Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces

A thin flow-focusing microfluidic channel is evaluated for generating monodisperse liquid droplets. The microfluidic device is used in its native state, which is hydrophilic, or treated with OTS to make it hydrophobic. Having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces allows for creation of both oil-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lab on a chip 2012-04, Vol.12 (8), p.1540-1547
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Christine C, Rao, Rekha R, Loewenberg, Michael, Brooks, Carlton F, Galambos, Paul, Grillet, Anne M, Nemer, Martin B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1547
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1540
container_title Lab on a chip
container_volume 12
creator Roberts, Christine C
Rao, Rekha R
Loewenberg, Michael
Brooks, Carlton F
Galambos, Paul
Grillet, Anne M
Nemer, Martin B
description A thin flow-focusing microfluidic channel is evaluated for generating monodisperse liquid droplets. The microfluidic device is used in its native state, which is hydrophilic, or treated with OTS to make it hydrophobic. Having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces allows for creation of both oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, facilitating a large parameter study of viscosity ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.05 to 96 and flow rate ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.01 to 2 in one geometry. The hydrophilic chip provides a partially-wetting surface (contact angle less than 90°) for the inner fluid. This surface, combined with the unusually thin channel height, promotes a flow regime where the inner fluid wets the top and bottom of the channel in the orifice and a stable jet is formed. Through confocal microscopy, this fluid stabilization is shown to be highly influenced by the contact angle of the liquids in the channel. Non-wetting jets undergo breakup and produce drops when the jet is comparable to or smaller than the channel thickness. In contrast, partially-wetting jets undergo breakup only when they are much smaller than the channel thickness. Drop sizes are found to scale with a modified capillary number based on the total flow rate regardless of wetting behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c2lc21197a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948896178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>948896178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b1021cf29e88a467f36401e06c7359563a943cf4c202706a2cf4895daeb967b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQAOAgiqurF3-A5KYI1bzaJEdZfMGCFz2XNE12I21Tk9Zl_71Z9uHN08zANwMzA8AVRvcYUfmgSaMJxpKrI3CGGacZwkIeH3LJJ-A8xi-EcM4KcQomhFApZE7PQD_zba-Ci76D3sLWd752sTchGlgH3zdmgAvTmaAGl4jroG38KrNej9F1C1ibH6dNhCs3LOFyvWlZusZpqLp6X_sq1XEMViV5AU6saqK53MUp-Hx--pi9ZvP3l7fZ4zzTFMshqzAiWFsijRCKFdzSgiFsUKE5zWVeUCUZ1ZZpgghHhSIpTxvVylSy4BWjU3CzndsH_z2aOJSti9o0jeqMH2MpmRCywFwkefuvxEgQgjaXS_RuS3XwMQZjyz64VoV1QuXmF-XfLxK-3s0dq9bUB7o_Pv0FD1KGRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082205468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Roberts, Christine C ; Rao, Rekha R ; Loewenberg, Michael ; Brooks, Carlton F ; Galambos, Paul ; Grillet, Anne M ; Nemer, Martin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Christine C ; Rao, Rekha R ; Loewenberg, Michael ; Brooks, Carlton F ; Galambos, Paul ; Grillet, Anne M ; Nemer, Martin B</creatorcontrib><description>A thin flow-focusing microfluidic channel is evaluated for generating monodisperse liquid droplets. The microfluidic device is used in its native state, which is hydrophilic, or treated with OTS to make it hydrophobic. Having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces allows for creation of both oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, facilitating a large parameter study of viscosity ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.05 to 96 and flow rate ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.01 to 2 in one geometry. The hydrophilic chip provides a partially-wetting surface (contact angle less than 90°) for the inner fluid. This surface, combined with the unusually thin channel height, promotes a flow regime where the inner fluid wets the top and bottom of the channel in the orifice and a stable jet is formed. Through confocal microscopy, this fluid stabilization is shown to be highly influenced by the contact angle of the liquids in the channel. Non-wetting jets undergo breakup and produce drops when the jet is comparable to or smaller than the channel thickness. In contrast, partially-wetting jets undergo breakup only when they are much smaller than the channel thickness. Drop sizes are found to scale with a modified capillary number based on the total flow rate regardless of wetting behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-0197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c2lc21197a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22398953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Channels ; Contact angle ; Devices ; Droplets ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; Microfluidics</subject><ispartof>Lab on a chip, 2012-04, Vol.12 (8), p.1540-1547</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b1021cf29e88a467f36401e06c7359563a943cf4c202706a2cf4895daeb967b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b1021cf29e88a467f36401e06c7359563a943cf4c202706a2cf4895daeb967b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22398953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Christine C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Rekha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Carlton F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galambos, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grillet, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemer, Martin B</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces</title><title>Lab on a chip</title><addtitle>Lab Chip</addtitle><description>A thin flow-focusing microfluidic channel