Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Total body calcium (TBCa) in 270 black and white women age 21-79 years was measured concurrently by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (DGNA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean value for TBCa calculated from DXA was 933 g compared with 730 g for DGNA. By regression, TBCa(DXA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Osteoporosis international 1999-11, Vol.10 (6), p.510-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 515 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 510 |
container_title | Osteoporosis international |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | ALOIA, J. F MA, R VASWANI, A FEUERMAN, M |
description | Total body calcium (TBCa) in 270 black and white women age 21-79 years was measured concurrently by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (DGNA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean value for TBCa calculated from DXA was 933 g compared with 730 g for DGNA. By regression, TBCa(DXA(g)) = 1.35 x TBCa(DGNA(g)) -54 (r = 0. 90, r(2) = 81.4%, SEE = 66.9 g). This remarkable difference of 203 g suggests that one or both these methods is not accurate. Adjustment of the regression of DXA versus DGNA for body mass index or trunk thickness explained 8.5-10% of the variability between methods. The unadjusted slope for the DXA values regressed against the DGNA values was 1.35, indicating significant discordance between the methods. There is greater agreement between the two DGNA facilities (Brookhaven National Laboratory and Baylor College of Medicine) and between the various DXA instruments. Either DGNA underestimates TBCa or DXA overestimates total-body bone mineral content. Resolution of these disparate results may possibly be achieved by concurrent measurement of whole human cadavers of different sizes with chemical determination of the calcium content of the ash. In the interim, cross-calibration equations between DGNA and standardized values for DXA for total-body bone mineral content may be used, which will permit reporting of consistent values for TBCa from the two technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s001980050262 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954602567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2254195811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-351afcb75974f5ad2185206056ace89a2f2073496a8f9b2fbcaa17d4fe28afb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctLHTEUBvBQlHpru-y2BCl1NfbknSxFWhUENxbcDWcyiYzM4zaZKcx_by73Qh-LuspZ_PiSnI-QjwwuGID5mgGYswAKuOZvyIZJISrutDoiG3DCVE6yxxPyLudnKN4585acMNBaCCU2ZHyYZuyrZmpX6rH33TLQkOduwDm0tFlpG3pcy_iEw4B0DMucppGin7tfOHe7ccR-zV0uQ0vbpYSFMaSnlT5WCVeKTZ7StsghzGl9T44j9jl8OJyn5Mf3bw9XN9Xd_fXt1eVd5YWWcyUUw-gbo5yRUWHLmVUcNCiNPliHPHIwQjqNNrqGx8YjMtPKGLjF2IA4Jef73G2afi7lQ_XQZR_6HscwLbl2SmrgSpsiv_xXaieF4RZehaw8iFu3g2f_wOdpSWVLubbSKqWE2l1b7ZFPU84pxHqbytLTWjOod8XWfxVb_KdD6NIMof1D75ss4PMBYC5FxoSj7_JvxyUzHMQLvJOq7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>848555357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>ALOIA, J. F ; MA, R ; VASWANI, A ; FEUERMAN, M</creator><creatorcontrib>ALOIA, J. F ; MA, R ; VASWANI, A ; FEUERMAN, M</creatorcontrib><description>Total body calcium (TBCa) in 270 black and white women age 21-79 years was measured concurrently by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (DGNA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean value for TBCa calculated from DXA was 933 g compared with 730 g for DGNA. By regression, TBCa(DXA(g)) = 1.35 x TBCa(DGNA(g)) -54 (r = 0. 90, r(2) = 81.4%, SEE = 66.9 g). This remarkable difference of 203 g suggests that one or both these methods is not accurate. Adjustment of the regression of DXA versus DGNA for body mass index or trunk thickness explained 8.5-10% of the variability between methods. The unadjusted slope for the DXA values regressed against the DGNA values was 1.35, indicating significant discordance between the methods. There is greater agreement between the two DGNA facilities (Brookhaven National Laboratory and Baylor College of Medicine) and between the various DXA instruments. Either DGNA underestimates TBCa or DXA overestimates total-body bone mineral content. Resolution of these disparate results may possibly be achieved by concurrent measurement of whole human cadavers of different sizes with chemical determination of the calcium content of the ash. In the interim, cross-calibration equations between DGNA and standardized values for DXA for total-body bone mineral content may be used, which will permit reporting of consistent values for TBCa from the two technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s001980050262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10663353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Composition ; Calcium - analysis ; Calcium - metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neutron Activation Analysis - methods ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 1999-11, Vol.10 (6), p.510-515</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1241720$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10663353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALOIA, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VASWANI, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEUERMAN, M</creatorcontrib><title>Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Total body calcium (TBCa) in 270 black and white women age 21-79 years was measured concurrently by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (DGNA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean value for TBCa calculated from DXA was 933 g compared with 730 g for DGNA. By regression, TBCa(DXA(g)) = 1.35 x TBCa(DGNA(g)) -54 (r = 0. 