Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models
Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Politická ekonomie 2011-01, Vol.59 (3), p.359-378 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | cze ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | Politická ekonomie |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Rubinova, Stela |
description | Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced energy service becomes cheaper and economic theory then suggests that consumers should demand more of it, which will cause a loss of the potential technological saving. The phenomenon is called the rebound effect and it has become a focus of energy economists since early 80s. However, even today there is no clear consensus on its importance. Quantification of the rebound effect is mainly hampered by poor data availability and the comparison of results is not straightforward due to methodological differences. Our study concentrates right on the economic theory of the demand for energy services, definitions and their applicability to empirical estimation. It summarizes the state of knowledge and elaborates on plausible models for empirical quantification of the rebound effect which should bear consistent results. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18267/j.polek.796 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925713814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>925713814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-e7a381ef8eff07645a35dc41e36e44934b144c2d6fb3180a41357f930fb505e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwd4x4YUv_Jih0qhlYqQUFlbrjOmKU4c7BQpX8Lv4rbAajSjc-d1EbqiZEILluW320nnLHxM8jI7QSPGeZYUjKWnaEQIZwmPlXM0DmFLCGFEFEXGRuj7FZTua9diZ_Dc7QJsnK3wrAX_PuAHaFRb4d7hRdN59wUNtH3AdfsHzIypdQ2tHu7wagPOD3gvWEQoKmyt1b53wMZ53G8AT2PS-93_xFnT1T5S1g54BaGHCj-7Cmy4RGdG2QDj33iB3h5nq-k8Wb48Lab3y0TTkvUJ5IoXFEwBxpA8E6niaaUFBZ6BECUXayqEZlVm1pwWRAnK09yUnJh1SlKg_AJdH_vG8z53cQPZ1EGDtaqF-A1ZsjSncYSI5M2R1N6F4MHIzteN8oOkRB4ckFt5cEBGB_gPyVJ80g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>925713814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rubinova, Stela</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubinova, Stela</creatorcontrib><description>Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced energy service becomes cheaper and economic theory then suggests that consumers should demand more of it, which will cause a loss of the potential technological saving. The phenomenon is called the rebound effect and it has become a focus of energy economists since early 80s. However, even today there is no clear consensus on its importance. Quantification of the rebound effect is mainly hampered by poor data availability and the comparison of results is not straightforward due to methodological differences. Our study concentrates right on the economic theory of the demand for energy services, definitions and their applicability to empirical estimation. It summarizes the state of knowledge and elaborates on plausible models for empirical quantification of the rebound effect which should bear consistent results. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2336-8225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.796</identifier><language>cze ; eng</language><subject>Consumers ; Definitions ; Economic Development ; Economic Theories ; Effectiveness ; Efficiency ; Energy ; Energy Policy ; Knowledge</subject><ispartof>Politická ekonomie, 2011-01, Vol.59 (3), p.359-378</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-e7a381ef8eff07645a35dc41e36e44934b144c2d6fb3180a41357f930fb505e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubinova, Stela</creatorcontrib><title>Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models</title><title>Politická ekonomie</title><description>Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced energy service becomes cheaper and economic theory then suggests that consumers should demand more of it, which will cause a loss of the potential technological saving. The phenomenon is called the rebound effect and it has become a focus of energy economists since early 80s. However, even today there is no clear consensus on its importance. Quantification of the rebound effect is mainly hampered by poor data availability and the comparison of results is not straightforward due to methodological differences. Our study concentrates right on the economic theory of the demand for energy services, definitions and their applicability to empirical estimation. It summarizes the state of knowledge and elaborates on plausible models for empirical quantification of the rebound effect which should bear consistent results. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic Theories</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy Policy</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><issn>0032-3233</issn><issn>2336-8225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwd4x4YUv_Jih0qhlYqQUFlbrjOmKU4c7BQpX8Lv4rbAajSjc-d1EbqiZEILluW320nnLHxM8jI7QSPGeZYUjKWnaEQIZwmPlXM0DmFLCGFEFEXGRuj7FZTua9diZ_Dc7QJsnK3wrAX_PuAHaFRb4d7hRdN59wUNtH3AdfsHzIypdQ2tHu7wagPOD3gvWEQoKmyt1b53wMZ53G8AT2PS-93_xFnT1T5S1g54BaGHCj-7Cmy4RGdG2QDj33iB3h5nq-k8Wb48Lab3y0TTkvUJ5IoXFEwBxpA8E6niaaUFBZ6BECUXayqEZlVm1pwWRAnK09yUnJh1SlKg_AJdH_vG8z53cQPZ1EGDtaqF-A1ZsjSncYSI5M2R1N6F4MHIzteN8oOkRB4ckFt5cEBGB_gPyVJ80g</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Rubinova, Stela</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models</title><author>Rubinova, Stela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-e7a381ef8eff07645a35dc41e36e44934b144c2d6fb3180a41357f930fb505e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>cze ; eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic Theories</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy Policy</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubinova, Stela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Politická ekonomie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubinova, Stela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models</atitle><jtitle>Politická ekonomie</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>359-378</pages><issn>0032-3233</issn><eissn>2336-8225</eissn><abstract>Energy efficiency improvements have become a major hope for decoupling the energy demand from economic growth and for achieving environmental goals. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of policies based on promoting energy efficiency may be undermined by behavioral responses. A more efficiently produced energy service becomes cheaper and economic theory then suggests that consumers should demand more of it, which will cause a loss of the potential technological saving. The phenomenon is called the rebound effect and it has become a focus of energy economists since early 80s. However, even today there is no clear consensus on its importance. Quantification of the rebound effect is mainly hampered by poor data availability and the comparison of results is not straightforward due to methodological differences. Our study concentrates right on the economic theory of the demand for energy services, definitions and their applicability to empirical estimation. It summarizes the state of knowledge and elaborates on plausible models for empirical quantification of the rebound effect which should bear consistent results. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.18267/j.polek.796</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3233 |
ispartof | Politická ekonomie, 2011-01, Vol.59 (3), p.359-378 |
issn | 0032-3233 2336-8225 |
language | cze ; eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925713814 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Consumers Definitions Economic Development Economic Theories Effectiveness Efficiency Energy Energy Policy Knowledge |
title | Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in Energy Efficiency: Theory and Its Implications for the Construction of Empirically Tested Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reaction%20of%20Household%20Energy%20Demand%20to%20Improvements%20in%20Energy%20Efficiency:%20Theory%20and%20Its%20Implications%20for%20the%20Construction%20of%20Empirically%20Tested%20Models&rft.jtitle=Politick%C3%A1%20ekonomie&rft.au=Rubinova,%20Stela&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=359-378&rft.issn=0032-3233&rft.eissn=2336-8225&rft_id=info:doi/10.18267/j.polek.796&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E925713814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=925713814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |