Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol
To compare the performances of four 64-slice CT devices, as regards radiation dose and image quality. Effective dose was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY). Quantitative image quality was evaluated in a Catphan 600 p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of computer assisted tomography 2011-01, Vol.35 (1), p.57-64 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 64 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 57 |
| container_title | Journal of computer assisted tomography |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Colli, Vittoria Mangini, Monica Strocchi, Sabina Lumia, Domenico Canì, Andrea Boffano, Carlo Cesarani, Federico Rizzi, Elisa Ferrara, Rosa Maria Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo Bruno, Jolanda Gozzi, Gino Cacciatori, Marco Ostinelli, Angelo Vite, Cristina Conte, Leopoldo Fugazzola, Carlo |
| description | To compare the performances of four 64-slice CT devices, as regards radiation dose and image quality.
Effective dose was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY). Quantitative image quality was evaluated in a Catphan 600 phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY) using 3 parameters (modulation transfer function, contrast-to-noise ratio, and figure of merit). Effective and main organ doses were measured in 40 patients (10 for each CT device), who underwent an abdominal study with the same standard protocol; moreover, in these patients, clinical image quality, using a 5-grade quality score, was assessed.
In-phantom measured doses and quantitative image quality showed some differences among the 4 devices. On the contrary, effective and organ doses provided to the patients were similar; no statistically significant differences were found also for clinical image quality.
Some differences were found among the 4 devices from a physical point of view; on the other hand, the patient data were similar. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f124fe |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926898176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>845764513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6f220f2fd172893505e5fd96720314461c078d7b847e85c3f2250e20a0dc7ccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qVXdZ-AYV8o1TFo__xM4RrYAiIYGq5Rx57XEblKyDnVTi22O62x649DQjvd_M08wj5BuwNbBGX_7YbNdsx0CgAAMBuAz4iSxBCV4JkOozWTJRi8poUAtykvMzY6CFkF_JggMoJhUsiX_EFGIa7N4htTljzgPuJxoDDXFOtJZV7ruiuTiM84SeTnGIP5Mdf3WOevxdtFzQRC2dXsfO2Z66vtv_acYUp-hif0q-BNtnPDvWFXm6ud5uvlf3D7d3m6v7yglhpqoOnLPAgwfNTSMUU6iCb2rNWTlI1uCYNl7vjNRolBMFVww5s8w77ZwXK3Jx2FuMX2bMUzt02WHf2z3GObcNr01jQNf_JY1Uui4PEoWUB9KlmHPC0I6pG2x6bYG170G0JYj2YxBl7PxoMO8G9P-G_n5evAEdfIVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>845764513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Colli, Vittoria ; Mangini, Monica ; Strocchi, Sabina ; Lumia, Domenico ; Canì, Andrea ; Boffano, Carlo ; Cesarani, Federico ; Rizzi, Elisa ; Ferrara, Rosa Maria ; Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo ; Bruno, Jolanda ; Gozzi, Gino ; Cacciatori, Marco ; Ostinelli, Angelo ; Vite, Cristina ; Conte, Leopoldo ; Fugazzola, Carlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Colli, Vittoria ; Mangini, Monica ; Strocchi, Sabina ; Lumia, Domenico ; Canì, Andrea ; Boffano, Carlo ; Cesarani, Federico ; Rizzi, Elisa ; Ferrara, Rosa Maria ; Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo ; Bruno, Jolanda ; Gozzi, Gino ; Cacciatori, Marco ; Ostinelli, Angelo ; Vite, Cristina ; Conte, Leopoldo ; Fugazzola, Carlo</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the performances of four 64-slice CT devices, as regards radiation dose and image quality.
Effective dose was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY). Quantitative image quality was evaluated in a Catphan 600 phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY) using 3 parameters (modulation transfer function, contrast-to-noise ratio, and figure of merit). Effective and main organ doses were measured in 40 patients (10 for each CT device), who underwent an abdominal study with the same standard protocol; moreover, in these patients, clinical image quality, using a 5-grade quality score, was assessed.
In-phantom measured doses and quantitative image quality showed some differences among the 4 devices. On the contrary, effective and organ doses provided to the patients were similar; no statistically significant differences were found also for clinical image quality.
Some differences were found among the 4 devices from a physical point of view; on the other hand, the patient data were similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f124fe</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21150451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Software ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of computer assisted tomography, 2011-01, Vol.35 (1), p.57-64</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6f220f2fd172893505e5fd96720314461c078d7b847e85c3f2250e20a0dc7ccd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6f220f2fd172893505e5fd96720314461c078d7b847e85c3f2250e20a0dc7ccd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21150451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colli, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangini, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strocchi, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumia, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canì, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffano, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesarani, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzi, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, Rosa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozzi, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatori, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostinelli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vite, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Leopoldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugazzola, Carlo</creatorcontrib><title>Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol</title><title>Journal of computer assisted tomography</title><addtitle>J Comput Assist Tomogr</addtitle><description>To compare the performances of four 64-slice CT devices, as regards radiation dose and image quality.
Effective dose was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY). Quantitative image quality was evaluated in a Catphan 600 phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY) using 3 parameters (modulation transfer function, contrast-to-noise ratio, and figure of merit). Effective and main organ doses were measured in 40 patients (10 for each CT device), who underwent an abdominal study with the same standard protocol; moreover, in these patients, clinical image quality, using a 5-grade quality score, was assessed.
