Fenton&gt;Fenton. Even though complete degradation of phenol was observed with photo-electro-Fenton and sono-electro-Fenton processes, photo-electro-Fenton process showed complete removal of phenol and 64.19% of mineralization within 30min, whereas in the case of sono-electro-Fenton process, no phenol was detected after 40min and the mineralization observed at optimum conditions was 67.93%. Fenton and electro-Fenton processes required more time for phenol degradation and mineralization. The phenol degradation kinetics was studied and compared for all the processes. The results showed higher rate constant values for sono-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0683min−1) and photo-electro-Fenton (kap=0.0934min−1) processes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-8947
ispartof Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996), 2012-02, Vol.183, p.1-9
issn 1385-8947
1873-3212
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954648687
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects AOPs
Chemical engineering
COD removal
Degradation
Degradation kinetics
electrolysis
Hydrogen peroxide
Mineralization
Optimization
oxidation
Phenol
Phenol degradation
Photo-electro-Fenton
Rate constants
ultraviolet radiation
Utilization
title Advanced oxidation of phenol: A comparison between Fenton, electro-Fenton, sono-electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton processes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advanced%20oxidation%20of%20phenol:%20A%20comparison%20between%20Fenton,%20electro-Fenton,%20sono-electro-Fenton%20and%20photo-electro-Fenton%20processes&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20engineering%20journal%20(Lausanne,%20Switzerland%20:%201996)&rft.au=Babuponnusami,%20Arjunan&rft.date=2012-02-15&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1385-8947&rft.eissn=1873-3212&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E954648687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709789965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1385894711015282&rfr_iscdi=true