is evaluated for generating monodisperse liquid droplets. The microfluidic device is used in its native state, which is hydrophilic, or treated with OTS to make it hydrophobic. Having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces allows for creation of both oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, facilitating a large parameter study of viscosity ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.05 to 96 and flow rate ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.01 to 2 in one geometry. The hydrophilic chip provides a partially-wetting surface (contact angle less than 90°) for the inner fluid. This surface, combined with the unusually thin channel height, promotes a flow regime where the inner fluid wets the top and bottom of the channel in the orifice and a stable jet is formed. Through confocal microscopy, this fluid stabilization is shown to be highly influenced by the contact angle of the liquids in the channel. Non-wetting jets undergo breakup and produce drops when the jet is comparable to or smaller than the channel thickness. In contrast, partially-wetting jets undergo breakup only when they are much smaller than the channel thickness. Drop sizes are found to scale with a modified capillary number based on the total flow rate regardless of wetting behavior.</description><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Microfluidics</subject><issn>1473-0197</issn><issn>1473-0189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQAOAgiqurF3-A5KYI1bzaJEdZfMGCFz2XNE12I21Tk9Zl_71Z9uHN08zANwMzA8AVRvcYUfmgSaMJxpKrI3CGGacZwkIeH3LJJ-A8xi-EcM4KcQomhFApZE7PQD_zba-Ci76D3sLWd752sTchGlgH3zdmgAvTmaAGl4jroG38KrNej9F1C1ibH6dNhCs3LOFyvWlZusZpqLp6X_sq1XEMViV5AU6saqK53MUp-Hx--pi9ZvP3l7fZ4zzTFMshqzAiWFsijRCKFdzSgiFsUKE5zWVeUCUZ1ZZpgghHhSIpTxvVylSy4BWjU3CzndsH_z2aOJSti9o0jeqMH2MpmRCywFwkefuvxEgQgjaXS_RuS3XwMQZjyz64VoV1QuXmF-XfLxK-3s0dq9bUB7o_Pv0FD1KGRQ</recordid><startdate>20120421</startdate><enddate>20120421</enddate><creator>Roberts, Christine C</creator><creator>Rao, Rekha R</creator><creator>Loewenberg, Michael</creator><creator>Brooks, Carlton F</creator><creator>Galambos, Paul</creator><creator>Grillet, Anne M</creator><creator>Nemer, Martin B</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120421</creationdate><title>Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces</title><author>Roberts, Christine C ; Rao, Rekha R ; Loewenberg, Michael ; Brooks, Carlton F ; Galambos, Paul ; Grillet, Anne M ; Nemer, Martin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b1021cf29e88a467f36401e06c7359563a943cf4c202706a2cf4895daeb967b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Microfluidics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Christine C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Rekha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Carlton F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galambos, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grillet, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemer, Martin B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lab on a chip</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Christine C</au><au>Rao, Rekha R</au><au>Loewenberg, Michael</au><au>Brooks, Carlton F</au><au>Galambos, Paul</au><au>Grillet, Anne M</au><au>Nemer, Martin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Lab on a chip</jtitle><addtitle>Lab Chip</addtitle><date>2012-04-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1540</spage><epage>1547</epage><pages>1540-1547</pages><issn>1473-0197</issn><eissn>1473-0189</eissn><abstract>A thin flow-focusing microfluidic channel is evaluated for generating monodisperse liquid droplets. The microfluidic device is used in its native state, which is hydrophilic, or treated with OTS to make it hydrophobic. Having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces allows for creation of both oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, facilitating a large parameter study of viscosity ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.05 to 96 and flow rate ratios (droplet fluid/continuous fluid) ranging from 0.01 to 2 in one geometry. The hydrophilic chip provides a partially-wetting surface (contact angle less than 90°) for the inner fluid. This surface, combined with the unusually thin channel height, promotes a flow regime where the inner fluid wets the top and bottom of the channel in the orifice and a stable jet is formed. Through confocal microscopy, this fluid stabilization is shown to be highly influenced by the contact angle of the liquids in the channel. Non-wetting jets undergo breakup and produce drops when the jet is comparable to or smaller than the channel thickness. In contrast, partially-wetting jets undergo breakup only when they are much smaller than the channel thickness. Drop sizes are found to scale with a modified capillary number based on the total flow rate regardless of wetting behavior.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22398953</pmid><doi>10.1039/c2lc21197a</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-0197
ispartof Lab on a chip, 2012-04, Vol.12 (8), p.1540-1547
issn 1473-0197
1473-0189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948896178
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Channels
Contact angle
Devices
Droplets
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Fluids
Microfluidics
title Comparison of monodisperse droplet generation in flow-focusing devices with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20monodisperse%20droplet%20generation%20in%20flow-focusing%20devices%20with%20hydrophilic%20and%20hydrophobic%20surfaces&rft.jtitle=Lab%20on%20a%20chip&rft.au=Roberts,%20Christine%20C&rft.date=2012-04-21&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1540&rft.epage=1547&rft.pages=1540-1547&rft.issn=1473-0197&rft.eissn=1473-0189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c2lc21197a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E948896178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082205468&rft_id=info:pmid/22398953&rfr_iscdi=true