Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera
In order to identify variables associated with the presence of the tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, we conducted a serological survey of roe deer [Capreolus capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae, Linnaeus 1758)] in three forest districts of southern Hesse, Germany. Overall, 24 out of 105 (22.9%) of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.18-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | KIFFNER, C. VOR, T. HAGEDORN, P. NIEDRIG, M. RÜHE, F. |
description | In order to identify variables associated with the presence of the tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, we conducted a serological survey of roe deer [Capreolus capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae, Linnaeus 1758)] in three forest districts of southern Hesse, Germany. Overall, 24 out of 105 (22.9%) of the sera were positive (≥1 : 10 plaque reduction neutralization test). Using a logistic regression approach, we found that unexplained spatial variation, indexed roe deer density (positive correlation), hind foot length of the tested roe deer (positive correlation) and infestation with female Ixodes spp. ticks (negative correlation) predicted the probability of TBE virus antibody presence in individual roe deer sera. Spring temperature increase and host sex were rejected as explanatory variables. We found considerable differences in TBE virus antibody seroprevalence (50.0% vs. 17.6%) between two forest districts located in the same county; this finding questions the current county‐resolution of public health recordings. Given the high seroprevalence of roe deer and the considerable explanatory power of our model, our approach appears suitable to delineate science‐based risk maps at a smaller spatial scale and to abandon the current human incidence per county criterion. Importantly, using roe deer as sentinels would eliminate the inherent bias of risk maps based on human incidence (varying levels of immunization and exposure of humans). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00961.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923197070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3373289151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-a6937cdc3426fc45771954722ab23255fa6cf4ea984b4347900638796204b0e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9CxLwQr2YMd-ZgDdl-yW0CkXb3oVM9gxmOzuzJjN199-bcdu98EYDIYec5z0hPAhhSkqa18dlSbmSBTNUloxQWhJiFC03z9Bs33iOZoQpU7CK3x2ilyktCaHaMPYCHTIqTd5yhpoTGCCuQue6IeG-wUPw90Xdxw4wdB7WP1wbhpDwQ4hjwpkKdb_Y4nWENPVx6HDsAS8AIn4_d_m-bzPon6oPOEF0r9BB49oErx_PI_T97PTb_KK4_Hr-eX58WXihJC2cMlz7heeCqcYLqTU1UmjGXM04k7JxyjcCnKlELbjQhhDFK20UI6ImYPgRerebu479zxHSYFcheWhb10E_JmsYp0YTTf5NUk0VrZjK5Nu_yGU_xi5_w1IpJGWVFjxT1Y7ysU8pQmPXMaxc3FpK7CTNLu3kxk5u7CTN_pFmNzn65vGBsV7BYh98spSBTzvgV2hh-9-D7dXNaS5yvNjFQxpgs4-7eG-V5lra2y_ndn52d317c2HsNf8NbSCzBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545128743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>KIFFNER, C. ; VOR, T. ; HAGEDORN, P. ; NIEDRIG, M. ; RÜHE, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>KIFFNER, C. ; VOR, T. ; HAGEDORN, P. ; NIEDRIG, M. ; RÜHE, F.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to identify variables associated with the presence of the tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, we conducted a serological survey of roe deer [Capreolus capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae, Linnaeus 1758)] in three forest districts of southern Hesse, Germany. Overall, 24 out of 105 (22.9%) of the sera were positive (≥1 : 10 plaque reduction neutralization test). Using a logistic regression approach, we found that unexplained spatial variation, indexed roe deer density (positive correlation), hind foot length of the tested roe deer (positive correlation) and infestation with female Ixodes spp. ticks (negative correlation) predicted the probability of TBE virus antibody presence in individual roe deer sera. Spring temperature increase and host sex were rejected as explanatory variables. We found considerable differences in TBE virus antibody seroprevalence (50.0% vs. 17.6%) between two forest districts located in the same county; this finding questions the current county‐resolution of public health recordings. Given the high seroprevalence of roe deer and the considerable explanatory power of our model, our approach appears suitable to delineate science‐based risk maps at a smaller spatial scale and to abandon the current human incidence per county criterion. Importantly, using roe deer as sentinels would eliminate the inherent bias of risk maps based on human incidence (varying levels of immunization and exposure of humans).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00961.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21592155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Artiodactyla ; Capreolus capreolus ; Cervidae ; Deer ; Demography ; Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne - immunology ; Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - blood ; Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - epidemiology ; Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - immunology ; Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - veterinary ; Female ; Germany - epidemiology ; host-pathogen interaction ; Ixodes ; Ixodes - physiology ; Ixodes ricinus ; Ixodidae ; Male ; Risk Factors ; risk mapping ; Tick Infestations - veterinary ; Tick-borne encephalitis virus ; tick-borne pathogens ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology © 2011 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology © 2011 The Royal Entomological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-a6937cdc3426fc45771954722ab23255fa6cf4ea984b4347900638796204b0e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-a6937cdc3426fc45771954722ab23255fa6cf4ea984b4347900638796204b0e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2915.2011.00961.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2915.2011.00961.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KIFFNER, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOR, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAGEDORN, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIEDRIG, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RÜHE, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>In order to identify variables associated with the presence of the tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, we conducted a serological survey of roe deer [Capreolus capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae, Linnaeus 1758)] in three forest districts of southern Hesse, Germany. Overall, 24 out of 105 (22.9%) of the sera were positive (≥1 : 10 plaque reduction neutralization test). Using a logistic regression approach, we found that unexplained spatial variation, indexed roe deer density (positive correlation), hind foot length of the tested roe deer (positive correlation) and infestation with female Ixodes spp. ticks (negative correlation) predicted the probability of TBE virus antibody presence in individual roe deer sera. Spring temperature increase and host sex were rejected as explanatory variables. We found considerable differences in TBE virus antibody seroprevalence (50.0% vs. 17.6%) between two forest districts located in the same county; this finding questions the current county‐resolution of public health recordings. Given the high seroprevalence of roe deer and the considerable explanatory power of our model, our approach appears suitable to delineate science‐based risk maps at a smaller spatial scale and to abandon the current human incidence per county criterion. Importantly, using roe deer as sentinels would eliminate the inherent bias of risk maps based on human incidence (varying levels of immunization and exposure of humans).