The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review

A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably great...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological bulletin 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174
Hauptverfasser: Rhodes, Matthew G, Anastasi, Jeffrey S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 146
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 138
creator Rhodes, Matthew G
Anastasi, Jeffrey S
description A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0025750
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ962896</ericid><sourcerecordid>1284061862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0VFLHDEQB_AglXpeC_0ApQRF7Mu2k0mySXw7RW3LFaHY5yWXZG1kb1eTPcVvb8RTS6HtUwj5ZWaYPyHvGHxiwNVnC4BSSdggE2a4qZiQ8hWZAHBeoQGzRbZzvgQAJWv-mmwhQs1qbSZkfv4r0LPbvppdBHoYbaaxpyfWBfojuOGij2Mc-gM6o9_DaKtZb7u7MTpqe0_LzyGFcrNdwTcx3L4hm63tcni7Pqfk58nx-dGXan52-vVoNq-cRBirBfOyRcc9Z4IHCGCc4Mp7w5jGYBSq1rVlUCu8XBTlLQNp3cJ4bdCKlk_J_mPdqzRcr0Iem2XMLnSd7cOwyo1BZQyAkUV-_KdkqEVZha7x_5ShRM11WfCU7PxBL4dVKrsprQE1SCVYQbt_QwwYGMUE_tbVpSHnFNrmKsWlTXcFNQ_ZNk_ZFvphXXC1WAb_DJ_CLGBvDWwuobTJ9i7mFyeFwlrXxb1_dCFF9_x8_M3UqE3N7wGRWK8j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902805741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><description>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0025750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22061689</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Age Differences ; Age Factors ; Age groups ; Aging - physiology ; Aging - psychology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Children ; Coding ; Cognitive Processes ; Computer Uses in Education ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Effect Size ; Elderly people ; Face ; Face Perception ; Face recognition ; Faces ; Feedback (Response) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; In-group ; Infants ; Ingroup Outgroup ; Intention ; Learning. Memory ; Measures (Individuals) ; Memory ; Meta Analysis ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition ; Recognition (Learning) ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Response Bias ; Search Engines ; Signal Detection, Psychological ; Signals ; Statistics as Topic ; Tests ; Theories ; Universities ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2012</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ962896$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25472686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22061689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Face Perception</subject><subject>Face recognition</subject><subject>Faces</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In-group</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Ingroup Outgroup</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Learning)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Response Bias</subject><subject>Search Engines</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><subject>Signals</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0VFLHDEQB_AglXpeC_0ApQRF7Mu2k0mySXw7RW3LFaHY5yWXZG1kb1eTPcVvb8RTS6HtUwj5ZWaYPyHvGHxiwNVnC4BSSdggE2a4qZiQ8hWZAHBeoQGzRbZzvgQAJWv-mmwhQs1qbSZkfv4r0LPbvppdBHoYbaaxpyfWBfojuOGij2Mc-gM6o9_DaKtZb7u7MTpqe0_LzyGFcrNdwTcx3L4hm63tcni7Pqfk58nx-dGXan52-vVoNq-cRBirBfOyRcc9Z4IHCGCc4Mp7w5jGYBSq1rVlUCu8XBTlLQNp3cJ4bdCKlk_J_mPdqzRcr0Iem2XMLnSd7cOwyo1BZQyAkUV-_KdkqEVZha7x_5ShRM11WfCU7PxBL4dVKrsprQE1SCVYQbt_QwwYGMUE_tbVpSHnFNrmKsWlTXcFNQ_ZNk_ZFvphXXC1WAb_DJ_CLGBvDWwuobTJ9i7mFyeFwlrXxb1_dCFF9_x8_M3UqE3N7wGRWK8j</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Matthew G</creator><creator>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><author>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Face Perception</topic><topic>Face recognition</topic><topic>Faces</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In-group</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Ingroup Outgroup</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Learning)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Response Bias</topic><topic>Search Engines</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological</topic><topic>Signals</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Matthew G</au><au>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ962896</ericid><atitle>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>146-174</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22061689</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0025750</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990095
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE
subjects Adults
Age
Age Differences
Age Factors
Age groups
Aging - physiology
Aging - psychology
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Children
Coding
Cognitive Processes
Computer Uses in Education
Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology
Effect Size
Elderly people
Face
Face Perception
Face recognition
Faces
Feedback (Response)
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
In-group
Infants
Ingroup Outgroup
Intention
Learning. Memory
Measures (Individuals)
Memory
Meta Analysis
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Older Adults
Older people
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Psychological Theory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition
Recognition (Learning)
Recognition (Psychology)
Response Bias
Search Engines
Signal Detection, Psychological
Signals
Statistics as Topic
Tests
Theories
Universities
Youth
title The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Own-Age%20Bias%20in%20Face%20Recognition:%20A%20Meta-Analytic%20and%20Theoretical%20Review&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Matthew%20G&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=146-174&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0025750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1284061862%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902805741&rft_id=info:pmid/22061689&rft_ericid=EJ962896&rfr_iscdi=true