Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The optimal degree of neck rotation during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation remains undetermined because previous studies suggested using sonography, but without puncturing the vein. We assessed whether a neutral position (NP) of the head (0 degrees) during ultrasound-guided cannulation of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2012-04, Vol.114 (4), p.777-784
Hauptverfasser: Lamperti, Massimo, Subert, Matteo, Cortellazzi, Paolo, Vailati, Davide, Borrelli, Paola, Montomoli, Cristina, D'Onofrio, Giovanni, Caldiroli, Dario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 4
container_start_page 777
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 114
creator Lamperti, Massimo
Subert, Matteo
Cortellazzi, Paolo
Vailati, Davide
Borrelli, Paola
Montomoli, Cristina
D'Onofrio, Giovanni
Caldiroli, Dario
description The optimal degree of neck rotation during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation remains undetermined because previous studies suggested using sonography, but without puncturing the vein. We assessed whether a neutral position (NP) of the head (0 degrees) during ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was safer than rotating the neck to 45 degrees head turned. The effect of these 2 positions during ultrasound-guided cannulation on major complications was the primary outcome. Overall complications, venous access time, and perception of difficulty during the procedure were also evaluated. A prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded study was conducted in a tertiary neurosurgical hospital. Patients undergoing major elective neurosurgical procedures requiring a central venous line were randomly allocated to 2 groups; ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was then performed using an out-of-plane orientation. One thousand four hundred twenty-four patients were evaluated, but 92 were excluded; 670 were allocated to the head turned group and 662 to the NP group. Cannulation was 100% successful. Demographic data were similar in the 2 groups except for IJV positions. There were only 10 major complications: 6 in the 0-degree NP group and 4 in the 45-degree head turned group. The frequency of these complications was not different between the 2 groups. The overall complication rate was 13%, and was higher in women, in patients with ASA physical status ≥II, and in patients with a smaller diameter vein, or when the vein was located deeper and lateral or in the anterolateral position. An increased venous access time was associated with an increased rate of overall complications. The perception of difficulty performing the procedure with the head placed in the 2 positions was not statistically different in either group. A head NP was as safe as a 45-degree neck rotation during ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation with regard to both major and minor complications, and venous access time was similar. Ultrasound guidance helps determine optimal head rotation for IJV cannulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182459917
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_934275215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>934275215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4937-af9806b18430c95d307d7caa082b515c5a871bd8a86ce1f6d31d5f40327cd8db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt9uFCEUxidGY9fqGxjDjfFqKn-GGbgyzba2a5pq1tbbyRlgdrEstDCk0VfyJWXsahO5gS_5fecc-Kiq1wQfEUrY--PL0yM8YMIMI4I2XErSPakWhNO27rgUT6sFxpjVVEp5UL1I6XuRBIv2eXVAKeWMtnJR_VolBOjS5CmCQ-cGNPoSkp1s8OgrjCaiaQseNbw-MZtoTEHVDVqHCf4gJzlav0HXrthTyF7XZ9lqo9HKTyb6UvJT3mQHEX0z1qMleF_UbP2A1iZlNyUUxjLBGrwOO_uzWJfBTzE4Nx-d9VaVKlfRgntZPRvBJfNqvx9W1x9Pr5bn9cXns9Xy-KJWjWRdDaMUuB2IaBhWkmuGO90pACzowAlXHERHBi1AtMqQsdWMaD42mNFOaaEHdli9e6h7G8NdNmnqdzYp4xx4E3LqJWtoxynhhWweSBVDStGM_W20O4g_eoL7OaW-pNT_n1Kxvdk3yMPO6H-mv7EU4O0egFSuP0bwyqZHjrdSEEYe-98HV9473bh8b2K_NeCmbY_nxZmsKSYUN0XU8xfo2G_v-avr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>934275215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lamperti, Massimo ; Subert, Matteo ; Cortellazzi, Paolo ; Vailati, Davide ; Borrelli, Paola ; Montomoli, Cristina ; D'Onofrio, Giovanni ; Caldiroli, Dario</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Massimo ; Subert, Matteo ; Cortellazzi, Paolo ; Vailati, Davide ; Borrelli, Paola ; Montomoli, Cristina ; D'Onofrio, Giovanni ; Caldiroli, Dario</creatorcontrib><description>The optimal degree of neck rotation during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation remains undetermined because previous studies suggested using sonography, but without puncturing the vein. We assessed whether a neutral position (NP) of the head (0 degrees) during ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was safer than rotating the neck to 45 degrees head turned. The effect of these 2 positions during ultrasound-guided cannulation on major complications was the primary outcome. Overall complications, venous access time, and perception of difficulty during the procedure were also evaluated. A prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded study was conducted in a tertiary neurosurgical hospital. Patients undergoing major elective neurosurgical procedures requiring a central venous line were randomly allocated to 2 groups; ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was then performed using an out-of-plane orientation. One thousand four hundred twenty-four patients were evaluated, but 92 were excluded; 670 were allocated to the head turned group and 662 to the NP group. Cannulation was 100% successful. Demographic data were similar in the 2 groups except for IJV positions. There were only 10 major complications: 6 in the 0-degree NP group and 4 in the 45-degree head turned group. The frequency of these complications was not different between the 2 groups. The overall complication rate was 13%, and was higher in women, in patients with ASA physical status ≥II, and in patients with a smaller diameter vein, or when the vein was located deeper and lateral or in the anterolateral position. An increased venous access time was associated with an increased rate of overall complications. The perception of difficulty performing the procedure with the head placed in the 2 positions was not statistically different in either group. A head NP was as safe as a 45-degree neck rotation during ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation with regard to both major and minor complications, and venous access time was similar. Ultrasound guidance helps determine optimal head rotation for IJV cannulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182459917</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22253269</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Female ; Head ; Humans ; Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neck ; Posture ; Prospective Studies ; Rotation ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2012-04, Vol.114 (4), p.777-784</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4937-af9806b18430c95d307d7caa082b515c5a871bd8a86ce1f6d31d5f40327cd8db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4937-af9806b18430c95d307d7caa082b515c5a871bd8a86ce1f6d31d5f40327cd8db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-201204000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25698131$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22253269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subert, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortellazzi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vailati, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrelli, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montomoli, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldiroli, Dario</creatorcontrib><title>Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>The optimal degree of neck rotation during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation remains undetermined because previous studies suggested using sonography, but without puncturing the vein. We assessed whether a neutral position (NP) of the head (0 degrees) during ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was safer than rotating the neck to 45 degrees head turned. The effect of these 2 positions during ultrasound-guided cannulation on major complications was the primary outcome. Overall complications, venous access time, and perception of difficulty during the procedure were also evaluated. A prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded study was conducted in a tertiary neurosurgical hospital. Patients undergoing major elective neurosurgical procedures requiring a central venous line were randomly allocated to 2 groups; ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was then performed using an out-of-plane orientation. One thousand four hundred twenty-four patients were evaluated, but 92 were excluded; 670 were allocated to the head turned group and 662 to the NP group. Cannulation was 100% successful. Demographic data were similar in the 2 groups except for IJV positions. There were only 10 major complications: 6 in the 0-degree NP group and 4 in the 45-degree head turned group. The frequency of these complications was not different between the 2 groups. The overall complication rate was 13%, and was higher in women, in patients with ASA physical status ≥II, and in patients with a smaller diameter vein, or when the vein was located deeper and lateral or in the anterolateral position. An increased venous access time was associated with an increased rate of overall complications. The perception of difficulty performing the procedure with the head placed in the 2 positions was not statistically different in either group. A head NP was as safe as a 45-degree neck rotation during ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation with regard to both major and minor complications, and venous access time was similar. Ultrasound guidance helps determine optimal head rotation for IJV