A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study

Cancer recurrence after surgery may be affected by immunosuppressive factors such as surgical stress, anesthetic drugs, and opioids. By limiting exposure to these, epidural analgesia may enhance tumor surveillance. This study compared survival and cancer recurrence rates for resection of colorectal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2012-04, Vol.116 (4), p.797-806
Hauptverfasser: CUMMINGS, Kenneth C, FANG XU, CUMMINGS, Linda C, COOPER, Gregory S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 806
container_issue 4
container_start_page 797
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 116
creator CUMMINGS, Kenneth C
FANG XU
CUMMINGS, Linda C
COOPER, Gregory S
description Cancer recurrence after surgery may be affected by immunosuppressive factors such as surgical stress, anesthetic drugs, and opioids. By limiting exposure to these, epidural analgesia may enhance tumor surveillance. This study compared survival and cancer recurrence rates for resection of colorectal cancer between patients who received perioperative epidurals and those who did not. The linked Medicare-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients ages 66 yr or older with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005 who underwent open colectomy. Recurrence was defined as chemotherapy 16 months or more after surgery and/or radiation 12 months or more after surgery. Patients were followed for at least 4 yr. To account for hospital effects, overall survival was estimated via marginal Cox regression. Recurrence was estimated by conditional logistic regression. A cohort of 42,151 patients, of whom 22.9% (n = 9,670) had epidurals at the time of resection, was identified. 5-yr survival was 61% in the epidural group and 55% in the nonepidural group. There was a significant association between epidural use and improved survival (adjusted Cox model hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = [0.87, 0.94]). Adjusting for covariates, there was no significant reduction of recurrence in the epidural group (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.15]). Several covariates, including blood transfusion, were predictive of mortality and cancer recurrence. This large cohort study found that epidural use is associated with improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer undergoing resection but does not support an association between epidural use and decreased cancer recurrence.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824674f6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948891005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>948891005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-c0c6950a8d4b47c1154f5dfcd7d4fae8a46d05513555fca73d600b469e0df76d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtq1UAUhgdR7Lb2DUTmRrxKnWMm8S6EbRV2tdj2OqzMoYwkmTiTFPaL9Hk7m24t9God-P5_wfoR-kDJOSW1-tLsfp6TnlBuOa2YKJVw5Su0oZJVBaVKvkYbQggvOGHsBL1L6U8eleTVW3TCGFO8rukGPTS4DeMM0acw4eDwdvZmjTDgZoLhziYPGCaDbyIYv_iQl_gK_IQvYYI7O9ppwVvnrF4SzgbXa7z395k5aFqYtI34t9VrjDb3GNySF20YMh_G_Vfc4KswrwMcnIsekjX4elnN_j1642BI9uxYT9Htt-1N-73Y_br40Ta7QrNKLoUmuqwlgcqIXihNqRROGqeNMsKBrUCUhkhJuZTSaVDclIT0oqwtMU6Vhp-iz0--cwx_V5uWbvRJ22GAyYY1dbWoqpoSIjMpnkgdQ0rRum6OfoS47yjpDoF0OZDuZSBZ9vF4YO1Ha_6L_iWQgU9HAJKGwcX8NJ-eOamU4pLxRxK1ljo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>948891005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C ; FANG XU ; CUMMINGS, Linda C ; COOPER, Gregory S</creator><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C ; FANG XU ; CUMMINGS, Linda C ; COOPER, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer recurrence after surgery may be affected by immunosuppressive factors such as surgical stress, anesthetic drugs, and opioids. By limiting exposure to these, epidural analgesia may enhance tumor surveillance. This study compared survival and cancer recurrence rates for resection of colorectal cancer between patients who received perioperative epidurals and those who did not. The linked Medicare-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients ages 66 yr or older with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005 who underwent open colectomy. Recurrence was defined as chemotherapy 16 months or more after surgery and/or radiation 12 months or more after surgery. Patients were followed for at least 4 yr. To account for hospital effects, overall survival was estimated via marginal Cox regression. Recurrence was estimated by conditional logistic regression. A cohort of 42,151 patients, of whom 22.9% (n = 9,670) had epidurals at the time of resection, was identified. 5-yr survival was 61% in the epidural group and 55% in the nonepidural group. There was a significant association between epidural use and improved survival (adjusted Cox model hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = [0.87, 0.94]). Adjusting for covariates, there was no significant reduction of recurrence in the epidural group (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.15]). Several covariates, including blood transfusion, were predictive of mortality and cancer recurrence. This large cohort study found that epidural use is associated with improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer undergoing resection but does not support an association between epidural use and decreased cancer recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824674f6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22273991</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesia, Epidural - methods ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; Colectomy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control ; Pain Management - methods ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Survival Rate - trends ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2012-04, Vol.116 (4), p.797-806</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25777352$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22273991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANG XU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, Linda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>Cancer recurrence after surgery may be affected by immunosuppressive factors such as surgical stress, anesthetic drugs, and opioids. By limiting exposure to these, epidural analgesia may enhance tumor surveillance. This study compared survival and cancer recurrence rates for resection of colorectal cancer between patients who received perioperative epidurals and those who did not. The linked Medicare-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients ages 66 yr or older with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005 who underwent open colectomy. Recurrence was defined as chemotherapy 16 months or more after surgery and/or radiation 12 months or more after surgery. Patients were followed for at least 4 yr. To account for hospital effects, overall survival was estimated via marginal Cox regression. Recurrence was estimated by conditional logistic regression. A cohort of 42,151 patients, of whom 22.9% (n = 9,670) had epidurals at the time of resection, was identified. 