Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance
The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on inpu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 2012-03, Vol.97 (2), p.435-447 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 447 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 435 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Stewart, Greg L. Courtright, Stephen H. Barrick, Murray R. |
| description | The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0025303 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927991393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ966166</ericid><sourcerecordid>2614828861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-536ddbe18696b7594a2ebdad8ea3d1b464ff2547163e6dcc889c5c0eb7d254c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFrFDEQx4Mo9qyCH0Ak-KIgq8lmk2z6pketlVOLHvgYsslsTd3Nrslu4b69We5awYfi0_Cf-c38mWQQekrJG0qYfGsIKTkj7B5aUcVUQWte3UernKWFIpQcoUcpXRFCK6bIQ3RU0lpxxssV2l0AxOK9SeDweghTHDrsA_4OXVt8NsFc-nCJt2D6dII3Pvxa5Dcz-SGYDpvg8Jch9llfAz4PbTdDsIB_-Olnls5fezcfuLM4zCO-gNguDZl6jB60pkvw5BCP0fbD6Xb9sdh8PTtfv9sUpuJqKjgTzjVAa6FEI7mqTAmNM64GwxxtKlG1bckrSQUD4ayta2W5JdBIl9OWHaOX-7FjHH7PkCbd-2Sh60yAYU5alVIpyhTL5Ks7SUpKKaQQvP4flBElVE0y-uIf9GqYY369xVoxqbhkd0F5n4rnTcRfUxuHlCK0eoy-N3GX7fRyBvrmDDL6_DBvbnpwt-DNv2fg2R6A6O1t-fSTEoKKxer1vmxGo8e0syZO3naQ7BwjhEmbsdNK6lJXjLM_FKrDng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889452546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Stewart, Greg L. ; Courtright, Stephen H. ; Barrick, Murray R.</creator><contributor>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Greg L. ; Courtright, Stephen H. ; Barrick, Murray R. ; Kozlowski, Steve W. J</creatorcontrib><description>The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0025303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21895352</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Cohesion ; Control Groups ; Cooperative Behavior ; Effective Schools Research ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Factories ; Female ; Goals ; Group Cohesion ; Group dynamics ; Group Performance ; Human ; Humans ; Industry - manpower ; Industry - organization & administration ; Interpersonal Control ; Interpersonal Influences ; Job performance ; Leadership ; Male ; Management theory ; Motivation ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational behaviour ; Peer Group ; Peer Groups ; Peers ; Rationality ; Research Methodology ; Reward ; Rewards ; Salaries ; School Effectiveness ; Self Management ; Self-Managing Work Teams ; Selfmanagement programmes ; Social influence ; Social norms ; Social Perception ; Statistical Analysis ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Team work ; Teams ; Teamwork ; United States (Midwest)</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2012-03, Vol.97 (2), p.435-447</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-536ddbe18696b7594a2ebdad8ea3d1b464ff2547163e6dcc889c5c0eb7d254c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ966166$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21895352$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Greg L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtright, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrick, Murray R.</creatorcontrib><title>Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Effective Schools Research</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Factories</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Group Cohesion</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group Performance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry - manpower</subject><subject>Industry - organization & administration</subject><subject>Interpersonal Control</subject><subject>Interpersonal Influences</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Peer Groups</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Salaries</subject><subject>School Effectiveness</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Self-Managing Work Teams</subject><subject>Selfmanagement programmes</subject><subject>Social influence</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Team work</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>United States (Midwest)</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFrFDEQx4Mo9qyCH0Ak-KIgq8lmk2z6pketlVOLHvgYsslsTd3Nrslu4b69We5awYfi0_Cf-c38mWQQekrJG0qYfGsIKTkj7B5aUcVUQWte3UernKWFIpQcoUcpXRFCK6bIQ3RU0lpxxssV2l0AxOK9SeDweghTHDrsA_4OXVt8NsFc-nCJt2D6dII3Pvxa5Dcz-SGYDpvg8Jch9llfAz4PbTdDsIB_-Olnls5fezcfuLM4zCO-gNguDZl6jB60pkvw5BCP0fbD6Xb9sdh8PTtfv9sUpuJqKjgTzjVAa6FEI7mqTAmNM64GwxxtKlG1bckrSQUD4ayta2W5JdBIl9OWHaOX-7FjHH7PkCbd-2Sh60yAYU5alVIpyhTL5Ks7SUpKKaQQvP4flBElVE0y-uIf9GqYY369xVoxqbhkd0F5n4rnTcRfUxuHlCK0eoy-N3GX7fRyBvrmDDL6_DBvbnpwt-DNv2fg2R6A6O1t-fSTEoKKxer1vmxGo8e0syZO3naQ7BwjhEmbsdNK6lJXjLM_FKrDng</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Stewart, Greg L.</creator><creator>Courtright, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Barrick, Murray R.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance</title><author>Stewart, Greg L. ; Courtright, Stephen H. ; Barrick, Murray R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a459t-536ddbe18696b7594a2ebdad8ea3d1b464ff2547163e6dcc889c5c0eb7d254c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Effective Schools Research</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Factories</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Group Cohesion</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group Performance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry - manpower</topic><topic>Industry - organization & administration</topic><topic>Interpersonal Control</topic><topic>Interpersonal Influences</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Peer Groups</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Salaries</topic><topic>School Effectiveness</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Self-Managing Work Teams</topic><topic>Selfmanagement programmes</topic><topic>Social influence</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Team work</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>United States (Midwest)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Greg L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtright, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrick, Murray R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, Greg L.</au><au>Courtright, Stephen H.</au><au>Barrick, Murray R.</au><au>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ966166</ericid><atitle>Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>435-447</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21895352</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0025303</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 2012-03, Vol.97 (2), p.435-447 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927991393 |
| source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult Adults Cohesion Control Groups Cooperative Behavior Effective Schools Research Employee Performance Appraisal Factories Female Goals Group Cohesion Group dynamics Group Performance Human Humans Industry - manpower Industry - organization & administration Interpersonal Control Interpersonal Influences Job performance Leadership Male Management theory Motivation Organizational behavior Organizational behaviour Peer Group Peer Groups Peers Rationality Research Methodology Reward Rewards Salaries School Effectiveness Self Management Self-Managing Work Teams Selfmanagement programmes Social influence Social norms Social Perception Statistical Analysis Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Task Performance and Analysis Team work Teams Teamwork United States (Midwest) |
| title | Peer-Based Control in Self-Managing Teams: Linking Rational and Normative Influence With Individual and Group Performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A28%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer-Based%20Control%20in%20Self-Managing%20Teams:%20Linking%20Rational%20and%20Normative%20Influence%20With%20Individual%20and%20Group%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Stewart,%20Greg%20L.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=435-447&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0025303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614828861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889452546&rft_id=info:pmid/21895352&rft_ericid=EJ966166&rfr_iscdi=true |