Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments
► We present some improvements on SVD-based methods for source localization in MEG. ► We concentrate in practical implementations for use in MEG commercial equipment. ► These improvements are tested in a practical case of auditive stimulation. ► Some strategies are proposed that can be implemented i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuroscience methods 2012-04, Vol.205 (2), p.312-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 323 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 312 |
container_title | Journal of neuroscience methods |
container_volume | 205 |
creator | de Hoyos, A. Portillo, J. Portillo, I. Marín, P. Maestú, F. Poch-Broto, J. Ortiz, T. Hernando, Antonio |
description | ► We present some improvements on SVD-based methods for source localization in MEG. ► We concentrate in practical implementations for use in MEG commercial equipment. ► These improvements are tested in a practical case of auditive stimulation. ► Some strategies are proposed that can be implemented in commercial equipments. ► We focus on real, clinical scenarios.
The present work shows some improvements realized on practical aspects of the implementation of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods to localize the sources of neural activity by means of magnetoencephalograph (MEG). Two methods have been improved and compared i.e. a spatial filter, the Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance Beamformer (LCMV) method, and a signal subspace method that is an implementation of the MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) method due to Mosher et al. (1992). It also shows the performance of both methods comparing three different averaging procedures. The influence of the correct selection of the noise subspace dimension has been analyzed. Using acoustic stimulus for real patient measurements, we discuss the relevant differences of both methods and propose an adequate strategy for future diagnosis based on correct source localization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927832355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165027012000271</els_id><sourcerecordid>927832355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ccb6cec610302d72222d4ec321161113db74fe1f6063d1a7fd3096115a7e64103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlqIzEQhkWYEDvLKwTd5tROSbIl-zZDM4vBJocs5CZkqZrIdEseqdswefrIcTzXKQrqUN9fy0_ILYMJAybvtpNtwKHD_nXCgfEJsJL8jIzZXPFKqvnLFzIu4KwCrmBELnPeAsB0AfKCjDgXAtRCjEmqY7czyecYqAmO-m6X4h47DH2msaGrev380Vg_PSxrmuOQLNI2WtP6N9P7IuvRvgb_Z8BMm5jokJH6QBOaltrWB19QimHvUwwfY6_JeWPajDef9Yo8_fzxWP-uVve_lvX3VWWFVH1l7UZatJKBAO4UL-GmaAVnTDLGhNuoaYOskSCFY0Y1TsCidGZGoZwW1RX5epxbPjpc1-vOZ4ttawLGIesFV3PBxWxWSHkkbYo5J2z0LvnOpL-agT7Yrbf6ZLc-2K2BleRFePu5Yth06P7JTv4W4NsRwPLo3mPS2XoMFp1PaHvtov_fjnfeSpVv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927832355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Hoyos, A. ; Portillo, J. ; Portillo, I. ; Marín, P. ; Maestú, F. ; Poch-Broto, J. ; Ortiz, T. ; Hernando, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>de Hoyos, A. ; Portillo, J. ; Portillo, I. ; Marín, P. ; Maestú, F. ; Poch-Broto, J. ; Ortiz, T. ; Hernando, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>► We present some improvements on SVD-based methods for source localization in MEG. ► We concentrate in practical implementations for use in MEG commercial equipment. ► These improvements are tested in a practical case of auditive stimulation. ► Some strategies are proposed that can be implemented in commercial equipments. ► We focus on real, clinical scenarios.
The present work shows some improvements realized on practical aspects of the implementation of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods to localize the sources of neural activity by means of magnetoencephalograph (MEG). Two methods have been improved and compared i.e. a spatial filter, the Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance Beamformer (LCMV) method, and a signal subspace method that is an implementation of the MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) method due to Mosher et al. (1992). It also shows the performance of both methods comparing three different averaging procedures. The influence of the correct selection of the noise subspace dimension has been analyzed. Using acoustic stimulus for real patient measurements, we discuss the relevant differences of both methods and propose an adequate strategy for future diagnosis based on correct source localization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-678X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22330793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; High-resolution spatial filtering ; Humans ; Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV) ; Magnetoencephalography ; Magnetoencephalography - methods ; Models, Neurological ; Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spatial beamforming</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012-04, Vol.205 (2), p.312-323</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ccb6cec610302d72222d4ec321161113db74fe1f6063d1a7fd3096115a7e64103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ccb6cec610302d72222d4ec321161113db74fe1f6063d1a7fd3096115a7e64103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Hoyos, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestú, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poch-Broto, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments</title><title>Journal of neuroscience methods</title><addtitle>J Neurosci Methods</addtitle><description>► We present some improvements on SVD-based methods for source localization in MEG. ► We concentrate in practical implementations for use in MEG commercial equipment. ► These improvements are tested in a practical case of auditive stimulation. ► Some strategies are proposed that can be implemented in commercial equipments. ► We focus on real, clinical scenarios.
