Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future

In this article, Jose Manuel Quijano takes us back to how the southern common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Mercosur) was formed and discusses the main strengths and weaknesses of this political and economic mechanism. There are, he says, two external factors vital to the future...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista mexicana de política exterior 2011-06 (92), p.57-96
1. Verfasser: Quijano, Jose Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 92
container_start_page 57
container_title Revista mexicana de política exterior
container_volume
creator Quijano, Jose Manuel
description In this article, Jose Manuel Quijano takes us back to how the southern common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Mercosur) was formed and discusses the main strengths and weaknesses of this political and economic mechanism. There are, he says, two external factors vital to the future of regional integration: the resumption of talks with the European Union (Eu) and the path the relationship of Mercosur member countries with China takes. In the first part of his article, the author analyzes a set of initiatives that raised expectations of a transformation within Mercosur at the turn of the century -- progress toward a customs union, the Trade in Services Protocol, programs for the integration of production, the handling of asymmetries, new institutions and the adhesion of Venezuela as a full member of the community. Many of these proposals have already been or are in the process of being implemented and most of them are judged favorably by Quijano, with the occasional exception. The second part of the essay deals with Mercosur negotiations with the EU, which were reinitiated in 2010 and which have continued in 2011. A good agreement, he says, must necessarily be beneficial to both parties and in the case of Mercosur, those benefits are linked to balanced sectorial growth and the diversification of exports to include not just primary products, but an increasing variety of industrial goods and technology oriented services. An agreement tailored to meet the needs of both parties would not repeat the traditional central-peripheral relationship pattern and, if entered into on an equal footing, could bring Mercosur closer to carving out a niche on the international arena alongside the major actors, thereby reverting current trends that are pigeonholing the country as a supplier of raw materials to industrial hubs. What is suggested here is a "new type of agreement", an ambitious undertaking that seeks a rapprochement between two regions that have historically enjoyed deep-seated ties and that stand to gain from a well-structured treaty that veers away from the traditional free-trade agreement, one in which reciprocity takes pride of place and that tackles "new issues" like intellectual property, government purchases and negative-list services, much like a WTO-plus-type agreement. Quijano concludes by commenting on the strength and international appeal of China, which accounts for a large slice of total Mercosur exports and the vast majority of Braz
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925720091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>925720091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p641-83501df90c00316e6a62ffbf1d1bfac97ccc610a2bddad2e944092201392b37c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01PwzAQRH0Aiar0P_jWC5F214md5YYqCkhBcOi9cvxRCiEusfP_qYA7cxk9afSkuRALwLapNBBdiVXO73AOG1AtL8TNc5hcyvN0K7uUPo7jQZYky1uQrzYXaUf_A9u5zFO4FpfRDjms_nopdtv73eax6l4enjZ3XXXSNVatagB9ZHAACnXQVlOMfUSPfbSOjXNOI1jqvbeeAtc1MBGgYuqVcWop1r_a05S-5pDL_vOYXRgGO4Y05z1TY-h8Af9fIjOgaVr1DUPUS_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919901758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Quijano, Jose Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Quijano, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, Jose Manuel Quijano takes us back to how the southern common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Mercosur) was formed and discusses the main strengths and weaknesses of this political and economic mechanism. There are, he says, two external factors vital to the future of regional integration: the resumption of talks with the European Union (Eu) and the path the relationship of Mercosur member countries with China takes. In the first part of his article, the author analyzes a set of initiatives that raised expectations of a transformation within Mercosur at the turn of the century -- progress toward a customs union, the Trade in Services Protocol, programs for the integration of production, the handling of asymmetries, new institutions and the adhesion of Venezuela as a full member of the community. Many of these proposals have already been or are in the process of being implemented and most of them are judged favorably by Quijano, with the occasional exception. The second part of the essay deals with Mercosur negotiations with the EU, which were reinitiated in 2010 and which have continued in 2011. A good agreement, he says, must necessarily be beneficial to both parties and in the case of Mercosur, those benefits are linked to balanced sectorial growth and the diversification of exports to include not just primary products, but an increasing variety of industrial