Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance
Purpose This paper describes the development of a Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale (ICS) and assesses the psychometric properties of this instrument. The ICS is one of the few tools available to measure a global level of illness concepts or health beliefs and has been widely used in a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2012-04, Vol.47 (4), p.597-606 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 606 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 597 |
| container_title | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Kao, Yu-Chen Liu, Yia-Ping Chou, Ming-Kuen Cheng, Tsung-Hsing |
| description | Purpose
This paper describes the development of a Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale (ICS) and assesses the psychometric properties of this instrument. The ICS is one of the few tools available to measure a global level of illness concepts or health beliefs and has been widely used in a range of clinical and research settings. The ICS has already been translated into several languages, but there is no validated Taiwanese version.
Methods
The English version of the ICS was translated into Taiwanese (ICS-T) and applied in this study. A total of 192 participants with and without psychoses completed the ICS-T and additional evaluations to assess psychopathology and medication compliance. Psychometric properties (factor structures and various types of reliability and validity) were assessed for this translated questionnaire.
Results
Overall, the ICS-T showed good reliability and stability over time. Its scale is comprised of a seven-factor solution, as in the original ICS. Following the validation of the internal structure of this scale, we obtained the total ICS-T score, representing the measurement of an individual’s illness concepts by subtracting the scores of the guilt, idiosyncratic assumption, and negative expectation subscales from those of the trust in medication, trust in physician, susceptibility, and chance control subscales. In comparison analyses, the differences in mean total scores between individuals with and without psychoses were not significant. No significant association was found between the ICS and psychopathology. However, both the total and six out of seven subscales of the ICS-T showed a significant connection with compliance.
Conclusions
In light of these findings, we believe that the ICS-T is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of illness concepts in research and clinical settings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A716457613</galeid><sourcerecordid>A716457613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a2d6d27ecba7ee46f1b7a381beb1b6f637da9c88ed5f57d53e22a41d56db4e253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEokvhAbggC1RxSvGfxE64VasClSqBRDlbjjPZdeXEwfaC9kV4XmbJlgoE8sHW-PfNeD5PUTxn9JxRqt4kShlXJWWspEKKcv-gWLFKiLLlTf2wWNEWz6qtq5PiSUq3lFLRKvG4OOFMKNHyelX8-JT2dhtGyNFZMscwQ8wOEgkDyVsgN8Z9NxMkIN8gJhemu4sr7zGcyDpMFuZMPlvj4S2J4E0-YlswPm9JB97BkEgOZP5VbDZ5G3zY7ImZejJC7-yisWGcvTOY8GnxaDA-wbPjflp8eXd5s_5QXn98f7W-uC5txdpcGt7LniuwnVEAlRxYp4xoWAcd6-QghepNa5sG-nqoVV8L4NxUrK9l31XAa3FavF7yYudfd5CyHl2y4D32HHZJo5EtbdBlJF_-Rd6GXZzwcQeIMsl5i9CrBdqgGdpNQ8jR2ENKfaGYrGolmUDq_B8Urh5GZ8MEg8P4HwK2CGwMKUUY9BzdaOJeM6oPk6CXSdA4CfowCXqPmhfH9-46tPi34u7rETg7Aibh3w0RfXfpnqtl1XB5KM4XLuHVtIF43_j_q_8ExuXNug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928016229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kao, Yu-Chen ; Liu, Yia-Ping ; Chou, Ming-Kuen ; Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</creator><creatorcontrib>Kao, Yu-Chen ; Liu, Yia-Ping ; Chou, Ming-Kuen ; Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This paper describes the development of a Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale (ICS) and assesses the psychometric properties of this instrument. The ICS is one of the few tools available to measure a global level of illness concepts or health beliefs and has been widely used in a range of clinical and research settings. The ICS has already been translated into several languages, but there is no validated Taiwanese version.
Methods
The English version of the ICS was translated into Taiwanese (ICS-T) and applied in this study. A total of 192 participants with and without psychoses completed the ICS-T and additional evaluations to assess psychopathology and medication compliance. Psychometric properties (factor structures and various types of reliability and validity) were assessed for this translated questionnaire.
Results
Overall, the ICS-T showed good reliability and stability over time. Its scale is comprised of a seven-factor solution, as in the original ICS. Following the validation of the internal structure of this scale, we obtained the total ICS-T score, representing the measurement of an individual’s illness concepts by subtracting the scores of the guilt, idiosyncratic assumption, and negative expectation subscales from those of the trust in medication, trust in physician, susceptibility, and chance control subscales. In comparison analyses, the differences in mean total scores between individuals with and without psychoses were not significant. No significant association was found between the ICS and psychopathology. However, both the total and six out of seven subscales of the ICS-T showed a significant connection with compliance.
Conclusions
In light of these findings, we believe that the ICS-T is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of illness concepts in research and clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-9285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21373925</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPPEEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Armed forces ; Biological and medical sciences ; Compliance ; Costs ; Epidemiology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology, Pathological ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics - standards ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Taiwan ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2012-04, Vol.47 (4), p.597-606</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a2d6d27ecba7ee46f1b7a381beb1b6f637da9c88ed5f57d53e22a41d56db4e253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25648263$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21373925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kao, Yu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yia-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Ming-Kuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance</title><title>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</title><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
This paper describes the development of a Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale (ICS) and assesses the psychometric properties of this instrument. The ICS is one of the few tools available to measure a global level of illness concepts or health beliefs and has been widely used in a range of clinical and research settings. The ICS has already been translated into several languages, but there is no validated Taiwanese version.
