Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet
Dietary medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 through C12:0) are researched for their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions and to increase N utilization efficiency in ruminants. We aimed to 1) compare coconut oil (CNO; ∼60% medium-chain fatty acids) with a source of long-chain fatty acids (animal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2012-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1484-1499 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1499 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1484 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Hollmann, M. Beede, D.K. |
description | Dietary medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 through C12:0) are researched for their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions and to increase N utilization efficiency in ruminants. We aimed to 1) compare coconut oil (CNO; ∼60% medium-chain fatty acids) with a source of long-chain fatty acids (animal fat blend; AFB) on lactational responses in a high-starch diet and 2) determine the effect of different dietary concentrations of CNO on dry matter intake (DMI). In experiment 1, the control diet (CTRL) contained (dry basis) 40% forage (71% corn silage, and alfalfa hay and haylage), 26% NDF, and 35% starch. Isonitrogenous treatment diets contained 5.0% of AFB (5%-AFB), CNO (5%-CNO), or a 1-to-1 mixture of AFB and CNO (5%-AFB-CNO) and 0.8% corn gluten meal in place of corn grain. Thirty-two multiparous dairy cows (201±46 d postpartum; 42.0±5.5 kg/d 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield) were adapted to CTRL, blocked by milk yield, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment diets for 21 d with samples and data collected from d 15 through 21. Treatment 5%-CNO decreased DMI markedly and precipitously and was discontinued after d 5. In wk 3, 5%-AFB and especially 5%-AFB-CNO lowered total-tract NDF digested vs. CTRL (2.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 3.1 kg/d, respectively), likely because fat treatments reduced DMI and 5%-AFB-CNO impaired total-tract NDF digestibility. Milk fat concentrations were 3.10% (CTRL), 2.51% (5%-AFB), and 1.97% (5%-AFB-CNO) and correlated negatively to concentrations of C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 in milk fat. Additionally, 5%-AFB and 5%-AFB-CNO tended to lower milk yield and decreased yields of solids-corrected milk and milk protein compared with CTRL. Fat treatments decreased milk lactose concentration, but increased milk citrate concentration. Moreover, cows fed 5%-AFB-CNO produced less solids-corrected milk than did cows fed 5%-AFB. In experiment 2, diets similar to CTRL contained 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0% CNO. Fifteen multiparous cows (219±42 d postpartum; 42.1±7.0kg milk yield; mean ± SD) were blocked by DMI and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment diets for an 8-d evaluation. Dietary concentration of CNO affected DMI, with the greatest depression at 4.0% CNO. Overall, dietary CNO depressed DMI and NDF digestibility of a high-starch diet compared with AFB. Feeding CNO to lactating cows equal to or greater than 2.5% decreased lactational performance or DMI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.2011-4792 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923952039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030212001051</els_id><sourcerecordid>923952039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f49581f41f3083843e80d8daa30c4413b281f037dfeb72ea96cf38b2df52c4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kTtvFDEURi1ERJZASQvToFQT_NzxlGgFCVIkiiS15bGvs45mxovtDUrPD-dOdoGKwvLr-LN9LiHvGL0QbK0_PfhywSljrex6_oKsmOKqFazXL8mKUs5bKig_Ja9LecAp41S9Iqeci7Xigq7Ir02adjbHkuYmhQZCAFfLMvQRqs1PjUsuzfvapDg2dvbY4mTHJtjaDCPgAp4crau2xjTjxg5ySHmys4Ml5iqNpUKcMednaQJgQLON99u2YLrbPl_zhpwEOxZ4e-zPyN3XL7ebq_b6--W3zefr1kkhahtkrzQLkgVBtdBSgKZee2sFdVIyMXDcpaLzAYaOg-3XLgg9cB8Ud1KvxRk5P-Tucvqxh1LNFIuDcbQzpH0xPRe94lT0SLYH0uVUSoZgdhm_nZ8Mo2bxbtC7WbybxTvy74_J-2EC_5f-IxqBj0fAFmfHkNFPLP84pVjXCYXchwMXbDL2Hgtj7m7wHkWxep1WEonuQACaeoyQTXER0LaPGWtnfIr_eeRv7KGn7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923952039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hollmann, M. ; Beede, D.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollmann, M. ; Beede, D.