cannulation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt9uFCEUxidGY9fqGxjDjfFqKn-GGbgyzba2a5pq1tbbyRlgdrEstDCk0VfyJWXsahO5gS_5fecc-Kiq1wQfEUrY--PL0yM8YMIMI4I2XErSPakWhNO27rgUT6sFxpjVVEp5UL1I6XuRBIv2eXVAKeWMtnJR_VolBOjS5CmCQ-cGNPoSkp1s8OgrjCaiaQseNbw-MZtoTEHVDVqHCf4gJzlav0HXrthTyF7XZ9lqo9HKTyb6UvJT3mQHEX0z1qMleF_UbP2A1iZlNyUUxjLBGrwOO_uzWJfBTzE4Nx-d9VaVKlfRgntZPRvBJfNqvx9W1x9Pr5bn9cXns9Xy-KJWjWRdDaMUuB2IaBhWkmuGO90pACzowAlXHERHBi1AtMqQsdWMaD42mNFOaaEHdli9e6h7G8NdNmnqdzYp4xx4E3LqJWtoxynhhWweSBVDStGM_W20O4g_eoL7OaW-pNT_n1Kxvdk3yMPO6H-mv7EU4O0egFSuP0bwyqZHjrdSEEYe-98HV9473bh8b2K_NeCmbY_nxZmsKSYUN0XU8xfo2G_v-avr</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Lamperti, Massimo</creator><creator>Subert, Matteo</creator><creator>Cortellazzi, Paolo</creator><creator>Vailati, Davide</creator><creator>Borrelli, Paola</creator><creator>Montomoli, Cristina</creator><creator>D'Onofrio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Caldiroli, Dario</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author>Lamperti, Massimo ; Subert, Matteo ; Cortellazzi, Paolo ; Vailati, Davide ; Borrelli, Paola ; Montomoli, Cristina ; D'Onofrio, Giovanni ; Caldiroli, Dario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4937-af9806b18430c95d307d7caa082b515c5a871bd8a86ce1f6d31d5f40327cd8db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subert, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortellazzi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vailati, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrelli, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montomoli, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Onofrio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldiroli, Dario</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamperti, Massimo</au><au>Subert, Matteo</au><au>Cortellazzi, Paolo</au><au>Vailati, Davide</au><au>Borrelli, Paola</au><au>Montomoli, Cristina</au><au>D'Onofrio, Giovanni</au><au>Caldiroli, Dario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>777-784</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>The optimal degree of neck rotation during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation remains undetermined because previous studies suggested using sonography, but without puncturing the vein. We assessed whether a neutral position (NP) of the head (0 degrees) during ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was safer than rotating the neck to 45 degrees head turned. The effect of these 2 positions during ultrasound-guided cannulation on major complications was the primary outcome. Overall complications, venous access time, and perception of difficulty during the procedure were also evaluated. A prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded study was conducted in a tertiary neurosurgical hospital. Patients undergoing major elective neurosurgical procedures requiring a central venous line were randomly allocated to 2 groups; ultrasound-guided cannulation of the IJV was then performed using an out-of-plane orientation. One thousand four hundred twenty-four patients were evaluated, but 92 were excluded; 670 were allocated to the head turned group and 662 to the NP group. Cannulation was 100% successful. Demographic data were similar in the 2 groups except for IJV positions. There were only 10 major complications: 6 in the 0-degree NP group and 4 in the 45-degree head turned group. The frequency of these complications was not different between the 2 groups. The overall complication rate was 13%, and was higher in women, in patients with ASA physical status ≥II, and in patients with a smaller diameter vein, or when the vein was located deeper and lateral or in the anterolateral position. An increased venous access time was associated with an increased rate of overall complications. The perception of difficulty performing the procedure with the head placed in the 2 positions was not statistically different in either group. A head NP was as safe as a 45-degree neck rotation during ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation with regard to both major and minor complications, and venous access time was similar. Ultrasound guidance helps determine optimal head rotation for IJV cannulation.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>22253269</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182459917</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2012-04, Vol.114 (4), p.777-784
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_934275215
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Female
Head
Humans
Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neck
Posture
Prospective Studies
Rotation
Ultrasonography
title Is a Neutral Head Position Safer than 45-Degree Neck Rotation During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation? Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%20Neutral%20Head%20Position%20Safer%20than%2045-Degree%20Neck%20Rotation%20During%20Ultrasound-Guided%20Internal%20Jugular%20Vein%20Cannulation?%20Results%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Lamperti,%20Massimo&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=777-784&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182459917&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E934275215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=934275215&rft_id=info:pmid/22253269&rfr_iscdi=true