Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance
BACKGROUND:High-energy extremity trauma is common in combat. Orthotic options for patients whose lower extremities have been salvaged are limited. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), was created and used with high-intensity rehabilitation as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2012-03, Vol.94 (6), p.507-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 515 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Patzkowski, Jeanne C Blanck, Ryan V Owens, Johnny G Wilken, Jason M Kirk, Kevin L Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R |
description | BACKGROUND:High-energy extremity trauma is common in combat. Orthotic options for patients whose lower extremities have been salvaged are limited. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), was created and used with high-intensity rehabilitation as part of the Return to Run clinical pathway. We hypothesized that the IDEO would improve functional performance compared with a non-custom carbon fiber orthosis (BlueRocker), a posterior leaf spring orthosis, and no brace.
METHODS:Eighteen subjects with unilateral dorsiflexion and/or plantar flexion weakness were evaluated with six functional tests while they were wearing the IDEO, BlueRocker, posterior leaf spring, or no brace. The brace order was randomized, and five trials were completed for each of the functional measures, which included a four-square step test, a sit-to-stand five times test, tests of self-selected walking velocity over level and rocky terrain, and a timed stair ascent. They also completed one trial of a forty-yard (37-m) dash, filled out a satisfaction questionnaire, and indicated whether they had ever considered an amputation and, if so, whether they still intended to proceed with it.
RESULTS:Performance was significantly better with the IDEO with respect to all functional measures compared with all other bracing conditions (p < 0.004), with the exception of the sit-to-stand five times test, in which there was a significant improvement only as compared with the BlueRocker (p = 0.014). The forty-yard dash improved by approximately 35% over the values for the posterior leaf spring and no-brace conditions, and by 28% over the BlueRocker. The BlueRocker demonstrated a significant improvement in the forty-yard dash compared with no brace (p = 0.033), and a significant improvement in self-selected walking velocity on level terrain compared with no brace and the posterior leaf spring orthosis (p < 0.028). However, no significant difference was found among the posterior leaf spring, BlueRocker, and no-brace conditions with respect to any other functional measure. Thirteen patients initially considered amputation, but after completion of the clinical pathway, eight desired limb salvage, two were undecided, and three still desired amputation.
CONCLUSIONS:Use of the IDEO significantly improves performance on validated tests of agility, power, and speed. The majority of subjects initially considering amputation favored limb salvage after this noninva |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.K.00254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_940835260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>940835260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-d25988e0f3271473ceeb24b62b7b230b7a55a492f2211ec88ff98f3628592f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFP3DAQRi1EBVvgxhnlgrg0W3tsJ84JwcLSAhJILWfLMWM2kMSLnRT139fLLvQ00qenb2YeIYeMToHR4vv1-fWv6c2UUpBii0yY5DJnXBXbZJIylldcyl3yNcZnSqkQtNwhuwCCl1VVTcjpzHdLE8zQ_MHs0jm0Q-ZddheGhY9NzC4wNk995vtsPvZ2aHxv2uweg_OhM73FffLFmTbiwWbukYf55e_Zj_z27urn7Ow2t7yQMn8EWSmF1HEomSi5RaxB1AXUZQ2c1qWR0ogKHABjaJVyrlKOF6BkChXle-Rk3bsM_nXEOOiuiRbb1vTox6grQRWXUKzIb2vSBh9jQKeXoelM-KsZ1StjemVM3-h3Ywk_2hSPdYePn_CHogQcbwATrWldSG838T8nSyU5LxMn1tybbwcM8aUd3zDoBZp2WKRlSX4BPAfKgPJ0R76KJP8HjmeBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>940835260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patzkowski, Jeanne C ; Blanck, Ryan V ; Owens, Johnny G ; Wilken, Jason M ; Kirk, Kevin L ; Wenke, Joseph C ; Hsu, Joseph R</creator><creatorcontrib>Patzkowski, Jeanne C ; Blanck, Ryan V ; Owens, Johnny G ; Wilken, Jason M ; Kirk, Kevin L ; Wenke, Joseph C ; Hsu, Joseph R ; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:High-energy extremity trauma is common in combat. Orthotic options for patients whose lower extremities have been salvaged are limited. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), was created and used with high-intensity rehabilitation as part of the Return to Run clinical pathway. We hypothesized that the IDEO would improve functional performance compared with a non-custom carbon fiber orthosis (BlueRocker), a posterior leaf spring orthosis, and no brace.
