Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients

Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2012-03, Vol.79 (3), p.585-590
Hauptverfasser: Guillotreau, Julien, Miocinovic, Ranko, Gamé, Xavier, Forest, Sylvain, Malavaud, Bernard, Kaouk, Jihad, Rischmann, Pascal, Haber, Georges-Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 590
container_issue 3
container_start_page 585
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 79
creator Guillotreau, Julien
Miocinovic, Ranko
Gamé, Xavier
Forest, Sylvain
Malavaud, Bernard
Kaouk, Jihad
Rischmann, Pascal
Haber, Georges-Pascal
description Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926504224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429511027130</els_id><sourcerecordid>926504224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-d2d7549f83efd607dd5105113c26f0f6c31c064bf48aea216ec113d0eca4ec803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGrFCEUxyWK7t5bH6HwJXqa7eios_NSxHJvBQsbt3oWV8-U28y4qRPMt89ht4JeggMK_s5Rf39CnjFYM2Dq1XE9xdCHr_OaA2PrUiD4A7JikjdV27byIVkBtFAJ3sorcp3SEQCUUs1jcsV5vVECxIrs91O2YcBEQ0d35mRiSDacvKVmdPQ-HEIu-3vjvDU93c4po81hmKkfaf6G9LZ3GPuZfjTZ45jTE_KoM33Cp5f1hny5u_28fV_t9u8-bN_uKiuZzJXjrpGi7TY1dk5B45xkIBmrLVcddMrWzIISh05sDBrOFNpy6ACtEWg3UN-Ql-e5pxh-TJiyHnyy2PdmxDAl3XIlixAuCinPpC1fSxE7fYp-MHHWDPSiUh_1RaVeVOpSpbP0Pb_cMB0GdH-6frsrwIsLYFKR00UzWp_-clIBMC4L9-bMYfHx02PUyRZXFp2PRaZ2wf_3Ka__mWB7Py6JfMcZ0zFMcSyyNdOJa9CfltyX2BkD3rAa6l8ZsamY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926504224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guillotreau, Julien ; Miocinovic, Ranko ; Gamé, Xavier ; Forest, Sylvain ; Malavaud, Bernard ; Kaouk, Jihad ; Rischmann, Pascal ; Haber, Georges-Pascal</creator><creatorcontrib>Guillotreau, Julien ; Miocinovic, Ranko ; Gamé, Xavier ; Forest, Sylvain ; Malavaud, Bernard ; Kaouk, Jihad ; Rischmann, Pascal ; Haber, Georges-Pascal</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (&lt;70 years) patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent LRRC between 2003 and 2010 at 2 academic institutions (Cleveland, Ohio, United States and Toulouse, France) was performed. Of these, 74 patients were classified as elderly (≥70 years) and 72 patients were considered younger (&lt;70 years). Perioperative outcomes, final pathology results, overall survival (OS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the 2 groups. Results Both groups had similar clinical stage at diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender distribution. Ileal conduit-type diversion was favored in the older vs younger group, 84% vs 36%, respectively. Overall conversion rate to open procedures was 4% in both groups. Perioperative complication rate was not significantly different between the younger and older patients. Positive margin rate was 5% in both groups. The 5-year OS for older and younger patients was 75% and 87%, respectively ( P = .03), and the 5-year CSS for the 2 groups was 51% and 54%, respectively ( P = .7). Conclusion Laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly does not have worse perioperative complications or pathologic outcomes compared with younger patients and therefore can be offered as treatment option in select older patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22386404</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cystectomy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Diversion ; Urology ; Urothelium - pathology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2012-03, Vol.79 (3), p.585-590</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-d2d7549f83efd607dd5105113c26f0f6c31c064bf48aea216ec113d0eca4ec803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-d2d7549f83efd607dd5105113c26f0f6c31c064bf48aea216ec113d0eca4ec803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429511027130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25600125$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22386404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guillotreau, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miocinovic, Ranko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamé, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forest, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malavaud, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaouk, Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rischmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haber, Georges-Pascal</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (&lt;70 years) patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent LRRC between 2003 and 2010 at 2 academic institutions (Cleveland, Ohio, United States and Toulouse, France) was performed. Of these, 74 patients were classified as elderly (≥70 years) and 72 patients were considered younger (&lt;70 years). Perioperative outcomes, final pathology results, overall survival (OS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the 2 groups. Results Both groups had similar clinical stage at diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender distribution. Ileal conduit-type diversion