Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union

In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This art...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of criminology 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51
Hauptverfasser: Garland, Jon, Chakraborti, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title European journal of criminology
container_volume 9
creator Garland, Jon
Chakraborti, Neil
description In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1477370811421645
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923209211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477370811421645</sage_id><sourcerecordid>921289996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4soOKd3j8GLXqp5Sds0JxnzJwy8uHNJ02TLaJPatIL6z5s5ZTBQzOUFvp_vF77vRdEp4EsAxq4gYYwynAMkBLIk3YtGwBKISYb5fvgHOV7rh9GR9yuMaXh4FH3cmFdTqQqVb0gg6ZrG2TCsVG1_jSbeK--NXaB-qZBp2tpI0RtnPXIaVUZr1Snb_xgGUZv3rb4UvUKyM02w2q-E26FzrRIWzW2AjqMDLWqvTr7nOJrf3T5PH-LZ0_3jdDKLZYrTPs5kSXLMqOKsLPMUKs4xzUQKFCAHTCspKQ1dRVmBhlQSWmmmQ1-hkkRKTcfR-Sa37dzLoHxfNMZLVdfCKjf4ghNKMCcA_yCB5JzzLJAXf5KACcWEM84DeraDrtzQ2dC44JCznHCSBghvINk57zulizYsTnRvIalYH7jYPXCwxBuLFwu1zfyV_wR6JaTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918782925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-3708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477370811421645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Conceptualization ; Crime ; Criminal law ; Criminality ; Europe ; European Union ; Failure ; Hate Crime ; Hate crimes ; Hatred ; Human Rights ; Legislation ; Protection ; Social theory ; Victimization ; Victims ; Victims of crime</subject><ispartof>European journal of criminology, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51</ispartof><rights>European Society of Criminology, SAGE Publications 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jan 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477370811421645$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477370811421645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><title>European journal of criminology</title><description>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</description><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminality</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Hate Crime</subject><subject>Hate crimes</subject><subject>Hatred</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of crime</subject><issn>1477-3708</issn><issn>1741-2609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4soOKd3j8GLXqp5Sds0JxnzJwy8uHNJ02TLaJPatIL6z5s5ZTBQzOUFvp_vF77vRdEp4EsAxq4gYYwynAMkBLIk3YtGwBKISYb5fvgHOV7rh9GR9yuMaXh4FH3cmFdTqQqVb0gg6ZrG2TCsVG1_jSbeK--NXaB-qZBp2tpI0RtnPXIaVUZr1Snb_xgGUZv3rb4UvUKyM02w2q-E26FzrRIWzW2AjqMDLWqvTr7nOJrf3T5PH-LZ0_3jdDKLZYrTPs5kSXLMqOKsLPMUKs4xzUQKFCAHTCspKQ1dRVmBhlQSWmmmQ1-hkkRKTcfR-Sa37dzLoHxfNMZLVdfCKjf4ghNKMCcA_yCB5JzzLJAXf5KACcWEM84DeraDrtzQ2dC44JCznHCSBghvINk57zulizYsTnRvIalYH7jYPXCwxBuLFwu1zfyV_wR6JaTT</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Garland, Jon</creator><creator>Chakraborti, Neil</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><author>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminality</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Hate Crime</topic><topic>Hate crimes</topic><topic>Hatred</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garland, Jon</au><au>Chakraborti, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>38-51</pages><issn>1477-3708</issn><eissn>1741-2609</eissn><abstract>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477370811421645</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-3708
ispartof European journal of criminology, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51
issn 1477-3708
1741-2609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923209211
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Publications; HeinOnline; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Conceptualization
Crime
Criminal law
Criminality
Europe
European Union
Failure
Hate Crime
Hate crimes
Hatred
Human Rights
Legislation
Protection
Social theory
Victimization
Victims
Victims of crime
title Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divided%20by%20a%20common%20concept?%20Assessing%20the%20implications%20of%20different%20conceptualizations%20of%20hate%20crime%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Garland,%20Jon&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=38-51&rft.issn=1477-3708&rft.eissn=1741-2609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477370811421645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921289996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918782925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477370811421645&rfr_iscdi=true