Upholding pregnant women's right to life
Abstract Recent decisions of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the High Court of Delhi have shown how the pregnancy-related deaths of individual women have been bases on which these authoritative tribunals have hel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2012-04, Vol.117 (1), p.90-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 94 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Cook, Rebecca J. Dickens, Bernard M. |
description | Abstract Recent decisions of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the High Court of Delhi have shown how the pregnancy-related deaths of individual women have been bases on which these authoritative tribunals have held Brazil, Paraguay, and India respectively accountable for avoidable maternal mortality not only in these cases, but also among their populations more generally. The right to life is the most fundamental of women's human rights, recognized in international human rights treaties and national laws. Failure of governments to apply their resources adequately to address, respect, and protect this right violates the law of human rights. These cases show, however, that governments may fail to allocate adequate resources to women's survival of pregnancy. Tribunals can build on the failures in individual cases to set standards of performance to which governments will legally be held to achieve safe motherhood. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927831356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020729212000458</els_id><sourcerecordid>927831356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5310-18d5ecd946fa9548c5c68c3713feac11324731f6c3a71f57e83d378a6e8187eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAuaBySfDY8UckVAlVUIoq9QA9W64z2Tpk7cXOUu2_x9EuIHFAnHx5nvHMO0PIS6ANUJBvx8aP69gwCqyh0FAKj8gKtOpq3qruMVlRymitWMdOyLOcR1oIBfCUnDDGhVSSr8ib2-19nHof1tU24TrYMFcPcYPhLFfJr-_nao7V5Ad8Tp4Mdsr44viektuPH75efKqvby6vLt5f105woDXoXqDru1YOthOtdsJJ7bgCPqB1AJy1isMgHbcKBqFQ854rbSXq0jne8VNydqi7TfH7DvNsNj47nCYbMO6y6ZjSHEr7hWQH0qWYc8LBbJPf2LQ3QM0SkBnNEpBZAjIUTBm_SK-O5Xd3G-x_K78SKcDrI2Czs9OQbHA-_-GEFIx1unDywD34Cff_8bW5-nx509EivjuIWFL84TGZ7DwGh71P6GbTR__vAc7_0t3kgy-tfsM95jHuUij7MWByccyX5QaWEwBW1t8KzX8CRJ6nTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927831356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upholding pregnant women's right to life</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cook, Rebecca J. ; Dickens, Bernard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cook, Rebecca J. ; Dickens, Bernard M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Recent decisions of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the High Court of Delhi have shown how the pregnancy-related deaths of individual women have been bases on which these authoritative tribunals have held Brazil, Paraguay, and India respectively accountable for avoidable maternal mortality not only in these cases, but also among their populations more generally. The right to life is the most fundamental of women's human rights, recognized in international human rights treaties and national laws. Failure of governments to apply their resources adequately to address, respect, and protect this right violates the law of human rights. These cases show, however, that governments may fail to allocate adequate resources to women's survival of pregnancy. Tribunals can build on the failures in individual cases to set standards of performance to which governments will legally be held to achieve safe motherhood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22356763</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJGOAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Brazil ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Human Rights - legislation & jurisprudence ; Human Rights - standards ; Humans ; India ; Maternal Mortality ; Medical sciences ; Near-miss maternal death ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Paraguay ; Pregnancy ; Right to life ; Value of Life ; Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence ; Women's Rights - standards ; Women's rights to life and equality</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2012-04, Vol.117 (1), p.90-94</ispartof><rights>International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5310-18d5ecd946fa9548c5c68c3713feac11324731f6c3a71f57e83d378a6e8187eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5310-18d5ecd946fa9548c5c68c3713feac11324731f6c3a71f57e83d378a6e8187eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2012.01.001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2012.01.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25652298$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22356763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cook, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Bernard M.