Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations

Purpose To evaluate the success of adjustable suture (AS) and nonadjustable suture (NAS) strabismus surgery in primary procedures and reoperations. Design Retrospective case series. Participants Four hundred four patients older than 12 years who underwent strabismus surgery over a 13-year period. Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2012-03, Vol.119 (3), p.629-633
Hauptverfasser: Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD, Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C), Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT, Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 633
container_issue 3
container_start_page 629
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 119
creator Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD
Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C)
Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT
Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC
description Purpose To evaluate the success of adjustable suture (AS) and nonadjustable suture (NAS) strabismus surgery in primary procedures and reoperations. Design Retrospective case series. Participants Four hundred four patients older than 12 years who underwent strabismus surgery over a 13-year period. Methods All eyes underwent the same hang-back suturing technique by a single surgeon (S.P.K.) in both the AS and NAS groups. Success was defined as alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal recti and within 5 PD of orthophoria for vertical recti without diplopia or further surgery. Main Outcome Measures Surgical success rate of AS and NAS primary surgery or reoperations was the primary outcome measure. Effects of amblyopia, binocularity, and strabismus type on success were secondary outcome measures and were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results Patients in the AS group required adjustment in 28.8% of cases. Higher overall success was seen with AS (77.7%) compared with NAS (69.1%) surgery, although this did not reach significance ( P = 0.059). Overall success for AS in exotropia surgery (80.8%) was significantly higher than that in the NAS group (65.9%; P = 0.011). This was because of higher success in patients undergoing primary surgery (82.5% vs. 50%; P = 0.003), but not in patients undergoing reoperation (80.2% vs. 77.6%; P = 0.71). On multiple regression analysis, male gender and not having a mechanical or neurogenic cause for strabismus were significant factors for a successful outcome. Overall, other factors including amblyopia, binocularity, strabismus type, and primary or reoperation were not significant. Conclusions These results suggest that primary surgery in adults with exotropia has a more successful outcome with AS surgery. This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926505056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161642011007901</els_id><sourcerecordid>926505056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9462088373a185de37590c8ca6abc698739c216438161a60d77e9e57a42b76483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVuL1DAUgIMo7rj6D0T6Ij61nqRpkr4Iy-INBlZ2dp9Dmp5xUzvNmKTC_HtTOir4suQhkPOdS75DyGsKFQUq3g-VPz6kB1MxoLQCVQFrnpANbXhbcknrp2STMVoKzuCCvIhxAAAhav6cXDBGaZOZDdneJze6dCr8vrjqhzkm041Y7OY0B4yFm4pvwR1MOBW7FEzn4mGOORq-Y34yU1_coj9iMMn5Kb4kz_ZmjPjqfF-S-08f766_lNubz1-vr7al5VyksuWCgVK1rA1VTY-1bFqwyhphOitaJevWMip4rfL8RkAvJbbYSMNZJwVX9SV5t9Y9Bv9zxpj0wUWL42gm9HPULRMN5CMyyVfSBh9jwL0-rt_RFPSiUQ961agXjRqUzhpz2ptzg7k7YP836Y-3DLw9AyZaM-6DmayL_7hGCcnkwn1YOcw6fjkMOlqHk8XeBbRJ9949Nsn_BezoJpd7_sATxsHPYcqqNdWRadC7ZeXLxikFkC3Q-jfRuaXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926505056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD ; Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C) ; Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT ; Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</creator><creatorcontrib>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD ; Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C) ; Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT ; Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the success of adjustable suture (AS) and nonadjustable suture (NAS) strabismus surgery in primary procedures and reoperations. Design Retrospective case series. Participants Four hundred four patients older than 12 years who underwent strabismus surgery over a 13-year period. Methods All eyes underwent the same hang-back suturing technique by a single surgeon (S.P.K.) in both the AS and NAS groups. Success was defined as alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal recti and within 5 PD of orthophoria for vertical recti without diplopia or further surgery. Main Outcome Measures Surgical success rate of AS and NAS primary surgery or reoperations was the primary outcome measure. Effects of amblyopia, binocularity, and strabismus type on success were secondary outcome measures and were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results Patients in the AS group required adjustment in 28.8% of cases. Higher overall success was seen with AS (77.7%) compared with NAS (69.1%) surgery, although this did not reach significance ( P = 0.059). Overall success for AS in exotropia surgery (80.8%) was significantly higher than that in the NAS group (65.9%; P = 0.011). This was because of higher success in patients undergoing primary surgery (82.5% vs. 50%; P = 0.003), but not in patients undergoing reoperation (80.2% vs. 77.6%; P = 0.71). On multiple regression analysis, male gender and not having a mechanical or neurogenic cause for strabismus were significant factors for a successful outcome. Overall, other factors including amblyopia, binocularity, strabismus type, and primary or reoperation were not significant. Conclusions These results suggest that primary surgery in adults with exotropia has a more successful outcome with AS surgery. This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22115713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Oculomotor disorders ; Oculomotor Muscles - surgery ; Ophthalmology ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Strabismus - surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Vision, Binocular</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2012-03, Vol.119 (3), p.629-633</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9462088373a185de37590c8ca6abc698739c216438161a60d77e9e57a42b76483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9462088373a185de37590c8ca6abc698739c216438161a60d77e9e57a42b76483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642011007901$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25867273$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22115713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the