Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data

Data from a Doppler SOund Detection And Ranging (SODAR) device, twice–daily radiosondes, 33 surface meteorological and four aerosol sites were used to assess the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with a chemistry package (WRF/Chem) to capture atmospheric boundary l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric pollution research 2011-07, Vol.2 (3), p.283-299
Hauptverfasser: Mölders, Nicole, Tran, Huy N.Q., Quinn, Patricia, Sassen, Kenneth, Shaw, Glenn E., Kramm, Gerhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Atmospheric pollution research
container_volume 2
creator Mölders, Nicole
Tran, Huy N.Q.
Quinn, Patricia
Sassen, Kenneth
Shaw, Glenn E.
Kramm, Gerhard
description Data from a Doppler SOund Detection And Ranging (SODAR) device, twice–daily radiosondes, 33 surface meteorological and four aerosol sites were used to assess the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with a chemistry package (WRF/Chem) to capture atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) characteristics in Interior Alaska during low solar irradiation (11–01–2005 to 02–28–2006). Biases determined based on all available data from the 33 sites over the entire episode are 1.6 K, 1.8 K, 1.85 m/s, –5 o, and 1.2 hPa for temperature, dewpoint temperature, wind–speed, wind–direction, and sea–level pressure, respectively. The SODAR–data reveal that WRF/Chem over/under–estimates wind–speed in the lower (upper) atmospheric boundary layer. WRF/Chem captures the frequency of low–level jets well, but overestimates the strength of moderate low–level jets. Data from the four aerosol sites suggest large underestimation of PM10, and NO3 at the remote sites and PM2.5 at the polluted site. Difficulty in capturing the temporal evolution of aerosol concentrations coincides with difficulty in capturing sudden temperature changes, underestimation of inversion–strengths and timing of frontal passages. Errors in PM2.5 concentrations strongly relate to temperature errors.
doi_str_mv 10.5094/APR.2011.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926900212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1309104215304852</els_id><sourcerecordid>926900212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d79f6e6b22a5620debc059b694c0ce167ab58e45ded12b68f9237c78fdfacc2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtOAzEMhkcIJCpgxwGyY9OWJPNqlqPylCoVFRDLKJN4IGhmUuIMiB13QFyQk5CqLFjgjW35t3_rS5JjRqc5FdlpdbOacsrYlKb5TjJiKRUTRjO--6feT44Qn2mMVOQlp6Pkq0IExA76QFxDHlYXp_Mn6EhwBG03tCoAwaH-_visvA5Wk9oNvVH-nbTqHTzRT8orHcBbjFMkZvC2fySteyPoWuWJ9V4Zq4J1PRlwM9v0Dl1vYExul2fVakxUb6KLb5QGYlRQh8leo1qEo998kNxfnN_NryaL5eX1vFpMdMZmYWJK0RRQ1JyrvODUQK1pLupCZJpqYEWp6nwGWW7AMF4Xs0bwtNTlrDHRSXNID5KT7d21dy8DYJCdRQ1tq3pwA0rBC0EpZzwqx1ul9g7RQyPX3naRg2RUbvjLyF9u-MvIP8qLrRzi968WvERtoddgrAcdpHH2_8UfURiN-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926900212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mölders, Nicole ; Tran, Huy N.Q. ; Quinn, Patricia ; Sassen, Kenneth ; Shaw, Glenn E. ; Kramm, Gerhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Mölders, Nicole ; Tran, Huy N.Q. ; Quinn, Patricia ; Sassen, Kenneth ; Shaw, Glenn E. ; Kramm, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><description>Data from a Doppler SOund Detection And Ranging (SODAR) device, twice–daily radiosondes, 33 surface meteorological and four aerosol sites were used to assess the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with a chemistry package (WRF/Chem) to capture atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) characteristics in Interior Alaska during low solar irradiation (11–01–2005 to 02–28–2006). Biases determined based on all available data from the 33 sites over the entire episode are 1.6 K, 1.8 K, 1.85 m/s, –5 o, and 1.2 hPa for temperature, dewpoint temperature, wind–speed, wind–direction, and sea–level pressure, respectively. The SODAR–data reveal that WRF/Chem over/under–estimates wind–speed in the lower (upper) atmospheric boundary layer. WRF/Chem captures the frequency of low–level jets well, but overestimates the strength of moderate low–level jets. Data from the four aerosol sites suggest large underestimation of PM10, and NO3 at the remote sites and PM2.5 at the polluted site. Difficulty in capturing the temporal evolution of aerosol concentrations coincides with difficulty in capturing sudden temperature changes, underestimation of inversion–strengths and timing of frontal passages. Errors in PM2.5 