The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults
This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of 'street-level bureaucracy' in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of social work 2011-07, Vol.41 (5), p.912-930 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 930 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 912 |
container_title | The British journal of social work |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Kirton, Derek Feast, Julia Goddard, Jim |
description | This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of 'street-level bureaucracy' in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this area, via questionnaires and interviews with key actors in local authorities and voluntary organisations. The study was prompted by widespread but largely anecdotal evidence that practices and service provision for those seeking to access their care records varied enormously. While post-care adults may seek access to records for reasons similar to those of adopted adults (curiosity, information on birth family, medical information, care histories and experiences, search and reunion), there is a lack of comparable legal framework and service provision, with reliance instead on the 1998 Data Protection Act (DPA). The intersection of data protection and (child) welfare gives rise to a number of important tensions that are explored, such as those surrounding 'ownership' of files and their content, between rights to information and (paternalistic) welfare considerations, and whether the handling of requests should constitute an administrative or a social work task. Finally, we consider the findings, their wider contexts and implications for legal reform and policy change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjsw/bcq122 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925714365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43771475</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/bjsw/bcq122</oup_id><sourcerecordid>43771475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-89e05ebcba67ffc2950f5a12f6d31a31041ebb8d8cf6fdbd0e1a472169b2af5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmARGug2zSnnguihWyhuNPrwR26L07SBQANJIDcjySPixbE2ktzSf19tXXLooTkNDA_DvLyEnAD7DKwRp2Ybf54a-wScH5AVyLIueCnuX5EVY1IVAhh_Td7EuGWMVYrBiqTbB6R3Eal39HyINmAa_ESHiWq6boepx4DjqNf0BsOPweIZPddJ0-vgE9o_VE893ViLMdLkafswjH3R6oD0YhgxUucDvfYxLbtNP48pviWHTo8Rj__OI3J38eW2_VZcff962W6uCitLmYq6QabQWKPLyjnLG8Wc0sBd2QvQOYwENKbua-tK15ueIWhZcSgbw7VTRhyR9XJ3F_zTjDF1jzniPs-Efo5dw1UFUpQqy4__laCAQ-YKXqYMoM7_K5Hp-3_o1s9hypG7um54ValaZvRpQTb4GAO6bheGRx1-5UvdvtVu32q3tJr1h0X7efcCfLfAbUw-PFMpqhy5UuI3OQqrVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889277584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kirton, Derek ; Feast, Julia ; Goddard, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek ; Feast, Julia ; Goddard, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of 'street-level bureaucracy' in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this area, via questionnaires and interviews with key actors in local authorities and voluntary organisations. The study was prompted by widespread but largely anecdotal evidence that practices and service provision for those seeking to access their care records varied enormously. While post-care adults may seek access to records for reasons similar to those of adopted adults (curiosity, information on birth family, medical information, care histories and experiences, search and reunion), there is a lack of comparable legal framework and service provision, with reliance instead on the 1998 Data Protection Act (DPA). The intersection of data protection and (child) welfare gives rise to a number of important tensions that are explored, such as those surrounding 'ownership' of files and their content, between rights to information and (paternalistic) welfare considerations, and whether the handling of requests should constitute an administrative or a social work task. Finally, we consider the findings, their wider contexts and implications for legal reform and policy change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq122</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Access ; Access to information ; Adopted children ; Adults ; Basic rights ; Care records ; Child care ; Child welfare ; Clinical information ; Data integrity ; Data protection ; Delivery Systems ; Family members ; Feasts ; Foster home care ; Legal consent ; Legislation ; Paternalism ; Policy Implementation ; Policy making ; Public policy ; Records (Documents) ; Reunion ; Rights ; Service provision ; Social policy ; Social work ; United Kingdom ; Welfare Services</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2011-07, Vol.41 (5), p.912-930</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2011</rights><rights>The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved. 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-89e05ebcba67ffc2950f5a12f6d31a31041ebb8d8cf6fdbd0e1a472169b2af5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-89e05ebcba67ffc2950f5a12f6d31a31041ebb8d8cf6fdbd0e1a472169b2af5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43771475$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43771475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1584,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feast, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of 'street-level bureaucracy' in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this area, via questionnaires and interviews with key actors in local authorities and voluntary organisations. The study was prompted by widespread but largely anecdotal evidence that practices and service provision for those seeking to access their care records varied enormously. While post-care adults may seek access to records for reasons similar to those of adopted adults (curiosity, information on birth family, medical information, care histories and experiences, search and reunion), there is a lack of comparable legal framework and service provision, with reliance instead on the 1998 Data Protection Act (DPA). The intersection of data protection and (child) welfare gives rise to a number of important tensions that are explored, such as those surrounding 'ownership' of files and their content, between rights to information and (paternalistic) welfare considerations, and whether the handling of requests should constitute an administrative or a social work task. Finally, we consider the findings, their wider contexts and implications for legal reform and policy change.