What lay behind the Libya intervention?
Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Washington report on Middle East affairs 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | The Washington report on Middle East affairs |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Pfaff, William |
description | Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923612466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A274115758</galeid><sourcerecordid>A274115758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-a5725cc752b6f031529fb15f759dbb50650241198e3c9454d9890f9380b315ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9zk1Lw0AQBuBFFKzV_xDwUC-R_Zr9OEkpWoWCF8Vj2E1m25V0o0kq9N-7Ui9CkTkMDM_MvCdkwpkSJdeGn5KJ0QCltEyfk4theKeUccHshMzeNm4sWrcvPG5iaopxg8Uq-r0rYhqx_8I0xi7dXZKz4NoBr377lLw-3L8sHsvV8_JpMV-Va6apKh1oDnWtgXsVqGDAbfAMggbbeA9UAeWSMWtQ1FaCbKyxNFhhqM8YUUzJ7HD3o-8-dziM1TYONbatS9jthspyoRiXSmV5869klBkh80eZ6fWBrl2LVUyhG3tX__BqznXOAxpMVuURtcaEvWu7hCHm8R9_e8TnanAb6yML36tCdYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923612466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pfaff, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><description>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-4917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-2782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Educational Trust</publisher><subject>British ; Government agencies ; Imperialism ; Intervention ; Libya ; Markets ; Military assistance, American ; North Atlantic treaty organization ; Political aspects ; War</subject><ispartof>The Washington report on Middle East affairs, 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 American Educational Trust</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Trust Dec 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><title>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</title><description>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>British</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Libya</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Military assistance, American</subject><subject>North Atlantic treaty organization</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>8755-4917</issn><issn>2163-2782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9zk1Lw0AQBuBFFKzV_xDwUC-R_Zr9OEkpWoWCF8Vj2E1m25V0o0kq9N-7Ui9CkTkMDM_MvCdkwpkSJdeGn5KJ0QCltEyfk4theKeUccHshMzeNm4sWrcvPG5iaopxg8Uq-r0rYhqx_8I0xi7dXZKz4NoBr377lLw-3L8sHsvV8_JpMV-Va6apKh1oDnWtgXsVqGDAbfAMggbbeA9UAeWSMWtQ1FaCbKyxNFhhqM8YUUzJ7HD3o-8-dziM1TYONbatS9jthspyoRiXSmV5869klBkh80eZ6fWBrl2LVUyhG3tX__BqznXOAxpMVuURtcaEvWu7hCHm8R9_e8TnanAb6yML36tCdYk</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Pfaff, William</creator><general>American Educational Trust</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</title><author>Pfaff, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-a5725cc752b6f031529fb15f759dbb50650241198e3c9454d9890f9380b315ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>British</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Libya</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Military assistance, American</topic><topic>North Atlantic treaty organization</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfaff, William</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfaff, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What lay behind the Libya intervention?</atitle><jtitle>The Washington report on Middle East affairs</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>25-25</pages><issn>8755-4917</issn><eissn>2163-2782</eissn><abstract>Since the start of the Franco-British intervention in Libya, which on British and American insistence last March was turned into a NATO affair, some commentaries on the left have interpreted the action as Western imperialism. It was called an effort to seize control of Libya's enormous oil reserves, in the guise of humanitarian intervention. Although I am willing-more willing than most-to think the worst of the motivations of states, I find it hard to see why the Western countries would want an expensive war to seize the oil to which they already had ample access through purchase on the international market. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Educational Trust</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-4917 |
ispartof | The Washington report on Middle East affairs, 2011-12, Vol.30 (9), p.25-25 |
issn | 8755-4917 2163-2782 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923612466 |
source | PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | British Government agencies Imperialism Intervention Libya Markets Military assistance, American North Atlantic treaty organization Political aspects War |
title | What lay behind the Libya intervention? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20lay%20behind%20the%20Libya%20intervention?&rft.jtitle=The%20Washington%20report%20on%20Middle%20East%20affairs&rft.au=Pfaff,%20William&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=25-25&rft.issn=8755-4917&rft.eissn=2163-2782&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA274115758%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923612466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A274115758&rfr_iscdi=true |