Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832
The long-standing understanding of the British 1832 Reform Act as an elite response to a revolutionary threat has been given renewed prominence in recent work on the political economy of democratization. But earlier episodes of popular revolt in Britain led to elite unity rather than elite concessio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World politics 2011-10, Vol.63 (4), p.678-710 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 710 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | World politics |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Morrison, Bruce |
description | The long-standing understanding of the British 1832 Reform Act as an elite response to a revolutionary threat has been given renewed prominence in recent work on the political economy of democratization. But earlier episodes of popular revolt in Britain led to elite unity rather than elite concessions. This article argues that the absence of effective elite closure against parliamentary reform in the early 1830s was the result of an extended process of state reform that had the effect of gradually reducing the capacity of the monarchy. This deprived the crown of patronage required for the construction of an antireform coalition, while also mollifying the reformers' fears that mass mobilization would invite repression and with it the recalibration of the constitution in favor of the monarchy. Therefore, while pressure from below was indeed critical to the passage of parliamentary reform, its contribution was mediated by institutional changes that, over time, weakened the sources of resistance to change and rendered reformist elites more amenable to the necessary reliance on the threat of force. This case study thus establishes that change at critical junctures can be subject to the influence of incremental institutional change occurring in relatively settled periods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0043887111000207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925701369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043887111000207</cupid><jstor_id>23018807</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23018807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-30c9ee9f730223d8d6da5ad4f8b9304caf28100037b8b7a7f518ec34485382ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGOFCEQhonRxHH1ATyYEC96aS2gaWhv62TVTTYx2dFzh6HpGSbdMAJt4m0eRF9un0SY2axGoycS6vs_qiiEnhJ4RYCI1yuAmkkpCCEAQEHcQwsCsqkYY_I-WpRyVeoP0aMYdwCENFQs0GG5Vc6Z0boNTluDbw7fr01Mo4kRr_Y22IT9gC-d819Vst7dHH68wRejTQYvvdMZy5cRK9dnKCab5kKpERfvxmDrjtq3WWTjFl-bwYcJn-ujlkhGH6MHgxqjeXJ7nqHP7y4-LT9UVx_fXy7Prypd1zJVDHRrTDsIBpSyXvZNr7jq60GuWwa1VgOVZXIm1nItlBg4kUaznOVMUtWzM_Ti5N0H_2XOI3aTjdqMo3LGz7FrKRdAWNNm8uV_yfzfRHJKKWT0-R_ozs8hj599wFsBjBeInCAdfIzBDN0-2EmFb9lUZKL7a3k5U9-Jd0anaY7ml7vm2Qvdqiy47JeQOud4k2PPTrFdTD7cvUMZECmPWnbbiprWwfab36T_buYnnsO1aQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905970350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Morrison, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>The long-standing understanding of the British 1832 Reform Act as an elite response to a revolutionary threat has been given renewed prominence in recent work on the political economy of democratization. But earlier episodes of popular revolt in Britain led to elite unity rather than elite concessions. This article argues that the absence of effective elite closure against parliamentary reform in the early 1830s was the result of an extended process of state reform that had the effect of gradually reducing the capacity of the monarchy. This deprived the crown of patronage required for the construction of an antireform coalition, while also mollifying the reformers' fears that mass mobilization would invite repression and with it the recalibration of the constitution in favor of the monarchy. Therefore, while pressure from below was indeed critical to the passage of parliamentary reform, its contribution was mediated by institutional changes that, over time, weakened the sources of resistance to change and rendered reformist elites more amenable to the necessary reliance on the threat of force. This case study thus establishes that change at critical junctures can be subject to the influence of incremental institutional change occurring in relatively settled periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043887111000207</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOPOBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Closure ; Coalitions ; Constitutions ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Economic reform ; Electoral reform ; Elites ; French Revolution ; Government reform ; Great Britain ; Institutional change ; International politics ; Monarchy ; Parliaments ; Patronage ; Political Economy ; Political elites ; Political history ; Political mobilization ; Political reform ; Political revolutions ; Reform ; Reforms ; Repression (Political) ; Revolution ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>World politics, 2011-10, Vol.63 (4), p.678-710</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2011</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Trustees of Princeton University</rights><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-30c9ee9f730223d8d6da5ad4f8b9304caf28100037b8b7a7f518ec34485382ad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23018807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23018807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832</title><title>World politics</title><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><description>The long-standing understanding of the British 1832 Reform Act as an elite response to a revolutionary threat has been given renewed prominence in recent work on the political economy of democratization. But earlier episodes of popular revolt in Britain led to elite unity rather than elite concessions. This article argues that the absence of effective elite closure against parliamentary reform in the early 1830s was the result of an extended process of state reform that had the effect of gradually reducing the capacity of the monarchy. This deprived the crown of patronage required for the construction of an antireform coalition, while also mollifying the reformers' fears that mass mobilization would invite repression and with it the recalibration of the constitution in favor of the monarchy. Therefore, while pressure from below was indeed critical to the passage of parliamentary reform, its contribution was mediated by institutional changes that, over time, weakened the sources of resistance to change and rendered reformist elites more amenable to the necessary reliance on the threat of force. This case study thus establishes that change at critical junctures can be subject to the influence of incremental institutional change occurring in relatively settled periods.