Energetics of reconnection: A reply

In this article we address several criticisms of Petschek-type reconnection models which have recently been raised by Heikkila. We discuss features of the time-dependent Petschek-type models in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, and point out that such models can incorporate an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Space science reviews 1997-11, Vol.82 (3-4), p.451-461
Hauptverfasser: Semenov, Vladimir S, Kubyshkin, Igor V, Kiendl, Michael T, Biernat, Helfried K, Rijnbeek, Richard P, Besser, Bruno P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 461
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 451
container_title Space science reviews
container_volume 82
creator Semenov, Vladimir S
Kubyshkin, Igor V
Kiendl, Michael T
Biernat, Helfried K
Rijnbeek, Richard P
Besser, Bruno P
description In this article we address several criticisms of Petschek-type reconnection models which have recently been raised by Heikkila. We discuss features of the time-dependent Petschek-type models in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, and point out that such models can incorporate and reproduce observed features at the magnetopause, such as plasma jets and erosion of the current sheet. We argue that some of Heikkila's criticisms can be attributed to weaknesses in the analysis due to incomplete experimental information, rather than to flaws in the concept of reconnection per se; in this category we include the question of which instability leads to the localised breakup of the magnetopause current sheet. Other criticisms are based on an adherence to steady-state models, and cannot be sustained within the extended time-dependent theory. We discuss, for example, how the time-dependent model can provide a consistent picture of how energy from the incoming solar wind is transferred and converted as it enters the magnetosphere.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1005009315093
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954529121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27251339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p243t-8326598e76513b75d28fd2fbc4254c2d254891e7b17abe72e97dcff17bd84e773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9z01LxDAQBuAgCq6rZ69FQU_VZJJ0kr2VZf2ABS96Lm06kS41rU178N8b0JMHL-8w8PAyw9il4HeCg7wvN4JzzbmVQqc4YiuhEXJbIByzFefS5IXk5pSdxXjgPGHEFbveBZreae5czAafTeSGEMjN3RA2WZn2sf86Zye-7iNd_M41e3vYvW6f8v3L4_O23OcjKDnnRkKhrSEstJAN6haMb8E3ToFWDtqUxgrCRmDdEAJZbJ33ApvWKEKUa3b70ztOw-dCca4-uuio7-tAwxIrq5UGK0AkefOvBIR0g7QJXv2Bh2GZQvqiQqmKQiGC_AbTwlph</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734664772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energetics of reconnection: A reply</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Semenov, Vladimir S ; Kubyshkin, Igor V ; Kiendl, Michael T ; Biernat, Helfried K ; Rijnbeek, Richard P ; Besser, Bruno P</creator><creatorcontrib>Semenov, Vladimir S ; Kubyshkin, Igor V ; Kiendl, Michael T ; Biernat, Helfried K ; Rijnbeek, Richard P ; Besser, Bruno P</creatorcontrib><description>In this article we address several criticisms of Petschek-type reconnection models which have recently been raised by Heikkila. We discuss features of the time-dependent Petschek-type models in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, and point out that such models can incorporate and reproduce observed features at the magnetopause, such as plasma jets and erosion of the current sheet. We argue that some of Heikkila's criticisms can be attributed to weaknesses in the analysis due to incomplete experimental information, rather than to flaws in the concept of reconnection per se; in this category we include the question of which instability leads to the localised breakup of the magnetopause current sheet. Other criticisms are based on an adherence to steady-state models, and cannot be sustained within the extended time-dependent theory. We discuss, for example, how the time-dependent model can provide a consistent picture of how energy from the incoming solar wind is transferred and converted as it enters the magnetosphere.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-6308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1005009315093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Solar energy</subject><ispartof>Space science reviews, 1997-11, Vol.82 (3-4), p.451-461</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Semenov, Vladimir S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubyshkin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiendl, Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernat, Helfried K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijnbeek, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besser, Bruno P</creatorcontrib><title>Energetics of reconnection: A reply</title><title>Space science reviews</title><description>In this article we address several criticisms of Petschek-type reconnection models which have recently been