METHODS:Eighteen subjects with unilateral dorsiflexion and/or plantar flexion weakness were evaluated with six functional tests while they were wearing the IDEO, BlueRocker, posterior leaf spring, or no brace. The brace order was randomized, and five trials were completed for each of the functional measures, which included a four-square step test, a sit-to-stand five times test, tests of self-selected walking velocity over level and rocky terrain, and a timed stair ascent. They also completed one trial of a forty-yard (37-m) dash, filled out a satisfaction questionnaire, and indicated whether they had ever considered an amputation and, if so, whether they still intended to proceed with it.
RESULTS:Performance was significantly better with the IDEO with respect to all functional measures compared with all other bracing conditions (p < 0.004), with the exception of the sit-to-stand five times test, in which there was a significant improvement only as compared with the BlueRocker (p = 0.014). The forty-yard dash improved by approximately 35% over the values for the posterior leaf spring and no-brace conditions, and by 28% over the BlueRocker. The BlueRocker demonstrated a significant improvement in the forty-yard dash compared with no brace (p = 0.033), and a significant improvement in self-selected walking velocity on level terrain compared with no brace and the posterior leaf spring orthosis (p < 0.028). However, no significant difference was found among the posterior leaf spring, BlueRocker, and no-brace conditions with respect to any other functional measure. Thirteen patients initially considered amputation, but after completion of the clinical pathway, eight desired limb salvage, two were undecided, and three still desired amputation.
CONCLUSIONS:Use of the IDEO significantly improves performance on validated tests of agility, power, and speed. The majority of subjects initially considering amputation favored limb salvage after this noninvasive intervention.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22437999</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBJSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Ankle ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Critical Pathways ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Equipment Design ; Foot ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Leg Injuries - complications ; Leg Injuries - rehabilitation ; Limb Salvage - rehabilitation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Military Personnel ; Muscle Weakness - diagnosis ; Muscle Weakness - etiology ; Muscle Weakness - rehabilitation ; Orthopedic surgery ; Orthotic Devices ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Recovery of Function ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012-03, Vol.94 (6), p.507-515</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-d25988e0f3271473ceeb24b62b7b230b7a55a492f2211ec88ff98f3628592f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-d25988e0f3271473ceeb24b62b7b230b7a55a492f2211ec88ff98f3628592f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25785337$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22437999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patzkowski, Jeanne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanck, Ryan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Johnny G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilken, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenke, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Joseph R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:High-energy extremity trauma is common in combat. Orthotic options for patients whose lower extremities have been salvaged are limited. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), was created and used with high-intensity rehabilitation as part of the Return to Run clinical pathway. We hypothesized that the IDEO would improve functional performance compared with a non-custom carbon fiber orthosis (BlueRocker), a posterior leaf spring orthosis, and no brace.
METHODS:Eighteen subjects with unilateral dorsiflexion and/or plantar flexion weakness were evaluated with six functional tests while they were wearing the IDEO, BlueRocker, posterior leaf spring, or no brace. The brace order was randomized, and five trials were completed for each of the functional measures, which included a four-square step test, a sit-to-stand five times test, tests of self-selected walking velocity over level and rocky terrain, and a timed stair ascent. They also completed one trial of a forty-yard (37-m) dash, filled out a satisfaction questionnaire, and indicated whether they had ever considered an amputation and, if so, whether they still intended to proceed with it.
RESULTS:Performance was significantly better with the IDEO with respect to all functional measures compared with all other bracing conditions (p < 0.004), with the exception of the sit-to-stand five times test, in which there was a significant improvement only as compared with the BlueRocker (p = 0.014). The forty-yard dash improved by approximately 35% over the values for the posterior leaf spring and no-brace conditions, and by 28% over the BlueRocker. The BlueRocker demonstrated a significant improvement in the forty-yard dash compared with no brace (p = 0.033), and a significant improvement in self-selected walking velocity on level terrain compared with no brace and the posterior leaf spring orthosis (p < 0.028). However, no significant difference was found among the posterior leaf spring, BlueRocker, and no-brace conditions with respect to any other functional measure. Thirteen patients initially considered amputation, but after completion of the clinical pathway, eight desired limb salvage, two were undecided, and three still desired amputation.