5-yr survival was 61% in the epidural group and 55% in the nonepidural group. There was a significant association between epidural use and improved survival (adjusted Cox model hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = [0.87, 0.94]). Adjusting for covariates, there was no significant reduction of recurrence in the epidural group (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.15]). Several covariates, including blood transfusion, were predictive of mortality and cancer recurrence. This large cohort study found that epidural use is associated with improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer undergoing resection but does not support an association between epidural use and decreased cancer recurrence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colectomy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtq1UAUhgdR7Lb2DUTmRrxKnWMm8S6EbRV2tdj2OqzMoYwkmTiTFPaL9Hk7m24t9God-P5_wfoR-kDJOSW1-tLsfp6TnlBuOa2YKJVw5Su0oZJVBaVKvkYbQggvOGHsBL1L6U8eleTVW3TCGFO8rukGPTS4DeMM0acw4eDwdvZmjTDgZoLhziYPGCaDbyIYv_iQl_gK_IQvYYI7O9ppwVvnrF4SzgbXa7z395k5aFqYtI34t9VrjDb3GNySF20YMh_G_Vfc4KswrwMcnIsekjX4elnN_j1642BI9uxYT9Htt-1N-73Y_br40Ta7QrNKLoUmuqwlgcqIXihNqRROGqeNMsKBrUCUhkhJuZTSaVDclIT0oqwtMU6Vhp-iz0--cwx_V5uWbvRJ22GAyYY1dbWoqpoSIjMpnkgdQ0rRum6OfoS47yjpDoF0OZDuZSBZ9vF4YO1Ha_6L_iWQgU9HAJKGwcX8NJ-eOamU4pLxRxK1ljo</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C</creator><creator>FANG XU</creator><creator>CUMMINGS, Linda C</creator><creator>COOPER, Gregory S</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study</title><author>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C ; FANG XU ; CUMMINGS, Linda C ; COOPER, Gregory S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-c0c6950a8d4b47c1154f5dfcd7d4fae8a46d05513555fca73d600b469e0df76d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colectomy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANG XU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, Linda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOPER, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CUMMINGS, Kenneth C</au><au>FANG XU</au><au>CUMMINGS, Linda C</au><au>COOPER, Gregory S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>797-806</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>Cancer recurrence after surgery may be affected by immunosuppressive factors such as surgical stress, anesthetic drugs, and opioids. By limiting exposure to these, epidural analgesia may enhance tumor surveillance. This study compared survival and cancer recurrence rates for resection of colorectal cancer between patients who received perioperative epidurals and those who did not. The linked Medicare-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients ages 66 yr or older with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2005 who underwent open colectomy. Recurrence was defined as chemotherapy 16 months or more after surgery and/or radiation 12 months or more after surgery. Patients were followed for at least 4 yr. To account for hospital effects, overall survival was estimated via marginal Cox regression. Recurrence was estimated by conditional logistic regression. A cohort of 42,151 patients, of whom 22.9% (n = 9,670) had epidurals at the time of resection, was identified. 5-yr survival was 61% in the epidural group and 55% in the nonepidural group. There was a significant association between epidural use and improved survival (adjusted Cox model hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = [0.87, 0.94]). Adjusting for covariates, there was no significant reduction of recurrence in the epidural group (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.15]). Several covariates, including blood transfusion, were predictive of mortality and cancer recurrence. This large cohort study found that epidural use is associated with improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer undergoing resection but does not support an association between epidural use and decreased cancer recurrence.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>22273991</pmid><doi>10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824674f6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2012-04, Vol.116 (4), p.797-806
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_948891005
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesia, Epidural - methods
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cohort Studies
Colectomy
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control
Pain Management - methods
Population Surveillance - methods
Survival Rate - trends
Treatment Outcome
title A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Traditional Pain Management Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence after Colectomy: A Population-based Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Epidural%20Analgesia%20and%20Traditional%20Pain%20Management%20Effects%20on%20Survival%20and%20Cancer%20Recurrence%20after%20Colectomy:%20A%20Population-based%20Study&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=CUMMINGS,%20Kenneth%20C&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=797-806&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824674f6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E948891005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=948891005&rft_id=info:pmid/22273991&rfr_iscdi=true