The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)

Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the struc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of language & communication disorders 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228
Hauptverfasser: Conti-Ramsden, Gina, Durkin, Kevin, Walker, Allan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 2
container_start_page 217
container_title International journal of language & communication disorders
container_volume 47
creator Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Durkin, Kevin
Walker, Allan J.
description Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods & Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language. Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924961543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ990285</ericid><sourcerecordid>924961543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEYh_wDxCyhNDGRYrtxHaMuEFlG6uqgrQBl5brHK8u-Sh2ojX_HmctReIC4Rsf6Tzv63P8JgkieELiebuekJzjlMsin1BMyARjLPlk-yg5PjQexzrjRUoLSo-SkxDWEaKEkafJEaUZl5jT48TfrgDVEIK-g4C6FQwoQFO-Q5DW2lWoD4CWA9JlW0Ew0HQB3btuhXRTPhRt3yGNVi50rR9Qa1HYgHHWGVTp5q6PrsjVG-18HbXo_GZ-_eZZ8sTqKsDz_X2afL28uJ1-Suefr66nH-apYUTwFGgJmTXcsoJiXTApBccSC7AlE4Rqo4le2kKUVpc5WwohSm7AWlsCERHNTpOzne_Gtz97CJ2qXVyhioNB2wclaS45YXkWyfN_kvEfc5FjKkfTV3-h67b3TdxDRatcFkKwkSp2lPFtCB6s2nhXaz8ogtWYoFqrMSg1BqXGBNVDgmobpS_3D_TLGsqD8HdkEXi9B3QwurJeN8aFPxxjXETvyL3YceCdObQvZlJiWrDYfr9r37sKhv-eT83m049ydE938pg8bA9y7X8oLjLB1PfFlbpcfMGLm-KbmmW_AC-tzmU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544987750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods &amp; Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language. Outcomes &amp; Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions &amp; Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-2822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22369062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJLDFI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; adolescent writing ; Adolescents ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Children &amp; youth ; Comprehension ; Correlation ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; e-mail ; Electronic Mail ; Electronic mail systems ; England ; Female ; Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula ; Flesch Reading Ease Formula ; Foreign Countries ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Aptitude ; Language Disorders ; Language Impairments ; Language Skills ; Literacy ; literacy skills ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Peers ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Readability ; Reading ; Single-Blind Method ; specific language impairment (SLI) ; Spelling ; Teenagers ; Writing</subject><ispartof>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders, 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228</ispartof><rights>2011 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1460-6984.2011.00096.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1460-6984.2011.00096.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ990285$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25567146$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22369062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><title>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</title><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods &amp; Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language. Outcomes &amp; Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions &amp; Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>adolescent writing</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>e-mail</subject><subject>Electronic Mail</subject><subject>Electronic mail systems</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</subject><subject>Flesch Reading Ease Formula</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Aptitude</subject><subject>Language Disorders</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>literacy skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Readability</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1368-2822</issn><issn>1460-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEYh_wDxCyhNDGRYrtxHaMuEFlG6uqgrQBl5brHK8u-Sh2ojX_HmctReIC4Rsf6Tzv63P8JgkieELiebuekJzjlMsin1BMyARjLPlk-yg5PjQexzrjRUoLSo-SkxDWEaKEkafJEaUZl5jT48TfrgDVEIK-g4C6FQwoQFO-Q5DW2lWoD4CWA9JlW0Ew0HQB3btuhXRTPhRt3yGNVi50rR9Qa1HYgHHWGVTp5q6PrsjVG-18HbXo_GZ-_eZZ8sTqKsDz_X2afL28uJ1-Suefr66nH-apYUTwFGgJmTXcsoJiXTApBccSC7AlE4Rqo4le2kKUVpc5WwohSm7AWlsCERHNTpOzne_Gtz97CJ2qXVyhioNB2wclaS45YXkWyfN_kvEfc5FjKkfTV3-h67b3TdxDRatcFkKwkSp2lPFtCB6s2nhXaz8ogtWYoFqrMSg1BqXGBNVDgmobpS_3D_TLGsqD8HdkEXi9B3QwurJeN8aFPxxjXETvyL3YceCdObQvZlJiWrDYfr9r37sKhv-eT83m049ydE938pg8bA9y7X8oLjLB1PfFlbpcfMGLm-KbmmW_AC-tzmU</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creator><creator>Durkin, Kevin</creator><creator>Walker, Allan J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</title><author>Conti-Ramsden, Gina ; Durkin, Kevin ; Walker, Allan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5176-e2de3fc6f5820a8599760907efd5712aca1abf87dfad45b777d6cefffde177603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>adolescent writing</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>e-mail</topic><topic>Electronic Mail</topic><topic>Electronic mail systems</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</topic><topic>Flesch Reading Ease Formula</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Aptitude</topic><topic>Language Disorders</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>literacy skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Readability</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>specific language impairment (SLI)</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conti-Ramsden, Gina</au><au>Durkin, Kevin</au><au>Walker, Allan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ990285</ericid><atitle>The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>217-228</pages><issn>1368-2822</issn><eissn>1460-6984</eissn><coden>IJLDFI</coden><abstract>Background: Contemporary adolescents use e‐mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e‐mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e‐mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods &amp; Procedures: Thirty‐eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e‐mail reply to a standard e‐mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e‐mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e‐mails were, how grammatically correct the e‐mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language. Outcomes &amp; Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e‐mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions &amp; Implications: The findings suggest that the e‐mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22369062</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-2822
ispartof International journal of language & communication disorders, 2012-03, Vol.47 (2), p.217-228
issn 1368-2822
1460-6984
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_924961543
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
adolescent writing
Adolescents
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Children & youth
Comprehension
Correlation
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
e-mail
Electronic Mail
Electronic mail systems
England
Female
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula
Flesch Reading Ease Formula
Foreign Countries
Humans
Language and communication disorders
Language Aptitude
Language Disorders
Language Impairments
Language Skills
Literacy
literacy skills
Male
Medical sciences
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Peers
Psycholinguistics
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Readability
Reading
Single-Blind Method
specific language impairment (SLI)
Spelling
Teenagers
Writing
title The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20messages%20they%20send:%20e-mail%20use%20by%20adolescents%20with%20and%20without%20a%20history%20of%20specific%20language%20impairment%20(SLI)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20language%20&%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Conti-Ramsden,%20Gina&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=217-228&rft.issn=1368-2822&rft.eissn=1460-6984&rft.coden=IJLDFI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E924961543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544987750&rft_id=info:pmid/22369062&rft_ericid=EJ990285&rfr_iscdi=true