The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK
Background. The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The firs...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family practice 2012-04, Vol.29 (suppl_1), p.i139-i144 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | i144 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_1 |
container_start_page | i139 |
container_title | Family practice |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Counterweight Project Team |
description | Background. The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The first two phases linked the Counterweight Programme to a primary care cardiovascular disease prevention programme; the third phase was commissioned independent of other interventions.
Aim. To assess the implementation of the Counterweight Programme in 13 Health Boards in Scotland and compare 12-month outcomes with published Counterweight data.
Methods. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 with at least one co-morbidity were screened for the Counterweight Programme. Patients were asked to attend nine structured appointments with a trained Counterweight Programme practitioner over 12 months.
Results. Six thousand seven hundred and fifteen patients from 184 general practices, 16 pharmacies and one centralized community-based service in 13 Health Boards, with a mean BMI of 37 kg/m2 were enrolled in the Counterweight Programme. Twenty-six per cent had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Attendance for patients at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up was 55%, 37% and 28%. Of those who attended at 12 months, 35.2% had maintained a weight loss of ≥5% compared to 30.7% in the original evaluation.
Conclusions. Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland demonstrated consistency in characteristics of patients enrolled into the programme. There was evidence of higher loss to follow-up in a population not routinely engaging with primary care but evidence of greater weight losses among those who attended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/fampra/cmr074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/fampra/cmr074</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1438663662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-56790e477609b3cfcfc868e9e93d1e87d641a1904826d00d2f6df18eda5ba27d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbH0s3Up2ujB2XpnJLEvxhQUF23WYZm7aSCcTZyaI_95Iqu6Uu_jgcvju5SB0RvA1wYpNKm1bryel9VjyPTQmXOCUUqr20RhTwVJKmBihoxBeMcZSZvIQjShlSmWcj9F0sYGktu0WLDRRx9o1iauS2G9nrmsi-Heo15uYPHu39tranm6Sl9LFrW7MVbJ8PEEHld4GON3lMVre3ixm9-n86e5hNp2nJVMyppmQCgOXUmC1YmXVTy5yUKCYIZBLIzjRRGGeU2EwNrQSpiI5GJ2tNJWGHaOLobf17q2DEAtbhxK2_R_gulAoKpXCkuQ9efknSTjLhWBC0B5NB7T0LgQPVdH62mr_URBcfPktBr_F4Lfnz3fV3cqC-aG_hf7edl37T9cnEOyFFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1438663662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Counterweight Project Team</creator><creatorcontrib>Counterweight Project Team ; Counterweight Project Team</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The first two phases linked the Counterweight Programme to a primary care cardiovascular disease prevention programme; the third phase was commissioned independent of other interventions.
Aim. To assess the implementation of the Counterweight Programme in 13 Health Boards in Scotland and compare 12-month outcomes with published Counterweight data.
Methods. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 with at least one co-morbidity were screened for the Counterweight Programme. Patients were asked to attend nine structured appointments with a trained Counterweight Programme practitioner over 12 months.
Results. Six thousand seven hundred and fifteen patients from 184 general practices, 16 pharmacies and one centralized community-based service in 13 Health Boards, with a mean BMI of 37 kg/m2 were enrolled in the Counterweight Programme. Twenty-six per cent had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Attendance for patients at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up was 55%, 37% and 28%. Of those who attended at 12 months, 35.2% had maintained a weight loss of ≥5% compared to 30.7% in the original evaluation.
Conclusions. Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland demonstrated consistency in characteristics of patients enrolled into the programme. There was evidence of higher loss to follow-up in a population not routinely engaging with primary care but evidence of greater weight losses among those who attended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22399544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Mass Index ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Health boards ; Health Promotion - organization & administration ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Obesity - prevention & control ; Pharmacies ; Primary health care ; Primary Prevention - organization & administration ; Program Development ; Scotland ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Family practice, 2012-04, Vol.29 (suppl_1), p.i139-i144</ispartof><rights>The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-56790e477609b3cfcfc868e9e93d1e87d641a1904826d00d2f6df18eda5ba27d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-56790e477609b3cfcfc868e9e93d1e87d641a1904826d00d2f6df18eda5ba27d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22399544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Counterweight Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counterweight Project Team</creatorcontrib><title>The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK</title><title>Family practice</title><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><description>Background. The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The first two phases linked the Counterweight Programme to a primary care cardiovascular disease prevention programme; the third phase was commissioned independent of other interventions.
Aim. To assess the implementation of the Counterweight Programme in 13 Health Boards in Scotland and compare 12-month outcomes with published Counterweight data.
Methods. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 with at least one co-morbidity were screened for the Counterweight Programme. Patients were asked to attend nine structured appointments with a trained Counterweight Programme practitioner over 12 months.
