Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes
Abstract Background Advances in screening and treatment are needed to mitigate increasing prevalence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (DAT). Current proposals to revise Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostic criteria incorporate diagnostic biomarkers. Such revisions would allow identification of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alzheimer's & dementia 2012, Vol.8 (1), p.31-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Alzheimer's & dementia |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Furiak, Nicolas M Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin Callahan, Christopher Klein, Timothy M Klein, Robert W Siemers, Eric R |
description | Abstract Background Advances in screening and treatment are needed to mitigate increasing prevalence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (DAT). Current proposals to revise Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostic criteria incorporate diagnostic biomarkers. Such revisions would allow identification of persons with AD pathology before the onset of dementia. The population-level impact of screening for preclinical AD and treating with a disease-modifying agent is important when evaluating new biomarkers and medications. Methods A published computer simulation model assigned AD-related event times, such that delays in disease progression due to therapy effectiveness can be estimated for a preclinical AD cohort. Attributes such as screening sensitivity/specificity, treatment efficacy, age at first screening, and rescreening intervals were varied. Outcomes included incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI-AD), incident DAT, and number of patients recommended for treatment. Results One-time screening at age 65 years, 50% efficacy, and literature-based proxy persistence rates yielded 12.4% incidence of MCI-AD and 0.9% decrease in DAT incidence from base case of no screening/treatment. Modest reductions in incident MCI-AD and DAT were observed with more sensitive testing. Reducing specificity yielded greater reductions in MCI-AD and DAT cases, albeit by treating more patients. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted that for a cohort of patients aged 65 years, the number that needed to be treated to avoid one AD case was 11.6 (range: 5.7–104). Conclusion The reduction in MCI-AD and DAT depends on initial screening age, screening frequency, and specificity. When considering population-level impact of screening–treatment, the effect of these parameters on incidence would need to be weighed against the number of individuals screened and treated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2415 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923196568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1552526011026215</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010708621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-b0ca755c5d2cee3f91b5f4777e4cfaef1fc692b24eb8b533495885c3af1d0ca93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQbuWS1B-ZfCCBtFoVaLUSSKUXLpbjTMDBsbd20mr763G0Sw8cKBfbsp73ndG8kySvKckpoeXZkA_S3OeMUJoTyFlB4UlyTAFYBqxqnj68S3KUvAhhIKQgNYXnyRFjrASom-Pk-kp5RKvtj1TaLp08ymlEO6W98-nK3P9EPaI_DWmnA8qA79KvHjutpkWxddvZyEk7mxm8RZO6eVJuxPAyedZLE_DV4T5Jrj-ef1t_zjZfPl2sV5tMAa8ha4mSFYCCjilE3je0hb6oqgoL1Uvsaa_KhrWswLZugfOigboGxWVPuyht-ElyuvfdenczY5jEqINCY6RFNwfRME6bEsr6cZJWUBV1QyL59p9knD2pSF0yGlG-R5V3IXjsxdbrUfpdhBauFINYMhJLRoKAWDKKqjeHAnM7Yveg-RNKBNZ74E4b3P2Pp1htvl9exmP5JHAo837vgjGAW41eBKXRqpieRzWJzulH2vzwl14ZbbWS5hfuMAxu9jZmK6gITBBxtSzbsmuxARaHA_w3t8TMVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010708621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Furiak, Nicolas M ; Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin ; Callahan, Christopher ; Klein, Timothy M ; Klein, Robert W ; Siemers, Eric R</creator><creatorcontrib>Furiak, Nicolas M ; Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin ; Callahan, Christopher ; Klein, Timothy M ; Klein, Robert W ; Siemers, Eric R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Advances in screening and treatment are needed to mitigate increasing prevalence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (DAT). Current proposals to revise Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostic criteria incorporate diagnostic biomarkers. Such revisions would allow identification of persons with AD pathology before the onset of dementia. The population-level impact of screening for preclinical AD and treating with a disease-modifying agent is important when evaluating new biomarkers and medications. Methods A published computer simulation model assigned AD-related event times, such that delays in disease progression due to therapy effectiveness can be estimated for a preclinical AD cohort. Attributes such as screening sensitivity/specificity, treatment efficacy, age at first screening, and rescreening intervals were varied. Outcomes included incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI-AD), incident DAT, and number of patients recommended for treatment. Results One-time screening at age 65 years, 50% efficacy, and literature-based proxy persistence rates yielded 12.4% incidence of MCI-AD and 0.9% decrease in DAT incidence from base case of no screening/treatment. Modest reductions in incident MCI-AD and DAT were observed with more sensitive testing. Reducing specificity yielded greater reductions in MCI-AD and DAT cases, albeit by treating more patients. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted that for a cohort of patients aged 65 years, the number that needed to be treated to avoid one AD case was 11.6 (range: 5.7–104). Conclusion The reduction in MCI-AD and DAT depends on initial screening age, screening frequency, and specificity. When considering population-level impact of screening–treatment, the effect of these parameters on incidence would need to be weighed against the number of individuals screened and treated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22265589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alzheimer Disease - complications ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology ; Alzheimer Disease - therapy ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biological markers ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology ; Dementia ; Dementia - diagnosis ; Disease Progression ; Efficacy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Mental Status Schedule ; Modeling ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Policy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; Screening ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's & dementia, 2012, Vol.8 (1), p.31-38</ispartof><rights>The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>2012 The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-b0ca755c5d2cee3f91b5f4777e4cfaef1fc692b24eb8b533495885c3af1d0ca93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-b0ca755c5d2cee3f91b5f4777e4cfaef1fc692b24eb8b533495885c3af1d0ca93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.05.2415$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.05.2415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265589$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furiak, Nicolas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemers, Eric R</creatorcontrib><title>Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes</title><title>Alzheimer's & dementia</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Advances in screening and treatment are needed to mitigate increasing prevalence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (DAT). Current proposals to revise Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostic criteria incorporate diagnostic biomarkers. Such revisions would allow identification of persons with AD pathology before the onset of dementia. The population-level impact of screening for preclinical AD and treating with a disease-modifying agent is important when evaluating new biomarkers and medications. Methods A published computer simulation model assigned AD-related event times, such that delays in disease progression due to therapy effectiveness can be estimated for a preclinical AD cohort. Attributes such as screening sensitivity/specificity, treatment efficacy, age at first screening, and rescreening intervals were varied. Outcomes included incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI-AD), incident DAT, and number of patients recommended for treatment. Results One-time screening at age 65 years, 50% efficacy, and literature-based proxy persistence rates yielded 12.4% incidence of MCI-AD and 0.9% decrease in DAT incidence from base case of no screening/treatment. Modest reductions in incident MCI-AD and DAT were observed with more sensitive testing. Reducing specificity yielded greater reductions in MCI-AD and DAT cases, albeit by treating more patients. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted that for a cohort of patients aged 65 years, the number that needed to be treated to avoid one AD case was 11.6 (range: 5.7–104). Conclusion The reduction in MCI-AD and DAT depends on initial screening age, screening frequency, and specificity. When considering population-level impact of screening–treatment, the effect of these parameters on incidence would need to be weighed against the number of individuals screened and treated.