Methods
The English version of the ICS was translated into Taiwanese (ICS-T) and applied in this study. A total of 192 participants with and without psychoses completed the ICS-T and additional evaluations to assess psychopathology and medication compliance. Psychometric properties (factor structures and various types of reliability and validity) were assessed for this translated questionnaire.
Results
Overall, the ICS-T showed good reliability and stability over time. Its scale is comprised of a seven-factor solution, as in the original ICS. Following the validation of the internal structure of this scale, we obtained the total ICS-T score, representing the measurement of an individual’s illness concepts by subtracting the scores of the guilt, idiosyncratic assumption, and negative expectation subscales from those of the trust in medication, trust in physician, susceptibility, and chance control subscales. In comparison analyses, the differences in mean total scores between individuals with and without psychoses were not significant. No significant association was found between the ICS and psychopathology. However, both the total and six out of seven subscales of the ICS-T showed a significant connection with compliance.
Conclusions
In light of these findings, we believe that the ICS-T is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of illness concepts in research and clinical settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology, Pathological</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sickness Impact Profile</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0933-7954</issn><issn>1433-9285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEokvhAbggC1RxSvGfxE64VasClSqBRDlbjjPZdeXEwfaC9kV4XmbJlgoE8sHW-PfNeD5PUTxn9JxRqt4kShlXJWWspEKKcv-gWLFKiLLlTf2wWNEWz6qtq5PiSUq3lFLRKvG4OOFMKNHyelX8-JT2dhtGyNFZMscwQ8wOEgkDyVsgN8Z9NxMkIN8gJhemu4sr7zGcyDpMFuZMPlvj4S2J4E0-YlswPm9JB97BkEgOZP5VbDZ5G3zY7ImZejJC7-yisWGcvTOY8GnxaDA-wbPjflp8eXd5s_5QXn98f7W-uC5txdpcGt7LniuwnVEAlRxYp4xoWAcd6-QghepNa5sG-nqoVV8L4NxUrK9l31XAa3FavF7yYudfd5CyHl2y4D32HHZJo5EtbdBlJF_-Rd6GXZzwcQeIMsl5i9CrBdqgGdpNQ8jR2ENKfaGYrGolmUDq_B8Urh5GZ8MEg8P4HwK2CGwMKUUY9BzdaOJeM6oPk6CXSdA4CfowCXqPmhfH9-46tPi34u7rETg7Aibh3w0RfXfpnqtl1XB5KM4XLuHVtIF43_j_q_8ExuXNug</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Kao, Yu-Chen</creator><creator>Liu, Yia-Ping</creator><creator>Chou, Ming-Kuen</creator><creator>Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance</title><author>Kao, Yu-Chen ; Liu, Yia-Ping ; Chou, Ming-Kuen ; Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a2d6d27ecba7ee46f1b7a381beb1b6f637da9c88ed5f57d53e22a41d56db4e253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology, Pathological</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sickness Impact Profile</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kao, Yu-Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yia-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Ming-Kuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kao, Yu-Chen</au><au>Liu, Yia-Ping</au><au>Chou, Ming-Kuen</au><au>Cheng, Tsung-Hsing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance</atitle><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle><stitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</stitle><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>597-606</pages><issn>0933-7954</issn><eissn>1433-9285</eissn><coden>SPPEEM</coden><abstract>Purpose
This paper describes the development of a Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale (ICS) and assesses the psychometric properties of this instrument. The ICS is one of the few tools available to measure a global level of illness concepts or health beliefs and has been widely used in a range of clinical and research settings. The ICS has already been translated into several languages, but there is no validated Taiwanese version.
Methods
The English version of the ICS was translated into Taiwanese (ICS-T) and applied in this study. A total of 192 participants with and without psychoses completed the ICS-T and additional evaluations to assess psychopathology and medication compliance. Psychometric properties (factor structures and various types of reliability and validity) were assessed for this translated questionnaire.
Results
Overall, the ICS-T showed good reliability and stability over time. Its scale is comprised of a seven-factor solution, as in the original ICS. Following the validation of the internal structure of this scale, we obtained the total ICS-T score, representing the measurement of an individual’s illness concepts by subtracting the scores of the guilt, idiosyncratic assumption, and negative expectation subscales from those of the trust in medication, trust in physician, susceptibility, and chance control subscales. In comparison analyses, the differences in mean total scores between individuals with and without psychoses were not significant. No significant association was found between the ICS and psychopathology. However, both the total and six out of seven subscales of the ICS-T showed a significant connection with compliance.
Conclusions
In light of these findings, we believe that the ICS-T is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of illness concepts in research and clinical settings.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21373925</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0933-7954 |
| ispartof | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2012-04, Vol.47 (4), p.597-606 |
| issn | 0933-7954 1433-9285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908012 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Adult Analysis Armed forces Biological and medical sciences Compliance Costs Epidemiology Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Language Male Medical research Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Mental disorders Mental health Middle Aged Original Paper Patient Compliance Patients Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychological aspects Psychology, Pathological Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics - standards Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - psychology Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - diagnosis Sickness Impact Profile Surveys and Questionnaires Taiwan Techniques and methods |
| title | Psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Illness Concept Scale: relation of health beliefs to psychopathology and medication compliance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A52%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20properties%20of%20the%20Taiwanese%20version%20of%20the%20Illness%20Concept%20Scale:%20relation%20of%20health%20beliefs%20to%20psychopathology%20and%20medication%20compliance&rft.jtitle=Social%20Psychiatry%20and%20Psychiatric%20Epidemiology&rft.au=Kao,%20Yu-Chen&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=597-606&rft.issn=0933-7954&rft.eissn=1433-9285&rft.coden=SPPEEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00127-011-0363-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA716457613%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928016229&rft_id=info:pmid/21373925&rft_galeid=A716457613&rfr_iscdi=true |