90, r(2) = 81.4%, SEE = 66.9 g). This remarkable difference of 203 g suggests that one or both these methods is not accurate. Adjustment of the regression of DXA versus DGNA for body mass index or trunk thickness explained 8.5-10% of the variability between methods. The unadjusted slope for the DXA values regressed against the DGNA values was 1.35, indicating significant discordance between the methods. There is greater agreement between the two DGNA facilities (Brookhaven National Laboratory and Baylor College of Medicine) and between the various DXA instruments. Either DGNA underestimates TBCa or DXA overestimates total-body bone mineral content. Resolution of these disparate results may possibly be achieved by concurrent measurement of whole human cadavers of different sizes with chemical determination of the calcium content of the ash. In the interim, cross-calibration equations between DGNA and standardized values for DXA for total-body bone mineral content may be used, which will permit reporting of consistent values for TBCa from the two technologies.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Calcium - analysis</subject><subject>Calcium - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutron Activation Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctLHTEUBvBQlHpru-y2BCl1NfbknSxFWhUENxbcDWcyiYzM4zaZKcx_by73Qh-LuspZ_PiSnI-QjwwuGID5mgGYswAKuOZvyIZJISrutDoiG3DCVE6yxxPyLudnKN4585acMNBaCCU2ZHyYZuyrZmpX6rH33TLQkOduwDm0tFlpG3pcy_iEw4B0DMucppGin7tfOHe7ccR-zV0uQ0vbpYSFMaSnlT5WCVeKTZ7StsghzGl9T44j9jl8OJyn5Mf3bw9XN9Xd_fXt1eVd5YWWcyUUw-gbo5yRUWHLmVUcNCiNPliHPHIwQjqNNrqGx8YjMtPKGLjF2IA4Jef73G2afi7lQ_XQZR_6HscwLbl2SmrgSpsiv_xXaieF4RZehaw8iFu3g2f_wOdpSWVLubbSKqWE2l1b7ZFPU84pxHqbytLTWjOod8XWfxVb_KdD6NIMof1D75ss4PMBYC5FxoSj7_JvxyUzHMQLvJOq7A</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>ALOIA, J. F</creator><creator>MA, R</creator><creator>VASWANI, A</creator><creator>FEUERMAN, M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</title><author>ALOIA, J. F ; MA, R ; VASWANI, A ; FEUERMAN, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-351afcb75974f5ad2185206056ace89a2f2073496a8f9b2fbcaa17d4fe28afb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Calcium - analysis</topic><topic>Calcium - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutron Activation Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALOIA, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VASWANI, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEUERMAN, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALOIA, J. F</au><au>MA, R</au><au>VASWANI, A</au><au>FEUERMAN, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>510-515</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Total body calcium (TBCa) in 270 black and white women age 21-79 years was measured concurrently by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (DGNA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The mean value for TBCa calculated from DXA was 933 g compared with 730 g for DGNA. By regression, TBCa(DXA(g)) = 1.35 x TBCa(DGNA(g)) -54 (r = 0. 90, r(2) = 81.4%, SEE = 66.9 g). This remarkable difference of 203 g suggests that one or both these methods is not accurate. Adjustment of the regression of DXA versus DGNA for body mass index or trunk thickness explained 8.5-10% of the variability between methods. The unadjusted slope for the DXA values regressed against the DGNA values was 1.35, indicating significant discordance between the methods. There is greater agreement between the two DGNA facilities (Brookhaven National Laboratory and Baylor College of Medicine) and between the various DXA instruments. Either DGNA underestimates TBCa or DXA overestimates total-body bone mineral content. Resolution of these disparate results may possibly be achieved by concurrent measurement of whole human cadavers of different sizes with chemical determination of the calcium content of the ash. In the interim, cross-calibration equations between DGNA and standardized values for DXA for total-body bone mineral content may be used, which will permit reporting of consistent values for TBCa from the two technologies.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>10663353</pmid><doi>10.1007/s001980050262</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 1999-11, Vol.10 (6), p.510-515 |
issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954602567 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - methods Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Body Composition Calcium - analysis Calcium - metabolism Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Middle Aged Neutron Activation Analysis - methods Osteoarticular system. Muscles Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques |
title | Total-body calcium estimated by delayed gamma neutron activation analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T19%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total-body%20calcium%20estimated%20by%20delayed%20gamma%20neutron%20activation%20analysis%20and%20dual-energy%20X-ray%20absorptiometry&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=ALOIA,%20J.%20F&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=510-515&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s001980050262&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2254195811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=848555357&rft_id=info:pmid/10663353&rfr_iscdi=true |