Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone
Eighteen participants (22–43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2010-12, Vol.20 (6), p.827-833 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 833 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 827 |
| container_title | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Carson, R. G. Popple, A. E. Verschueren, S. M. P. Riek, S. |
| description | Eighteen participants (22–43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954580698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>821201053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-cfc5b7244fdf2b59525725a5fc14934ecd3127c7a7d59e4db8027668c804dcba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFuFCEUhomxsWvrKxjijVczAgMDJN6Y1laTbZtmW70xIQwwyjrLjDDTbt9eplvbxJuSEAjn-w_J-QCAGJU4rw_rEtcIFUhUoiQIyTJvKcvtC7B4LLwECyQRKzgWYh-8TmmNEOaSsldgH0teM1LJBfixmgYX_Wbok7PwxjdRj74P0PShdTHB0ENtrZ_fdAcbF1zrx1zdDDrmwK0ff8Hokk-jDsbBMWoffPgJddcHdwj2Wt0l9-bhPADXJ5-vjr4Uy4vTr0efloWhlMvCtIY1nFDa2pY0TDLCOGGatQZTWVFnbIUJN1xzy6SjthGI8LoWRiBqTaOrA_B-13eI_Z_JpVFtfDKu63Rw_ZSUZJQJVEvxLCkYpazK43ueJJggjNhMvvuPXPdTzOOaIUIoovX88dsHaGo2zqohz1zHO_XPRAY-7oBb37m7pzpSs3G1VrNYNYtVs3F1b1xt1epslS85Xuzi2YTbPsZ1_K1qXnGmvp-fKs4ul_jbsVDH1V9hnq2F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822240468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Carson, R. G. ; Popple, A. E. ; Verschueren, S. M. P. ; Riek, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carson, R. G. ; Popple, A. E. ; Verschueren, S. M. P. ; Riek, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Eighteen participants (22–43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P<0.01) with training. There were no significant changes in measures that assessed the rate at which force was developed. Countermovement jump height increased for the CON (P<0.01) but not for the VIB group. Comparisons between the groups revealed that they did not differ significantly from one another with respect to any measure of performance, before or following training. It appears that vibration superimposed upon resistance training does not alter or augment the increase in strength induced by resistance training alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19765239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Comparative studies ; Feet ; Female ; Height ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Male ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Resistance exercise ; Resistance Training - methods ; Sport science ; Sports training ; Statistics as Topic ; strength training ; Vibration ; Vibration - therapeutic use ; vibration exercise ; vibration plate ; Weightlifting ; whole-body vibration training ; Work ; Work load ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2010-12, Vol.20 (6), p.827-833</ispartof><rights>2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-cfc5b7244fdf2b59525725a5fc14934ecd3127c7a7d59e4db8027668c804dcba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0838.2009.00999.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0838.2009.00999.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19765239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carson, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popple, A. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, S. M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riek, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>Eighteen participants (22–43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P<0.01) with training. There were no significant changes in measures that assessed the rate at which force was developed. Countermovement jump height increased for the CON (P<0.01) but not for the VIB group. Comparisons between the groups revealed that they did not differ significantly from one another with respect to any measure of performance, before or following training. It appears that vibration superimposed upon resistance training does not alter or augment the increase in strength induced by resistance training alone.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Resistance exercise</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Sport science</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>strength training</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><subject>vibration exercise</subject><subject>vibration plate</subject><subject>Weightlifting</subject><subject>whole-body vibration training</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work load</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFuFCEUhomxsWvrKxjijVczAgMDJN6Y1laTbZtmW70xIQwwyjrLjDDTbt9eplvbxJuSEAjn-w_J-QCAGJU4rw_rEtcIFUhUoiQIyTJvKcvtC7B4LLwECyQRKzgWYh-8TmmNEOaSsldgH0teM1LJBfixmgYX_Wbok7PwxjdRj74P0PShdTHB0ENtrZ_fdAcbF1zrx1zdDDrmwK0ff8Hokk-jDsbBMWoffPgJddcHdwj2Wt0l9-bhPADXJ5-vjr4Uy4vTr0efloWhlMvCtIY1nFDa2pY0TDLCOGGatQZTWVFnbIUJN1xzy6SjthGI8LoWRiBqTaOrA_B-13eI_Z_JpVFtfDKu63Rw_ZSUZJQJVEvxLCkYpazK43ueJJggjNhMvvuPXPdTzOOaIUIoovX88dsHaGo2zqohz1zHO_XPRAY-7oBb37m7pzpSs3G1VrNYNYtVs3F1b1xt1epslS85Xuzi2YTbPsZ1_K1qXnGmvp-fKs4ul_jbsVDH1V9hnq2F</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Carson, R. G.</creator><creator>Popple, A. E.</creator><creator>Verschueren, S. M. P.</creator><creator>Riek, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone</title><author>Carson, R. G. ; Popple, A. E. ; Verschueren, S. M. P. ; Riek, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4479-cfc5b7244fdf2b59525725a5fc14934ecd3127c7a7d59e4db8027668c804dcba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Resistance exercise</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Sport science</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>strength training</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Vibration - therapeutic use</topic><topic>vibration exercise</topic><topic>vibration plate</topic><topic>Weightlifting</topic><topic>whole-body vibration training</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work load</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carson, R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popple, A. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, S. M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riek, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carson, R. G.</au><au>Popple, A. E.</au><au>Verschueren, S. M. P.</au><au>Riek, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>827</spage><epage>833</epage><pages>827-833</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>Eighteen participants (22–43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P<0.01) with training. There were no significant changes in measures that assessed the rate at which force was developed. Countermovement jump height increased for the CON (P<0.01) but not for the VIB group. Comparisons between the groups revealed that they did not differ significantly from one another with respect to any measure of performance, before or following training. It appears that vibration superimposed upon resistance training does not alter or augment the increase in strength induced by resistance training alone.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19765239</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7188 |
| ispartof | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2010-12, Vol.20 (6), p.827-833 |
| issn | 0905-7188 1600-0838 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954580698 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Comparative studies Feet Female Height Humans Isometric Contraction - physiology Male Muscle Strength - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Range of Motion, Articular Resistance exercise Resistance Training - methods Sport science Sports training Statistics as Topic strength training Vibration Vibration - therapeutic use vibration exercise vibration plate Weightlifting whole-body vibration training Work Work load Young Adult |
| title | Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A32%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Superimposed%20vibration%20confers%20no%20additional%20benefit%20compared%20with%20resistance%20training%20alone&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=Carson,%20R.%20G.&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=827&rft.epage=833&rft.pages=827-833&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E821201053%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822240468&rft_id=info:pmid/19765239&rfr_iscdi=true |