What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization?
E-business standards are a key infrastructure for electronic commerce. In many industries, they are collaboratively developed by firms in an open and neutral industry consortium. It is imperative to understand what drives firms' resource investments in such consortia, as they are critical for t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management information systems 2011-10, Vol.28 (2), p.305-334 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 334 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Journal of management information systems |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Zhao, Kexin Xia, Mu Shaw, Michael J. |
description | E-business standards are a key infrastructure for electronic commerce. In many industries, they are collaboratively developed by firms in an open and neutral industry consortium. It is imperative to understand what drives firms' resource investments in such consortia, as they are critical for the success of e-business standardization. Based on collective action theory, we propose a research model to investigate the drivers of standard development within consortia. We test the model through a data set of 232 firms from 7 consortia. Consistent with collective action theory, our results demonstrate that firms' interests, resource availability, and consortium management effectiveness jointly determine their resource expenditures within the consortium. However, our exploratory investigation indicates differences between vendors and users, as vendors are more motivated by perceived standard benefits whereas users are more motivated by perceived process benefits. Our research provides a deeper understanding of firms' behaviors within consortia and factors driving their standard making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280211 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_940979518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41304628</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41304628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8da3c32898664dde536413ed20c5e3875d4fefc2cf223c9c0d5f8228b0dcaa043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOC4vIAgNHjy1ZuklOYjoMOqAIjiK3kJM0pihO9FUWhmf3pYZFDxYl6Ko76_lR2iP4CNal-z4ZjrDdUFzQofgmBKyhkakLOtcUP60jkY_3U20BTDHGBNBxQjdPb6olN2E5N5VspBduNhBlkI2Dj5F99wnu6ogxOT6Lj9XYE02yc97cN4CZLOkvFHRuE-VXPCnO2ijUS3Y3VXeRg8Xk_vxVX59ezkdn13nuuA45dwophnlgldVYYwtWVUQZg3FurSM16UpGttoqhtKmRYam7Lhw3PP2GilcMG20eFy7msMb72FJDsH2rat8jb0IEWBRS1Kwgfy4A85D330w3GSsKoeMF6JgaJLSscAEG0jX6PrVFxIguW3y3Llsvx1eRDtL0VzSCH-KIZPcFHR79Uny77zTYid-gixNTKpRRtiE5XXDiT7Z_4XL-eMtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1367097869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Zhao, Kexin ; Xia, Mu ; Shaw, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Kexin ; Xia, Mu ; Shaw, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>E-business standards are a key infrastructure for electronic commerce. In many industries, they are collaboratively developed by firms in an open and neutral industry consortium. It is imperative to understand what drives firms' resource investments in such consortia, as they are critical for the success of e-business standardization. Based on collective action theory, we propose a research model to investigate the drivers of standard development within consortia. We test the model through a data set of 232 firms from 7 consortia. Consistent with collective action theory, our results demonstrate that firms' interests, resource availability, and consortium management effectiveness jointly determine their resource expenditures within the consortium. However, our exploratory investigation indicates differences between vendors and users, as vendors are more motivated by perceived standard benefits whereas users are more motivated by perceived process benefits. Our research provides a deeper understanding of firms' behaviors within consortia and factors driving their standard making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-1222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Action theory ; Business strategies ; Collective action ; collective action theory ; Consortia ; Cooperation ; e-business standards ; Electronic commerce ; Enterprises ; Information and communication technologies ; Integrated development ; IT vendors ; Motivation ; motivations to contribute ; Organizational behavior ; standard consortia ; Standardization ; Studies ; user organizations</subject><ispartof>Journal of management information systems, 2011-10, Vol.28 (2), p.305-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 M.E. Sharpe, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright M. E. Sharpe Inc. Fall 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8da3c32898664dde536413ed20c5e3875d4fefc2cf223c9c0d5f8228b0dcaa043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8da3c32898664dde536413ed20c5e3875d4fefc2cf223c9c0d5f8228b0dcaa043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41304628$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41304628$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Kexin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Mu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization?</title><title>Journal of management information systems</title><description>E-business standards are a key infrastructure for electronic commerce. In many industries, they are collaboratively developed by firms in an open and neutral industry consortium. It is imperative to understand what drives firms' resource investments in such consortia, as they are critical for the success of e-business standardization. Based on collective action theory, we propose a research model to investigate the drivers of standard development within consortia. We test the model through a data set of 232 firms from 7 consortia. Consistent with collective action theory, our results demonstrate that firms' interests, resource availability, and consortium management effectiveness jointly determine their resource expenditures within the consortium. However, our exploratory investigation indicates differences between vendors and users, as vendors are more motivated by perceived standard benefits whereas users are more motivated by perceived process benefits. Our research provides a deeper understanding of firms' behaviors within consortia and factors driving their standard making.</description><subject>Action theory</subject><subject>Business strategies</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>collective action theory</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>e-business standards</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Information and communication technologies</subject><subject>Integrated development</subject><subject>IT vendors</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>motivations to contribute</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>standard consortia</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>user organizations</subject><issn>0742-1222</issn><issn>1557-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOC4vIAgNHjy1ZuklOYjoMOqAIjiK3kJM0pihO9FUWhmf3pYZFDxYl6Ko76_lR2iP4CNal-z4ZjrDdUFzQofgmBKyhkakLOtcUP60jkY_3U20BTDHGBNBxQjdPb6olN2E5N5VspBduNhBlkI2Dj5F99wnu6ogxOT6Lj9XYE02yc97cN4CZLOkvFHRuE-VXPCnO2ijUS3Y3VXeRg8Xk_vxVX59ezkdn13nuuA45dwophnlgldVYYwtWVUQZg3FurSM16UpGttoqhtKmRYam7Lhw3PP2GilcMG20eFy7msMb72FJDsH2rat8jb0IEWBRS1Kwgfy4A85D330w3GSsKoeMF6JgaJLSscAEG0jX6PrVFxIguW3y3Llsvx1eRDtL0VzSCH-KIZPcFHR79Uny77zTYid-gixNTKpRRtiE5XXDiT7Z_4XL-eMtw</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Zhao, Kexin</creator><creator>Xia, Mu</creator><creator>Shaw, Michael J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>M. E. Sharpe</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization?</title><author>Zhao, Kexin ; Xia, Mu ; Shaw, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-8da3c32898664dde536413ed20c5e3875d4fefc2cf223c9c0d5f8228b0dcaa043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Action theory</topic><topic>Business strategies</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>collective action theory</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>e-business standards</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Information and communication technologies</topic><topic>Integrated development</topic><topic>IT vendors</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>motivations to contribute</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>standard consortia</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>user organizations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Kexin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Mu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Kexin</au><au>Xia, Mu</au><au>Shaw, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management information systems</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>305-334</pages><issn>0742-1222</issn><eissn>1557-928X</eissn><abstract>E-business standards are a key infrastructure for electronic commerce. In many industries, they are collaboratively developed by firms in an open and neutral industry consortium. It is imperative to understand what drives firms' resource investments in such consortia, as they are critical for the success of e-business standardization. Based on collective action theory, we propose a research model to investigate the drivers of standard development within consortia. We test the model through a data set of 232 firms from 7 consortia. Consistent with collective action theory, our results demonstrate that firms' interests, resource availability, and consortium management effectiveness jointly determine their resource expenditures within the consortium. However, our exploratory investigation indicates differences between vendors and users, as vendors are more motivated by perceived standard benefits whereas users are more motivated by perceived process benefits. Our research provides a deeper understanding of firms' behaviors within consortia and factors driving their standard making.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.2753/MIS0742-1222280211</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0742-1222 |
ispartof | Journal of management information systems, 2011-10, Vol.28 (2), p.305-334 |
issn | 0742-1222 1557-928X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_940979518 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Action theory Business strategies Collective action collective action theory Consortia Cooperation e-business standards Electronic commerce Enterprises Information and communication technologies Integrated development IT vendors Motivation motivations to contribute Organizational behavior standard consortia Standardization Studies user organizations |
title | What Motivates Firms to Contribute to Consortium-Based E-Business Standardization? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A28%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Motivates%20Firms%20to%20Contribute%20to%20Consortium-Based%20E-Business%20Standardization?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20information%20systems&rft.au=Zhao,%20Kexin&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=305-334&rft.issn=0742-1222&rft.eissn=1557-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280211&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41304628%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1367097869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41304628&rfr_iscdi=true |