</creatorcontrib><title>Upholding pregnant women's right to life</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Abstract Recent decisions of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the High Court of Delhi have shown how the pregnancy-related deaths of individual women have been bases on which these authoritative tribunals have held Brazil, Paraguay, and India respectively accountable for avoidable maternal mortality not only in these cases, but also among their populations more generally. The right to life is the most fundamental of women's human rights, recognized in international human rights treaties and national laws. Failure of governments to apply their resources adequately to address, respect, and protect this right violates the law of human rights. These cases show, however, that governments may fail to allocate adequate resources to women's survival of pregnancy. Tribunals can build on the failures in individual cases to set standards of performance to which governments will legally be held to achieve safe motherhood.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Human Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Human Rights - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Maternal Mortality</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Near-miss maternal death</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Paraguay</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Right to life</subject><subject>Value of Life</subject><subject>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Women's Rights - standards</subject><subject>Women's rights to life and equality</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAuaBySfDY8UckVAlVUIoq9QA9W64z2Tpk7cXOUu2_x9EuIHFAnHx5nvHMO0PIS6ANUJBvx8aP69gwCqyh0FAKj8gKtOpq3qruMVlRymitWMdOyLOcR1oIBfCUnDDGhVSSr8ib2-19nHof1tU24TrYMFcPcYPhLFfJr-_nao7V5Ad8Tp4Mdsr44viektuPH75efKqvby6vLt5f105woDXoXqDru1YOthOtdsJJ7bgCPqB1AJy1isMgHbcKBqFQ854rbSXq0jne8VNydqi7TfH7DvNsNj47nCYbMO6y6ZjSHEr7hWQH0qWYc8LBbJPf2LQ3QM0SkBnNEpBZAjIUTBm_SK-O5Xd3G-x_K78SKcDrI2Czs9OQbHA-_-GEFIx1unDywD34Cff_8bW5-nx509EivjuIWFL84TGZ7DwGh71P6GbTR__vAc7_0t3kgy-tfsM95jHuUij7MWByccyX5QaWEwBW1t8KzX8CRJ6nTw</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Cook, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Dickens, Bernard M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Upholding pregnant women's right to life</title><author>Cook, Rebecca J. ; Dickens, Bernard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5310-18d5ecd946fa9548c5c68c3713feac11324731f6c3a71f57e83d378a6e8187eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Human Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Human Rights - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Maternal Mortality</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Near-miss maternal death</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Paraguay</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Right to life</topic><topic>Value of Life</topic><topic>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Women's Rights - standards</topic><topic>Women's rights to life and equality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cook, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickens, Bernard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cook, Rebecca J.</au><au>Dickens, Bernard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upholding pregnant women's right to life</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>90-94</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><coden>IJGOAL</coden><abstract>Abstract Recent decisions of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the High Court of Delhi have shown how the pregnancy-related deaths of individual women have been bases on which these authoritative tribunals have held Brazil, Paraguay, and India respectively accountable for avoidable maternal mortality not only in these cases, but also among their populations more generally. The right to life is the most fundamental of women's human rights, recognized in international human rights treaties and national laws. Failure of governments to apply their resources adequately to address, respect, and protect this right violates the law of human rights. These cases show, however, that governments may fail to allocate adequate resources to women's survival of pregnancy. Tribunals can build on the failures in individual cases to set standards of performance to which governments will legally be held to achieve safe motherhood.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>22356763</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2012-04, Vol.117 (1), p.90-94 |
issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927831356 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Brazil Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Human Rights - legislation & jurisprudence Human Rights - standards Humans India Maternal Mortality Medical sciences Near-miss maternal death Obstetrics and Gynecology Paraguay Pregnancy Right to life Value of Life Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence Women's Rights - standards Women's rights to life and equality |
title | Upholding pregnant women's right to life |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A27%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upholding%20pregnant%20women's%20right%20to%20life&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Cook,%20Rebecca%20J.&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=90-94&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft.coden=IJGOAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E927831356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927831356&rft_id=info:pmid/22356763&rft_els_id=S0020729212000458&rfr_iscdi=true |