What lay behind the Libya intervention?

Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil rese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Washington report on Middle East affairs 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25
1. Verfasser: Pfaff, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 9
container_start_page 25
container_title The Washington report on Middle East affairs
container_volume 30
creator Pfaff, William
description Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923612466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A274115758</galeid><sourcerecordid>A274115758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-a5725cc752b6f031529fb15f759dbb50650241198e3c9454d9890f9380b315ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9zk1Lw0AQBuBFFKzV_xDwUC-R_Zr9OEkpWoWCF8Vj2E1m25V0o0kq9N-7Ui9CkTkMDM_MvCdkwpkSJdeGn5KJ0QCltEyfk4theKeUccHshMzeNm4sWrcvPG5iaopxg8Uq-r0rYhqx_8I0xi7dXZKz4NoBr377lLw-3L8sHsvV8_JpMV-Va6apKh1oDnWtgXsVqGDAbfAMggbbeA9UAeWSMWtQ1FaCbKyxNFhhqM8YUUzJ7HD3o-8-dziM1TYONbatS9jthspyoRiXSmV5869klBkh80eZ6fWBrl2LVUyhG3tX__BqznXOAxpMVuURtcaEvWu7hCHm8R9_e8TnanAb6yML36tCdYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923612466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pfaff, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><description>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-4917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-2782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Educational Trust</publisher><subject>British ; Government agencies ; Imperialism ; Intervention ; Libya ; Markets ; Military assistance, American ; North Atlantic treaty organization ; Political aspects ; War</subject><ispartof>The Washington report on Middle East affairs, 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 American Educational Trust</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Trust Dec 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><title>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</title><description>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>British</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Libya</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Military assistance, American</subject><subject>North Atlantic treaty organization</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>8755-4917</issn><issn>2163-2782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9zk1Lw0AQBuBFFKzV_xDwUC-R_Zr9OEkpWoWCF8Vj2E1m25V0o0kq9N-7Ui9CkTkMDM_MvCdkwpkSJdeGn5KJ0QCltEyfk4theKeUccHshMzeNm4sWrcvPG5iaopxg8Uq-r0rYhqx_8I0xi7dXZKz4NoBr377lLw-3L8sHsvV8_JpMV-Va6apKh1oDnWtgXsVqGDAbfAMggbbeA9UAeWSMWtQ1FaCbKyxNFhhqM8YUUzJ7HD3o-8-dziM1TYONbatS9jthspyoRiXSmV5869klBkh80eZ6fWBrl2LVUyhG3tX__BqznXOAxpMVuURtcaEvWu7hCHm8R9_e8TnanAb6yML36tCdYk</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Pfaff, William</creator><general>American Educational Trust</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><author>Pfaff, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-a5725cc752b6f031529fb15f759dbb50650241198e3c9454d9890f9380b315ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>British</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Libya</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Military assistance, American</topic><topic>North Atlantic treaty organization</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfaff, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</atitle><jtitle>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>25-25</pages><issn>8755-4917</issn><eissn>2163-2782</eissn><abstract>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Educational Trust</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-4917
ispartof The Washington report on Middle East affairs, 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25
issn 8755-4917
2163-2782
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923612466
source PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects British
Government agencies
Imperialism
Intervention
Libya
Markets
Military assistance, American
North Atlantic treaty organization
Political aspects
War
title What lay behind the Libya intervention?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20lay%20behind%20the%20Libya%20intervention?&rft.jtitle=The%20Washington%20report%20on%20Middle%20East%20affairs&rft.au=Pfaff,%20William&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=25-25&rft.issn=8755-4917&rft.eissn=2163-2782&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA274115758%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923612466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A274115758&rfr_iscdi=true