Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography
Purpose Respiratory motion of organs during PET scans is known to degrade PET image quality, potentially resulting in blurred images, attenuation artefacts and erroneous tracer quantification. List mode-based gating has been shown to reduce these pitfalls in cardiac PET. This study evaluates these i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2010-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2315-2327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2327 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2315 |
container_title | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Büther, Florian Ernst, Iris Dawood, Mohammad Kraxner, Peter Schäfers, Michael Schober, Otmar Schäfers, Klaus P. |
description | Purpose
Respiratory motion of organs during PET scans is known to degrade PET image quality, potentially resulting in blurred images, attenuation artefacts and erroneous tracer quantification. List mode-based gating has been shown to reduce these pitfalls in cardiac PET. This study evaluates these intrinsic gating methods for tumour PET scans.
Methods
A total of 34 patients with liver or lung tumours (14 liver tumours and 27 lung tumours in all) underwent a 15-min single-bed list mode PET scan of the tumour region. Of these, 15 patients (8 liver and 11 lung tumours in total) were monitored by a video camera registering a marker on the patient’s abdomen, thus capturing the respiratory motion for PET gating (video method). Further gating information was deduced by dividing the list mode stream into 200-ms frames, determining the number of coincidences (sensitivity method) and computing the axial centre of mass of the measured count rates in the same frames (centre of mass method). Additionally, these list mode-based methods were evaluated using only coincidences originating from the tumour region by segmenting the tumour in sinogram space (segmented sensitivity/centre of mass method). Measured displacement of the tumours between end-expiration and end-inspiration and the increase in apparent uptake in the gated images served as a measure for the exactness of gating. To estimate the accuracy, a thorax phantom study with moved activity sources simulating small tumours was also performed.
Results
All methods resolved the respiratory motion with varying success. The best results were seen in the segmented centre of mass method, on average leading to larger displacements and uptake values than the other methods. The simple centre of mass method performed worse in terms of displacements due to activities moving into the field of view during the respiratory cycle. Both sensitivity- and video-based methods lead to similar results.
Conclusion
List mode-driven PET gating, especially the segmented centre of mass method, is feasible and accurate in PET scans of liver and lung tumours. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954598610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>954598610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2338344aa00208247eaf9d6d94ab96dbd8a50e6eef0f745448dfce6686f602eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqJtu-gF6qaxecnIyGIzhWOVPGylSLskZsfZ4y2oNLuBI_vZh4zSVKkU5AZrfm2HeI-QrhTMK0JxHgKpWJVAoac1YOX8gx1RQVTYg1cfXewMr8jnGHQCVlVSfyKoCAU3N-DFxl5iwTda7wvdFwDjaYJIPc5GmwU-hGPxzcYrWbQvrUrAu2rbY25hyrcOyC_YRXbE1aSGK0UebQtbgYGM8iJMf_DaY8fd8Qo56s4_45eVck4frq_uLX-Xt3c-bix-3ZcuhSmXFmGScG5MXBFnxBk2vOtEpbjZKdJtOmhpQIPbQN7zmXHZ9i0JI0QuocMPW5HTpOwb_Z8KYdP5Li_u9ceinqFXNayUFhXfJRrDsMRMsk9__I3fZIJfX0DK7CbJ5hugCtcHHGLDXY7CDCbOmoA-h6SU0DYd3Dk3PWfPtpfG0GbB7VfxNKQPVAsRcclsM_ya_3fUJEYCkeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807508763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Büther, Florian ; Ernst, Iris ; Dawood, Mohammad ; Kraxner, Peter ; Schäfers, Michael ; Schober, Otmar ; Schäfers, Klaus P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Büther, Florian ; Ernst, Iris ; Dawood, Mohammad ; Kraxner, Peter ; Schäfers, Michael ; Schober, Otmar ; Schäfers, Klaus P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Respiratory motion of organs during PET scans is known to degrade PET image quality, potentially resulting in blurred images, attenuation artefacts and erroneous tracer quantification. List mode-based gating has been shown to reduce these pitfalls in cardiac PET. This study evaluates these intrinsic gating methods for tumour PET scans.
Methods
A total of 34 patients with liver or lung tumours (14 liver tumours and 27 lung tumours in all) underwent a 15-min single-bed list mode PET scan of the tumour region. Of these, 15 patients (8 liver and 11 lung tumours in total) were monitored by a video camera registering a marker on the patient’s abdomen, thus capturing the respiratory motion for PET gating (video method). Further gating information was deduced by dividing the list mode stream into 200-ms frames, determining the number of coincidences (sensitivity method) and computing the axial centre of mass of the measured count rates in the same frames (centre of mass method). Additionally, these list mode-based methods were evaluated using only coincidences originating from the tumour region by segmenting the tumour in sinogram space (segmented sensitivity/centre of mass method). Measured displacement of the tumours between end-expiration and end-inspiration and the increase in apparent uptake in the gated images served as a measure for the exactness of gating. To estimate the accuracy, a thorax phantom study with moved activity sources simulating small tumours was also performed.
Results
All methods resolved the respiratory motion with varying success. The best results were seen in the segmented centre of mass method, on average leading to larger displacements and uptake values than the other methods. The simple centre of mass method performed worse in terms of displacements due to activities moving into the field of view during the respiratory cycle. Both sensitivity- and video-based methods lead to similar results.
Conclusion
List mode-driven PET gating, especially the segmented centre of mass method, is feasible and accurate in PET scans of liver and lung tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20607534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiology ; Data analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Imaging ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medical technology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Movement ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Mechanics ; Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2010-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2315-2327</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2338344aa00208247eaf9d6d94ab96dbd8a50e6eef0f745448dfce6686f602eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2338344aa00208247eaf9d6d94ab96dbd8a50e6eef0f745448dfce6686f602eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Büther, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawood, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraxner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schober, Otmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Klaus P.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
Respiratory motion of organs during PET scans is known to degrade PET image quality, potentially resulting in blurred images, attenuation artefacts and erroneous tracer quantification. List mode-based gating has been shown to reduce these pitfalls in cardiac PET. This study evaluates these intrinsic gating methods for tumour PET scans.
Methods
A total of 34 patients with liver or lung tumours (14 liver tumours and 27 lung tumours in all) underwent a 15-min single-bed list mode PET scan of the tumour region. Of these, 15 patients (8 liver and 11 lung tumours in total) were monitored by a video camera registering a marker on the patient’s abdomen, thus capturing the respiratory motion for PET gating (video method). Further gating information was deduced by dividing the list mode stream into 200-ms frames, determining the number of coincidences (sensitivity method) and computing the axial centre of mass of the measured count rates in the same frames (centre of mass method). Additionally, these list mode-based methods were evaluated using only coincidences originating from the tumour region by segmenting the tumour in sinogram space (segmented sensitivity/centre of mass method). Measured displacement of the tumours between end-expiration and end-inspiration and the increase in apparent uptake in the gated images served as a measure for the exactness of gating. To estimate the accuracy, a thorax phantom study with moved activity sources simulating small tumours was also performed.
Results
All methods resolved the respiratory motion with varying success. The best results were seen in the segmented centre of mass method, on average leading to larger displacements and uptake values than the other methods. The simple centre of mass method performed worse in terms of displacements due to activities moving into the field of view during the respiratory cycle. Both sensitivity- and video-based methods lead to similar results.
