The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND:As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2012-03, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425
Hauptverfasser: Souder, Christopher D, Brennan, Michael L, Brennan, Kindyle Losey, Song, Juhee, Williams, Johnathan, Chaput, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 425
container_issue 5
container_start_page 418
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 94
creator Souder, Christopher D
Brennan, Michael L
Brennan, Kindyle Losey
Song, Juhee
Williams, Johnathan
Chaput, Christopher
description BACKGROUND:As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS:Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.J.01134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927691689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>927691689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-f1a7d63eed583b133d05a826108947870872bd254056704ee050b04ce60a96673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVFv0zAQgCMEYt3gjWfkF8TLUs52bCePo6JANUE1yrPlOhca5sSd7ajsT_EbSdZuvPjs06e7831Z9obCnFGQH1YfVz_mqzlQyotn2YwKLnLKS_k8mwEwmldciLPsPMbfAFAUoF5mZ4zxqlRczLK_mx2SG5OQ-IYsfJ-CceNrPMk6-D9tN16W2PkpsQzGpiEgWXrn_KHtf5GF8xFrcoP1YFPre2L6mqwx2CGZHv0Qybrt-wfSd3sTRvbQph25CmkX_N6ZmO5J4wNJ4xibgCZ12Kdplsem39DePnWOr7IXjXERX5_iRfZz-Wmz-JJff__8dXF1nVsuhcgbalQtOWItSr6lnNcgTMkkhbIqVKmgVGxbM1GAkAoKRBCwhcKiBFNJqfhF9v5Ydx_83YAx6a6NFp07_kpXTMmKyrIaycsjaYOPMWCj92HcWrjXFPQkSE-C9Eo_CBrxt6fCw7bD-gl-NDIC706Aida4JpjetvE_J5TiRTFxxZE7eDf6irduOGDQOzQu7TRMriXjOQPKgIOCfEoJ_g_Rr6nd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927691689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Souder, Christopher D ; Brennan, Michael L ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey ; Song, Juhee ; Williams, Johnathan ; Chaput, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D ; Brennan, Michael L ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey ; Song, Juhee ; Williams, Johnathan ; Chaput, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS:Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22398735</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBJSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery ; Hip Fractures - etiology ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012-03, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-f1a7d63eed583b133d05a826108947870872bd254056704ee050b04ce60a96673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-f1a7d63eed583b133d05a826108947870872bd254056704ee050b04ce60a96673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25773445$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22398735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Kindyle Losey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Juhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaput, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS:Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVFv0zAQgCMEYt3gjWfkF8TLUs52bCePo6JANUE1yrPlOhca5sSd7ajsT_EbSdZuvPjs06e7831Z9obCnFGQH1YfVz_mqzlQyotn2YwKLnLKS_k8mwEwmldciLPsPMbfAFAUoF5mZ4zxqlRczLK_mx2SG5OQ-IYsfJ-CceNrPMk6-D9tN16W2PkpsQzGpiEgWXrn_KHtf5GF8xFrcoP1YFPre2L6mqwx2CGZHv0Qybrt-wfSd3sTRvbQph25CmkX_N6ZmO5J4wNJ4xibgCZ12Kdplsem39DePnWOr7IXjXERX5_iRfZz-Wmz-JJff__8dXF1nVsuhcgbalQtOWItSr6lnNcgTMkkhbIqVKmgVGxbM1GAkAoKRBCwhcKiBFNJqfhF9v5Ydx_83YAx6a6NFp07_kpXTMmKyrIaycsjaYOPMWCj92HcWrjXFPQkSE-C9Eo_CBrxt6fCw7bD-gl-NDIC706Aida4JpjetvE_J5TiRTFxxZE7eDf6irduOGDQOzQu7TRMriXjOQPKgIOCfEoJ_g_Rr6nd</recordid><startdate>20120307</startdate><enddate>20120307</enddate><creator>Souder, Christopher D</creator><creator>Brennan, Michael L</creator><creator>Brennan, Kindyle Losey</creator><creator>Song, Juhee</creator><creator>Williams, Johnathan</creator><creator>Chaput, Christopher</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120307</creationdate><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><author>Souder, Christopher D ; Brennan, Michael L ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey ; Song, Juhee ; Williams, Johnathan ; Chaput, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3655-f1a7d63eed583b133d05a826108947870872bd254056704ee050b04ce60a96673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Kindyle Losey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Juhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaput, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Souder, Christopher D</au><au>Brennan, Michael L</au><au>Brennan, Kindyle Losey</au><au>Song, Juhee</au><au>Williams, Johnathan</au><au>Chaput, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2012-03-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>418-425</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><coden>JBJSA3</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS:Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>22398735</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.J.01134</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012-03, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_927691689
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery
Hip Fractures - etiology
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedic surgery
Postoperative Complications
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A56%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Rate%20of%20Contralateral%20Proximal%20Femoral%20Fracture%20Following%20Closed%20Reduction%20and%20Percutaneous%20Pinning%20Compared%20with%20Arthroplasty%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Femoral%20Neck%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Souder,%20Christopher%20D&rft.date=2012-03-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=418-425&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft.coden=JBJSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.J.01134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E927691689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927691689&rft_id=info:pmid/22398735&rfr_iscdi=true