Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence
This study tests two hypotheses regarding factors affecting arrest of the perpetrator in domestic violence incidents. Black’s relational-distance thesis is that the probability of arrest increases with increasing relational distance between perpetrator and victim. Klinger’s leniency principle sugges...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crime and delinquency 2012-01, Vol.58 (1), p.103-123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Crime and delinquency |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Lally, William DeMaris, Alfred |
description | This study tests two hypotheses regarding factors affecting arrest of the perpetrator in domestic violence incidents. Black’s relational-distance thesis is that the probability of arrest increases with increasing relational distance between perpetrator and victim. Klinger’s leniency principle suggests that the probability of arrest is lower for male perpetrators assaulting female intimate partners, compared with other scenarios. The authors employed marginal logistic regression models using incident-based data from the National Survey of Violence and Threats of Violence Against Women and Men in the United States, 1994-1996, to test both effects. They found support for Black’s thesis: The likelihood of arrest was lower when the perpetrator was an acquaintance, a relative, or a romantic partner of the victim, versus a stranger. However, the authors’ results failed to support Klinger’s hypothesis. They found that men were more likely to be arrested when assaulting a female—regardless of relationship status—compared with assaulting another male. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0011128711420102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928987190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ955515</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0011128711420102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>928987190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae2b28a7c4bb11989998e4a05ee8b046be2e98cdc19e7e8f93dba6ab8832e9703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3Dx6KF71U89JmSY5jm1MZCKLiraTpq2R0zUy6g_-9KRUFQd_lPfh-70v4HiGnQK8AhLimFACYFAA5o0DZHhkB5yzNpHjdJ6NeTnv9kByFsKaxMgUjslxiW6FPdFslj9jozrpWN-nchk63BpNFXaPpQmLbZOo9hjjWzidzt4mzNcmLdQ1G8Jgc1LoJePLVx-T5ZvE0u01XD8u72XSVmkzlXaqRlUxqYfKyBFBSKSUx15QjypLmkxIZKmkqAwoFylplVaknupQyi4Kg2ZhcDL5b79538Q_FxgaDTaNbdLtQKCZVDEH15OW_JFCQGeeRjuj5L3Ttdj7m0PuxmKCgeYToABnvQvBYF1tvN9p_RKeiP0Hx-wRx5WxYQW_NN764V5xz4FFOBznoN_x58k-7TydmjS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922387704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lally, William ; DeMaris, Alfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Lally, William ; DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><description>This study tests two hypotheses regarding factors affecting arrest of the perpetrator in domestic violence incidents. Black’s relational-distance thesis is that the probability of arrest increases with increasing relational distance between perpetrator and victim. Klinger’s leniency principle suggests that the probability of arrest is lower for male perpetrators assaulting female intimate partners, compared with other scenarios. The authors employed marginal logistic regression models using incident-based data from the National Survey of Violence and Threats of Violence Against Women and Men in the United States, 1994-1996, to test both effects. They found support for Black’s thesis: The likelihood of arrest was lower when the perpetrator was an acquaintance, a relative, or a romantic partner of the victim, versus a stranger. However, the authors’ results failed to support Klinger’s hypothesis. They found that men were more likely to be arrested when assaulting a female—regardless of relationship status—compared with assaulting another male.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011128711420102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRDLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Arrest ; Arrests ; Domestic violence ; Family Violence ; Females ; Gender ; Gender Differences ; Hypothesis testing ; Interpersonal relations ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Intimacy ; Law Enforcement ; Males ; National Surveys ; Partner Abuse ; Personal relationships ; Police ; Probability ; Regression (Statistics) ; Regression analysis ; Sex ; Surveys ; Threat ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Victims ; Victims of Crime ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 2012-01, Vol.58 (1), p.103-123</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jan 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae2b28a7c4bb11989998e4a05ee8b046be2e98cdc19e7e8f93dba6ab8832e9703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae2b28a7c4bb11989998e4a05ee8b046be2e98cdc19e7e8f93dba6ab8832e9703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011128711420102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011128711420102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ955515$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lally, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><title>Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>This