</description><subject>Closure</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Electoral reform</subject><subject>Elites</subject><subject>French Revolution</subject><subject>Government reform</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>Monarchy</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Political Economy</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Political history</subject><subject>Political mobilization</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Political revolutions</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Repression (Political)</subject><subject>Revolution</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0043-8871</issn><issn>1086-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcGOFCEQhonRxHH1ATyYEC96aS2gaWhv62TVTTYx2dFzh6HpGSbdMAJt4m0eRF9un0SY2axGoycS6vs_qiiEnhJ4RYCI1yuAmkkpCCEAQEHcQwsCsqkYY_I-WpRyVeoP0aMYdwCENFQs0GG5Vc6Z0boNTluDbw7fr01Mo4kRr_Y22IT9gC-d819Vst7dHH68wRejTQYvvdMZy5cRK9dnKCab5kKpERfvxmDrjtq3WWTjFl-bwYcJn-ujlkhGH6MHgxqjeXJ7nqHP7y4-LT9UVx_fXy7Prypd1zJVDHRrTDsIBpSyXvZNr7jq60GuWwa1VgOVZXIm1nItlBg4kUaznOVMUtWzM_Ti5N0H_2XOI3aTjdqMo3LGz7FrKRdAWNNm8uV_yfzfRHJKKWT0-R_ozs8hj599wFsBjBeInCAdfIzBDN0-2EmFb9lUZKL7a3k5U9-Jd0anaY7ml7vm2Qvdqiy47JeQOud4k2PPTrFdTD7cvUMZECmPWnbbiprWwfab36T_buYnnsO1aQ</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Morrison, Bruce</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832</title><author>Morrison, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-30c9ee9f730223d8d6da5ad4f8b9304caf28100037b8b7a7f518ec34485382ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Closure</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Electoral reform</topic><topic>Elites</topic><topic>French Revolution</topic><topic>Government reform</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>Monarchy</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Political Economy</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Political history</topic><topic>Political mobilization</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Political revolutions</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Repression (Political)</topic><topic>Revolution</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>World politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrison, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832</atitle><jtitle>World politics</jtitle><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>678-710</pages><issn>0043-8871</issn><eissn>1086-3338</eissn><coden>WOPOBI</coden><abstract>The long-standing understanding of the British 1832 Reform Act as an elite response to a revolutionary threat has been given renewed prominence in recent work on the political economy of democratization. But earlier episodes of popular revolt in Britain led to elite unity rather than elite concessions. This article argues that the absence of effective elite closure against parliamentary reform in the early 1830s was the result of an extended process of state reform that had the effect of gradually reducing the capacity of the monarchy. This deprived the crown of patronage required for the construction of an antireform coalition, while also mollifying the reformers' fears that mass mobilization would invite repression and with it the recalibration of the constitution in favor of the monarchy. Therefore, while pressure from below was indeed critical to the passage of parliamentary reform, its contribution was mediated by institutional changes that, over time, weakened the sources of resistance to change and rendered reformist elites more amenable to the necessary reliance on the threat of force. This case study thus establishes that change at critical junctures can be subject to the influence of incremental institutional change occurring in relatively settled periods.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043887111000207</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-8871 |
ispartof | World politics, 2011-10, Vol.63 (4), p.678-710 |
issn | 0043-8871 1086-3338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_925701369 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Closure Coalitions Constitutions Democracy Democratization Economic reform Electoral reform Elites French Revolution Government reform Great Britain Institutional change International politics Monarchy Parliaments Patronage Political Economy Political elites Political history Political mobilization Political reform Political revolutions Reform Reforms Repression (Political) Revolution United Kingdom |
title | Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Channeling%20the%20%E2%80%9CRestless%20Spirit%20of%20Innovation%E2%80%9D:%20Elite%20Concessions%20and%20Institutional%20Change%20in%20the%20British%20Reform%20Act%20of%201832&rft.jtitle=World%20politics&rft.au=Morrison,%20Bruce&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=678-710&rft.issn=0043-8871&rft.eissn=1086-3338&rft.coden=WOPOBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043887111000207&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23018807%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905970350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043887111000207&rft_jstor_id=23018807&rfr_iscdi=true |