Biases in TASER research

Biases in TASER research

Because of different study design and methodology used in the studies mentioned in this article, it is not possible to compare them only by their conclusions, but a review of their methodology details has to be taken into account, as well as their limitations.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American heart journal 2012-03, Vol.163 (3), p.e7-e8
1. Verfasser: Kunz, Sebastian N., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animals
Biomedical Research - economics
Cardiovascular
Foundations
Humans
Medical research
Organizational Affiliation - economics
Periodicals as Topic - economics
Studies
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e8
container_issue 3
container_start_page e7
container_title The American heart journal
container_volume 163
creator Kunz, Sebastian N., MD
description Because of different study design and methodology used in the studies mentioned in this article, it is not possible to compare them only by their conclusions, but a review of their methodology details has to be taken into account, as well as their limitations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_929124159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002870311008970</els_id><sourcerecordid>3238410371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-8a673a1f720d01ef2268911e14f0e6796a62f46adfab5608628082dc9ad2d6743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFLHEEQhZtgyG5M7nqRBQ-eZlJV09MzjSCYRU1ACERzbtqeGrbH2Rnt3g347-3NrgY8eKoueO_x-ishDhFyBFTfutwuupwAMUfKAcsPYoqgq0xVUu6JKQBQVldQTMTnGLu0KqrVJzEhkiSB6qk4-O5t5Djzw-z2_Obi9yxwZBvc4ov42No-8tfd3Bd_Li9u5z-y619XP-fn15mTRbnKaquqwmJbETSA3BKpWiMyyhZYVVpZRa1UtmntXamgTgWgpsZp21CTahb74mSb-xDGxzXHlVn66Ljv7cDjOhpNGkliqZPy-I2yG9dhSOUMliBVofFfHm5VLowxBm7NQ_BLG54MgtlQM51J1MyGmkEyiVryHO2S13dLbl4dL5iS4HQr4ETir-dgovM8OG58YLcyzejfjT9743a9H7yz_T0_cfz_CxOTwdxszra5GiJArdPjGV1jjNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504639174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biases in TASER research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Because of different study design and methodology used in the studies mentioned in this article, it is not possible to compare them only by their conclusions, but a review of their methodology details has to be taken into account, as well as their limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22424028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AHJOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical Research - economics ; Cardiovascular ; Foundations ; Humans ; Medical research ; Organizational Affiliation - economics ; Periodicals as Topic - economics ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The American heart journal, 2012-03, Vol.163 (3), p.e7-e8</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-8a673a1f720d01ef2268911e14f0e6796a62f46adfab5608628082dc9ad2d6743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-8a673a1f720d01ef2268911e14f0e6796a62f46adfab5608628082dc9ad2d6743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1504639174?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Biases in TASER research</title><title>The American heart journal</title><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><description>Because of different study design and methodology used in the studies mentioned in this article, it is not possible to compare them only by their conclusions, but a review of their methodology details has to be taken into account, as well as their limitations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - economics</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Organizational Affiliation - economics</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - economics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0002-8703</issn><issn>1097-6744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFLHEEQhZtgyG5M7nqRBQ-eZlJV09MzjSCYRU1ACERzbtqeGrbH2Rnt3g347-3NrgY8eKoueO_x-ishDhFyBFTfutwuupwAMUfKAcsPYoqgq0xVUu6JKQBQVldQTMTnGLu0KqrVJzEhkiSB6qk4-O5t5Djzw-z2_Obi9yxwZBvc4ov42No-8tfd3Bd_Li9u5z-y619XP-fn15mTRbnKaquqwmJbETSA3BKpWiMyyhZYVVpZRa1UtmntXamgTgWgpsZp21CTahb74mSb-xDGxzXHlVn66Ljv7cDjOhpNGkliqZPy-I2yG9dhSOUMliBVofFfHm5VLowxBm7NQ_BLG54MgtlQM51J1MyGmkEyiVryHO2S13dLbl4dL5iS4HQr4ETir-dgovM8OG58YLcyzejfjT9743a9H7yz_T0_cfz_CxOTwdxszra5GiJArdPjGV1jjNc</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Biases in TASER research</title><author>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-8a673a1f720d01ef2268911e14f0e6796a62f46adfab5608628082dc9ad2d6743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - economics</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Organizational Affiliation - economics</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - economics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kunz, Sebastian N., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biases in TASER research</atitle><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e7</spage><epage>e8</epage><pages>e7-e8</pages><issn>0002-8703</issn><eissn>1097-6744</eissn><coden>AHJOA2</coden><abstract>Because of different study design and methodology used in the studies mentioned in this article, it is not possible to compare them only by their conclusions, but a review of their methodology details has to be taken into account, as well as their limitations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22424028</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.015</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8703
ispartof The American heart journal, 2012-03, Vol.163 (3), p.e7-e8
issn 0002-8703
1097-6744
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_929124159
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Animals
Biomedical Research - economics
Cardiovascular
Foundations
Humans
Medical research
Organizational Affiliation - economics
Periodicals as Topic - economics
Studies
title Biases in TASER research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biases%20in%20TASER%20research&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Kunz,%20Sebastian%20N.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e7&rft.epage=e8&rft.pages=e7-e8&rft.issn=0002-8703&rft.eissn=1097-6744&rft.coden=AHJOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3238410371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504639174&rft_id=info:pmid/22424028&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002870311008970&rfr_iscdi=true