Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering

Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: McGlynn, Ian O., Fedo, Christopher M., McSween Jr, Harry Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue E1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
container_volume 117
creator McGlynn, Ian O.
Fedo, Christopher M.
McSween Jr, Harry Y.
description Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions. Key Points Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2011JE003861
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923198548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1925493759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtuEzEQhlcIJKLSOx7AAiFu2OLj2uauqpKUqpwKiEvLu5ltXHbXqWdDm4foO-MkVYWQwDeWxt_3a8ZTFM8ZPWKU27ecMnY2pVSYij0qJpypquSc8sfFhDJpSsq5flocIl7RfKSqJGWT4u5rDB3pwwDJd_FyQ_xIxiWQDz4hmd6uupj8GOJALuIvSKTzwyIMlwTDCPiOHA_EIwJiD8NIYrtTm9ivYNxSKXaA2_JqucHQ-I5gTLuXHEOaJfS74g347KVcf1Y8aX2HcHh_HxTfZ9NvJ6fl-af5-5Pj87KRmomyNrBoaqCVMqBarQStjaILpo3RvGYSau-h1mC08bYVioHVwsh6IaqW-aYSB8Xrfe4qxes14Oj6gA10eTyIa3SWC2aNkiaTL_4ir-I6Dbk5Z5lRTKnKZujlvyBmuZJWaLWl3uypJkXEBK1bpdD7tHGMuu0K3Z8rzPir-1CP-Zfa5Icm4IPDldWSa505vuduQgeb_2a6s_nFlNtKZKncSwFHuH2QfPrpKp27dT8-zh39MhOf5al0M_EbUo65BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918515569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions. Key Points Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2011JE003861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Apatite ; Basalt ; Bedrock ; Chemical composition ; Chemical weathering ; Chromite ; Comminution ; Craters ; Crystals ; Depletion ; Dissolution ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochemistry ; Hematite ; Mars ; Mars exploration ; Mars landing ; Mineral exploration ; Mineralogy ; Minerals ; Olivine ; Oxides ; Petrology ; Phases ; Plains ; Planetology ; Planets ; Rocks ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Soil chemistry ; Soil formation ; Soil mineralogy ; Soils ; Sulfates ; Weathering</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2011JE003861$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2011JE003861$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25974277$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedo, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions. Key Points Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</description><subject>Apatite</subject><subject>Basalt</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemical weathering</subject><subject>Chromite</subject><subject>Comminution</subject><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hematite</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mars exploration</subject><subject>Mars landing</subject><subject>Mineral exploration</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Olivine</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Petrology</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Plains</subject><subject>Planetology</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil formation</subject><subject>Soil mineralogy</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Weathering</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9097</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtuEzEQhlcIJKLSOx7AAiFu2OLj2uauqpKUqpwKiEvLu5ltXHbXqWdDm4foO-MkVYWQwDeWxt_3a8ZTFM8ZPWKU27ecMnY2pVSYij0qJpypquSc8sfFhDJpSsq5flocIl7RfKSqJGWT4u5rDB3pwwDJd_FyQ_xIxiWQDz4hmd6uupj8GOJALuIvSKTzwyIMlwTDCPiOHA_EIwJiD8NIYrtTm9ivYNxSKXaA2_JqucHQ-I5gTLuXHEOaJfS74g347KVcf1Y8aX2HcHh_HxTfZ9NvJ6fl-af5-5Pj87KRmomyNrBoaqCVMqBarQStjaILpo3RvGYSau-h1mC08bYVioHVwsh6IaqW-aYSB8Xrfe4qxes14Oj6gA10eTyIa3SWC2aNkiaTL_4ir-I6Dbk5Z5lRTKnKZujlvyBmuZJWaLWl3uypJkXEBK1bpdD7tHGMuu0K3Z8rzPir-1CP-Zfa5Icm4IPDldWSa505vuduQgeb_2a6s_nFlNtKZKncSwFHuH2QfPrpKp27dT8-zh39MhOf5al0M_EbUo65BQ</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>McGlynn, Ian O.</creator><creator>Fedo, Christopher M.</creator><creator>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><author>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Apatite</topic><topic>Basalt</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemical weathering</topic><topic>Chromite</topic><topic>Comminution</topic><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hematite</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mars exploration</topic><topic>Mars landing</topic><topic>Mineral exploration</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Olivine</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Petrology</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Plains</topic><topic>Planetology</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil formation</topic><topic>Soil mineralogy</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Weathering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedo, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlynn, Ian O.</au><au>Fedo, Christopher M.</au><au>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>E1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9097</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9100</eissn><abstract>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions. Key Points Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2011JE003861</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-9097
2156-2202
2169-9100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923198548
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Apatite
Basalt
Bedrock
Chemical composition
Chemical weathering
Chromite
Comminution
Craters
Crystals
Depletion
Dissolution
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Geochemistry
Hematite
Mars
Mars exploration
Mars landing
Mineral exploration
Mineralogy
Minerals
Olivine
Oxides
Petrology
Phases
Plains
Planetology
Planets
Rocks
Silica
Silicon dioxide
Soil chemistry
Soil formation
Soil mineralogy
Soils
Sulfates
Weathering
title Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20mineralogy%20at%20the%20Mars%20Exploration%20Rover%20landing%20sites:%20An%20assessment%20of%20the%20competing%20roles%20of%20physical%20sorting%20and%20chemical%20weathering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Planets&rft.au=McGlynn,%20Ian%20O.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=E1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2011JE003861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1925493759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918515569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true