raised by Heikkila. We discuss features of the time-dependent Petschek-type models in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, and point out that such models can incorporate and reproduce observed features at the magnetopause, such as plasma jets and erosion of the current sheet. We argue that some of Heikkila's criticisms can be attributed to weaknesses in the analysis due to incomplete experimental information, rather than to flaws in the concept of reconnection per se; in this category we include the question of which instability leads to the localised breakup of the magnetopause current sheet. Other criticisms are based on an adherence to steady-state models, and cannot be sustained within the extended time-dependent theory. We discuss, for example, how the time-dependent model can provide a consistent picture of how energy from the incoming solar wind is transferred and converted as it enters the magnetosphere.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Solar energy</subject><issn>0038-6308</issn><issn>1572-9672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9z01LxDAQBuAgCq6rZ69FQU_VZJJ0kr2VZf2ABS96Lm06kS41rU178N8b0JMHL-8w8PAyw9il4HeCg7wvN4JzzbmVQqc4YiuhEXJbIByzFefS5IXk5pSdxXjgPGHEFbveBZreae5czAafTeSGEMjN3RA2WZn2sf86Zye-7iNd_M41e3vYvW6f8v3L4_O23OcjKDnnRkKhrSEstJAN6haMb8E3ToFWDtqUxgrCRmDdEAJZbJ33ApvWKEKUa3b70ztOw-dCca4-uuio7-tAwxIrq5UGK0AkefOvBIR0g7QJXv2Bh2GZQvqiQqmKQiGC_AbTwlph</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>Semenov, Vladimir S</creator><creator>Kubyshkin, Igor V</creator><creator>Kiendl, Michael T</creator><creator>Biernat, Helfried K</creator><creator>Rijnbeek, Richard P</creator><creator>Besser, Bruno P</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Energetics of reconnection: A reply</title><author>Semenov, Vladimir S ; Kubyshkin, Igor V ; Kiendl, Michael T ; Biernat, Helfried K ; Rijnbeek, Richard P ; Besser, Bruno P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p243t-8326598e76513b75d28fd2fbc4254c2d254891e7b17abe72e97dcff17bd84e773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Solar energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Semenov, Vladimir S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubyshkin, Igor V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiendl, Michael T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernat, Helfried K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijnbeek, Richard P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besser, Bruno P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Space science reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Semenov, Vladimir S</au><au>Kubyshkin, Igor V</au><au>Kiendl, Michael T</au><au>Biernat, Helfried K</au><au>Rijnbeek, Richard P</au><au>Besser, Bruno P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energetics of reconnection: A reply</atitle><jtitle>Space science reviews</jtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>451-461</pages><issn>0038-6308</issn><eissn>1572-9672</eissn><abstract>In this article we address several criticisms of Petschek-type reconnection models which have recently been raised by Heikkila. We discuss features of the time-dependent Petschek-type models in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, and point out that such models can incorporate and reproduce observed features at the magnetopause, such as plasma jets and erosion of the current sheet. We argue that some of Heikkila's criticisms can be attributed to weaknesses in the analysis due to incomplete experimental information, rather than to flaws in the concept of reconnection per se; in this category we include the question of which instability leads to the localised breakup of the magnetopause current sheet. Other criticisms are based on an adherence to steady-state models, and cannot be sustained within the extended time-dependent theory. We discuss, for example, how the time-dependent model can provide a consistent picture of how energy from the incoming solar wind is transferred and converted as it enters the magnetosphere.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1005009315093</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-6308
ispartof Space science reviews, 1997-11, Vol.82 (3-4), p.451-461
issn 0038-6308
1572-9672
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954529121
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Solar energy
title Energetics of reconnection: A reply
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A02%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energetics%20of%20reconnection:%20A%20reply&rft.jtitle=Space%20science%20reviews&rft.au=Semenov,%20Vladimir%20S&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=451-461&rft.issn=0038-6308&rft.eissn=1572-9672&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1005009315093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E27251339%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734664772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true