Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769

This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Common market law review 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259
1. Verfasser: Bulterman, Mielle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 1
container_start_page 245
container_title Common market law review
container_volume 45
creator Bulterman, Mielle
description This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925711218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1499165261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p598-4561b004bc178835ca03e5c5f66b7a9e9acec38910eaac762bac8b4eba93b5723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjs1KAzEURoMoWKvvENy4afQmmfwtJdRaKSjSnUi5Se_YlulMnen4_LbqytWBw-HjO2ED6Z0RXis4ZQOQ1ghwBs7ZRddtAMC7ohiwMmJHPApTwB3oEX_Btlrjluo9_7rlsenrvK5G_KlffvzIpuT7FfFJi_WSxxVuE7VHqdyhqYkrADvib0e883F85VNhnA2X7KzEqqOrPw7Z_GE8j49i9jyZxvuZ2JngRWGsTABFytJ5r01G0GSyKa1NDgMFzJS1DxIIMTurEmafCkoYdDJO6SG7-Z3dtc1nT91-sV13maoKa2r6bhGUcVIq6Q_l9b9y0_Rtffi2UAqU01Jp_Q0NDVn6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220273123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Kluwer Law International</source><creator>Bulterman, Mielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><description>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMLRDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Kluwer Law International</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Children ; Conformity ; Councils ; Courts ; Discretion ; EU directives ; European Union ; Families &amp; family life ; Human Rights ; International Court ; International Law ; Legislative Bodies ; Migration ; Parliaments ; Provisions ; Reunification ; Treaties ; Waiting period</subject><ispartof>Common market law review, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><title>Common market law review</title><description>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Discretion</subject><subject>EU directives</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Reunification</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Waiting period</subject><issn>0165-0750</issn><issn>1875-8320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjs1KAzEURoMoWKvvENy4afQmmfwtJdRaKSjSnUi5Se_YlulMnen4_LbqytWBw-HjO2ED6Z0RXis4ZQOQ1ghwBs7ZRddtAMC7ohiwMmJHPApTwB3oEX_Btlrjluo9_7rlsenrvK5G_KlffvzIpuT7FfFJi_WSxxVuE7VHqdyhqYkrADvib0e883F85VNhnA2X7KzEqqOrPw7Z_GE8j49i9jyZxvuZ2JngRWGsTABFytJ5r01G0GSyKa1NDgMFzJS1DxIIMTurEmafCkoYdDJO6SG7-Z3dtc1nT91-sV13maoKa2r6bhGUcVIq6Q_l9b9y0_Rtffi2UAqU01Jp_Q0NDVn6</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Bulterman, Mielle</creator><general>Kluwer Law International</general><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</title><author>Bulterman, Mielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p598-4561b004bc178835ca03e5c5f66b7a9e9acec38910eaac762bac8b4eba93b5723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Discretion</topic><topic>EU directives</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Reunification</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Waiting period</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulterman, Mielle</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Common market law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulterman, Mielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769</atitle><jtitle>Common market law review</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>245-259</pages><issn>0165-0750</issn><eissn>1875-8320</eissn><coden>CMLRDD</coden><abstract>This case provided the first opportunity for the European Court of Justice to rule on a Title IV instrument. In this case, the European Parliament challenged the lawfulness of several provisions of Directive 2003/86, on the right to family reunification. This Directive lays down the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the EU Member States; as well as imposing obligations, it also allows for some discretion on the part of the Member States. Only the national courts whose judgments are not subject to appeal are allowed to do so. It seems that in due course this situation will change: with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the special regime for preliminary rulings under Title IV EC Treaty will be abolished. Furthermore, at the time of writing a proposal of the Court to change its jurisdiction under Title IV is being discussed in Council.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Kluwer Law International</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0750
ispartof Common market law review, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.245-259
issn 0165-0750
1875-8320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925711218
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Kluwer Law International
subjects Advocacy
Children
Conformity
Councils
Courts
Discretion
EU directives
European Union
Families & family life
Human Rights
International Court
International Law
Legislative Bodies
Migration
Parliaments
Provisions
Reunification
Treaties
Waiting period
title Case C-540/03, Parliament v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-5769
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20C-540/03,%20Parliament%20v.%20Council,%20Judgment%20of%20the%20Grand%20Chamber%20of%2027%20June%202006,%20%5B2006%5D%20ECR%20I-5769&rft.jtitle=Common%20market%20law%20review&rft.au=Bulterman,%20Mielle&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=245-259&rft.issn=0165-0750&rft.eissn=1875-8320&rft.coden=CMLRDD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1499165261%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220273123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true