The present work shows some improvements realized on practical aspects of the implementation of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods to localize the sources of neural activity by means of magnetoencephalograph (MEG). Two methods have been improved and compared i.e. a spatial filter, the Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance Beamformer (LCMV) method, and a signal subspace method that is an implementation of the MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) method due to Mosher et al. (1992). It also shows the performance of both methods comparing three different averaging procedures. The influence of the correct selection of the noise subspace dimension has been analyzed. Using acoustic stimulus for real patient measurements, we discuss the relevant differences of both methods and propose an adequate strategy for future diagnosis based on correct source localization.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>High-resolution spatial filtering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV)</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC)</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spatial beamforming</subject><issn>0165-0270</issn><issn>1872-678X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlqIzEQhkWYEDvLKwTd5tROSbIl-zZDM4vBJocs5CZkqZrIdEseqdswefrIcTzXKQrqUN9fy0_ILYMJAybvtpNtwKHD_nXCgfEJsJL8jIzZXPFKqvnLFzIu4KwCrmBELnPeAsB0AfKCjDgXAtRCjEmqY7czyecYqAmO-m6X4h47DH2msaGrev380Vg_PSxrmuOQLNI2WtP6N9P7IuvRvgb_Z8BMm5jokJH6QBOaltrWB19QimHvUwwfY6_JeWPajDef9Yo8_fzxWP-uVve_lvX3VWWFVH1l7UZatJKBAO4UL-GmaAVnTDLGhNuoaYOskSCFY0Y1TsCidGZGoZwW1RX5epxbPjpc1-vOZ4ttawLGIesFV3PBxWxWSHkkbYo5J2z0LvnOpL-agT7Yrbf6ZLc-2K2BleRFePu5Yth06P7JTv4W4NsRwPLo3mPS2XoMFp1PaHvtov_fjnfeSpVv</recordid><startdate>20120415</startdate><enddate>20120415</enddate><creator>de Hoyos, A.</creator><creator>Portillo, J.</creator><creator>Portillo, I.</creator><creator>Marín, P.</creator><creator>Maestú, F.</creator><creator>Poch-Broto, J.</creator><creator>Ortiz, T.</creator><creator>Hernando, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120415</creationdate><title>Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments</title><author>de Hoyos, A. ; Portillo, J. ; Portillo, I. ; Marín, P. ; Maestú, F. ; Poch-Broto, J. ; Ortiz, T. ; Hernando, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ccb6cec610302d72222d4ec321161113db74fe1f6063d1a7fd3096115a7e64103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>High-resolution spatial filtering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV)</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC)</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spatial beamforming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Hoyos, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestú, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poch-Broto, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Hoyos, A.</au><au>Portillo, J.</au><au>Portillo, I.</au><au>Marín, P.</au><au>Maestú, F.</au><au>Poch-Broto, J.</au><au>Ortiz, T.</au><au>Hernando, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci Methods</addtitle><date>2012-04-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>205</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>312-323</pages><issn>0165-0270</issn><eissn>1872-678X</eissn><abstract>► We present some improvements on SVD-based methods for source localization in MEG. ► We concentrate in practical implementations for use in MEG commercial equipment. ► These improvements are tested in a practical case of auditive stimulation. ► Some strategies are proposed that can be implemented in commercial equipments. ► We focus on real, clinical scenarios.
The present work shows some improvements realized on practical aspects of the implementation of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods to localize the sources of neural activity by means of magnetoencephalograph (MEG). Two methods have been improved and compared i.e. a spatial filter, the Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance Beamformer (LCMV) method, and a signal subspace method that is an implementation of the MUSIC (Multiple Signal Classification) method due to Mosher et al. (1992). It also shows the performance of both methods comparing three different averaging procedures. The influence of the correct selection of the noise subspace dimension has been analyzed. Using acoustic stimulus for real patient measurements, we discuss the relevant differences of both methods and propose an adequate strategy for future diagnosis based on correct source localization.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22330793</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0270 |
ispartof | Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012-04, Vol.205 (2), p.312-323 |
issn | 0165-0270 1872-678X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927832355 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Algorithms Brain - physiology Brain Mapping - methods High-resolution spatial filtering Humans Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance (LCMV) Magnetoencephalography Magnetoencephalography - methods Models, Neurological Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Spatial beamforming |
title | Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A25%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20improvements%20of%20LCMV%20and%20MUSIC%20source%20localization%20techniques%20for%20use%20in%20real%20clinical%20environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroscience%20methods&rft.au=de%20Hoyos,%20A.&rft.date=2012-04-15&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=312-323&rft.issn=0165-0270&rft.eissn=1872-678X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E927832355%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927832355&rft_id=info:pmid/22330793&rft_els_id=S0165027012000271&rfr_iscdi=true |