Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation?
In this paper we discuss the relative physical, psychological and social harms of the two most frequently used intoxicant drugs in the UK, namely cannabis and alcohol. Over the past 40 years, the use of both drugs has risen significantly with differential consequences. It is argued that increased po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford) 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.213-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Weissenborn, Ruth Nutt, David J |
description | In this paper we discuss the relative physical, psychological and social harms of the two most frequently used intoxicant drugs in the UK, namely cannabis and alcohol. Over the past 40 years, the use of both drugs has risen significantly with differential consequences. It is argued that increased policing of cannabis use under the current drug classification system will lead to increased criminalization of young people, but is unlikely to significantly reduce the rates of schizophrenia and psychosis. In comparison, increases in alcohol drinking are related to significant increases in liver cirrhosis hospital admissions and mortality, at a time when mortality rates from other major causes are on the decline. A recent expert-led comparison of the health and social harms to the user and to others caused by the most commonly used drugs in the UK showed alcohol to be more than twice as harmful as cannabis to users, and five times as harmful as cannabis to others. The findings underline the need for a coherent, evidence-based drugs policy that enables individuals to make informed decisions about the consequences of their drug use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269881111414751 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923204591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269881111414751</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2579945001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-feb0def1344af1dd7d01ee1f5d8626af133474f5cfa22c9edce28ee81e0a7f7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2LFDEQxYMo7rh69yRBEE-9ptJJf3gRWfxYWNCDnpuapLLTa08yprrR_e83w4wuLGwuIfV-71WREuIlqDOAtn2ndNN3HZRjwLQWHokVmAaqVnf2sVjt5Wqvn4hnzNdKQWMa-1ScaOh1Y7RaiV_f026ZMMsxzunv6DDO_F7-2eAsJ2JOkWWpyTWVJ-ZIXoactnLelALyLI2SN0VgmYLEyaVNmiRGvzdFXI8sM12V_HlM8cNz8STgxPTieJ-Kn58__Tj_Wl1--3Jx_vGyckbbuQq0Vp4C1MZgAO9br4AIgvVdo5tSqmvTmmBdQK1dT96R7og6IIVtaH19Kt4ecnc5_V6I52E7sqNpwkhp4aHXtVbG9lDI1_fI67TkWIYrkAJQtVUFUgfI5cScKQy7PG4x3wyghv0ahvtrKJZXx9xlvSX_3_Dv3wvw5gggO5xCxuhGvuOsKSs0pnDVgWO8orvhHmx8C0KXnKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920110350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Weissenborn, Ruth ; Nutt, David J</creator><creatorcontrib>Weissenborn, Ruth ; Nutt, David J</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we discuss the relative physical, psychological and social harms of the two most frequently used intoxicant drugs in the UK, namely cannabis and alcohol. Over the past 40 years, the use of both drugs has risen significantly with differential consequences. It is argued that increased policing of cannabis use under the current drug classification system will lead to increased criminalization of young people, but is unlikely to significantly reduce the rates of schizophrenia and psychosis. In comparison, increases in alcohol drinking are related to significant increases in liver cirrhosis hospital admissions and mortality, at a time when mortality rates from other major causes are on the decline. A recent expert-led comparison of the health and social harms to the user and to others caused by the most commonly used drugs in the UK showed alcohol to be more than twice as harmful as cannabis to users, and five times as harmful as cannabis to others. The findings underline the need for a coherent, evidence-based drugs policy that enables individuals to make informed decisions about the consequences of their drug use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269881111414751</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21926420</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOPSEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alcohol Drinking - adverse effects ; Alcohol Drinking - legislation & jurisprudence ; Alcoholism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cannabis ; Cannabis - poisoning ; Drug addictions ; Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug use ; Humans ; Liver cirrhosis ; Marijuana ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prevention and actions ; Psychopharmacology ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public Policy ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; Substance-Related Disorders - etiology ; Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford), 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.213-220</ispartof><rights>British Association for Psychopharmacology 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-feb0def1344af1dd7d01ee1f5d8626af133474f5cfa22c9edce28ee81e0a7f7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-feb0def1344af1dd7d01ee1f5d8626af133474f5cfa22c9edce28ee81e0a7f7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269881111414751$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269881111414751$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25472844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21926420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weissenborn, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutt, David J</creatorcontrib><title>Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation?