An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample
Abstract One of the aims of forensic science is to determine the identities of victims of crime. In some cases the investigators may have ideas as to the identities of the victims and in these situations, ante mortem photographs of the victims could be used in order to try and establish identity thr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forensic science international 2012-03, Vol.216 (1), p.198.e1-198.e6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198.e6 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 198.e1 |
container_title | Forensic science international |
container_volume | 216 |
creator | Gordon, G.M Steyn, M |
description | Abstract One of the aims of forensic science is to determine the identities of victims of crime. In some cases the investigators may have ideas as to the identities of the victims and in these situations, ante mortem photographs of the victims could be used in order to try and establish identity through skull-photo superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed digital photographic superimposition technique on a South African sample of cadaver photographs and skulls. Forty facial photographs were selected and for each photo, 10 skulls (including the skull corresponding to the photo) were used for superimposition. The investigator did not know which of the 10 skulls corresponded to the photograph in question. The skulls were scanned 3-dimensionally, using a Cyberware™ Model 3030 Colour-3D Scanhead scanner. The photos were also scanned. Superimposition was done in 3D Studio Max and involved a morphological superimposition, whereby a skull is superimposed over the photo and assessed for a morphological match. Superimposition using selected anatomical landmarks was also performed to assess the match. A total of 400 skull-photo superimpositions were carried out using the morphological assessment and another 400 using the anatomical landmarks. In 85% of cases the correct skull was included in the possible matches for a particular photo using morphological assessment. However, in all of these cases, between zero and three other skulls out of 10 possibilities could also match a specific photo. In the landmark based assessment, the correct skull was included in 80% of cases. Once again, however, between one and seven other skulls out of 10 possibilities also matched the photo. This indicates that skull-photo superimposition has limited use in the identification of human skeletal remains, but may be useful as an initial screening tool. Corroborative techniques should also be used in the identification process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924962625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0379073811004555</els_id><sourcerecordid>924962625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-e385fc4766f86e432ee66f3c730540bac128efccf54b4d1ede7b2da882795b5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FzToQS895rvTl4Vh8QsWPKyeQzpdcTLT02mT7oX596aZcYUFxVMq8NRbvPUWQq8oWVNC1fvd2seUXQjDtGaE0jVp1oToR2hFdc0qxTR_jFaE101Faq4v0LOcd4QQKZl6ii4YI0woKVZovxlwGO4gT-GHnUJcflPE0xawdW5O1h2xHTqcoA-2DX2Yjjh6nPdz31fjNhY2zyOkcBhjDmcBbPFtnKct3vgUnB1wtoexh-foibd9hhfn9xJ9__jh2_Xn6ubrpy_Xm5vKScWmCriW3olaKa8VCM4ASsldzYkUpLWOMg3eOS9FKzoKHdQt66zWrG5kKz2_RG9PumOKP-dizRxCdtD3doA4Z9Mw0SimmCzku3-SZdeNEoI3qqCvH6C7OKeh-Ch6knNB5QK9-RtECRdac6V5oeoT5VLMOYE3Y9mfTccCLSOV2Zn7eM0SryGNKfGWzpdn_bk9QHff9zvPAmxOAJT93gVIpqjA4KALCdxkuhj-Y8jVAw3Xh6Hk2O_hCPmPI5OZIeZ2ubLlyCglREgp-S_yms-5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034883683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Gordon, G.M ; Steyn, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gordon, G.M ; Steyn, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract One of the aims of forensic science is to determine the identities of victims of crime. In some cases the investigators may have ideas as to the identities of the victims and in these situations, ante mortem photographs of the victims could be used in order to try and establish identity through skull-photo superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed digital photographic superimposition technique on a South African sample of cadaver photographs and skulls. Forty facial photographs were selected and for each photo, 10 skulls (including the skull corresponding to the photo) were used for superimposition. The investigator did not know which of the 10 skulls corresponded to the photograph in question. The skulls were scanned 3-dimensionally, using a Cyberware™ Model 3030 Colour-3D Scanhead scanner. The photos were also scanned. Superimposition was done in 3D Studio Max and involved a morphological superimposition, whereby a skull is superimposed over the photo and assessed for a morphological match. Superimposition using selected anatomical landmarks was also performed to assess the match. A total of 400 skull-photo superimpositions were carried out using the morphological assessment and another 400 using the anatomical landmarks. In 85% of cases the correct skull was included in the possible matches for a particular photo using morphological assessment. However, in all of these cases, between zero and three other skulls out of 10 