Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy
The use of standardized uptake values (SUVs) is now common place in clinical 2-deoxy-2-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography-computed tomography oncology imaging and has a specific role in assessing patient response to cancer therapy. Ideally, the use of SUVs removes variability...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI CT, and MRI, 2010-12, Vol.31 (6), p.496-505 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 505 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 496 |
| container_title | Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Kinahan, Paul E., PhD Fletcher, James W., MD |
| description | The use of standardized uptake values (SUVs) is now common place in clinical 2-deoxy-2-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography-computed tomography oncology imaging and has a specific role in assessing patient response to cancer therapy. Ideally, the use of SUVs removes variability introduced by differences in patient size and the amount of injected FDG. However, in practice there are several sources of bias and variance that are introduced in the measurement of FDG uptake in tumors and also in the conversion of the image count data to SUVs. In this article the overall imaging process is reviewed and estimates of the magnitude of errors, where known, are given. Recommendations are provided for best practices in improving SUV accuracy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.sult.2010.10.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954616760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0887217110000880</els_id><sourcerecordid>954616760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-cdcf1a13f57e6bcefe6271552b61ca6f630a0b03ea17c27da537543bd64ffe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kbz7Nmj-TZAoilKVaoWCxq68hk9xps52ZjElGWB_95M24q4gP5iXhcO4h53cReknJmhLB3-zWae7zmpFfwpoQ-gitqBBNJQivH6MVaRpVMaroCXqW0o4Qps6EfIpOGKW14kqt0M_rkHyOYcQXg0_Jl8c2DOE2muluX23CMM0Z3F8avslmdCY6_6PoX6Zs7gF_Nf0MCfsRb3o_emt6fB2Nzd4CLm58nhKU8PEWf4Y0hTEBzgFv76BE7p-jJ53pE7w43qdo-_5iu7msrj59-Lg5v6qsECxX1tmOGso7oUC2FjqQTJW2rJXUGtlJTgxpCQdDlWXKGcGVqHnrZN11QPkpen2InWL4Vn6bdSlsoe_NCGFO-kzUkkolSXGyg9PGkFKETk_RDybuNSV6Ia93eiGvF_KLVsiXoVfH-LkdwP0Z-Y26GN4eDFA6fvcQdbIeRgvOR7BZu-D_n__un3F7RH0Pe0i7MMex0NNUJ6aJvll2v6yeknKahvAH6Mis-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>954616760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD ; Fletcher, James W., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD ; Fletcher, James W., MD</creatorcontrib><description>The use of standardized uptake values (SUVs) is now common place in clinical 2-deoxy-2-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography-computed tomography oncology imaging and has a specific role in assessing patient response to cancer therapy. Ideally, the use of SUVs removes variability introduced by differences in patient size and the amount of injected FDG. However, in practice there are several sources of bias and variance that are introduced in the measurement of FDG uptake in tumors and also in the conversion of the image count data to SUVs. In this article the overall imaging process is reviewed and estimates of the magnitude of errors, where known, are given. Recommendations are provided for best practices in improving SUV accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-2171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21147377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Radiology ; Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI, 2010-12, Vol.31 (6), p.496-505</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-cdcf1a13f57e6bcefe6271552b61ca6f630a0b03ea17c27da537543bd64ffe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-cdcf1a13f57e6bcefe6271552b61ca6f630a0b03ea17c27da537543bd64ffe13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887217110000880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, James W., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy</title><title>Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI</title><addtitle>Semin Ultrasound CT MR</addtitle><description>The use of standardized uptake values (SUVs) is now common place in clinical 2-deoxy-2-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography-computed tomography oncology imaging and has a specific role in assessing patient response to cancer therapy. Ideally, the use of SUVs removes variability introduced by differences in patient size and the amount of injected FDG. However, in practice there are several sources of bias and variance that are introduced in the measurement of FDG uptake in tumors and also in the conversion of the image count data to SUVs. In this article the overall imaging process is reviewed and estimates of the magnitude of errors, where known, are given. Recommendations are provided for best practices in improving SUV accuracy.</description><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0887-2171</issn><issn>1558-5034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kbz7Nmj-TZAoilKVaoWCxq68hk9xps52ZjElGWB_95M24q4gP5iXhcO4h53cReknJmhLB3-zWae7zmpFfwpoQ-gitqBBNJQivH6MVaRpVMaroCXqW0o4Qps6EfIpOGKW14kqt0M_rkHyOYcQXg0_Jl8c2DOE2muluX23CMM0Z3F8avslmdCY6_6PoX6Zs7gF_Nf0MCfsRb3o_emt6fB2Nzd4CLm58nhKU8PEWf4Y0hTEBzgFv76BE7p-jJ53pE7w43qdo-_5iu7msrj59-Lg5v6qsECxX1tmOGso7oUC2FjqQTJW2rJXUGtlJTgxpCQdDlWXKGcGVqHnrZN11QPkpen2InWL4Vn6bdSlsoe_NCGFO-kzUkkolSXGyg9PGkFKETk_RDybuNSV6Ia93eiGvF_KLVsiXoVfH-LkdwP0Z-Y26GN4eDFA6fvcQdbIeRgvOR7BZu-D_n__un3F7RH0Pe0i7MMex0NNUJ6aJvll2v6yeknKahvAH6Mis-g</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD</creator><creator>Fletcher, James W., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy</title><author>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD ; Fletcher, James W., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-cdcf1a13f57e6bcefe6271552b61ca6f630a0b03ea17c27da537543bd64ffe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, James W., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kinahan, Paul E., PhD</au><au>Fletcher, James W., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Ultrasound CT MR</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>496-505</pages><issn>0887-2171</issn><eissn>1558-5034</eissn><abstract>The use of standardized uptake values (SUVs) is now common place in clinical 2-deoxy-2-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography-computed tomography oncology imaging and has a specific role in assessing patient response to cancer therapy. Ideally, the use of SUVs removes variability introduced by differences in patient size and the amount of injected FDG. However, in practice there are several sources of bias and variance that are introduced in the measurement of FDG uptake in tumors and also in the conversion of the image count data to SUVs. In this article the overall imaging process is reviewed and estimates of the magnitude of errors, where known, are given. Recommendations are provided for best practices in improving SUV accuracy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21147377</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.sult.2010.10.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-2171 |
| ispartof | Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI, 2010-12, Vol.31 (6), p.496-505 |
| issn | 0887-2171 1558-5034 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954616760 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Neoplasms - therapy Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Radiology Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics Reproducibility of Results Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Treatment Outcome |
| title | Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positron%20Emission%20Tomography-Computed%20Tomography%20Standardized%20Uptake%20Values%20in%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Assessing%20Response%20to%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20ultrasound,%20CT,%20and%20MRI&rft.au=Kinahan,%20Paul%20E.,%20PhD&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=496-505&rft.issn=0887-2171&rft.eissn=1558-5034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.sult.2010.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E954616760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=954616760&rft_id=info:pmid/21147377&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0887217110000880&rfr_iscdi=true |