</title><title>Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>J Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>In this paper we discuss the relative physical, psychological and social harms of the two most frequently used intoxicant drugs in the UK, namely cannabis and alcohol. Over the past 40 years, the use of both drugs has risen significantly with differential consequences. It is argued that increased policing of cannabis use under the current drug classification system will lead to increased criminalization of young people, but is unlikely to significantly reduce the rates of schizophrenia and psychosis. In comparison, increases in alcohol drinking are related to significant increases in liver cirrhosis hospital admissions and mortality, at a time when mortality rates from other major causes are on the decline. A recent expert-led comparison of the health and social harms to the user and to others caused by the most commonly used drugs in the UK showed alcohol to be more than twice as harmful as cannabis to users, and five times as harmful as cannabis to others. The findings underline the need for a coherent, evidence-based drugs policy that enables individuals to make informed decisions about the consequences of their drug use.</description><subject>Alcohol Drinking - adverse effects</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Cannabis - poisoning</subject><subject>Drug addictions</subject><subject>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0269-8811</issn><issn>1461-7285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2LFDEQxYMo7rh69yRBEE-9ptJJf3gRWfxYWNCDnpuapLLTa08yprrR_e83w4wuLGwuIfV-71WREuIlqDOAtn2ndNN3HZRjwLQWHokVmAaqVnf2sVjt5Wqvn4hnzNdKQWMa-1ScaOh1Y7RaiV_f026ZMMsxzunv6DDO_F7-2eAsJ2JOkWWpyTWVJ-ZIXoactnLelALyLI2SN0VgmYLEyaVNmiRGvzdFXI8sM12V_HlM8cNz8STgxPTieJ-Kn58__Tj_Wl1--3Jx_vGyckbbuQq0Vp4C1MZgAO9br4AIgvVdo5tSqmvTmmBdQK1dT96R7og6IIVtaH19Kt4ecnc5_V6I52E7sqNpwkhp4aHXtVbG9lDI1_fI67TkWIYrkAJQtVUFUgfI5cScKQy7PG4x3wyghv0ahvtrKJZXx9xlvSX_3_Dv3wvw5gggO5xCxuhGvuOsKSs0pnDVgWO8orvhHmx8C0KXnKI</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Weissenborn, Ruth</creator><creator>Nutt, David J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation?</title><author>Weissenborn, Ruth ; Nutt, David J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-feb0def1344af1dd7d01ee1f5d8626af133474f5cfa22c9edce28ee81e0a7f7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alcohol Drinking - adverse effects</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Cannabis - poisoning</topic><topic>Drug addictions</topic><topic>Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weissenborn, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutt, David J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weissenborn, Ruth</au><au>Nutt, David J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>213-220</pages><issn>0269-8811</issn><eissn>1461-7285</eissn><coden>JOPSEQ</coden><abstract>In this paper we discuss the relative physical, psychological and social harms of the two most frequently used intoxicant drugs in the UK, namely cannabis and alcohol. Over the past 40 years, the use of both drugs has risen significantly with differential consequences. It is argued that increased policing of cannabis use under the current drug classification system will lead to increased criminalization of young people, but is unlikely to significantly reduce the rates of schizophrenia and psychosis. In comparison, increases in alcohol drinking are related to significant increases in liver cirrhosis hospital admissions and mortality, at a time when mortality rates from other major causes are on the decline. A recent expert-led comparison of the health and social harms to the user and to others caused by the most commonly used drugs in the UK showed alcohol to be more than twice as harmful as cannabis to users, and five times as harmful as cannabis to others. The findings underline the need for a coherent, evidence-based drugs policy that enables individuals to make informed decisions about the consequences of their drug use.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21926420</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269881111414751</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8811 |
ispartof | Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford), 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.213-220 |
issn | 0269-8811 1461-7285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923204591 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Alcohol Drinking - adverse effects Alcohol Drinking - legislation & jurisprudence Alcoholism Biological and medical sciences Cannabis Cannabis - poisoning Drug addictions Drug and Narcotic Control - legislation & jurisprudence Drug use Humans Liver cirrhosis Marijuana Medical sciences Neuropharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prevention and actions Psychopharmacology Public Health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public Policy Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) Substance-Related Disorders - etiology Substance-Related Disorders - prevention & control Toxicology United Kingdom Young adults |
title | Popular intoxicants: what lessons can be learned from the last 40 years of alcohol and cannabis regulation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A44%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Popular%20intoxicants:%20what%20lessons%20can%20be%20learned%20from%20the%20last%2040%20years%20of%20alcohol%20and%20cannabis%20regulation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychopharmacology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Weissenborn,%20Ruth&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=213-220&rft.issn=0269-8811&rft.eissn=1461-7285&rft.coden=JOPSEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269881111414751&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579945001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920110350&rft_id=info:pmid/21926420&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269881111414751&rfr_iscdi=true |