concentrations strongly relate to temperature errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1309-1042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5094/APR.2011.035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aerosol ; Aerosol concentration ; Aerosols ; Air pollution ; Atmospheric boundary layer ; Atmospheric pollution ; Atmospheric pollution models ; Atmospheric pollution research ; Boundary layers ; High–latitudes ; Irradiation ; Low-level jet stream ; Particle size ; Particulate atmospheric pollution ; radiosondes ; Sea level ; SODAR ; Solar irradiation ; Stable boundary layer ; Temperature ; Temperature changes ; Weather ; WRF/Chem</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric pollution research, 2011-07, Vol.2 (3), p.283-299</ispartof><rights>2011 Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control (TUNCAP)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d79f6e6b22a5620debc059b694c0ce167ab58e45ded12b68f9237c78fdfacc2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d79f6e6b22a5620debc059b694c0ce167ab58e45ded12b68f9237c78fdfacc2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mölders, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Huy N.Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sassen, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramm, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data</title><title>Atmospheric pollution research</title><description>Data from a Doppler SOund Detection And Ranging (SODAR) device, twice–daily radiosondes, 33 surface meteorological and four aerosol sites were used to assess the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with a chemistry package (WRF/Chem) to capture atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) characteristics in Interior Alaska during low solar irradiation (11–01–2005 to 02–28–2006). Biases determined based on all available data from the 33 sites over the entire episode are 1.6 K, 1.8 K, 1.85 m/s, –5 o, and 1.2 hPa for temperature, dewpoint temperature, wind–speed, wind–direction, and sea–level pressure, respectively. The SODAR–data reveal that WRF/Chem over/under–estimates wind–speed in the lower (upper) atmospheric boundary layer. WRF/Chem captures the frequency of low–level jets well, but overestimates the strength of moderate low–level jets. Data from the four aerosol sites suggest large underestimation of PM10, and NO3 at the remote sites and PM2.5 at the polluted site. Difficulty in capturing the temporal evolution of aerosol concentrations coincides with difficulty in capturing sudden temperature changes, underestimation of inversion–strengths and timing of frontal passages. Errors in PM2.5 concentrations strongly relate to temperature errors.</description><subject>Aerosol</subject><subject>Aerosol concentration</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric boundary layer</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution models</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution research</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>High–latitudes</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Low-level jet stream</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particulate atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>radiosondes</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>SODAR</subject><subject>Solar irradiation</subject><subject>Stable boundary layer</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature changes</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>WRF/Chem</subject><issn>1309-1042</issn><issn>1309-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtOAzEMhkcIJCpgxwGyY9OWJPNqlqPylCoVFRDLKJN4IGhmUuIMiB13QFyQk5CqLFjgjW35t3_rS5JjRqc5FdlpdbOacsrYlKb5TjJiKRUTRjO--6feT44Qn2mMVOQlp6Pkq0IExA76QFxDHlYXp_Mn6EhwBG03tCoAwaH-_visvA5Wk9oNvVH-nbTqHTzRT8orHcBbjFMkZvC2fySteyPoWuWJ9V4Zq4J1PRlwM9v0Dl1vYExul2fVakxUb6KLb5QGYlRQh8leo1qEo998kNxfnN_NryaL5eX1vFpMdMZmYWJK0RRQ1JyrvODUQK1pLupCZJpqYEWp6nwGWW7AMF4Xs0bwtNTlrDHRSXNID5KT7d21dy8DYJCdRQ1tq3pwA0rBC0EpZzwqx1ul9g7RQyPX3naRg2RUbvjLyF9u-MvIP8qLrRzi968WvERtoddgrAcdpHH2_8UfURiN-Q</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Mölders, Nicole</creator><creator>Tran, Huy N.Q.</creator><creator>Quinn, Patricia</creator><creator>Sassen, Kenneth</creator><creator>Shaw, Glenn E.