Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union
In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This art...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of criminology 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 51 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | European journal of criminology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Garland, Jon Chakraborti, Neil |
description | In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1477370811421645 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923209211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1477370811421645</sage_id><sourcerecordid>921289996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4soOKd3j8GLXqp5Sds0JxnzJwy8uHNJ02TLaJPatIL6z5s5ZTBQzOUFvp_vF77vRdEp4EsAxq4gYYwynAMkBLIk3YtGwBKISYb5fvgHOV7rh9GR9yuMaXh4FH3cmFdTqQqVb0gg6ZrG2TCsVG1_jSbeK--NXaB-qZBp2tpI0RtnPXIaVUZr1Snb_xgGUZv3rb4UvUKyM02w2q-E26FzrRIWzW2AjqMDLWqvTr7nOJrf3T5PH-LZ0_3jdDKLZYrTPs5kSXLMqOKsLPMUKs4xzUQKFCAHTCspKQ1dRVmBhlQSWmmmQ1-hkkRKTcfR-Sa37dzLoHxfNMZLVdfCKjf4ghNKMCcA_yCB5JzzLJAXf5KACcWEM84DeraDrtzQ2dC44JCznHCSBghvINk57zulizYsTnRvIalYH7jYPXCwxBuLFwu1zfyV_wR6JaTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918782925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-3708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1477370811421645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Conceptualization ; Crime ; Criminal law ; Criminality ; Europe ; European Union ; Failure ; Hate Crime ; Hate crimes ; Hatred ; Human Rights ; Legislation ; Protection ; Social theory ; Victimization ; Victims ; Victims of crime</subject><ispartof>European journal of criminology, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51</ispartof><rights>European Society of Criminology, SAGE Publications 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jan 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477370811421645$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477370811421645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><title>European journal of criminology</title><description>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</description><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminality</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Hate Crime</subject><subject>Hate crimes</subject><subject>Hatred</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of crime</subject><issn>1477-3708</issn><issn>1741-2609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4soOKd3j8GLXqp5Sds0JxnzJwy8uHNJ02TLaJPatIL6z5s5ZTBQzOUFvp_vF77vRdEp4EsAxq4gYYwynAMkBLIk3YtGwBKISYb5fvgHOV7rh9GR9yuMaXh4FH3cmFdTqQqVb0gg6ZrG2TCsVG1_jSbeK--NXaB-qZBp2tpI0RtnPXIaVUZr1Snb_xgGUZv3rb4UvUKyM02w2q-E26FzrRIWzW2AjqMDLWqvTr7nOJrf3T5PH-LZ0_3jdDKLZYrTPs5kSXLMqOKsLPMUKs4xzUQKFCAHTCspKQ1dRVmBhlQSWmmmQ1-hkkRKTcfR-Sa37dzLoHxfNMZLVdfCKjf4ghNKMCcA_yCB5JzzLJAXf5KACcWEM84DeraDrtzQ2dC44JCznHCSBghvINk57zulizYsTnRvIalYH7jYPXCwxBuLFwu1zfyV_wR6JaTT</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Garland, Jon</creator><creator>Chakraborti, Neil</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</title><author>Garland, Jon ; Chakraborti, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-6cb28073e97bb851d99036a513118103dcc33174abd1f15c23df7f477ae44ccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminality</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Hate Crime</topic><topic>Hate crimes</topic><topic>Hatred</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garland, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garland, Jon</au><au>Chakraborti, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>38-51</pages><issn>1477-3708</issn><eissn>1741-2609</eissn><abstract>In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1477370811421645</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-3708 |
ispartof | European journal of criminology, 2012-01, Vol.9 (1), p.38-51 |
issn | 1477-3708 1741-2609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923209211 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Publications; HeinOnline; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Conceptualization Crime Criminal law Criminality Europe European Union Failure Hate Crime Hate crimes Hatred Human Rights Legislation Protection Social theory Victimization Victims Victims of crime |
title | Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divided%20by%20a%20common%20concept?%20Assessing%20the%20implications%20of%20different%20conceptualizations%20of%20hate%20crime%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Garland,%20Jon&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=38-51&rft.issn=1477-3708&rft.eissn=1741-2609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1477370811421645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921289996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918782925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1477370811421645&rfr_iscdi=true |