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Dietary medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 through C12:0) are researched for their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions and to increase N utilization efficiency in ruminants. We aimed to 1) compare coconut oil (CNO; ∼60% medium-chain fatty acids) with a source of long-chain fatty acids (animal fat blend; AFB) on lactational responses in a high-starch diet and 2) determine the effect of different dietary concentrations of CNO on dry matter intake (DMI). In experiment 1, the control diet (CTRL) contained (dry basis) 40% forage (71% corn silage, and alfalfa hay and haylage), 26% NDF, and 35% starch. Isonitrogenous treatment diets contained 5.0% of AFB (5%-AFB), CNO (5%-CNO), or a 1-to-1 mixture of AFB and CNO (5%-AFB-CNO) and 0.8% corn gluten meal in place of corn grain. Thirty-two multiparous dairy cows (201±46 d postpartum; 42.0±5.5 kg/d 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield) were adapted to CTRL, blocked by milk yield, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment diets for 21 d with samples and data collected from d 15 through 21. Treatment 5%-CNO decreased DMI markedly and precipitously and was discontinued after d 5. In wk 3, 5%-AFB and especially 5%-AFB-CNO lowered total-tract NDF digested vs. CTRL (2.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 3.1 kg/d, respectively), likely because fat treatments reduced DMI and 5%-AFB-CNO impaired total-tract NDF digestibility. Milk fat concentrations were 3.10% (CTRL), 2.51% (5%-AFB), and 1.97% (5%-AFB-CNO) and correlated negatively to concentrations of C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 in milk fat. Additionally, 5%-AFB and 5%-AFB-CNO tended to lower milk yield and decreased yields of solids-corrected milk and milk protein compared with CTRL. Fat treatments decreased milk lactose concentration, but increased milk citrate concentration. Moreover, cows fed 5%-AFB-CNO produced less solids-corrected milk than did cows fed 5%-AFB. In experiment 2, diets similar to CTRL contained 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0% CNO. Fifteen multiparous cows (219±42 d postpartum; 42.1±7.0kg milk yield; mean ± SD) were blocked by DMI and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment diets for an 8-d evaluation. Dietary concentration of CNO affected DMI, with the greatest depression at 4.0% CNO. Overall, dietary CNO depressed DMI and NDF digestibility of a high-starch diet compared with AFB. Feeding CNO to lactating cows equal to or greater than 2.5% decreased lactational performance or DMI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22365230</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>alfalfa hay ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; citrates ; Coconut Oil ; corn ; corn gluten meal ; corn silage ; correlation ; dairy cows ; dairy protein ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology ; Dietary Fats - pharmacology ; dietary starch ; digestibility ; dry matter intake ; fat source ; fatty acid ; Fatty Acids ; Female ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; haylage ; Holstein ; lactation ; Lactation - drug effects ; Lactation - physiology ; lactational performance ; lactose ; long chain fatty acids ; medium chain fatty acids ; methane production ; milk ; milk fat ; milk yield ; Plant Oils - pharmacology ; starch ; Starch - pharmacology ; Starch and starchy product industries ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2012-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1484-1499</ispartof><rights>2012 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f49581f41f3083843e80d8daa30c4413b281f037dfeb72ea96cf38b2df52c4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f49581f41f3083843e80d8daa30c4413b281f037dfeb72ea96cf38b2df52c4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4792$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25517735$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22365230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollmann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beede, D.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Dietary medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 through C12:0) are researched for their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions and to increase N utilization efficiency in ruminants. We aimed to 1) compare coconut oil (CNO; ∼60% medium-chain fatty acids) with a source of long-chain fatty acids (animal fat blend; AFB) on lactational responses in a high-starch diet and 2) determine the effect of different dietary concentrations of CNO on dry matter intake (DMI). In experiment 1, the control diet (CTRL) contained (dry basis) 40% forage (71% corn silage, and alfalfa hay and haylage), 26% NDF, and 35% starch. Isonitrogenous treatment diets contained 5.0% of AFB (5%-AFB), CNO (5%-CNO), or a 1-to-1 mixture of AFB and CNO (5%-AFB-CNO) and 0.8% corn gluten meal in place of corn grain. Thirty-two multiparous dairy cows (201±46 d postpartum; 42.0±5.5 kg/d 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield) were adapted to CTRL, blocked by milk yield, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment diets for 21 d with samples and data collected from d 15 through 21. Treatment 5%-CNO decreased DMI markedly and precipitously and was discontinued after d 5. In wk 3, 5%-AFB and especially 5%-AFB-CNO lowered total-tract NDF digested vs. CTRL (2.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 3.1 kg/d, respectively), likely because fat treatments reduced DMI and 5%-AFB-CNO impaired total-tract NDF digestibility. Milk fat concentrations were 3.10% (CTRL), 2.51% (5%-AFB), and 1.97% (5%-AFB-CNO) and correlated negatively to concentrations of C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 in milk fat. Additionally, 5%-AFB and 5%-AFB-CNO tended to lower milk yield and decreased yields of solids-corrected milk and milk protein compared with CTRL. Fat treatments decreased milk lactose concentration, but increased milk citrate concentration. Moreover, cows fed 5%-AFB-CNO produced less solids-corrected milk than did cows fed 5%-AFB. In experiment 2, diets similar to CTRL contained 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0% CNO. Fifteen multiparous cows (219±42 d postpartum; 42.1±7.0kg milk yield; mean ± SD) were blocked by DMI and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment diets for an 8-d evaluation. Dietary concentration of CNO affected DMI, with the greatest depression at 4.0% CNO. Overall, dietary CNO depressed DMI and NDF digestibility of a high-starch diet compared with AFB. Feeding CNO to lactating cows equal to or greater than 2.5% decreased lactational performance or DMI.</description><subject>alfalfa hay</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>citrates</subject><subject>Coconut Oil</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>corn gluten meal</subject><subject>corn silage</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>dairy protein</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - pharmacology</subject><subject>dietary starch</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>dry matter intake</subject><subject>fat source</subject><subject>fatty acid</subject><subject>Fatty Acids</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>haylage</subject><subject>Holstein</subject><subject>lactation</subject><subject>Lactation - drug effects</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>lactational performance</subject><subject>lactose</subject><subject>long chain fatty acids</subject><subject>medium chain fatty acids</subject><subject>methane production</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>milk fat</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>Plant Oils - pharmacology</subject><subject>starch</subject><subject>Starch - pharmacology</subject><subject>Starch and starchy product industries</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kTtvFDEURi1ERJZASQvToFQT_NzxlGgFCVIkiiS15bGvs45mxovtDUrPD-dOdoGKwvLr-LN9LiHvGL0QbK0_PfhywSljrex6_oKsmOKqFazXL8mKUs5bKig_Ja9LecAp41S9Iqeci7Xigq7Ir02adjbHkuYmhQZCAFfLMvQRqs1PjUsuzfvapDg2dvbY4mTHJtjaDCPgAp4crau2xjTjxg5ySHmys4Ml5iqNpUKcMednaQJgQLON99u2YLrbPl_zhpwEOxZ4e-zPyN3XL7ebq_b6--W3zefr1kkhahtkrzQLkgVBtdBSgKZee2sFdVIyMXDcpaLzAYaOg-3XLgg9cB8Ud1KvxRk5P-Tucvqxh1LNFIuDcbQzpH0xPRe94lT0SLYH0uVUSoZgdhm_nZ8Mo2bxbtC7WbybxTvy74_J-2EC_5f-IxqBj0fAFmfHkNFPLP84pVjXCYXchwMXbDL2Hgtj7m7wHkWxep1WEonuQACaeoyQTXER0LaPGWtnfIr_eeRv7KGn7Q</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Hollmann, M.</creator><creator>Beede, D.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet</title><author>Hollmann, M. ; Beede, D.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f49581f41f3083843e80d8daa30c4413b281f037dfeb72ea96cf38b2df52c4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>alfalfa hay</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>citrates</topic><topic>Coconut Oil</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>corn gluten meal</topic><topic>corn silage</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>dairy protein</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - pharmacology</topic><topic>dietary starch</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>dry matter intake</topic><topic>fat source</topic><topic>fatty acid</topic><topic>Fatty Acids</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>haylage</topic><topic>Holstein</topic><topic>lactation</topic><topic>Lactation - drug effects</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>lactational performance</topic><topic>lactose</topic><topic>long chain fatty acids</topic><topic>medium chain fatty acids</topic><topic>methane production</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>milk fat</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>Plant Oils - pharmacology</topic><topic>starch</topic><topic>Starch - pharmacology</topic><topic>Starch and starchy product industries</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollmann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beede, D.