</creator><creator>Kramm, Gerhard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data</title><author>Mölders, Nicole ; Tran, Huy N.Q. ; Quinn, Patricia ; Sassen, Kenneth ; Shaw, Glenn E. ; Kramm, Gerhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d79f6e6b22a5620debc059b694c0ce167ab58e45ded12b68f9237c78fdfacc2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aerosol</topic><topic>Aerosol concentration</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric boundary layer</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution models</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution research</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>High–latitudes</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Low-level jet stream</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particulate atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>radiosondes</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>SODAR</topic><topic>Solar irradiation</topic><topic>Stable boundary layer</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature changes</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>WRF/Chem</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mölders, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Huy N.Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sassen, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramm, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric pollution research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mölders, Nicole</au><au>Tran, Huy N.Q.</au><au>Quinn, Patricia</au><au>Sassen, Kenneth</au><au>Shaw, Glenn E.</au><au>Kramm, Gerhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric pollution research</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>283-299</pages><issn>1309-1042</issn><eissn>1309-1042</eissn><abstract>Data from a Doppler SOund Detection And Ranging (SODAR) device, twice–daily radiosondes, 33 surface meteorological and four aerosol sites were used to assess the ability of the Weather Research and Forecasting model inline coupled with a chemistry package (WRF/Chem) to capture atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) characteristics in Interior Alaska during low solar irradiation (11–01–2005 to 02–28–2006). Biases determined based on all available data from the 33 sites over the entire episode are 1.6 K, 1.8 K, 1.85 m/s, –5 o, and 1.2 hPa for temperature, dewpoint temperature, wind–speed, wind–direction, and sea–level pressure, respectively. The SODAR–data reveal that WRF/Chem over/under–estimates wind–speed in the lower (upper) atmospheric boundary layer. WRF/Chem captures the frequency of low–level jets well, but overestimates the strength of moderate low–level jets. Data from the four aerosol sites suggest large underestimation of PM10, and NO3 at the remote sites and PM2.5 at the polluted site. Difficulty in capturing the temporal evolution of aerosol concentrations coincides with difficulty in capturing sudden temperature changes, underestimation of inversion–strengths and timing of frontal passages. Errors in PM2.5 concentrations strongly relate to temperature errors.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.5094/APR.2011.035</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1309-1042
ispartof Atmospheric pollution research, 2011-07, Vol.2 (3), p.283-299
issn 1309-1042
1309-1042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926900212
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerosol
Aerosol concentration
Aerosols
Air pollution
Atmospheric boundary layer
Atmospheric pollution
Atmospheric pollution models
Atmospheric pollution research
Boundary layers
High–latitudes
Irradiation
Low-level jet stream
Particle size
Particulate atmospheric pollution
radiosondes
Sea level
SODAR
Solar irradiation
Stable boundary layer
Temperature
Temperature changes
Weather
WRF/Chem
title Assessment of WRF/Chem to simulate sub–Arctic boundary layer characteristics during low solar irradiation using radiosonde, SODAR, and surface data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20WRF/Chem%20to%20simulate%20sub%E2%80%93Arctic%20boundary%20layer%20characteristics%20during%20low%20solar%20irradiation%20using%20radiosonde,%20SODAR,%20and%20surface%20data&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20pollution%20research&rft.au=M%C3%B6lders,%20Nicole&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=283-299&rft.issn=1309-1042&rft.eissn=1309-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.5094/APR.2011.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E926900212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926900212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1309104215304852&rfr_iscdi=true