Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level
CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states. METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 2011-06, Vol.43 (2), p.78-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Finer, Lawrence B. Kost, Kathryn |
description | CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states. METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant figures by the number of women aged 15–44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Most rates fell within a range of 40–65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline. CONCLUSIONS: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1363/4307811 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925721615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23048865</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23048865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-b7584662cf7cc64ec37a57a158c2e2f040e3c733aa938f35a285367c849e269e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEURq2Kqjxa9ReARmxYTWv7-rlE4VUpAkSKys4yzh2YMJkJ9oQ2_75GSYmEVGVlW_f4SN93CfnK6DcGCr4LoNow9oHsMAus5GBhK98lmFKBYNtkN6UJpUxYzT-Rbc6UZJqqHVLetnXbYzvGcXEd8aH1bVgUN77HVPi-6B-xGPX5VQzxBZvP5GPlm4RfVuceuT07_Tm4KIdX5z8Gx8MySNCsvNfSCKV4qHQISmAA7aX2TJrAkVdUUISgAby3YCqQnhsJSgcjLHJlEfbI0dI7i93zHFPvpnUK2DS-xW6enOVS5ww530aSWausoXQjaQxQoakUm0nNIOejkMnDd-Skm8c2V5Mhaa3Mfa91IXYpRazcLNZTHxeOUfe6PbfaXiYPVrr5_RTHb9y_dWWALoHfdYOL_3nc9ejmYu3cX36ZpL6La2UOa4x6LbBczuvU45-3uY9PTmnQ0v26PHd3d2w0EObEGfgL-CS1sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875995497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Finer, Lawrence B. ; Kost, Kathryn</creator><creatorcontrib>Finer, Lawrence B. ; Kost, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states. METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant figures by the number of women aged 15–44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Most rates fell within a range of 40–65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline. CONCLUSIONS: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1363/4307811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21651706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data ; Adolescent ; Adult ; benchmarks ; Birth control ; Births ; Contraception ; Contraceptives ; Data Collection ; Education ; Family planning ; Family Planning Policy ; Family Planning Services - methods ; Family Planning Services - standards ; Female ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Intention ; Modeling ; Polls & surveys ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy, Unwanted ; Pregnant women ; Pregnant Women - psychology ; Regression analysis ; Reproduction ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive Medicine - standards ; Reproductive Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Response rates ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk management ; Sex Education ; Socioeconomic Factors ; State policies ; Statistics ; United States ; United States - epidemiology ; Unwanted pregnancy ; urban populations ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2011-06, Vol.43 (2), p.78-87</ispartof><rights>2011 Guttmacher Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-b7584662cf7cc64ec37a57a158c2e2f040e3c733aa938f35a285367c849e269e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-b7584662cf7cc64ec37a57a158c2e2f040e3c733aa938f35a285367c849e269e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23048865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23048865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27865,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21651706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finer, Lawrence B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kost, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><title>Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level</title><title>Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health</title><addtitle>Perspect Sex Reprod Health</addtitle><description>CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states. METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant figures by the number of women aged 15–44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Most rates fell within a range of 40–65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline. CONCLUSIONS: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>benchmarks</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraceptives</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Policy</subject><subject>Family Planning Services - methods</subject><subject>Family Planning Services - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Unwanted</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Pregnant Women - psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sex Education</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>State policies</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Unwanted pregnancy</subject><subject>urban populations</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1538-6341</issn><issn>1931-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEURq2Kqjxa9ReARmxYTWv7-rlE4VUpAkSKys4yzh2YMJkJ9oQ2_75GSYmEVGVlW_f4SN93CfnK6DcGCr4LoNow9oHsMAus5GBhK98lmFKBYNtkN6UJpUxYzT-Rbc6UZJqqHVLetnXbYzvGcXEd8aH1bVgUN77HVPi-6B-xGPX5VQzxBZvP5GPlm4RfVuceuT07_Tm4KIdX5z8Gx8MySNCsvNfSCKV4qHQISmAA7aX2TJrAkVdUUISgAby3YCqQnhsJSgcjLHJlEfbI0dI7i93zHFPvpnUK2DS-xW6enOVS5ww530aSWausoXQjaQxQoakUm0nNIOejkMnDd-Skm8c2V5Mhaa3Mfa91IXYpRazcLNZTHxeOUfe6PbfaXiYPVrr5_RTHb9y_dWWALoHfdYOL_3nc9ejmYu3cX36ZpL6La2UOa4x6LbBczuvU45-3uY9PTmnQ0v26PHd3d2w0EObEGfgL-CS1sw</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Finer, Lawrence B.</creator><creator>Kost, Kathryn</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Guttmacher Institute and Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level</title><author>Finer, Lawrence B. ; Kost, Kathryn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5371-b7584662cf7cc64ec37a57a158c2e2f040e3c733aa938f35a285367c849e269e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>benchmarks</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraceptives</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Policy</topic><topic>Family Planning Services - methods</topic><topic>Family Planning Services - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Unwanted</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Pregnant Women - psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sex Education</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>State policies</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Unwanted pregnancy</topic><topic>urban populations</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finer, Lawrence B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kost, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finer, Lawrence B.</au><au>Kost, Kathryn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect Sex Reprod Health</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>78-87</pages><issn>1538-6341</issn><eissn>1931-2393</eissn><abstract>CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all 50 states. METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant figures by the number of women aged 15–44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Most rates fell within a range of 40–65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline. CONCLUSIONS: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21651706</pmid><doi>10.1363/4307811</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-6341 |
ispartof | Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2011-06, Vol.43 (2), p.78-87 |
issn | 1538-6341 1931-2393 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925721615 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data Adolescent Adult benchmarks Birth control Births Contraception Contraceptives Data Collection Education Family planning Family Planning Policy Family Planning Services - methods Family Planning Services - standards Female Health surveys Humans Intention Modeling Polls & surveys Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Pregnancy Rate Pregnancy, Unwanted Pregnant women Pregnant Women - psychology Regression analysis Reproduction Reproductive health Reproductive Medicine - standards Reproductive Medicine - statistics & numerical data Response rates Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk Factors Risk management Sex Education Socioeconomic Factors State policies Statistics United States United States - epidemiology Unwanted pregnancy urban populations Women Womens health |
title | Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unintended%20Pregnancy%20Rates%20at%20the%20State%20Level&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20sexual%20and%20reproductive%20health&rft.au=Finer,%20Lawrence%20B.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=78-87&rft.issn=1538-6341&rft.eissn=1931-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1363/4307811&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23048865%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875995497&rft_id=info:pmid/21651706&rft_jstor_id=23048865&rfr_iscdi=true |