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollmann, M.</au><au>Beede, D.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1484</spage><epage>1499</epage><pages>1484-1499</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>Dietary medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 through C12:0) are researched for their potential to reduce enteric methane emissions and to increase N utilization efficiency in ruminants. We aimed to 1) compare coconut oil (CNO; ∼60% medium-chain fatty acids) with a source of long-chain fatty acids (animal fat blend; AFB) on lactational responses in a high-starch diet and 2) determine the effect of different dietary concentrations of CNO on dry matter intake (DMI). In experiment 1, the control diet (CTRL) contained (dry basis) 40% forage (71% corn silage, and alfalfa hay and haylage), 26% NDF, and 35% starch. Isonitrogenous treatment diets contained 5.0% of AFB (5%-AFB), CNO (5%-CNO), or a 1-to-1 mixture of AFB and CNO (5%-AFB-CNO) and 0.8% corn gluten meal in place of corn grain. Thirty-two multiparous dairy cows (201±46 d postpartum; 42.0±5.5 kg/d 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield) were adapted to CTRL, blocked by milk yield, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment diets for 21 d with samples and data collected from d 15 through 21. Treatment 5%-CNO decreased DMI markedly and precipitously and was discontinued after d 5. In wk 3, 5%-AFB and especially 5%-AFB-CNO lowered total-tract NDF digested vs. CTRL (2.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 3.1 kg/d, respectively), likely because fat treatments reduced DMI and 5%-AFB-CNO impaired total-tract NDF digestibility. Milk fat concentrations were 3.10% (CTRL), 2.51% (5%-AFB), and 1.97% (5%-AFB-CNO) and correlated negatively to concentrations of C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 in milk fat. Additionally, 5%-AFB and 5%-AFB-CNO tended to lower milk yield and decreased yields of solids-corrected milk and milk protein compared with CTRL. Fat treatments decreased milk lactose concentration, but increased milk citrate concentration. Moreover, cows fed 5%-AFB-CNO produced less solids-corrected milk than did cows fed 5%-AFB. In experiment 2, diets similar to CTRL contained 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0% CNO. Fifteen multiparous cows (219±42 d postpartum; 42.1±7.0kg milk yield; mean ± SD) were blocked by DMI and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment diets for an 8-d evaluation. Dietary concentration of CNO affected DMI, with the greatest depression at 4.0% CNO. Overall, dietary CNO depressed DMI and NDF digestibility of a high-starch diet compared with AFB. Feeding CNO to lactating cows equal to or greater than 2.5% decreased lactational performance or DMI.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22365230</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2011-4792</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2012-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1484-1499 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923952039 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | alfalfa hay Animal Feed - analysis Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle citrates Coconut Oil corn corn gluten meal corn silage correlation dairy cows dairy protein Diet - veterinary Dietary Carbohydrates - pharmacology Dietary Fats - pharmacology dietary starch digestibility dry matter intake fat source fatty acid Fatty Acids Female Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology haylage Holstein lactation Lactation - drug effects Lactation - physiology lactational performance lactose long chain fatty acids medium chain fatty acids methane production milk milk fat milk yield Plant Oils - pharmacology starch Starch - pharmacology Starch and starchy product industries Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
title | Comparison of effects of dietary coconut oil and animal fat blend on lactational performance of Holstein cows fed a high-starch diet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20effects%20of%20dietary%20coconut%20oil%20and%20animal%20fat%20blend%20on%20lactational%20performance%20of%20Holstein%20cows%20fed%20a%20high-starch%20diet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Hollmann,%20M.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1484&rft.epage=1499&rft.pages=1484-1499&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2011-4792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E923952039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923952039&rft_id=info:pmid/22365230&rft_els_id=S0022030212001051&rfr_iscdi=true |