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - complications</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Mental Status Schedule</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwC5BQbuWS1B-ZfCCBtFoVaLUSSKUXLpbjTMDBsbd20mr763G0Sw8cKBfbsp73ndG8kySvKckpoeXZkA_S3OeMUJoTyFlB4UlyTAFYBqxqnj68S3KUvAhhIKQgNYXnyRFjrASom-Pk-kp5RKvtj1TaLp08ymlEO6W98-nK3P9EPaI_DWmnA8qA79KvHjutpkWxddvZyEk7mxm8RZO6eVJuxPAyedZLE_DV4T5Jrj-ef1t_zjZfPl2sV5tMAa8ha4mSFYCCjilE3je0hb6oqgoL1Uvsaa_KhrWswLZugfOigboGxWVPuyht-ElyuvfdenczY5jEqINCY6RFNwfRME6bEsr6cZJWUBV1QyL59p9knD2pSF0yGlG-R5V3IXjsxdbrUfpdhBauFINYMhJLRoKAWDKKqjeHAnM7Yveg-RNKBNZ74E4b3P2Pp1htvl9exmP5JHAo837vgjGAW41eBKXRqpieRzWJzulH2vzwl14ZbbWS5hfuMAxu9jZmK6gITBBxtSzbsmuxARaHA_w3t8TMVA</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Furiak, Nicolas M</creator><creator>Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin</creator><creator>Callahan, Christopher</creator><creator>Klein, Timothy M</creator><creator>Klein, Robert W</creator><creator>Siemers, Eric R</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes</title><author>Furiak, Nicolas M ; Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin ; Callahan, Christopher ; Klein, Timothy M ; Klein, Robert W ; Siemers, Eric R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-b0ca755c5d2cee3f91b5f4777e4cfaef1fc692b24eb8b533495885c3af1d0ca93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - complications</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Mental Status Schedule</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furiak, Nicolas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemers, Eric R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furiak, Nicolas M</au><au>Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin</au><au>Callahan, Christopher</au><au>Klein, Timothy M</au><au>Klein, Robert W</au><au>Siemers, Eric R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>31-38</pages><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Advances in screening and treatment are needed to mitigate increasing prevalence of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (DAT). Current proposals to revise Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostic criteria incorporate diagnostic biomarkers. Such revisions would allow identification of persons with AD pathology before the onset of dementia. The population-level impact of screening for preclinical AD and treating with a disease-modifying agent is important when evaluating new biomarkers and medications. Methods A published computer simulation model assigned AD-related event times, such that delays in disease progression due to therapy effectiveness can be estimated for a preclinical AD cohort. Attributes such as screening sensitivity/specificity, treatment efficacy, age at first screening, and rescreening intervals were varied. Outcomes included incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI-AD), incident DAT, and number of patients recommended for treatment. Results One-time screening at age 65 years, 50% efficacy, and literature-based proxy persistence rates yielded 12.4% incidence of MCI-AD and 0.9% decrease in DAT incidence from base case of no screening/treatment. Modest reductions in incident MCI-AD and DAT were observed with more sensitive testing. Reducing specificity yielded greater reductions in MCI-AD and DAT cases, albeit by treating more patients. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted that for a cohort of patients aged 65 years, the number that needed to be treated to avoid one AD case was 11.6 (range: 5.7–104). Conclusion The reduction in MCI-AD and DAT depends on initial screening age, screening frequency, and specificity. When considering population-level impact of screening–treatment, the effect of these parameters on incidence would need to be weighed against the number of individuals screened and treated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22265589</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2415</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-5260 |
ispartof | Alzheimer's & dementia, 2012, Vol.8 (1), p.31-38 |
issn | 1552-5260 1552-5279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923196568 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Alzheimer Disease - complications Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology Alzheimer Disease - therapy Alzheimer's disease Biological markers Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology Dementia Dementia - diagnosis Disease Progression Efficacy Female Humans Male Mass Screening Mental Status Schedule Modeling Neurology Neuropsychological Tests Policy Predictive Value of Tests Prevalence Screening Sensitivity analysis Sensitivity and Specificity Simulation |
title | Screening and treatment for Alzheimer's disease: Predicting population-level outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A10%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20and%20treatment%20for%20Alzheimer's%20disease:%20Predicting%20population-level%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Furiak,%20Nicolas%20M&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=31-38&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010708621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010708621&rft_id=info:pmid/22265589&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1552526011026215&rfr_iscdi=true |