Conclusion
List mode-driven PET gating, especially the segmented centre of mass method, is feasible and accurate in PET scans of liver and lung tumours.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics</subject><subject>Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqJtu-gF6qaxecnIyGIzhWOVPGylSLskZsfZ4y2oNLuBI_vZh4zSVKkU5AZrfm2HeI-QrhTMK0JxHgKpWJVAoac1YOX8gx1RQVTYg1cfXewMr8jnGHQCVlVSfyKoCAU3N-DFxl5iwTda7wvdFwDjaYJIPc5GmwU-hGPxzcYrWbQvrUrAu2rbY25hyrcOyC_YRXbE1aSGK0UebQtbgYGM8iJMf_DaY8fd8Qo56s4_45eVck4frq_uLX-Xt3c-bix-3ZcuhSmXFmGScG5MXBFnxBk2vOtEpbjZKdJtOmhpQIPbQN7zmXHZ9i0JI0QuocMPW5HTpOwb_Z8KYdP5Li_u9ceinqFXNayUFhXfJRrDsMRMsk9__I3fZIJfX0DK7CbJ5hugCtcHHGLDXY7CDCbOmoA-h6SU0DYd3Dk3PWfPtpfG0GbB7VfxNKQPVAsRcclsM_ya_3fUJEYCkeQ</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Büther, Florian</creator><creator>Ernst, Iris</creator><creator>Dawood, Mohammad</creator><creator>Kraxner, Peter</creator><creator>Schäfers, Michael</creator><creator>Schober, Otmar</creator><creator>Schäfers, Klaus P.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography</title><author>Büther, Florian ; Ernst, Iris ; Dawood, Mohammad ; Kraxner, Peter ; Schäfers, Michael ; Schober, Otmar ; Schäfers, Klaus P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2338344aa00208247eaf9d6d94ab96dbd8a50e6eef0f745448dfce6686f602eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics</topic><topic>Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Büther, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawood, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraxner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schober, Otmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Klaus P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Büther, Florian</au><au>Ernst, Iris</au><au>Dawood, Mohammad</au><au>Kraxner, Peter</au><au>Schäfers, Michael</au><au>Schober, Otmar</au><au>Schäfers, Klaus P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2315</spage><epage>2327</epage><pages>2315-2327</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Respiratory motion of organs during PET scans is known to degrade PET image quality, potentially resulting in blurred images, attenuation artefacts and erroneous tracer quantification. List mode-based gating has been shown to reduce these pitfalls in cardiac PET. This study evaluates these intrinsic gating methods for tumour PET scans.
Methods
A total of 34 patients with liver or lung tumours (14 liver tumours and 27 lung tumours in all) underwent a 15-min single-bed list mode PET scan of the tumour region. Of these, 15 patients (8 liver and 11 lung tumours in total) were monitored by a video camera registering a marker on the patient’s abdomen, thus capturing the respiratory motion for PET gating (video method). Further gating information was deduced by dividing the list mode stream into 200-ms frames, determining the number of coincidences (sensitivity method) and computing the axial centre of mass of the measured count rates in the same frames (centre of mass method). Additionally, these list mode-based methods were evaluated using only coincidences originating from the tumour region by segmenting the tumour in sinogram space (segmented sensitivity/centre of mass method). Measured displacement of the tumours between end-expiration and end-inspiration and the increase in apparent uptake in the gated images served as a measure for the exactness of gating. To estimate the accuracy, a thorax phantom study with moved activity sources simulating small tumours was also performed.
Results
All methods resolved the respiratory motion with varying success. The best results were seen in the segmented centre of mass method, on average leading to larger displacements and uptake values than the other methods. The simple centre of mass method performed worse in terms of displacements due to activities moving into the field of view during the respiratory cycle. Both sensitivity- and video-based methods lead to similar results.
Conclusion
List mode-driven PET gating, especially the segmented centre of mass method, is feasible and accurate in PET scans of liver and lung tumours.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20607534</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1619-7070 |
ispartof | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2010-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2315-2327 |
issn | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954598610 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Cardiology Data analysis Female Humans Image Enhancement - methods Imaging Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Male Medical technology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Movement Nuclear Medicine Oncology Original Article Orthopedics Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Radiology Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Mechanics Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography Tumors |
title | Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A43%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20respiratory%20tumour%20motion%20using%20intrinsic%20list%20mode-driven%20gating%20in%20positron%20emission%20tomography&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=B%C3%BCther,%20Florian&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2315&rft.epage=2327&rft.pages=2315-2327&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-010-1533-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E954598610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807508763&rft_id=info:pmid/20607534&rfr_iscdi=true |