Results. Six thousand seven hundred and fifteen patients from 184 general practices, 16 pharmacies and one centralized community-based service in 13 Health Boards, with a mean BMI of 37 kg/m2 were enrolled in the Counterweight Programme. Twenty-six per cent had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Attendance for patients at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up was 55%, 37% and 28%. Of those who attended at 12 months, 35.2% had maintained a weight loss of ≥5% compared to 30.7% in the original evaluation.
Conclusions. Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland demonstrated consistency in characteristics of patients enrolled into the programme. There was evidence of higher loss to follow-up in a population not routinely engaging with primary care but evidence of greater weight losses among those who attended.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health boards</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pharmacies</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Prevention - organization & administration</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0263-2136</issn><issn>1460-2229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbH0s3Up2ujB2XpnJLEvxhQUF23WYZm7aSCcTZyaI_95Iqu6Uu_jgcvju5SB0RvA1wYpNKm1bryel9VjyPTQmXOCUUqr20RhTwVJKmBihoxBeMcZSZvIQjShlSmWcj9F0sYGktu0WLDRRx9o1iauS2G9nrmsi-Heo15uYPHu39tranm6Sl9LFrW7MVbJ8PEEHld4GON3lMVre3ixm9-n86e5hNp2nJVMyppmQCgOXUmC1YmXVTy5yUKCYIZBLIzjRRGGeU2EwNrQSpiI5GJ2tNJWGHaOLobf17q2DEAtbhxK2_R_gulAoKpXCkuQ9efknSTjLhWBC0B5NB7T0LgQPVdH62mr_URBcfPktBr_F4Lfnz3fV3cqC-aG_hf7edl37T9cnEOyFFQ</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Counterweight Project Team</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK</title><author>Counterweight Project Team</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-56790e477609b3cfcfc868e9e93d1e87d641a1904826d00d2f6df18eda5ba27d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health boards</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pharmacies</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Prevention - organization & administration</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Counterweight Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counterweight Project Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Counterweight Project Team</au><aucorp>Counterweight Project Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK</atitle><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>i139</spage><epage>i144</epage><pages>i139-i144</pages><issn>0263-2136</issn><eissn>1460-2229</eissn><abstract>Background. The Counterweight Programme is a proven model for the management of obesity in the UK, evaluated over 5 years (2000-05) and demonstrating clinical and cost effectiveness. The Scottish Government commissioned three phases of Counterweight implementation during the period 2006-08. The first two phases linked the Counterweight Programme to a primary care cardiovascular disease prevention programme; the third phase was commissioned independent of other interventions.
Aim. To assess the implementation of the Counterweight Programme in 13 Health Boards in Scotland and compare 12-month outcomes with published Counterweight data.
Methods. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 with at least one co-morbidity were screened for the Counterweight Programme. Patients were asked to attend nine structured appointments with a trained Counterweight Programme practitioner over 12 months.
Results. Six thousand seven hundred and fifteen patients from 184 general practices, 16 pharmacies and one centralized community-based service in 13 Health Boards, with a mean BMI of 37 kg/m2 were enrolled in the Counterweight Programme. Twenty-six per cent had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Attendance for patients at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up was 55%, 37% and 28%. Of those who attended at 12 months, 35.2% had maintained a weight loss of ≥5% compared to 30.7% in the original evaluation.
Conclusions. Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland demonstrated consistency in characteristics of patients enrolled into the programme. There was evidence of higher loss to follow-up in a population not routinely engaging with primary care but evidence of greater weight losses among those who attended.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>22399544</pmid><doi>10.1093/fampra/cmr074</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-2136 |
ispartof | Family practice, 2012-04, Vol.29 (suppl_1), p.i139-i144 |
issn | 0263-2136 1460-2229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990718 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Body Mass Index Female Health Behavior Health boards Health Promotion - organization & administration Humans Male Middle Aged Obesity - epidemiology Obesity - prevention & control Pharmacies Primary health care Primary Prevention - organization & administration Program Development Scotland Scotland - epidemiology Weight Loss |
title | The implementation of the Counterweight Programme in Scotland, UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20implementation%20of%20the%20Counterweight%20Programme%20in%20Scotland,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Family%20practice&rft.au=Counterweight%20Project%20Team&rft.aucorp=Counterweight%20Project%20Team&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=i139&rft.epage=i144&rft.pages=i139-i144&rft.issn=0263-2136&rft.eissn=1460-2229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/fampra/cmr074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1438663662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1438663662&rft_id=info:pmid/22399544&rft_oup_id=10.1093/fampra/cmr074&rfr_iscdi=true |