goods and technology oriented services. An agreement tailored to meet the needs of both parties would not repeat the traditional central-peripheral relationship pattern and, if entered into on an equal footing, could bring Mercosur closer to carving out a niche on the international arena alongside the major actors, thereby reverting current trends that are pigeonholing the country as a supplier of raw materials to industrial hubs. What is suggested here is a "new type of agreement", an ambitious undertaking that seeks a rapprochement between two regions that have historically enjoyed deep-seated ties and that stand to gain from a well-structured treaty that veers away from the traditional free-trade agreement, one in which reciprocity takes pride of place and that tackles "new issues" like intellectual property, government purchases and negative-list services, much like a WTO-plus-type agreement. Quijano concludes by commenting on the strength and international appeal of China, which accounts for a large slice of total Mercosur exports and the vast majority of Brazil's. A cursory look at Mercosur's exports reveals that China purchases neither capital nor consumer goods from the region, but almost exclusively food and raw materials. In this sense, it is contributing to the rapid "primarization" of the bloc's exports and creating a problem all four member countries will have to address sooner rather than later. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0185-6022</identifier><language>spa</language><subject>Argentina ; Brazil ; Customs unions ; Economic relations ; European Union ; Exports and Imports ; Majorities ; Negotiation ; Peoples Republic of China ; Raw Materials ; Services ; South America ; Southern cone common market ; Trade liberalization ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Revista mexicana de política exterior, 2011-06 (92), p.57-96</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quijano, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future</title><title>Revista mexicana de política exterior</title><description>In this article, Jose Manuel Quijano takes us back to how the southern common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Mercosur) was formed and discusses the main strengths and weaknesses of this political and economic mechanism. There are, he says, two external factors vital to the future of regional integration: the resumption of talks with the European Union (Eu) and the path the relationship of Mercosur member countries with China takes. In the first part of his article, the author analyzes a set of initiatives that raised expectations of a transformation within Mercosur at the turn of the century -- progress toward a customs union, the Trade in Services Protocol, programs for the integration of production, the handling of asymmetries, new institutions and the adhesion of Venezuela as a full member of the community. Many of these proposals have already been or are in the process of being implemented and most of them are judged favorably by Quijano, with the occasional exception. The second part of the essay deals with Mercosur negotiations with the EU, which were reinitiated in 2010 and which have continued in 2011. A good agreement, he says, must necessarily be beneficial to both parties and in the case of Mercosur, those benefits are linked to balanced sectorial growth and the diversification of exports to include not just primary products, but an increasing variety of industrial goods and technology oriented services. An agreement tailored to meet the needs of both parties would not repeat the traditional central-peripheral relationship pattern and, if entered into on an equal footing, could bring Mercosur closer to carving out a niche on the international arena alongside the major actors, thereby reverting current trends that are pigeonholing the country as a supplier of raw materials to industrial hubs. What is suggested here is a "new type of agreement", an ambitious undertaking that seeks a rapprochement between two regions that have historically enjoyed deep-seated ties and that stand to gain from a well-structured treaty that veers away from the traditional free-trade agreement, one in which reciprocity takes pride of place and that tackles "new issues" like intellectual property, government purchases and negative-list services, much like a WTO-plus-type agreement. Quijano concludes by commenting on the strength and international appeal of China, which accounts for a large slice of total Mercosur exports and the vast majority of Brazil's. A cursory look at Mercosur's exports reveals that China purchases neither capital nor consumer goods from the region, but almost exclusively food and raw materials. In this sense, it is contributing to the rapid "primarization" of the bloc's exports and creating a problem all four member countries will have to address sooner rather than later. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Customs unions</subject><subject>Economic relations</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Exports and Imports</subject><subject>Majorities</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Raw Materials</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Southern cone common market</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0185-6022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj01PwzAQRH0Aiar0P_jWC5F214md5YYqCkhBcOi9cvxRCiEusfP_qYA7cxk9afSkuRALwLapNBBdiVXO73AOG1AtL8TNc5hcyvN0K7uUPo7jQZYky1uQrzYXaUf_A9u5zFO4FpfRDjms_nopdtv73eax6l4enjZ3XXXSNVatagB9ZHAACnXQVlOMfUSPfbSOjXNOI1jqvbeeAtc1MBGgYuqVcWop1r_a05S-5pDL_vOYXRgGO4Y05z1TY-h8Af9fIjOgaVr1DUPUS_E</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Quijano, Jose Manuel</creator><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future</title><author>Quijano, Jose Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p641-83501df90c00316e6a62ffbf1d1bfac97ccc610a2bddad2e944092201392b37c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Customs unions</topic><topic>Economic relations</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Exports and Imports</topic><topic>Majorities</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Raw Materials</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Southern cone common market</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quijano, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Revista mexicana de política exterior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quijano, Jose Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future</atitle><jtitle>Revista mexicana de política exterior</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>92</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>57-96</pages><issn>0185-6022</issn><abstract>In this article, Jose Manuel Quijano takes us back to how the southern common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (Mercosur) was formed and discusses the main strengths and weaknesses of this political and economic mechanism. There are, he says, two external factors vital to the future of regional integration: the resumption of talks with the European Union (Eu) and the path the relationship of Mercosur member countries with China takes. In the first part of his article, the author analyzes a set of initiatives that raised expectations of a transformation within Mercosur at the turn of the century -- progress toward a customs union, the Trade in Services Protocol, programs for the integration of production, the handling of asymmetries, new institutions and the adhesion of Venezuela as a full member of the community. Many of these proposals have already been or are in the process of being implemented and most of them are judged favorably by Quijano, with the occasional exception. The second part of the essay deals with Mercosur negotiations with the EU, which were reinitiated in 2010 and which have continued in 2011. A good agreement, he says, must necessarily be beneficial to both parties and in the case of Mercosur, those benefits are linked to balanced sectorial growth and the diversification of exports to include not just primary products, but an increasing variety of industrial goods and technology oriented services. An agreement tailored to meet the needs of both parties would not repeat the traditional central-peripheral relationship pattern and, if entered into on an equal footing, could bring Mercosur closer to carving out a niche on the international arena alongside the major actors, thereby reverting current trends that are pigeonholing the country as a supplier of raw materials to industrial hubs. What is suggested here is a "new type of agreement", an ambitious undertaking that seeks a rapprochement between two regions that have historically enjoyed deep-seated ties and that stand to gain from a well-structured treaty that veers away from the traditional free-trade agreement, one in which reciprocity takes pride of place and that tackles "new issues" like intellectual property, government purchases and negative-list services, much like a WTO-plus-type agreement. Quijano concludes by commenting on the strength and international appeal of China, which accounts for a large slice of total Mercosur exports and the vast majority of Brazil's. A cursory look at Mercosur's exports reveals that China purchases neither capital nor consumer goods from the region, but almost exclusively food and raw materials. In this sense, it is contributing to the rapid "primarization" of the bloc's exports and creating a problem all four member countries will have to address sooner rather than later. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0185-6022
ispartof Revista mexicana de política exterior, 2011-06 (92), p.57-96
issn 0185-6022
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925720091
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Argentina
Brazil
Customs unions
Economic relations
European Union
Exports and Imports
Majorities
Negotiation
Peoples Republic of China
Raw Materials
Services
South America
Southern cone common market
Trade liberalization
Treaties
title Mercosur: Looking to the Past and the Future
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A08%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mercosur:%20Looking%20to%20the%20Past%20and%20the%20Future&rft.jtitle=Revista%20mexicana%20de%20pol%C3%ADtica%20exterior&rft.au=Quijano,%20Jose%20Manuel&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.issue=92&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=57-96&rft.issn=0185-6022&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E925720091%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919901758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true