Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"

Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"

Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750) analyzed the standardized sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness" at fine-scale. However, their method was biased toward site-number-domin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2012-03, Vol.335 (6075), p.1441; author reply 1441-1441
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Xubin, Liu, Fengqiao, Zhang, Mi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Biodiversity
Biomass
Ecosystem
Flowers & plants
Plant ecology
Plant populations
Plants
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1441
container_issue 6075
container_start_page 1441; author reply 1441
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 335
creator Pan, Xubin
Liu, Fengqiao
Zhang, Mi
description Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750) analyzed the standardized sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness" at fine-scale. However, their method was biased toward site-number-dominated plant communities. They also failed to provide enough data for regional analysis and detailed information for within-site analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.1214786
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948898357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>948898357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-3207245e00a67df186465d856e70509dcdb6a8f24d6c3e007ff01fe9a07955a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlbP3iT04mnbfH8cpWgVCnrQc0iTLG7pbtZkV_DfG2n14GkG5pmZlweAa4wWGBOxzK4JnQsLTDCTSpyAKUaaV5ogegqmCFFRKST5BFzkvEOozDQ9BxNCGCNM0ClYr2Lbhm6AsYPzlxT96Ibmsxm-YJOhhX2MCfYp-MYNpYs17Pe20LkP5XOGqXHvXch5fgnOarvP4epYZ-Dt4f519VhtntdPq7tN5QhVQ0UJkoTxgJAV0tdYCSa4V1wEiTjS3vmtsKomzAtHCyXrGuE6aIuk5txSOgO3h7t9ih9jyINpm-zCvqQKccxGM6W0olwWcv6P3MUxdSWc0ZQpSQXlBVoeIJdizinUpk9Na9OXwcj8GDZHw-ZouGzcHM-O2zb4P_5XKf0GebR2qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>934873635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><creator>Pan, Xubin ; Liu, Fengqiao ; Zhang, Mi</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Xubin ; Liu, Fengqiao ; Zhang, Mi</creatorcontrib><description>Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750) analyzed the standardized sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness" at fine-scale. However, their method was biased toward site-number-dominated plant communities. They also failed to provide enough data for regional analysis and detailed information for within-site analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.1214786</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22442463</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCIEAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Ecosystem ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Plant ecology ; Plant populations ; Plants</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2012-03, Vol.335 (6075), p.1441; author reply 1441-1441</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012, American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-3207245e00a67df186465d856e70509dcdb6a8f24d6c3e007ff01fe9a07955a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-3207245e00a67df186465d856e70509dcdb6a8f24d6c3e007ff01fe9a07955a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2884,2885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22442463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fengqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mi</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750) analyzed the standardized sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness" at fine-scale. However, their method was biased toward site-number-dominated plant communities. They also failed to provide enough data for regional analysis and detailed information for within-site analysis.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plants</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlbP3iT04mnbfH8cpWgVCnrQc0iTLG7pbtZkV_DfG2n14GkG5pmZlweAa4wWGBOxzK4JnQsLTDCTSpyAKUaaV5ogegqmCFFRKST5BFzkvEOozDQ9BxNCGCNM0ClYr2Lbhm6AsYPzlxT96Ibmsxm-YJOhhX2MCfYp-MYNpYs17Pe20LkP5XOGqXHvXch5fgnOarvP4epYZ-Dt4f519VhtntdPq7tN5QhVQ0UJkoTxgJAV0tdYCSa4V1wEiTjS3vmtsKomzAtHCyXrGuE6aIuk5txSOgO3h7t9ih9jyINpm-zCvqQKccxGM6W0olwWcv6P3MUxdSWc0ZQpSQXlBVoeIJdizinUpk9Na9OXwcj8GDZHw-ZouGzcHM-O2zb4P_5XKf0GebR2qQ</recordid><startdate>20120323</startdate><enddate>20120323</enddate><creator>Pan, Xubin</creator><creator>Liu, Fengqiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Mi</creator><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120323</creationdate><title>Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"</title><author>Pan, Xubin ; Liu, Fengqiao ; Zhang, Mi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-3207245e00a67df186465d856e70509dcdb6a8f24d6c3e007ff01fe9a07955a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fengqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Xubin</au><au>Liu, Fengqiao</au><au>Zhang, Mi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2012-03-23</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>335</volume><issue>6075</issue><spage>1441; author reply 1441</spage><epage>1441</epage><pages>1441; author reply 1441-1441</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><coden>SCIEAS</coden><abstract>Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750) analyzed the standardized sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness" at fine-scale. However, their method was biased toward site-number-dominated plant communities. They also failed to provide enough data for regional analysis and detailed information for within-site analysis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>22442463</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.1214786</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2012-03, Vol.335 (6075), p.1441; author reply 1441-1441
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948898357
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; American Association for the Advancement of Science
subjects Biodiversity
Biomass
Ecosystem
Flowers & plants
Plant ecology
Plant populations
Plants
title Comment on "Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness"
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A22%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20%22Productivity%20is%20a%20poor%20predictor%20of%20plant%20species%20richness%22&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Pan,%20Xubin&rft.date=2012-03-23&rft.volume=335&rft.issue=6075&rft.spage=1441;%20author%20reply%201441&rft.epage=1441&rft.pages=1441;%20author%20reply%201441-1441&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft.coden=SCIEAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.1214786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E948898357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=934873635&rft_id=info:pmid/22442463&rfr_iscdi=true