Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering
Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | E1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | McGlynn, Ian O. Fedo, Christopher M. McSween Jr, Harry Y. |
description | Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions.
Key Points
Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars
Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock
Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2011JE003861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923198548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1925493759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtuEzEQhlcIJKLSOx7AAiFu2OLj2uauqpKUqpwKiEvLu5ltXHbXqWdDm4foO-MkVYWQwDeWxt_3a8ZTFM8ZPWKU27ecMnY2pVSYij0qJpypquSc8sfFhDJpSsq5flocIl7RfKSqJGWT4u5rDB3pwwDJd_FyQ_xIxiWQDz4hmd6uupj8GOJALuIvSKTzwyIMlwTDCPiOHA_EIwJiD8NIYrtTm9ivYNxSKXaA2_JqucHQ-I5gTLuXHEOaJfS74g347KVcf1Y8aX2HcHh_HxTfZ9NvJ6fl-af5-5Pj87KRmomyNrBoaqCVMqBarQStjaILpo3RvGYSau-h1mC08bYVioHVwsh6IaqW-aYSB8Xrfe4qxes14Oj6gA10eTyIa3SWC2aNkiaTL_4ir-I6Dbk5Z5lRTKnKZujlvyBmuZJWaLWl3uypJkXEBK1bpdD7tHGMuu0K3Z8rzPir-1CP-Zfa5Icm4IPDldWSa505vuduQgeb_2a6s_nFlNtKZKncSwFHuH2QfPrpKp27dT8-zh39MhOf5al0M_EbUo65BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918515569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions.
Key Points
Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars
Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock
Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2011JE003861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Apatite ; Basalt ; Bedrock ; Chemical composition ; Chemical weathering ; Chromite ; Comminution ; Craters ; Crystals ; Depletion ; Dissolution ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochemistry ; Hematite ; Mars ; Mars exploration ; Mars landing ; Mineral exploration ; Mineralogy ; Minerals ; Olivine ; Oxides ; Petrology ; Phases ; Plains ; Planetology ; Planets ; Rocks ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Soil chemistry ; Soil formation ; Soil mineralogy ; Soils ; Sulfates ; Weathering</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2011JE003861$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2011JE003861$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25974277$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedo, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions.
Key Points
Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars
Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock
Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</description><subject>Apatite</subject><subject>Basalt</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemical weathering</subject><subject>Chromite</subject><subject>Comminution</subject><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hematite</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mars exploration</subject><subject>Mars landing</subject><subject>Mineral exploration</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Olivine</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Petrology</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Plains</subject><subject>Planetology</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil formation</subject><subject>Soil mineralogy</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Weathering</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9097</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtuEzEQhlcIJKLSOx7AAiFu2OLj2uauqpKUqpwKiEvLu5ltXHbXqWdDm4foO-MkVYWQwDeWxt_3a8ZTFM8ZPWKU27ecMnY2pVSYij0qJpypquSc8sfFhDJpSsq5flocIl7RfKSqJGWT4u5rDB3pwwDJd_FyQ_xIxiWQDz4hmd6uupj8GOJALuIvSKTzwyIMlwTDCPiOHA_EIwJiD8NIYrtTm9ivYNxSKXaA2_JqucHQ-I5gTLuXHEOaJfS74g347KVcf1Y8aX2HcHh_HxTfZ9NvJ6fl-af5-5Pj87KRmomyNrBoaqCVMqBarQStjaILpo3RvGYSau-h1mC08bYVioHVwsh6IaqW-aYSB8Xrfe4qxes14Oj6gA10eTyIa3SWC2aNkiaTL_4ir-I6Dbk5Z5lRTKnKZujlvyBmuZJWaLWl3uypJkXEBK1bpdD7tHGMuu0K3Z8rzPir-1CP-Zfa5Icm4IPDldWSa505vuduQgeb_2a6s_nFlNtKZKncSwFHuH2QfPrpKp27dT8-zh39MhOf5al0M_EbUo65BQ</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>McGlynn, Ian O.</creator><creator>Fedo, Christopher M.</creator><creator>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</title><author>McGlynn, Ian O. ; Fedo, Christopher M. ; McSween Jr, Harry Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-b8edcbe0658e5f7530b850d178872b14ebaaeb7e878a9f351e97384bd36f1ac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Apatite</topic><topic>Basalt</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemical weathering</topic><topic>Chromite</topic><topic>Comminution</topic><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hematite</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mars exploration</topic><topic>Mars landing</topic><topic>Mineral exploration</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Olivine</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Petrology</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Plains</topic><topic>Planetology</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil formation</topic><topic>Soil mineralogy</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Weathering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedo, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlynn, Ian O.</au><au>Fedo, Christopher M.</au><au>McSween Jr, Harry Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>E1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9097</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9100</eissn><abstract>Soils in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum derive primarily from a surface dominated by basalt. The modal mineralogy of primary (igneous) and secondary (alteration) phases in the soils is estimated using Mössbauer, MiniTES, and APXS spectra. Primary minerals include plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine with less common apatite, magnetite, and chromite. Secondary phases are dominated by sulfates, and include nanophase oxides, chlorides, hematite, and are assumed to include amorphous silica and phyllosilicates. Most soil chemical compositions overlap with basalts indicating that despite the presence of a secondary component in the soils, they have not been significantly chemically weathered. We modeled the significance of olivine dissolution by acid‐S by iteratively removing the molar FeOT + MgO component (olivine proxy) from the mean bulk compositions of the Gusev rock classes Adirondack, Algonquin, and Irvine until none remained. Regardless of modeling conditions, acid‐S alteration cannot account for many soils in Gusev Crater that are either depleted or enriched in molar FeOT + MgO, although it is a process capable of explaining some soil compositions. Based on a rock and mineral mixing model, supports our hypothesis for soil formation that consists of surface comminution by impact gardening, followed by compositional modification by hydrodynamic sorting and admixing of secondary components, including phyllosilicates and sulfates. Such a physical process can produce the range of molar FeOT + MgO in soils by concentrating or depleting specific minerals. For example, dust and fine sands are enriched in molar FeOT + MgO relative to coarse sand, which suggests accumulation of more mafic phases in finer grain fractions.
Key Points
Integrated compositional and textural characterization of soil sediment on Mars
Soils are compositionally similar to bedrock
Controls for soil compositions are bedrock, sorting, weathering, sulfate</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2011JE003861</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2012-01, Vol.117 (E1), p.n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2169-9097 2156-2202 2169-9100 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923198548 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Apatite Basalt Bedrock Chemical composition Chemical weathering Chromite Comminution Craters Crystals Depletion Dissolution Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Geochemistry Hematite Mars Mars exploration Mars landing Mineral exploration Mineralogy Minerals Olivine Oxides Petrology Phases Plains Planetology Planets Rocks Silica Silicon dioxide Soil chemistry Soil formation Soil mineralogy Soils Sulfates Weathering |
title | Soil mineralogy at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites: An assessment of the competing roles of physical sorting and chemical weathering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20mineralogy%20at%20the%20Mars%20Exploration%20Rover%20landing%20sites:%20An%20assessment%20of%20the%20competing%20roles%20of%20physical%20sorting%20and%20chemical%20weathering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Planets&rft.au=McGlynn,%20Ian%20O.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=E1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2011JE003861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1925493759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918515569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |