Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010
Abstract In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immuni...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2012-03, Vol.30 (14), p.2399-2404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2404 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 2399 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea Ahmed, Faruque Duclos, Philippe Falck-Ytter, Yngve Forland, Frode Houweling, Hans Kramarz, Piotr Langley, Joanne M Mertens, Thomas Schünemann, Holger Senouci, Kamel Temte, Jonathan Wichmann, Ole |
description | Abstract In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in developing a framework for evidence-based vaccination recommendations, (ii) discuss the applicability of methods like Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and (iii) to identify opportunities for international collaboration to support NITAGs in the development of vaccination recommendations at country-level. Recognizing that a systematic and transparent approach is necessary to promote the quality and acceptance of vaccination recommendations, various decision making frameworks have been implemented by national and international advisory groups addressing common key aspects of knowledge, such as the burden of disease or characteristics of the vaccine. There are several challenges when grading the quality of evidence of some immunization-specific topics (e.g. population-level effects of vaccination). This does not, however, necessitate development of an entirely new systematic methodology. The participants concluded that (i) GRADE or a modification of this methodology is suitable for the grading of quality of evidence related to vaccine effectiveness and safety, and that (ii) international cooperation would be beneficial to develop common framework methodologies for certain aspects of national immunization recommendation developments in order to avoid duplication of efforts, to build on existing strengths, and to support NITAGs worldwide. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_929119994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0264410X1101927X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3379273581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6ead690b325742f5e4d0ec352fcc1e7a70ab4151d005c0a28bac0fd77aa42b913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEotvCIwCWOJTDZvE4TpxciqCCglSBRKnUm-XYE-ptEi92NmhvvAMvwLPxJDi7C0g9wMmy9M2vmfkmSR4BXQCF4vlyMSqtbY8LRgEWwBaU8jvJDEqRpSyH8m4yo6zgKQd6dZAchrCklOYZVPeTA8ZAlIJls-THR1w5PxDXk-EaCYSB2H5A36vBul615KvzN-HarSZi5Z1Gs_YYSOP8tsDgiK1bddjHjIbgaA32GtNaBTRk1-I2injUrouc2X7DnLxC39p-Ts7Qd6rfzAljP799Zxl570bsavQkTkYfJPca1QZ8uH-Pkss3rz-dvk3PP5y9O315nmoO1ZAWqExR0TpjueCsyZEbijrLWaM1oFCCqppDDibuQFPFylpp2hghlOKsriA7So53uXHIL2sMg-xs0Ni2qke3DrJiFUBVVTySz_5JAqVlyRkTE_r0Frp067jbNlI5F1CUkIlI5TtKexeCx0auvO2U38QoOcmWS7mXLSfZEpiMsmPd4336uu7Q_Kn6bTcCT3ZAo5xUn70N8vIiJuSUAmdlwSLxYkdgXO1o0cug7STQ2OhrkMbZ_zZxcitBR6tWq_YGNxj-zitDLJAX001OJwkxs2LiKvsFPjLdCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547168137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea ; Ahmed, Faruque ; Duclos, Philippe ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Forland, Frode ; Houweling, Hans ; Kramarz, Piotr ; Langley, Joanne M ; Mertens, Thomas ; Schünemann, Holger ; Senouci, Kamel ; Temte, Jonathan ; Wichmann, Ole</creator><creatorcontrib>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea ; Ahmed, Faruque ; Duclos, Philippe ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Forland, Frode ; Houweling, Hans ; Kramarz, Piotr ; Langley, Joanne M ; Mertens, Thomas ; Schünemann, Holger ; Senouci, Kamel ; Temte, Jonathan ; Wichmann, Ole</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in developing a framework for evidence-based vaccination recommendations, (ii) discuss the applicability of methods like Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and (iii) to identify opportunities for international collaboration to support NITAGs in the development of vaccination recommendations at country-level. Recognizing that a systematic and transparent approach is necessary to promote the quality and acceptance of vaccination recommendations, various decision making frameworks have been implemented by national and international advisory groups addressing common key aspects of knowledge, such as the burden of disease or characteristics of the vaccine. There are several challenges when grading the quality of evidence of some immunization-specific topics (e.g. population-level effects of vaccination). This does not, however, necessitate development of an entirely new systematic methodology. The participants concluded that (i) GRADE or a modification of this methodology is suitable for the grading of quality of evidence related to vaccine effectiveness and safety, and that (ii) international cooperation would be beneficial to develop