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Artiodactyla</subject><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>Cervidae</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne - immunology</subject><subject>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - blood</subject><subject>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - epidemiology</subject><subject>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - immunology</subject><subject>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>host-pathogen interaction</subject><subject>Ixodes</subject><subject>Ixodes - physiology</subject><subject>Ixodes ricinus</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk mapping</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Tick-borne encephalitis virus</subject><subject>tick-borne pathogens</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9CxLwQr2YMd-ZgDdl-yW0CkXb3oVM9gxmOzuzJjN199-bcdu98EYDIYec5z0hPAhhSkqa18dlSbmSBTNUloxQWhJiFC03z9Bs33iOZoQpU7CK3x2ilyktCaHaMPYCHTIqTd5yhpoTGCCuQue6IeG-wUPw90Xdxw4wdB7WP1wbhpDwQ4hjwpkKdb_Y4nWENPVx6HDsAS8AIn4_d_m-bzPon6oPOEF0r9BB49oErx_PI_T97PTb_KK4_Hr-eX58WXihJC2cMlz7heeCqcYLqTU1UmjGXM04k7JxyjcCnKlELbjQhhDFK20UI6ImYPgRerebu479zxHSYFcheWhb10E_JmsYp0YTTf5NUk0VrZjK5Nu_yGU_xi5_w1IpJGWVFjxT1Y7ysU8pQmPXMaxc3FpK7CTNLu3kxk5u7CTN_pFmNzn65vGBsV7BYh98spSBTzvgV2hh-9-D7dXNaS5yvNjFQxpgs4-7eG-V5lra2y_ndn52d317c2HsNf8NbSCzBw</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>KIFFNER, C.</creator><creator>VOR, T.</creator><creator>HAGEDORN, P.</creator><creator>NIEDRIG, M.</creator><creator>RÜHE, F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera</title><author>KIFFNER, C. ; VOR, T. ; HAGEDORN, P. ; NIEDRIG, M. ; RÜHE, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-a6937cdc3426fc45771954722ab23255fa6cf4ea984b4347900638796204b0e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Artiodactyla</topic><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>Cervidae</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne - immunology</topic><topic>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - blood</topic><topic>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - epidemiology</topic><topic>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - immunology</topic><topic>Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>host-pathogen interaction</topic><topic>Ixodes</topic><topic>Ixodes - physiology</topic><topic>Ixodes ricinus</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk mapping</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Tick-borne encephalitis virus</topic><topic>tick-borne pathogens</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KIFFNER, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOR, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAGEDORN, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIEDRIG, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RÜHE, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KIFFNER, C.</au><au>VOR, T.</au><au>HAGEDORN, P.</au><au>NIEDRIG, M.</au><au>RÜHE, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>In order to identify variables associated with the presence of the tick‐borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, we conducted a serological survey of roe deer [Capreolus capreolus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae, Linnaeus 1758)] in three forest districts of southern Hesse, Germany. Overall, 24 out of 105 (22.9%) of the sera were positive (≥1 : 10 plaque reduction neutralization test). Using a logistic regression approach, we found that unexplained spatial variation, indexed roe deer density (positive correlation), hind foot length of the tested roe deer (positive correlation) and infestation with female Ixodes spp. ticks (negative correlation) predicted the probability of TBE virus antibody presence in individual roe deer sera. Spring temperature increase and host sex were rejected as explanatory variables. We found considerable differences in TBE virus antibody seroprevalence (50.0% vs. 17.6%) between two forest districts located in the same county; this finding questions the current county‐resolution of public health recordings. Given the high seroprevalence of roe deer and the considerable explanatory power of our model, our approach appears suitable to delineate science‐based risk maps at a smaller spatial scale and to abandon the current human incidence per county criterion. Importantly, using roe deer as sentinels would eliminate the inherent bias of risk maps based on human incidence (varying levels of immunization and exposure of humans).</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21592155</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00961.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2012-03, Vol.26 (1), p.18-25 |
issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923197070 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals Antibodies, Viral - blood Artiodactyla Capreolus capreolus Cervidae Deer Demography Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne - immunology Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - blood Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - epidemiology Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - immunology Encephalitis, Tick-Borne - veterinary Female Germany - epidemiology host-pathogen interaction Ixodes Ixodes - physiology Ixodes ricinus Ixodidae Male Risk Factors risk mapping Tick Infestations - veterinary Tick-borne encephalitis virus tick-borne pathogens Trees |
title | Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibody presence in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) sera |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20tick-borne%20encephalitis%20virus%20antibody%20presence%20in%20roe%20deer%20(Capreolus%20capreolus)%20sera&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=KIFFNER,%20C.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00961.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3373289151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545128743&rft_id=info:pmid/21592155&rfr_iscdi=true |