was favored in the older vs younger group, 84% vs 36%, respectively. Overall conversion rate to open procedures was 4% in both groups. Perioperative complication rate was not significantly different between the younger and older patients. Positive margin rate was 5% in both groups. The 5-year OS for older and younger patients was 75% and 87%, respectively ( P = .03), and the 5-year CSS for the 2 groups was 51% and 54%, respectively ( P = .7). Conclusion Laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly does not have worse perioperative complications or pathologic outcomes compared with younger patients and therefore can be offered as treatment option in select older patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urothelium - pathology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVGrFCEUxyWK7t5bH6HwJXqa7eios_NSxHJvBQsbt3oWV8-U28y4qRPMt89ht4JeggMK_s5Rf39CnjFYM2Dq1XE9xdCHr_OaA2PrUiD4A7JikjdV27byIVkBtFAJ3sorcp3SEQCUUs1jcsV5vVECxIrs91O2YcBEQ0d35mRiSDacvKVmdPQ-HEIu-3vjvDU93c4po81hmKkfaf6G9LZ3GPuZfjTZ45jTE_KoM33Cp5f1hny5u_28fV_t9u8-bN_uKiuZzJXjrpGi7TY1dk5B45xkIBmrLVcddMrWzIISh05sDBrOFNpy6ACtEWg3UN-Ql-e5pxh-TJiyHnyy2PdmxDAl3XIlixAuCinPpC1fSxE7fYp-MHHWDPSiUh_1RaVeVOpSpbP0Pb_cMB0GdH-6frsrwIsLYFKR00UzWp_-clIBMC4L9-bMYfHx02PUyRZXFp2PRaZ2wf_3Ka__mWB7Py6JfMcZ0zFMcSyyNdOJa9CfltyX2BkD3rAa6l8ZsamY</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Guillotreau, Julien</creator><creator>Miocinovic, Ranko</creator><creator>Gamé, Xavier</creator><creator>Forest, Sylvain</creator><creator>Malavaud, Bernard</creator><creator>Kaouk, Jihad</creator><creator>Rischmann, Pascal</creator><creator>Haber, Georges-Pascal</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients</title><author>Guillotreau, Julien ; Miocinovic, Ranko ; Gamé, Xavier ; Forest, Sylvain ; Malavaud, Bernard ; Kaouk, Jihad ; Rischmann, Pascal ; Haber, Georges-Pascal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-d2d7549f83efd607dd5105113c26f0f6c31c064bf48aea216ec113d0eca4ec803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urothelium - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guillotreau, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miocinovic, Ranko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamé, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forest, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malavaud, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaouk, Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rischmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haber, Georges-Pascal</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guillotreau, Julien</au><au>Miocinovic, Ranko</au><au>Gamé, Xavier</au><au>Forest, Sylvain</au><au>Malavaud, Bernard</au><au>Kaouk, Jihad</au><au>Rischmann, Pascal</au><au>Haber, Georges-Pascal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>585-590</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (&lt;70 years) patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent LRRC between 2003 and 2010 at 2 academic institutions (Cleveland, Ohio, United States and Toulouse, France) was performed. Of these, 74 patients were classified as elderly (≥70 years) and 72 patients were considered younger (&lt;70 years). Perioperative outcomes, final pathology results, overall survival (OS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the 2 groups. Results Both groups had similar clinical stage at diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender distribution. Ileal conduit-type diversion was favored in the older vs younger group, 84% vs 36%, respectively. Overall conversion rate to open procedures was 4% in both groups. Perioperative complication rate was not significantly different between the younger and older patients. Positive margin rate was 5% in both groups. The 5-year OS for older and younger patients was 75% and 87%, respectively ( P = .03), and the 5-year CSS for the 2 groups was 51% and 54%, respectively ( P = .7). Conclusion Laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly does not have worse perioperative complications or pathologic outcomes compared with younger patients and therefore can be offered as treatment option in select older patients.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22386404</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2012-03, Vol.79 (3), p.585-590
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926504224
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cystectomy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Retrospective Studies
Robotics
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary Diversion
Urology
Urothelium - pathology
title Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Laparoscopic%20and%20Robotic%20Radical%20Cystectomy%20in%20the%20Elderly%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Guillotreau,%20Julien&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=585-590&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E926504224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926504224&rft_id=info:pmid/22386404&rft_els_id=S0090429511027130&rfr_iscdi=true