common framework methodologies for certain aspects of national immunization recommendation developments in order to avoid duplication of efforts, to build on existing strengths, and to support NITAGs worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22178723</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; burden of disease ; Conferences ; Decision making ; Disease control ; Epidemiology ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; experts ; Immunisation recommendation ; Immunization ; International Cooperation ; Methodology ; Public health ; Reviews ; Vaccination ; Vaccination - legislation & jurisprudence ; Vaccination - standards ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2012-03, Vol.30 (14), p.2399-2404</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 23, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6ead690b325742f5e4d0ec352fcc1e7a70ab4151d005c0a28bac0fd77aa42b913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6ead690b325742f5e4d0ec352fcc1e7a70ab4151d005c0a28bac0fd77aa42b913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1547168137?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22178723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Faruque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duclos, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falck-Ytter, Yngve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forland, Frode</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramarz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schünemann, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senouci, Kamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temte, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Ole</creatorcontrib><title>Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Abstract In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in developing a framework for evidence-based vaccination recommendations, (ii) discuss the applicability of methods like Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and (iii) to identify opportunities for international collaboration to support NITAGs in the development of vaccination recommendations at country-level. Recognizing that a systematic and transparent approach is necessary to promote the quality and acceptance of vaccination recommendations, various decision making frameworks have been implemented by national and international advisory groups addressing common key aspects of knowledge, such as the burden of disease or characteristics of the vaccine. There are several challenges when grading the quality of evidence of some immunization-specific topics (e.g. population-level effects of vaccination). This does not, however, necessitate development of an entirely new systematic methodology. The participants concluded that (i) GRADE or a modification of this methodology is suitable for the grading of quality of evidence related to vaccine effectiveness and safety, and that (ii) international cooperation would be beneficial to develop common framework methodologies for certain aspects of national immunization recommendation developments in order to avoid duplication of efforts, to build on existing strengths, and to support NITAGs worldwide.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>burden of disease</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>experts</subject><subject>Immunisation recommendation</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Vaccination - standards</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEotvCIwCWOJTDZvE4TpxciqCCglSBRKnUm-XYE-ptEi92NmhvvAMvwLPxJDi7C0g9wMmy9M2vmfkmSR4BXQCF4vlyMSqtbY8LRgEWwBaU8jvJDEqRpSyH8m4yo6zgKQd6dZAchrCklOYZVPeTA8ZAlIJls-THR1w5PxDXk-EaCYSB2H5A36vBul615KvzN-HarSZi5Z1Gs_YYSOP8tsDgiK1bddjHjIbgaA32GtNaBTRk1-I2injUrouc2X7DnLxC39p-Ts7Qd6rfzAljP799Zxl570bsavQkTkYfJPca1QZ8uH-Pkss3rz-dvk3PP5y9O315nmoO1ZAWqExR0TpjueCsyZEbijrLWaM1oFCCqppDDibuQFPFylpp2hghlOKsriA7So53uXHIL2sMg-xs0Ni2qke3DrJiFUBVVTySz_5JAqVlyRkTE_r0Frp067jbNlI5F1CUkIlI5TtKexeCx0auvO2U38QoOcmWS7mXLSfZEpiMsmPd4336uu7Q_Kn6bTcCT3ZAo5xUn70N8vIiJuSUAmdlwSLxYkdgXO1o0cug7STQ2OhrkMbZ_zZxcitBR6tWq_YGNxj-zitDLJAX001OJwkxs2LiKvsFPjLdCA</recordid><startdate>20120323</startdate><enddate>20120323</enddate><creator>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea</creator><creator>Ahmed, Faruque</creator><creator>Duclos, Philippe</creator><creator>Falck-Ytter, Yngve</creator><creator>Forland, Frode</creator><creator>Houweling, Hans</creator><creator>Kramarz, Piotr</creator><creator>Langley, Joanne M</creator><creator>Mertens, Thomas</creator><creator>Schünemann, Holger</creator><creator>Senouci, Kamel</creator><creator>Temte, Jonathan</creator><creator>Wichmann, Ole</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120323</creationdate><title>Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010</title><author>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea ; Ahmed, Faruque ; Duclos, Philippe ; Falck-Ytter, Yngve ; Forland, Frode ; Houweling, Hans ; Kramarz, Piotr ; Langley, Joanne M ; Mertens, Thomas ; Schünemann, Holger ; Senouci, Kamel ; Temte, Jonathan ; Wichmann, Ole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6ead690b325742f5e4d0ec352fcc1e7a70ab4151d005c0a28bac0fd77aa42b913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>burden of disease</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>experts</topic><topic>Immunisation recommendation</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Vaccination - standards</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Faruque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duclos, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falck-Ytter, Yngve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forland, Frode</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houweling, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramarz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schünemann, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senouci, Kamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temte, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Ole</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matysiak-Klose, Dorothea</au><au>Ahmed, Faruque</au><au>Duclos, Philippe</au><au>Falck-Ytter, Yngve</au><au>Forland, Frode</au><au>Houweling, Hans</au><au>Kramarz, Piotr</au><au>Langley, Joanne M</au><au>Mertens, Thomas</au><au>Schünemann, Holger</au><au>Senouci, Kamel</au><au>Temte, Jonathan</au><au>Wichmann, Ole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2012-03-23</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2399</spage><epage>2404</epage><pages>2399-2404</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Abstract In November 2010, experts from European and North-American countries met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss improved methods for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations. The objectives of the workshop were to (i) review current procedures and experiences of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in developing a framework for evidence-based vaccination recommendations, (ii) discuss the applicability of methods like Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and (iii) to identify opportunities for international collaboration to support NITAGs in the development of vaccination recommendations at country-level. Recognizing that a systematic and transparent approach is necessary to promote the quality and acceptance of vaccination recommendations, various decision making frameworks have been implemented by national and international advisory groups addressing common key aspects of knowledge, such as the burden of disease or characteristics of the vaccine. There are several challenges when grading the quality of evidence of some immunization-specific topics (e.g. population-level effects of vaccination). This does not, however, necessitate development of an entirely new systematic methodology. The participants concluded that (i) GRADE or a modification of this methodology is suitable for the grading of quality of evidence related to vaccine effectiveness and safety, and that (ii) international cooperation would be beneficial to develop common framework methodologies for certain aspects of national immunization recommendation developments in order to avoid duplication of efforts, to build on existing strengths, and to support NITAGs worldwide.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22178723</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2012-03, Vol.30 (14), p.2399-2404 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_929119994 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Allergy and Immunology burden of disease Conferences Decision making Disease control Epidemiology Evidence-Based Medicine experts Immunisation recommendation Immunization International Cooperation Methodology Public health Reviews Vaccination Vaccination - legislation & jurisprudence Vaccination - standards Vaccines |
title | Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22–23 November 2010 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A55%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Report%20on%20the%201st%20international%20workshop%20on%20procedures%20for%20the%20development%20of%20evidence-based%20vaccination%20recommendations,%20Berlin,%20Germany,%2022%E2%80%9323%20November%202010&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Matysiak-Klose,%20Dorothea&rft.date=2012-03-23&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2399&rft.epage=2404&rft.pages=2399-2404&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3379273581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547168137&rft_id=info:pmid/22178723&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0264410X1101927X&rfr_iscdi=true |