CONCLUSIONS:Use of the IDEO significantly improves performance on validated tests of agility, power, and speed. The majority of subjects initially considering amputation favored limb salvage after this noninvasive intervention.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Critical Pathways</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Leg Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Limb Salvage - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - etiology</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFP3DAQRi1EBVvgxhnlgrg0W3tsJ84JwcLSAhJILWfLMWM2kMSLnRT139fLLvQ00qenb2YeIYeMToHR4vv1-fWv6c2UUpBii0yY5DJnXBXbZJIylldcyl3yNcZnSqkQtNwhuwCCl1VVTcjpzHdLE8zQ_MHs0jm0Q-ZddheGhY9NzC4wNk995vtsPvZ2aHxv2uweg_OhM73FffLFmTbiwWbukYf55e_Zj_z27urn7Ow2t7yQMn8EWSmF1HEomSi5RaxB1AXUZQ2c1qWR0ogKHABjaJVyrlKOF6BkChXle-Rk3bsM_nXEOOiuiRbb1vTox6grQRWXUKzIb2vSBh9jQKeXoelM-KsZ1StjemVM3-h3Ywk_2hSPdYePn_CHogQcbwATrWldSG838T8nSyU5LxMn1tybbwcM8aUd3zDoBZp2WKRlSX4BPAfKgPJ0R76KJP8HjmeBEA</recordid><startdate>20120321</startdate><enddate>20120321</enddate><creator>Patzkowski, Jeanne C</creator><creator>Blanck, Ryan V</creator><creator>Owens, Johnny G</creator><creator>Wilken, Jason M</creator><creator>Kirk, Kevin L</creator><creator>Wenke, Joseph C</creator><creator>Hsu, Joseph R</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120321</creationdate><title>Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance</title><author>Patzkowski, Jeanne C ; Blanck, Ryan V ; Owens, Johnny G ; Wilken, Jason M ; Kirk, Kevin L ; Wenke, Joseph C ; Hsu, Joseph R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-d25988e0f3271473ceeb24b62b7b230b7a55a492f2211ec88ff98f3628592f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Critical Pathways</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Leg Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Limb Salvage - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - etiology</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patzkowski, Jeanne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanck, Ryan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Johnny G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilken, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Kevin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenke, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Joseph R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patzkowski, Jeanne C</au><au>Blanck, Ryan V</au><au>Owens, Johnny G</au><au>Wilken, Jason M</au><au>Kirk, Kevin L</au><au>Wenke, Joseph C</au><au>Hsu, Joseph R</au><aucorp>Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2012-03-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>507-515</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><coden>JBJSA3</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:High-energy extremity trauma is common in combat. Orthotic options for patients whose lower extremities have been salvaged are limited. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), was created and used with high-intensity rehabilitation as part of the Return to Run clinical pathway. We hypothesized that the IDEO would improve functional performance compared with a non-custom carbon fiber orthosis (BlueRocker), a posterior leaf spring orthosis, and no brace.
METHODS:Eighteen subjects with unilateral dorsiflexion and/or plantar flexion weakness were evaluated with six functional tests while they were wearing the IDEO, BlueRocker, posterior leaf spring, or no brace. The brace order was randomized, and five trials were completed for each of the functional measures, which included a four-square step test, a sit-to-stand five times test, tests of self-selected walking velocity over level and rocky terrain, and a timed stair ascent. They also completed one trial of a forty-yard (37-m) dash, filled out a satisfaction questionnaire, and indicated whether they had ever considered an amputation and, if so, whether they still intended to proceed with it.
RESULTS:Performance was significantly better with the IDEO with respect to all functional measures compared with all other bracing conditions (p < 0.004), with the exception of the sit-to-stand five times test, in which there was a significant improvement only as compared with the BlueRocker (p = 0.014). The forty-yard dash improved by approximately 35% over the values for the posterior leaf spring and no-brace conditions, and by 28% over the BlueRocker. The BlueRocker demonstrated a significant improvement in the forty-yard dash compared with no brace (p = 0.033), and a significant improvement in self-selected walking velocity on level terrain compared with no brace and the posterior leaf spring orthosis (p < 0.028). However, no significant difference was found among the posterior leaf spring, BlueRocker, and no-brace conditions with respect to any other functional measure. Thirteen patients initially considered amputation, but after completion of the clinical pathway, eight desired limb salvage, two were undecided, and three still desired amputation.
CONCLUSIONS:Use of the IDEO significantly improves performance on validated tests of agility, power, and speed. The majority of subjects initially considering amputation favored limb salvage after this noninvasive intervention.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>22437999</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.K.00254</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012-03, Vol.94 (6), p.507-515 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_940835260 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Ankle Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Critical Pathways Diseases of the osteoarticular system Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Equipment Design Foot Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation Humans Leg Injuries - complications Leg Injuries - rehabilitation Limb Salvage - rehabilitation Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Military Personnel Muscle Weakness - diagnosis Muscle Weakness - etiology Muscle Weakness - rehabilitation Orthopedic surgery Orthotic Devices Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Recovery of Function Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Young Adult |
title | Comparative Effect of Orthosis Design on Functional Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Effect%20of%20Orthosis%20Design%20on%20Functional%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Patzkowski,%20Jeanne%20C&rft.aucorp=Skeletal%20Trauma%20Research%20Consortium&rft.date=2012-03-21&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=507-515&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft.coden=JBJSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.K.00254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E940835260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=940835260&rft_id=info:pmid/22437999&rfr_iscdi=true |