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Adopted children</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Basic rights</subject><subject>Care records</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Clinical information</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Data protection</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Family members</subject><subject>Feasts</subject><subject>Foster home care</subject><subject>Legal consent</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Policy Implementation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Records (Documents)</subject><subject>Reunion</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Service provision</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Welfare Services</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmARGug2zSnnguihWyhuNPrwR26L07SBQANJIDcjySPixbE2ktzSf19tXXLooTkNDA_DvLyEnAD7DKwRp2Ybf54a-wScH5AVyLIueCnuX5EVY1IVAhh_Td7EuGWMVYrBiqTbB6R3Eal39HyINmAa_ESHiWq6boepx4DjqNf0BsOPweIZPddJ0-vgE9o_VE893ViLMdLkafswjH3R6oD0YhgxUucDvfYxLbtNP48pviWHTo8Rj__OI3J38eW2_VZcff962W6uCitLmYq6QabQWKPLyjnLG8Wc0sBd2QvQOYwENKbua-tK15ueIWhZcSgbw7VTRhyR9XJ3F_zTjDF1jzniPs-Efo5dw1UFUpQqy4__laCAQ-YKXqYMoM7_K5Hp-3_o1s9hypG7um54ValaZvRpQTb4GAO6bheGRx1-5UvdvtVu32q3tJr1h0X7efcCfLfAbUw-PFMpqhy5UuI3OQqrVQ</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Kirton, Derek</creator><creator>Feast, Julia</creator><creator>Goddard, Jim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults</title><author>Kirton, Derek ; Feast, Julia ; Goddard, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-89e05ebcba67ffc2950f5a12f6d31a31041ebb8d8cf6fdbd0e1a472169b2af5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Adopted children</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Basic rights</topic><topic>Care records</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Clinical information</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Data protection</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Family members</topic><topic>Feasts</topic><topic>Foster home care</topic><topic>Legal consent</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Policy Implementation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Records (Documents)</topic><topic>Reunion</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Service provision</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Welfare Services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirton, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feast, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirton, Derek</au><au>Feast, Julia</au><au>Goddard, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>912</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>912-930</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This paper focuses on policy implementation and, in particular, the workings of 'street-level bureaucracy' in a small, marginalised area of welfare provision, namely post-care adults seeking access to their care records. The work arises from research mapping UK service provision in this area, via questionnaires and interviews with key actors in local authorities and voluntary organisations. The study was prompted by widespread but largely anecdotal evidence that practices and service provision for those seeking to access their care records varied enormously. While post-care adults may seek access to records for reasons similar to those of adopted adults (curiosity, information on birth family, medical information, care histories and experiences, search and reunion), there is a lack of comparable legal framework and service provision, with reliance instead on the 1998 Data Protection Act (DPA). The intersection of data protection and (child) welfare gives rise to a number of important tensions that are explored, such as those surrounding 'ownership' of files and their content, between rights to information and (paternalistic) welfare considerations, and whether the handling of requests should constitute an administrative or a social work task. Finally, we consider the findings, their wider contexts and implications for legal reform and policy change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcq122</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3102 |
ispartof | The British journal of social work, 2011-07, Vol.41 (5), p.912-930 |
issn | 0045-3102 1468-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925714365 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Access Access to information Adopted children Adults Basic rights Care records Child care Child welfare Clinical information Data integrity Data protection Delivery Systems Family members Feasts Foster home care Legal consent Legislation Paternalism Policy Implementation Policy making Public policy Records (Documents) Reunion Rights Service provision Social policy Social work United Kingdom Welfare Services |
title | The Use of Discretion in a 'Cinderella' Service: Data Protection and Access to Child-Care Files for Post-Care Adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A24%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Discretion%20in%20a%20'Cinderella'%20Service:%20Data%20Protection%20and%20Access%20to%20Child-Care%20Files%20for%20Post-Care%20Adults&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Kirton,%20Derek&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=912&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=912-930&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcq122&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43771475%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889277584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43771475&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjsw/bcq122&rfr_iscdi=true |