Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769
This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Common market law review 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | Common market law review |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Bulterman, Mielle |
description | This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925711218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1499165261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p598-4561b004bc178835ca03e5c5f66b7a9e9acec38910eaac762bac8b4eba93b5723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjs1KAzEURoMoWKvvENy4afQmmfwtJdRaKSjSnUi5Se_YlulMnen4_LbqytWBw-HjO2ED6Z0RXis4ZQOQ1ghwBs7ZRddtAMC7ohiwMmJHPApTwB3oEX_Btlrjluo9_7rlsenrvK5G_KlffvzIpuT7FfFJi_WSxxVuE7VHqdyhqYkrADvib0e883F85VNhnA2X7KzEqqOrPw7Z_GE8j49i9jyZxvuZ2JngRWGsTABFytJ5r01G0GSyKa1NDgMFzJS1DxIIMTurEmafCkoYdDJO6SG7-Z3dtc1nT91-sV13maoKa2r6bhGUcVIq6Q_l9b9y0_Rtffi2UAqU01Jp_Q0NDVn6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220273123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Kluwer Law International</source><creator>Bulterman, Mielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><description>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMLRDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Kluwer Law International</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Children ; Conformity ; Councils ; Courts ; Discretion ; EU directives ; European Union ; Families & family life ; Human Rights ; International Court ; International Law ; Legislative Bodies ; Migration ; Parliaments ; Provisions ; Reunification ; Treaties ; Waiting period</subject><ispartof>Common market law review, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><title>Common market law review</title><description>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Discretion</subject><subject>EU directives</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Reunification</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Waiting period</subject><issn>0165-0750</issn><issn>1875-8320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjs1KAzEURoMoWKvvENy4afQmmfwtJdRaKSjSnUi5Se_YlulMnen4_LbqytWBw-HjO2ED6Z0RXis4ZQOQ1ghwBs7ZRddtAMC7ohiwMmJHPApTwB3oEX_Btlrjluo9_7rlsenrvK5G_KlffvzIpuT7FfFJi_WSxxVuE7VHqdyhqYkrADvib0e883F85VNhnA2X7KzEqqOrPw7Z_GE8j49i9jyZxvuZ2JngRWGsTABFytJ5r01G0GSyKa1NDgMFzJS1DxIIMTurEmafCkoYdDJO6SG7-Z3dtc1nT91-sV13maoKa2r6bhGUcVIq6Q_l9b9y0_Rtffi2UAqU01Jp_Q0NDVn6</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Bulterman, Mielle</creator><general>Kluwer Law International</general><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><author>Bulterman, Mielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p598-4561b004bc178835ca03e5c5f66b7a9e9acec38910eaac762bac8b4eba93b5723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Discretion</topic><topic>EU directives</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Reunification</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Waiting period</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Common market law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulterman, Mielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</atitle><jtitle>Common market law review</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>245-259</pages><issn>0165-0750</issn><eissn>1875-8320</eissn><coden>CMLRDD</coden><abstract>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Kluwer Law International</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0750 |
ispartof | Common market law review, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259 |
issn | 0165-0750 1875-8320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925711218 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Kluwer Law International |
subjects | Advocacy Children Conformity Councils Courts Discretion EU directives European Union Families & family life Human Rights International Court International Law Legislative Bodies Migration Parliaments Provisions Reunification Treaties Waiting period |
title | Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20C-540/03,%20Parliament%20v.%20Council,%20Judgment%20of%20the%20Grand%20Chamber%20of%2027%20June%202006,%20%5B2006%5D%20ECR%20I-5769&rft.jtitle=Common%20market%20law%20review&rft.au=Bulterman,%20Mielle&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=245-259&rft.issn=0165-0750&rft.eissn=1875-8320&rft.coden=CMLRDD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1499165261%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220273123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |