Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique

Abstract Background Single-site or single-incision laparosopic surgery has recently been developed, but it is difficult to use in more complicated gastric bypass surgery. We have introduced a 2-site modified single-incision laparosopic surgery technique for laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (LR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery for obesity and related diseases 2012-03, Vol.8 (2), p.208-213
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D, Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D, Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D, Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N, Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D, Ser, Kong-Han, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 208
container_title Surgery for obesity and related diseases
container_volume 8
creator Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D
Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D
Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D
Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N
Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D
Ser, Kong-Han, M.D
description Abstract Background Single-site or single-incision laparosopic surgery has recently been developed, but it is difficult to use in more complicated gastric bypass surgery. We have introduced a 2-site modified single-incision laparosopic surgery technique for laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Methods We used the umbilical site incision to place 2 ports (12 and 10 mm) to serve as the video port and working port for the stapler. Another small skin incision was placed at a left lateral abdominal site for the 5-mm working port. Through these working channels, we could use conventional laparoscopic instruments to perform LRYGB. The data from 100 consecutive 2-site LRYGB procedures (February 2009 to September 2009) were compared with the data from 100 traditional LRYGB procedures (September 2008 to January 2009). Results The mean body mass index for the study group was 43 kg/m2 (range 32–61), and mean age was 34 years (range 18–55). The procedures were successfully performed in all but 18 patients. These 18 patients had required an extra skin incision for a 5-mm port to complete the procedures. The mean operating time was 144 minutes (range 95–160), and blood loss was 56 mL (range 20–150). A total of 3 perioperative major complications (3%) occurred, and 6 patients (6%) had minor complications. The 2-site LRYGB group had a significantly longer operating time and more blood loss than the traditional LRYGB group but less pain and better cosmesis. Conclusion Two-site LRYGB generated minimal somatic pain and achieved excellent cosmetic results. We believe it can be applied as routine LRYGB surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soard.2010.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_934257019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550728910008075</els_id><sourcerecordid>934257019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8ccd6e7d075039482cef0d5f947c7c5a9498df04a861f4727a8855cfa69408f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBEjIO1a5-CeOHSSQqoqfSpWQoCxYWb72hPqSxMHjAPcx-sY43BYJNl3ZGp1zxp5vquopoxtGWftit8Fok99wulb4htLmXnXMtNK1kkLcL3cpaa247o6qR4g7SkUrFX9YHXEmmGxbflxdXyY74TJuwxCcHQivMWQgg51tiujiHBz5GJdfNUw1-UK-WsyplLb72SK-JGEKORRbAlyGjCT2hFFKnEVAYidPXBxLUsA4kZ8hX5GcrC-WOBXTP00yuKspfF_gcfWgtwPCk5vzpPr89s3l2fv64sO787PTi9o1TORaO-dbUJ4qSUXXaO6gp172XaOcctJ2Tad9TxurW9Y3iiurtZSut23XUN1LcVI9P-TOKZa2mM0Y0MEw2AnigqYTDZeKsq4oxUHpymsxQW_mFEab9oZRs6IwO_MHhVlRGMZNQVFcz27yl-0I_q_ndvZF8OoggPLLHwGSQRdgcuBDApeNj-GOBq__87uh8CgUv8EecBeXVKaMhhksBvNp3YZ1GQogqsvYxG8TO7JI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>934257019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D ; Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D ; Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D ; Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N ; Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D ; Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D ; Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D ; Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D ; Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N ; Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D ; Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Single-site or single-incision laparosopic surgery has recently been developed, but it is difficult to use in more complicated gastric bypass surgery. We have introduced a 2-site modified single-incision laparosopic surgery technique for laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Methods We used the umbilical site incision to place 2 ports (12 and 10 mm) to serve as the video port and working port for the stapler. Another small skin incision was placed at a left lateral abdominal site for the 5-mm working port. Through these working channels, we could use conventional laparoscopic instruments to perform LRYGB. The data from 100 consecutive 2-site LRYGB procedures (February 2009 to September 2009) were compared with the data from 100 traditional LRYGB procedures (September 2008 to January 2009). Results The mean body mass index for the study group was 43 kg/m2 (range 32–61), and mean age was 34 years (range 18–55). The procedures were successfully performed in all but 18 patients. These 18 patients had required an extra skin incision for a 5-mm port to complete the procedures. The mean operating time was 144 minutes (range 95–160), and blood loss was 56 mL (range 20–150). A total of 3 perioperative major complications (3%) occurred, and 6 patients (6%) had minor complications. The 2-site LRYGB group had a significantly longer operating time and more blood loss than the traditional LRYGB group but less pain and better cosmesis. Conclusion Two-site LRYGB generated minimal somatic pain and achieved excellent cosmetic results. We believe it can be applied as routine LRYGB surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21315662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analgesics - therapeutic use ; Bariatric surgery ; Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Body Mass Index ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Gastric Bypass - methods ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Needles ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery ; Surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Two-site laparoscopic surgery ; Umbilicus - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2012-03, Vol.8 (2), p.208-213</ispartof><rights>American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery</rights><rights>2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8ccd6e7d075039482cef0d5f947c7c5a9498df04a861f4727a8855cfa69408f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8ccd6e7d075039482cef0d5f947c7c5a9498df04a861f4727a8855cfa69408f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21315662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique</title><title>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</title><addtitle>Surg Obes Relat Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Single-site or single-incision laparosopic surgery has recently been developed, but it is