The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)
Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the struc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of language & communication disorders 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | International journal of language & communication disorders |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Conti-Ramsden, Gina Durkin, Kevin Walker, Allan J. |
description | Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth.
Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI).
Methods & Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language.
Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers.
Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924961543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ990285</ericid><sourcerecordid>924961543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEYh_wDxCyhNDGRYrtxHaMuEFlG6uqgrQBl5brHK8u-Sh2ojX_HmctReIC4Rsf6Tzv63P8JgkieELiebuekJzjlMsin1BMyARjLPlk-yg5PjQexzrjRUoLSo-SkxDWEaKEkafJEaUZl5jT48TfrgDVEIK-g4C6FQwoQFO-Q5DW2lWoD4CWA9JlW0Ew0HQB3btuhXRTPhRt3yGNVi50rR9Qa1HYgHHWGVTp5q6PrsjVG-18HbXo_GZ-_eZZ8sTqKsDz_X2afL28uJ1-Suefr66nH-apYUTwFGgJmTXcsoJiXTApBccSC7AlE4Rqo4le2kKUVpc5WwohSm7AWlsCERHNTpOzne_Gtz97CJ2qXVyhioNB2wclaS45YXkWyfN_kvEfc5FjKkfTV3-h67b3TdxDRatcFkKwkSp2lPFtCB6s2nhXaz8ogtWYoFqrMSg1BqXGBNVDgmobpS_3D_TLGsqD8HdkEXi9B3QwurJeN8aFPxxjXETvyL3YceCdObQvZlJiWrDYfr9r37sKhv-eT83m049ydE938pg8bA9y7X8oLjLB1PfFlbpcfMGLm-KbmmW_AC-tzmU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544987750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth.
Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI).
Methods & Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language.
Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers.
Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-2822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22369062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJLDFI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; adolescent writing ; Adolescents ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Children & youth ; Comprehension ; Correlation ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; e-mail ; Electronic Mail ; Electronic mail systems ; England ; Female ; Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula ; Flesch Reading Ease Formula ; Foreign Countries ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Aptitude ; Language Disorders ; Language Impairments ; Language Skills ; Literacy ; literacy skills ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Peers ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Readability ; Reading ; Single-Blind Method ; specific language impairment (SLI) ; Spelling ; Teenagers ; Writing</subject><ispartof>International journal of language & communication disorders, 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228</ispartof><rights>2011 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1460-6984.2011.00096.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1460-6984.2011.00096.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ990285$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25567146$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22369062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><title>International journal of language & communication disorders</title><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth.
Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI).
Methods & Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language.
Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers.
Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>adolescent writing</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>e-mail</subject><subject>Electronic Mail</subject><subject>Electronic mail systems</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</subject><subject>Flesch Reading Ease Formula</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Aptitude</subject><subject>Language Disorders</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>literacy skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Readability</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1368-2822</issn><issn>1460-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEYh_wDxCyhNDGRYrtxHaMuEFlG6uqgrQBl5brHK8u-Sh2ojX_HmctReIC4Rsf6Tzv63P8JgkieELiebuekJzjlMsin1BMyARjLPlk-yg5PjQexzrjRUoLSo-SkxDWEaKEkafJEaUZl5jT48TfrgDVEIK-g4C6FQwoQFO-Q5DW2lWoD4CWA9JlW0Ew0HQB3btuhXRTPhRt3yGNVi50rR9Qa1HYgHHWGVTp5q6PrsjVG-18HbXo_GZ-_eZZ8sTqKsDz_X2afL28uJ1-Suefr66nH-apYUTwFGgJmTXcsoJiXTApBccSC7AlE4Rqo4le2kKUVpc5WwohSm7AWlsCERHNTpOzne_Gtz97CJ2qXVyhioNB2wclaS45YXkWyfN_kvEfc5FjKkfTV3-h67b3TdxDRatcFkKwkSp2lPFtCB6s2nhXaz8ogtWYoFqrMSg1BqXGBNVDgmobpS_3D_TLGsqD8HdkEXi9B3QwurJeN8aFPxxjXETvyL3YceCdObQvZlJiWrDYfr9r37sKhv-eT83m049ydE938pg8bA9y7X8oLjLB1PfFlbpcfMGLm-KbmmW_AC-tzmU</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creator><creator>Durkin, Kevin</creator><creator>Walker, Allan J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><author>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>adolescent writing</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>e-mail</topic><topic>Electronic Mail</topic><topic>Electronic mail systems</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</topic><topic>Flesch Reading Ease Formula</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Aptitude</topic><topic>Language Disorders</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>literacy skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Readability</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>specific language impairment (SLI)</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of language & communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</au><au>Durkin, Kevin</au><au>Walker, Allan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ990285</ericid><atitle>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of language & communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>217-228</pages><issn>1368-2822</issn><eissn>1460-6984</eissn><coden>IJLDFI</coden><abstract>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth.
Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI).
Methods & Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language.
Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers.
Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22369062</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-2822 |
ispartof | International journal of language & communication disorders, 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228 |
issn | 1368-2822 1460-6984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924961543 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent adolescent writing Adolescents Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Children & youth Comprehension Correlation Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes Electronic Mail Electronic mail systems England Female Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula Flesch Reading Ease Formula Foreign Countries Humans Language and communication disorders Language Aptitude Language Disorders Language Impairments Language Skills Literacy literacy skills Male Medical sciences Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology Peers Psycholinguistics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Readability Reading Single-Blind Method specific language impairment (SLI) Spelling Teenagers Writing |
title | The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20messages%20they%20send:%20e-mail%20use%20by%20adolescents%20with%20and%20without%20a%20history%20of%20specific%20language%20impairment%20(SLI)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20language%20&%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Conti-Ramsden,%20Gina&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=217-228&rft.issn=1368-2822&rft.eissn=1460-6984&rft.coden=IJLDFI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E924961543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544987750&rft_id=info:pmid/22369062&rft_ericid=EJ990285&rfr_iscdi=true |