study tests two hypotheses regarding factors affecting arrest of the perpetrator in domestic violence incidents. Black’s relational-distance thesis is that the probability of arrest increases with increasing relational distance between perpetrator and victim. Klinger’s leniency principle suggests that the probability of arrest is lower for male perpetrators assaulting female intimate partners, compared with other scenarios. The authors employed marginal logistic regression models using incident-based data from the National Survey of Violence and Threats of Violence Against Women and Men in the United States, 1994-1996, to test both effects. They found support for Black’s thesis: The likelihood of arrest was lower when the perpetrator was an acquaintance, a relative, or a romantic partner of the victim, versus a stranger. However, the authors’ results failed to support Klinger’s hypothesis. They found that men were more likely to be arrested when assaulting a female—regardless of relationship status—compared with assaulting another male.</description><subject>Arrest</subject><subject>Arrests</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Partner Abuse</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of Crime</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3Dx6KF71U89JmSY5jm1MZCKLiraTpq2R0zUy6g_-9KRUFQd_lPfh-70v4HiGnQK8AhLimFACYFAA5o0DZHhkB5yzNpHjdJ6NeTnv9kByFsKaxMgUjslxiW6FPdFslj9jozrpWN-nchk63BpNFXaPpQmLbZOo9hjjWzidzt4mzNcmLdQ1G8Jgc1LoJePLVx-T5ZvE0u01XD8u72XSVmkzlXaqRlUxqYfKyBFBSKSUx15QjypLmkxIZKmkqAwoFylplVaknupQyi4Kg2ZhcDL5b79538Q_FxgaDTaNbdLtQKCZVDEH15OW_JFCQGeeRjuj5L3Ttdj7m0PuxmKCgeYToABnvQvBYF1tvN9p_RKeiP0Hx-wRx5WxYQW_NN764V5xz4FFOBznoN_x58k-7TydmjS8</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lally, William</creator><creator>DeMaris, Alfred</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence</title><author>Lally, William ; DeMaris, Alfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae2b28a7c4bb11989998e4a05ee8b046be2e98cdc19e7e8f93dba6ab8832e9703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arrest</topic><topic>Arrests</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Partner Abuse</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of Crime</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lally, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMaris, Alfred</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lally, William</au><au>DeMaris, Alfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ955515</ericid><atitle>Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>103-123</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><coden>CRDLAL</coden><abstract>This study tests two hypotheses regarding factors affecting arrest of the perpetrator in domestic violence incidents. Black’s relational-distance thesis is that the probability of arrest increases with increasing relational distance between perpetrator and victim. Klinger’s leniency principle suggests that the probability of arrest is lower for male perpetrators assaulting female intimate partners, compared with other scenarios. The authors employed marginal logistic regression models using incident-based data from the National Survey of Violence and Threats of Violence Against Women and Men in the United States, 1994-1996, to test both effects. They found support for Black’s thesis: The likelihood of arrest was lower when the perpetrator was an acquaintance, a relative, or a romantic partner of the victim, versus a stranger. However, the authors’ results failed to support Klinger’s hypothesis. They found that men were more likely to be arrested when assaulting a female—regardless of relationship status—compared with assaulting another male.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011128711420102</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-1287 |
ispartof | Crime and delinquency, 2012-01, Vol.58 (1), p.103-123 |
issn | 0011-1287 1552-387X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928987190 |
source | Access via SAGE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Arrest Arrests Domestic violence Family Violence Females Gender Gender Differences Hypothesis testing Interpersonal relations Interpersonal Relationship Intimacy Law Enforcement Males National Surveys Partner Abuse Personal relationships Police Probability Regression (Statistics) Regression analysis Sex Surveys Threat U.S.A United States of America Victims Victims of Crime Violence |
title | Gender and Relational-Distance Effects in Arrests for Domestic Violence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20and%20Relational-Distance%20Effects%20in%20Arrests%20for%20Domestic%20Violence&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Lally,%20William&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=103-123&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft.coden=CRDLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011128711420102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E928987190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922387704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ955515&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011128711420102&rfr_iscdi=true |