difficult to use in more complicated gastric bypass surgery. We have introduced a 2-site modified single-incision laparosopic surgery technique for laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Methods We used the umbilical site incision to place 2 ports (12 and 10 mm) to serve as the video port and working port for the stapler. Another small skin incision was placed at a left lateral abdominal site for the 5-mm working port. Through these working channels, we could use conventional laparoscopic instruments to perform LRYGB. The data from 100 consecutive 2-site LRYGB procedures (February 2009 to September 2009) were compared with the data from 100 traditional LRYGB procedures (September 2008 to January 2009). Results The mean body mass index for the study group was 43 kg/m2 (range 32–61), and mean age was 34 years (range 18–55). The procedures were successfully performed in all but 18 patients. These 18 patients had required an extra skin incision for a 5-mm port to complete the procedures. The mean operating time was 144 minutes (range 95–160), and blood loss was 56 mL (range 20–150). A total of 3 perioperative major complications (3%) occurred, and 6 patients (6%) had minor complications. The 2-site LRYGB group had a significantly longer operating time and more blood loss than the traditional LRYGB group but less pain and better cosmesis. Conclusion Two-site LRYGB generated minimal somatic pain and achieved excellent cosmetic results. We believe it can be applied as routine LRYGB surgery.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bariatric surgery</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Single-incision laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Two-site laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Umbilicus - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1550-7289</issn><issn>1878-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBEjIO1a5-CeOHSSQqoqfSpWQoCxYWb72hPqSxMHjAPcx-sY43BYJNl3ZGp1zxp5vquopoxtGWftit8Fok99wulb4htLmXnXMtNK1kkLcL3cpaa247o6qR4g7SkUrFX9YHXEmmGxbflxdXyY74TJuwxCcHQivMWQgg51tiujiHBz5GJdfNUw1-UK-WsyplLb72SK-JGEKORRbAlyGjCT2hFFKnEVAYidPXBxLUsA4kZ8hX5GcrC-WOBXTP00yuKspfF_gcfWgtwPCk5vzpPr89s3l2fv64sO787PTi9o1TORaO-dbUJ4qSUXXaO6gp172XaOcctJ2Tad9TxurW9Y3iiurtZSut23XUN1LcVI9P-TOKZa2mM0Y0MEw2AnigqYTDZeKsq4oxUHpymsxQW_mFEab9oZRs6IwO_MHhVlRGMZNQVFcz27yl-0I_q_ndvZF8OoggPLLHwGSQRdgcuBDApeNj-GOBq__87uh8CgUv8EecBeXVKaMhhksBvNp3YZ1GQogqsvYxG8TO7JI</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D</creator><creator>Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D</creator><creator>Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N</creator><creator>Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D</creator><creator>Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique</title><author>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D ; Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D ; Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D ; Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N ; Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D ; Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8ccd6e7d075039482cef0d5f947c7c5a9498df04a861f4727a8855cfa69408f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bariatric surgery</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Single-incision laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Two-site laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Umbilicus - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Wei-Jei, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Chen, Jung-Chien, M.D</au><au>Yao, Wei-Cheng, M.D</au><au>Taou, Jun-Jin, S.P.N</au><au>Lee, Yi-Chih, Ph.D</au><au>Ser, Kong-Han, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique</atitle><jtitle>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Obes Relat Dis</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>208-213</pages><issn>1550-7289</issn><eissn>1878-7533</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Single-site or single-incision laparosopic surgery has recently been developed, but it is difficult to use in more complicated gastric bypass surgery. We have introduced a 2-site modified single-incision laparosopic surgery technique for laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Methods We used the umbilical site incision to place 2 ports (12 and 10 mm) to serve as the video port and working port for the stapler. Another small skin incision was placed at a left lateral abdominal site for the 5-mm working port. Through these working channels, we could use conventional laparoscopic instruments to perform LRYGB. The data from 100 consecutive 2-site LRYGB procedures (February 2009 to September 2009) were compared with the data from 100 traditional LRYGB procedures (September 2008 to January 2009). Results The mean body mass index for the study group was 43 kg/m2 (range 32–61), and mean age was 34 years (range 18–55). The procedures were successfully performed in all but 18 patients. These 18 patients had required an extra skin incision for a 5-mm port to complete the procedures. The mean operating time was 144 minutes (range 95–160), and blood loss was 56 mL (range 20–150). A total of 3 perioperative major complications (3%) occurred, and 6 patients (6%) had minor complications. The 2-site LRYGB group had a significantly longer operating time and more blood loss than the traditional LRYGB group but less pain and better cosmesis. Conclusion Two-site LRYGB generated minimal somatic pain and achieved excellent cosmetic results. We believe it can be applied as routine LRYGB surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21315662</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.soard.2010.12.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7289
ispartof Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2012-03, Vol.8 (2), p.208-213
issn 1550-7289
1878-7533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_934257019
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Analgesics - therapeutic use
Bariatric surgery
Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data
Body Mass Index
Equipment Design
Female
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Laparoscopy - methods
Length of Stay
Male
Needles
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Care - methods
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery
Surgery
Suture Techniques
Two-site laparoscopic surgery
Umbilicus - surgery
Young Adult
title Transumbilical 2-site laparoscopic Roux-en- Y gastric bypass: initial results of 100 cases and comparison with traditional laparoscopic technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transumbilical%202-site%20laparoscopic%20Roux-en-%20Y%20gastric%20bypass:%20initial%20results%20of%20100%20cases%20and%20comparison%20with%20traditional%20laparoscopic%20technique&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20for%20obesity%20and%20related%20diseases&rft.au=Lee,%20Wei-Jei,%20M.D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=208-213&rft.issn=1550-7289&rft.eissn=1878-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soard.2010.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E934257019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=934257019&rft_id=info:pmid/21315662&rft_els_id=S1550728910008075&rfr_iscdi=true