In-phantom measured doses and quantitative image quality showed some differences among the 4 devices. On the contrary, effective and organ doses provided to the patients were similar; no statistically significant differences were found also for clinical image quality.
Some differences were found among the 4 devices from a physical point of view; on the other hand, the patient data were similar.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><issn>0363-8715</issn><issn>1532-3145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qVXdZ-AYV8o1TFo__xM4RrYAiIYGq5Rx57XEblKyDnVTi22O62x649DQjvd_M08wj5BuwNbBGX_7YbNdsx0CgAAMBuAz4iSxBCV4JkOozWTJRi8poUAtykvMzY6CFkF_JggMoJhUsiX_EFGIa7N4htTljzgPuJxoDDXFOtJZV7ruiuTiM84SeTnGIP5Mdf3WOevxdtFzQRC2dXsfO2Z66vtv_acYUp-hif0q-BNtnPDvWFXm6ud5uvlf3D7d3m6v7yglhpqoOnLPAgwfNTSMUU6iCb2rNWTlI1uCYNl7vjNRolBMFVww5s8w77ZwXK3Jx2FuMX2bMUzt02WHf2z3GObcNr01jQNf_JY1Uui4PEoWUB9KlmHPC0I6pG2x6bYG170G0JYj2YxBl7PxoMO8G9P-G_n5evAEdfIVk</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Colli, Vittoria</creator><creator>Mangini, Monica</creator><creator>Strocchi, Sabina</creator><creator>Lumia, Domenico</creator><creator>Canì, Andrea</creator><creator>Boffano, Carlo</creator><creator>Cesarani, Federico</creator><creator>Rizzi, Elisa</creator><creator>Ferrara, Rosa Maria</creator><creator>Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo</creator><creator>Bruno, Jolanda</creator><creator>Gozzi, Gino</creator><creator>Cacciatori, Marco</creator><creator>Ostinelli, Angelo</creator><creator>Vite, Cristina</creator><creator>Conte, Leopoldo</creator><creator>Fugazzola, Carlo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol</title><author>Colli, Vittoria ; Mangini, Monica ; Strocchi, Sabina ; Lumia, Domenico ; Canì, Andrea ; Boffano, Carlo ; Cesarani, Federico ; Rizzi, Elisa ; Ferrara, Rosa Maria ; Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo ; Bruno, Jolanda ; Gozzi, Gino ; Cacciatori, Marco ; Ostinelli, Angelo ; Vite, Cristina ; Conte, Leopoldo ; Fugazzola, Carlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6f220f2fd172893505e5fd96720314461c078d7b847e85c3f2250e20a0dc7ccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colli, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangini, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strocchi, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumia, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canì, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffano, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesarani, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzi, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, Rosa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozzi, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciatori, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostinelli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vite, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Leopoldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugazzola, Carlo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted tomography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colli, Vittoria</au><au>Mangini, Monica</au><au>Strocchi, Sabina</au><au>Lumia, Domenico</au><au>Canì, Andrea</au><au>Boffano, Carlo</au><au>Cesarani, Federico</au><au>Rizzi, Elisa</au><au>Ferrara, Rosa Maria</au><au>Andreis, Ivo Andrea Bergamo</au><au>Bruno, Jolanda</au><au>Gozzi, Gino</au><au>Cacciatori, Marco</au><au>Ostinelli, Angelo</au><au>Vite, Cristina</au><au>Conte, Leopoldo</au><au>Fugazzola, Carlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted tomography</jtitle><addtitle>J Comput Assist Tomogr</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>57-64</pages><issn>0363-8715</issn><eissn>1532-3145</eissn><abstract>To compare the performances of four 64-slice CT devices, as regards radiation dose and image quality.
Effective dose was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY). Quantitative image quality was evaluated in a Catphan 600 phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY) using 3 parameters (modulation transfer function, contrast-to-noise ratio, and figure of merit). Effective and main organ doses were measured in 40 patients (10 for each CT device), who underwent an abdominal study with the same standard protocol; moreover, in these patients, clinical image quality, using a 5-grade quality score, was assessed.
In-phantom measured doses and quantitative image quality showed some differences among the 4 devices. On the contrary, effective and organ doses provided to the patients were similar; no statistically significant differences were found also for clinical image quality.
Some differences were found among the 4 devices from a physical point of view; on the other hand, the patient data were similar.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21150451</pmid><doi>10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f124fe</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0363-8715 |
| ispartof | Journal of computer assisted tomography, 2011-01, Vol.35 (1), p.57-64 |
| issn | 0363-8715 1532-3145 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926898176 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Female Humans Male Phantoms, Imaging Radiation Dosage Software Statistics, Nonparametric Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards |
| title | Performance assessment of four 64-slice computed tomographic devices for a typical clinical protocol |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20assessment%20of%20four%2064-slice%20computed%20tomographic%20devices%20for%20a%20typical%20clinical%20protocol&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computer%20assisted%20tomography&rft.au=Colli,%20Vittoria&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=57-64&rft.issn=0363-8715&rft.eissn=1532-3145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f124fe&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E845764513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=845764513&rft_id=info:pmid/21150451&rfr_iscdi=true |