Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types

Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Population research and policy review 2010-12, Vol.29 (6), p.843-864
Hauptverfasser: Simpson, Nicole B, Tiefenthaler, Jill, Hyde, Jameson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 864
container_issue 6
container_start_page 843
container_title Population research and policy review
container_volume 29
creator Simpson, Nicole B
Tiefenthaler, Jill
Hyde, Jameson
description Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11113-009-9170-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954620706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40927002</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40927002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-cee24841bb357716bc53a42b3bd38a51337bcb6159f91bd31c27c18bd8a3c3933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2P0zAQjRBIlIUfwAFhceEUsD3xF7du1d0tWokDXXG0HMdtU5o42Cmi_54pQYvEgcXSeCzPe89PMy6Kl4y-Y5Sq95nhgpJSUxqmaCkeFTMmFJRKc_O4mFEmVSkMh6fFs5z3lCILzKyoV93g_Ejihoy7QJYu9aEhq97HLpC1-0EWKTQt1nuy9LGPXevJl3A4lJeh7bcfyJwsIiqkNiNi7lPMmdzEYw67eGjI-jSE_Lx4snGHHF78zhfF3dVyvbgpbz9drxbz29JLZsbSh8ArXbG6BqEUk7UX4CpeQ92AdoIBqNrXkgmzMQzvmOfKM1032oEHA3BRvJ10hxS_HUMebddmj15dH9CRNaKSnCoqH0RqpjWFSsH_IJXhCtSDSKWlURUTGpFv_kLu4zH12BqrqWCCc3l-mE2gXy1NYWOH1HYunSyj9jxxO03c4sTteeJWIOfjxElhCP6e8NUNQxzSkOx3C44b3E7nA34BTC2GxBgwdAVWy8ruxg7F-CSWUaffhvTH5b8cvJpI-zzGdO-gotgjSjnWX0_1jYvWbfHX2LvPaAQoM1jGhv8E-NfW9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>805152263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Simpson, Nicole B ; Tiefenthaler, Jill ; Hyde, Jameson</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Nicole B ; Tiefenthaler, Jill ; Hyde, Jameson</creatorcontrib><description>Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11113-009-9170-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRPRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Basic needs ; Children ; Credit cards ; Debt ; Demography ; Earned income ; Earned income tax credit ; Economic conditions ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Effectiveness ; EITC ; Government programs ; Household types ; Households ; Income ; Income tax ; Income taxes ; Low Income Groups ; Parents ; Population Economics ; Poverty ; Poverty rates ; Poverty relief ; Single Parent Family ; Single parents ; Single status ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Studies ; Tax credits ; Tax refunds ; Taxation ; Taxes ; U.S.A ; Uses of EITC ; Well Being</subject><ispartof>Population research and policy review, 2010-12, Vol.29 (6), p.843-864</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-cee24841bb357716bc53a42b3bd38a51337bcb6159f91bd31c27c18bd8a3c3933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-cee24841bb357716bc53a42b3bd38a51337bcb6159f91bd31c27c18bd8a3c3933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40927002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40927002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3993,27323,27844,27845,27903,27904,33753,33754,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kappoprpr/v_3a29_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a843-864.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Nicole B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenthaler, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Jameson</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types</title><title>Population research and policy review</title><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><description>Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.</description><subject>Basic needs</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Credit cards</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Earned income</subject><subject>Earned income tax credit</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>EITC</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Household types</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income tax</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Low Income Groups</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Poverty rates</subject><subject>Poverty relief</subject><subject>Single Parent Family</subject><subject>Single parents</subject><subject>Single status</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax credits</subject><subject>Tax refunds</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Uses of EITC</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><issn>0167-5923</issn><issn>1573-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2P0zAQjRBIlIUfwAFhceEUsD3xF7du1d0tWokDXXG0HMdtU5o42Cmi_54pQYvEgcXSeCzPe89PMy6Kl4y-Y5Sq95nhgpJSUxqmaCkeFTMmFJRKc_O4mFEmVSkMh6fFs5z3lCILzKyoV93g_Ejihoy7QJYu9aEhq97HLpC1-0EWKTQt1nuy9LGPXevJl3A4lJeh7bcfyJwsIiqkNiNi7lPMmdzEYw67eGjI-jSE_Lx4snGHHF78zhfF3dVyvbgpbz9drxbz29JLZsbSh8ArXbG6BqEUk7UX4CpeQ92AdoIBqNrXkgmzMQzvmOfKM1032oEHA3BRvJ10hxS_HUMebddmj15dH9CRNaKSnCoqH0RqpjWFSsH_IJXhCtSDSKWlURUTGpFv_kLu4zH12BqrqWCCc3l-mE2gXy1NYWOH1HYunSyj9jxxO03c4sTteeJWIOfjxElhCP6e8NUNQxzSkOx3C44b3E7nA34BTC2GxBgwdAVWy8ruxg7F-CSWUaffhvTH5b8cvJpI-zzGdO-gotgjSjnWX0_1jYvWbfHX2LvPaAQoM1jGhv8E-NfW9A</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Simpson, Nicole B</creator><creator>Tiefenthaler, Jill</creator><creator>Hyde, Jameson</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types</title><author>Simpson, Nicole B ; Tiefenthaler, Jill ; Hyde, Jameson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-cee24841bb357716bc53a42b3bd38a51337bcb6159f91bd31c27c18bd8a3c3933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Basic needs</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Credit cards</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Earned income</topic><topic>Earned income tax credit</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>EITC</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Household types</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income tax</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Low Income Groups</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Poverty rates</topic><topic>Poverty relief</topic><topic>Single Parent Family</topic><topic>Single parents</topic><topic>Single status</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax credits</topic><topic>Tax refunds</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Uses of EITC</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Nicole B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenthaler, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Jameson</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, Nicole B</au><au>Tiefenthaler, Jill</au><au>Hyde, Jameson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types</atitle><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle><stitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</stitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>864</epage><pages>843-864</pages><issn>0167-5923</issn><eissn>1573-7829</eissn><coden>PRPRE8</coden><abstract>Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11113-009-9170-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5923
ispartof Population research and policy review, 2010-12, Vol.29 (6), p.843-864
issn 0167-5923
1573-7829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954620706
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Basic needs
Children
Credit cards
Debt
Demography
Earned income
Earned income tax credit
Economic conditions
Economic Policy
Economics
Effectiveness
EITC
Government programs
Household types
Households
Income
Income tax
Income taxes
Low Income Groups
Parents
Population Economics
Poverty
Poverty rates
Poverty relief
Single Parent Family
Single parents
Single status
Social Sciences
Sociology
Studies
Tax credits
Tax refunds
Taxation
Taxes
U.S.A
Uses of EITC
Well Being
title Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20Earned%20Income%20Tax%20Credit%20on%20Economic%20Well-Being:%20A%20Comparison%20Across%20Household%20Types&rft.jtitle=Population%20research%20and%20policy%20review&rft.au=Simpson,%20Nicole%20B&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=864&rft.pages=843-864&rft.issn=0167-5923&rft.eissn=1573-7829&rft.coden=PRPRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11113-009-9170-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40927002%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=805152263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40927002&rfr_iscdi=true