success of adjustable suture (AS) and nonadjustable suture (NAS) strabismus surgery in primary procedures and reoperations. Design Retrospective case series. Participants Four hundred four patients older than 12 years who underwent strabismus surgery over a 13-year period. Methods All eyes underwent the same hang-back suturing technique by a single surgeon (S.P.K.) in both the AS and NAS groups. Success was defined as alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal recti and within 5 PD of orthophoria for vertical recti without diplopia or further surgery. Main Outcome Measures Surgical success rate of AS and NAS primary surgery or reoperations was the primary outcome measure. Effects of amblyopia, binocularity, and strabismus type on success were secondary outcome measures and were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results Patients in the AS group required adjustment in 28.8% of cases. Higher overall success was seen with AS (77.7%) compared with NAS (69.1%) surgery, although this did not reach significance ( P = 0.059). Overall success for AS in exotropia surgery (80.8%) was significantly higher than that in the NAS group (65.9%; P = 0.011). This was because of higher success in patients undergoing primary surgery (82.5% vs. 50%; P = 0.003), but not in patients undergoing reoperation (80.2% vs. 77.6%; P = 0.71). On multiple regression analysis, male gender and not having a mechanical or neurogenic cause for strabismus were significant factors for a successful outcome. Overall, other factors including amblyopia, binocularity, strabismus type, and primary or reoperation were not significant. Conclusions These results suggest that primary surgery in adults with exotropia has a more successful outcome with AS surgery. This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Oculomotor disorders</subject><subject>Oculomotor Muscles - surgery</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Strabismus - surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVuL1DAUgIMo7rj6D0T6Ij61nqRpkr4Iy-INBlZ2dp9Dmp5xUzvNmKTC_HtTOir4suQhkPOdS75DyGsKFQUq3g-VPz6kB1MxoLQCVQFrnpANbXhbcknrp2STMVoKzuCCvIhxAAAhav6cXDBGaZOZDdneJze6dCr8vrjqhzkm041Y7OY0B4yFm4pvwR1MOBW7FEzn4mGOORq-Y34yU1_coj9iMMn5Kb4kz_ZmjPjqfF-S-08f766_lNubz1-vr7al5VyksuWCgVK1rA1VTY-1bFqwyhphOitaJevWMip4rfL8RkAvJbbYSMNZJwVX9SV5t9Y9Bv9zxpj0wUWL42gm9HPULRMN5CMyyVfSBh9jwL0-rt_RFPSiUQ961agXjRqUzhpz2ptzg7k7YP836Y-3DLw9AyZaM-6DmayL_7hGCcnkwn1YOcw6fjkMOlqHk8XeBbRJ9949Nsn_BezoJpd7_sATxsHPYcqqNdWRadC7ZeXLxikFkC3Q-jfRuaXQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD</creator><creator>Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C)</creator><creator>Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT</creator><creator>Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations</title><author>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD ; Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C) ; Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT ; Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9462088373a185de37590c8ca6abc698739c216438161a60d77e9e57a42b76483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Oculomotor disorders</topic><topic>Oculomotor Muscles - surgery</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Strabismus - surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mireskandari, Kamiar, FRCOphth, PhD</au><au>Cotesta, Melissa, BSc, OC(C)</au><au>Schofield, Jennifer, BA, OC(C), COMT</au><au>Kraft, Stephen P., MD, FRCSC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>629-633</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the success of adjustable suture (AS) and nonadjustable suture (NAS) strabismus surgery in primary procedures and reoperations. Design Retrospective case series. Participants Four hundred four patients older than 12 years who underwent strabismus surgery over a 13-year period. Methods All eyes underwent the same hang-back suturing technique by a single surgeon (S.P.K.) in both the AS and NAS groups. Success was defined as alignment within 10 prism diopters (PD) for horizontal recti and within 5 PD of orthophoria for vertical recti without diplopia or further surgery. Main Outcome Measures Surgical success rate of AS and NAS primary surgery or reoperations was the primary outcome measure. Effects of amblyopia, binocularity, and strabismus type on success were secondary outcome measures and were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results Patients in the AS group required adjustment in 28.8% of cases. Higher overall success was seen with AS (77.7%) compared with NAS (69.1%) surgery, although this did not reach significance ( P = 0.059). Overall success for AS in exotropia surgery (80.8%) was significantly higher than that in the NAS group (65.9%; P = 0.011). This was because of higher success in patients undergoing primary surgery (82.5% vs. 50%; P = 0.003), but not in patients undergoing reoperation (80.2% vs. 77.6%; P = 0.71). On multiple regression analysis, male gender and not having a mechanical or neurogenic cause for strabismus were significant factors for a successful outcome. Overall, other factors including amblyopia, binocularity, strabismus type, and primary or reoperation were not significant. Conclusions These results suggest that primary surgery in adults with exotropia has a more successful outcome with AS surgery. This advantage was not present with esotropia and vertical deviations in this series. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22115713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2012-03, Vol.119 (3), p.629-633
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926505056
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Oculomotor disorders
Oculomotor Muscles - surgery
Ophthalmology
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Strabismus - surgery
Suture Techniques
Vision, Binocular
title Utility of Adjustable Sutures in Primary Strabismus Surgery and Reoperations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A13%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20Adjustable%20Sutures%20in%20Primary%20Strabismus%20Surgery%20and%20Reoperations&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Mireskandari,%20Kamiar,%20FRCOphth,%20PhD&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=629-633&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E926505056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926505056&rft_id=info:pmid/22115713&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161642011007901&rfr_iscdi=true