possibilities could also match a specific photo. In the landmark based assessment, the correct skull was included in 80% of cases. Once again, however, between one and seven other skulls out of 10 possibilities also matched the photo. This indicates that skull-photo superimposition has limited use in the identification of human skeletal remains, but may be useful as an initial screening tool. Corroborative techniques should also be used in the identification process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22024654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; African Continental Ancestry Group ; Assessments ; Bones ; Cranio-facial identification ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Face - anatomy & histology ; Forensic anthropology ; Forensic Anthropology - methods ; Forensic Anthropology Population Data ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Human remains ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Landmarks ; Male ; Morphology ; Pathology ; Personal identification ; Photography ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skeletal remains ; Skull ; Skull - anatomy & histology ; Skull-photo superimposition ; Software ; South Africa ; Three dimensional</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2012-03, Vol.216 (1), p.198.e1-198.e6</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 10, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-e385fc4766f86e432ee66f3c730540bac128efccf54b4d1ede7b2da882795b5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-e385fc4766f86e432ee66f3c730540bac128efccf54b4d1ede7b2da882795b5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1034883683?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22024654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gordon, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M</creatorcontrib><title>An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>Abstract One of the aims of forensic science is to determine the identities of victims of crime. In some cases the investigators may have ideas as to the identities of the victims and in these situations, ante mortem photographs of the victims could be used in order to try and establish identity through skull-photo superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed digital photographic superimposition technique on a South African sample of cadaver photographs and skulls. Forty facial photographs were selected and for each photo, 10 skulls (including the skull corresponding to the photo) were used for superimposition. The investigator did not know which of the 10 skulls corresponded to the photograph in question. The skulls were scanned 3-dimensionally, using a Cyberware™ Model 3030 Colour-3D Scanhead scanner. The photos were also scanned. Superimposition was done in 3D Studio Max and involved a morphological superimposition, whereby a skull is superimposed over the photo and assessed for a morphological match. Superimposition using selected anatomical landmarks was also performed to assess the match. A total of 400 skull-photo superimpositions were carried out using the morphological assessment and another 400 using the anatomical landmarks. In 85% of cases the correct skull was included in the possible matches for a particular photo using morphological assessment. However, in all of these cases, between zero and three other skulls out of 10 possibilities could also match a specific photo. In the landmark based assessment, the correct skull was included in 80% of cases. Once again, however, between one and seven other skulls out of 10 possibilities also matched the photo. This indicates that skull-photo superimposition has limited use in the identification of human skeletal remains, but may be useful as an initial screening tool. Corroborative techniques should also be used in the identification process.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>African Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Cranio-facial identification</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Face - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Forensic anthropology</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology - methods</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology Population Data</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Human remains</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Landmarks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Personal identification</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skeletal remains</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Skull - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Skull-photo superimposition</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FzToQS895rvTl4Vh8QsWPKyeQzpdcTLT02mT7oX596aZcYUFxVMq8NRbvPUWQq8oWVNC1fvd2seUXQjDtGaE0jVp1oToR2hFdc0qxTR_jFaE101Faq4v0LOcd4QQKZl6ii4YI0woKVZovxlwGO4gT-GHnUJcflPE0xawdW5O1h2xHTqcoA-2DX2Yjjh6nPdz31fjNhY2zyOkcBhjDmcBbPFtnKct3vgUnB1wtoexh-foibd9hhfn9xJ9__jh2_Xn6ubrpy_Xm5vKScWmCriW3olaKa8VCM4ASsldzYkUpLWOMg3eOS9FKzoKHdQt66zWrG5kKz2_RG9PumOKP-dizRxCdtD3doA4Z9Mw0SimmCzku3-SZdeNEoI3qqCvH6C7OKeh-Ch6knNB5QK9-RtECRdac6V5oeoT5VLMOYE3Y9mfTccCLSOV2Zn7eM0SryGNKfGWzpdn_bk9QHff9zvPAmxOAJT93gVIpqjA4KALCdxkuhj-Y8jVAw3Xh6Hk2O_hCPmPI5OZIeZ2ubLlyCglREgp-S_yms-5</recordid><startdate>20120310</startdate><enddate>20120310</enddate><creator>Gordon, G.M</creator><creator>Steyn, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120310</creationdate><title>An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample</title><author>Gordon, G.M ; Steyn, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-e385fc4766f86e432ee66f3c730540bac128efccf54b4d1ede7b2da882795b5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>African Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Cranio-facial identification</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Face - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Forensic anthropology</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology - methods</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology Population Data</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Human remains</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Landmarks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Personal identification</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skeletal remains</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Skull - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Skull-photo superimposition</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gordon, G.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyn, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gordon, G.M</au><au>Steyn, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2012-03-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>198.e1</spage><epage>198.e6</epage><pages>198.e1-198.e6</pages><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><abstract>Abstract One of the aims of forensic science is to determine the identities of victims of crime. In some cases the investigators may have ideas as to the identities of the victims and in these situations, ante mortem photographs of the victims could be used in order to try and establish identity through skull-photo superimposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed digital photographic superimposition technique on a South African sample of cadaver photographs and skulls. Forty facial photographs were selected and for each photo, 10 skulls (including the skull corresponding to the photo) were used for superimposition. The investigator did not know which of the 10 skulls corresponded to the photograph in question. The skulls were scanned 3-dimensionally, using a Cyberware™ Model 3030 Colour-3D Scanhead scanner. The photos were also scanned. Superimposition was done in 3D Studio Max and involved a morphological superimposition, whereby a skull is superimposed over the photo and assessed for a morphological match. Superimposition using selected anatomical landmarks was also performed to assess the match. A total of 400 skull-photo superimpositions were carried out using the morphological assessment and another 400 using the anatomical landmarks. In 85% of cases the correct skull was included in the possible matches for a particular photo using morphological assessment. However, in all of these cases, between zero and three other skulls out of 10 possibilities could also match a specific photo. In the landmark based assessment, the correct skull was included in 80% of cases. Once again, however, between one and seven other skulls out of 10 possibilities also matched the photo. This indicates that skull-photo superimposition has limited use in the identification of human skeletal remains, but may be useful as an initial screening tool. Corroborative techniques should also be used in the identification process.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>22024654</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.008</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-0738 |
ispartof | Forensic science international, 2012-03, Vol.216 (1), p.198.e1-198.e6 |
issn | 0379-0738 1872-6283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924962625 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Accuracy African Continental Ancestry Group Assessments Bones Cranio-facial identification European Continental Ancestry Group Face - anatomy & histology Forensic anthropology Forensic Anthropology - methods Forensic Anthropology Population Data Forensic science Forensic sciences Human remains Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional Landmarks Male Morphology Pathology Personal identification Photography Reproducibility of Results Skeletal remains Skull Skull - anatomy & histology Skull-photo superimposition Software South Africa Three dimensional |
title | An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20investigation%20into%20the%20accuracy%20and%20reliability%20of%20skull-photo%20superimposition%20in%20a%20South%20African%20sample&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Gordon,%20G.M&rft.date=2012-03-10&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=198.e1&rft.epage=198.e6&rft.pages=198.e1-198.e6&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E924962625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034883683&rft_id=info:pmid/22024654&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0379073811004555&rfr_iscdi=true |