The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review
A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably great...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Rhodes, Matthew G Anastasi, Jeffrey S |
description | A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0025750 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ962896</ericid><sourcerecordid>1284061862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0VFLHDEQB_AglXpeC_0ApQRF7Mu2k0mySXw7RW3LFaHY5yWXZG1kb1eTPcVvb8RTS6HtUwj5ZWaYPyHvGHxiwNVnC4BSSdggE2a4qZiQ8hWZAHBeoQGzRbZzvgQAJWv-mmwhQs1qbSZkfv4r0LPbvppdBHoYbaaxpyfWBfojuOGij2Mc-gM6o9_DaKtZb7u7MTpqe0_LzyGFcrNdwTcx3L4hm63tcni7Pqfk58nx-dGXan52-vVoNq-cRBirBfOyRcc9Z4IHCGCc4Mp7w5jGYBSq1rVlUCu8XBTlLQNp3cJ4bdCKlk_J_mPdqzRcr0Iem2XMLnSd7cOwyo1BZQyAkUV-_KdkqEVZha7x_5ShRM11WfCU7PxBL4dVKrsprQE1SCVYQbt_QwwYGMUE_tbVpSHnFNrmKsWlTXcFNQ_ZNk_ZFvphXXC1WAb_DJ_CLGBvDWwuobTJ9i7mFyeFwlrXxb1_dCFF9_x8_M3UqE3N7wGRWK8j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902805741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><description>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0025750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22061689</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Age Differences ; Age Factors ; Age groups ; Aging - physiology ; Aging - psychology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Children ; Coding ; Cognitive Processes ; Computer Uses in Education ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Effect Size ; Elderly people ; Face ; Face Perception ; Face recognition ; Faces ; Feedback (Response) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; In-group ; Infants ; Ingroup Outgroup ; Intention ; Learning. Memory ; Measures (Individuals) ; Memory ; Meta Analysis ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition ; Recognition (Learning) ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Response Bias ; Search Engines ; Signal Detection, Psychological ; Signals ; Statistics as Topic ; Tests ; Theories ; Universities ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2012</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ962896$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25472686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22061689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Face Perception</subject><subject>Face recognition</subject><subject>Faces</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In-group</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Ingroup Outgroup</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition (Learning)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Response Bias</subject><subject>Search Engines</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><subject>Signals</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0VFLHDEQB_AglXpeC_0ApQRF7Mu2k0mySXw7RW3LFaHY5yWXZG1kb1eTPcVvb8RTS6HtUwj5ZWaYPyHvGHxiwNVnC4BSSdggE2a4qZiQ8hWZAHBeoQGzRbZzvgQAJWv-mmwhQs1qbSZkfv4r0LPbvppdBHoYbaaxpyfWBfojuOGij2Mc-gM6o9_DaKtZb7u7MTpqe0_LzyGFcrNdwTcx3L4hm63tcni7Pqfk58nx-dGXan52-vVoNq-cRBirBfOyRcc9Z4IHCGCc4Mp7w5jGYBSq1rVlUCu8XBTlLQNp3cJ4bdCKlk_J_mPdqzRcr0Iem2XMLnSd7cOwyo1BZQyAkUV-_KdkqEVZha7x_5ShRM11WfCU7PxBL4dVKrsprQE1SCVYQbt_QwwYGMUE_tbVpSHnFNrmKsWlTXcFNQ_ZNk_ZFvphXXC1WAb_DJ_CLGBvDWwuobTJ9i7mFyeFwlrXxb1_dCFF9_x8_M3UqE3N7wGRWK8j</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Matthew G</creator><creator>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</title><author>Rhodes, Matthew G ; Anastasi, Jeffrey S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-b1d5f2c3d3143e0e09c437dd91182e9727fcf563a4d5b3d3da105acb9d892a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Face Perception</topic><topic>Face recognition</topic><topic>Faces</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In-group</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Ingroup Outgroup</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition (Learning)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Response Bias</topic><topic>Search Engines</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological</topic><topic>Signals</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Matthew G</au><au>Anastasi, Jeffrey S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ962896</ericid><atitle>The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>146-174</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>A large number of studies have examined the finding that recognition memory for faces of one's own age group is often superior to memory for faces of another age group. We examined this "own-age bias" (OAB) in the meta-analyses reported. These data showed that hits were reliably greater for same-age relative to other-age faces (g = 0.23) and that false alarms were reliably less likely for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = -0.23). Further meta-analyses of measures of signal detection demonstrated that, although no difference in response criterion was evident (g = -0.01), discriminability was reliably better for same-age compared with other-age faces (g = 0.37). As well, children, younger adults, and older adults exhibited superior discriminability for same-age compared with other-age age faces. Thus, the OAB appears to be a robust effect that influences the accuracy of face recognition. Theoretical accounts of the OAB have generally suggested that it reflects more extensive, recent experiences with one's own age group relative to other-age groups. Additional analyses were supportive of this account as the OAB was present even for groups (e.g., older adults) that had prior experiences as members of another age group. However, the most comprehensive account of the OAB will also likely invoke mechanisms suggested by social-cognitive theories. (Contains 6 footnotes, 11 tables, and 4 figures.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22061689</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0025750</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2012-01, Vol.138 (1), p.146-174 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927990095 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
subjects | Adults Age Age Differences Age Factors Age groups Aging - physiology Aging - psychology Bias Biological and medical sciences Children Coding Cognitive Processes Computer Uses in Education Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Effect Size Elderly people Face Face Perception Face recognition Faces Feedback (Response) Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans In-group Infants Ingroup Outgroup Intention Learning. Memory Measures (Individuals) Memory Meta Analysis Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data Older Adults Older people Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Psychological Theory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition Recognition (Learning) Recognition (Psychology) Response Bias Search Engines Signal Detection, Psychological Signals Statistics as Topic Tests Theories Universities Youth |
title | The Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Own-Age%20Bias%20in%20Face%20Recognition:%20A%20Meta-Analytic%20and%20Theoretical%20Review&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Matthew%20G&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=146-174&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0025750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1284061862%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902805741&rft_id=info:pmid/22061689&rft_ericid=EJ962896&rfr_iscdi=true |