On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights
This article traces the development of the international human rights and international indigenous rights movements, with a particular eye towards their points of convergence and divergence and the extent to which each has influenced the other. Focusing on the United Nations Declaration on the Right...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of international law 2011-02, Vol.22 (1), p.141-163 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | European journal of international law |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Engle, Karen |
description | This article traces the development of the international human rights and international indigenous rights movements, with a particular eye towards their points of convergence and divergence and the extent to which each has influenced the other. Focusing on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it argues that the document, while apparently pushing the envelope in its articulation of self-determination and collective rights, also represents the continued power and persistence of an international human rights paradigm that eschews strong forms of indigenous self-determination and privileges individual civil and political rights. In this sense, it signifies the continued limitation of human rights, especially in terms of the recognition of collective rights, in a post-Cold War era in which a particular form of human rights has become the lingua franca of both state and non-state actors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ejil/chr019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923193993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>887500230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-be3c3c0f4bc2640e2f5459cb34e41407bca88c3be724e99b1e8fe32b6e4ca9e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQgIMoOKdP_oHgiw9SlzRpm_g2pnOD4US255DG65rRpTNJQf-9HduTL8LBwd13xx0fQreUPFIi2Qi2thmZ2hMqz9CA8pwnLJP5ORr0XZFkPBWX6CqELSEkJ1k6QG7p8NTrjW0Aj72pbQQTOw9PeFUDXr_hZzCN9jra1uE-Yl_9sJs6BtxWeO4-7QZc2wX8Du2-gYDtkZm0LsJ3PECzbqfdaegaXVS6CXBzykO0nr6sJrNksXydT8aLxHAqY1ICM8yQipcmzTmBtMp4Jk3JOHDKSVEaLYRhJRQpBylLCqIClpY5cKMl5GyI7o9797796iBEtbPBQNNoB_21SqaMSiYl-5cUosgISRnpybs_5LbtvOvfUCJnheQZFT30cISMb0PwUKm9tzvtfxQl6uBIHRypoyP2C7n3haQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863794518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Engle, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Engle, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>This article traces the development of the international human rights and international indigenous rights movements, with a particular eye towards their points of convergence and divergence and the extent to which each has influenced the other. Focusing on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it argues that the document, while apparently pushing the envelope in its articulation of self-determination and collective rights, also represents the continued power and persistence of an international human rights paradigm that eschews strong forms of indigenous self-determination and privileges individual civil and political rights. In this sense, it signifies the continued limitation of human rights, especially in terms of the recognition of collective rights, in a post-Cold War era in which a particular form of human rights has become the lingua franca of both state and non-state actors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-5428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chr019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Civil Rights ; Collectives ; Human Rights ; Indigenous Populations ; International law ; Native peoples ; Native rights ; Political Power ; Right Wing Politics ; Self Determination ; Studies ; United Nations ; War</subject><ispartof>European journal of international law, 2011-02, Vol.22 (1), p.141-163</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-be3c3c0f4bc2640e2f5459cb34e41407bca88c3be724e99b1e8fe32b6e4ca9e63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engle, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights</title><title>European journal of international law</title><description>This article traces the development of the international human rights and international indigenous rights movements, with a particular eye towards their points of convergence and divergence and the extent to which each has influenced the other. Focusing on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it argues that the document, while apparently pushing the envelope in its articulation of self-determination and collective rights, also represents the continued power and persistence of an international human rights paradigm that eschews strong forms of indigenous self-determination and privileges individual civil and political rights. In this sense, it signifies the continued limitation of human rights, especially in terms of the recognition of collective rights, in a post-Cold War era in which a particular form of human rights has become the lingua franca of both state and non-state actors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Civil Rights</subject><subject>Collectives</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>Indigenous Populations</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Native rights</subject><subject>Political Power</subject><subject>Right Wing Politics</subject><subject>Self Determination</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0938-5428</issn><issn>1464-3596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQgIMoOKdP_oHgiw9SlzRpm_g2pnOD4US255DG65rRpTNJQf-9HduTL8LBwd13xx0fQreUPFIi2Qi2thmZ2hMqz9CA8pwnLJP5ORr0XZFkPBWX6CqELSEkJ1k6QG7p8NTrjW0Aj72pbQQTOw9PeFUDXr_hZzCN9jra1uE-Yl_9sJs6BtxWeO4-7QZc2wX8Du2-gYDtkZm0LsJ3PECzbqfdaegaXVS6CXBzykO0nr6sJrNksXydT8aLxHAqY1ICM8yQipcmzTmBtMp4Jk3JOHDKSVEaLYRhJRQpBylLCqIClpY5cKMl5GyI7o9797796iBEtbPBQNNoB_21SqaMSiYl-5cUosgISRnpybs_5LbtvOvfUCJnheQZFT30cISMb0PwUKm9tzvtfxQl6uBIHRypoyP2C7n3haQ</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Engle, Karen</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights</title><author>Engle, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-be3c3c0f4bc2640e2f5459cb34e41407bca88c3be724e99b1e8fe32b6e4ca9e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Civil Rights</topic><topic>Collectives</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>Indigenous Populations</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Native rights</topic><topic>Political Power</topic><topic>Right Wing Politics</topic><topic>Self Determination</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engle, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>European journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engle, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights</atitle><jtitle>European journal of international law</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>141-163</pages><issn>0938-5428</issn><eissn>1464-3596</eissn><abstract>This article traces the development of the international human rights and international indigenous rights movements, with a particular eye towards their points of convergence and divergence and the extent to which each has influenced the other. Focusing on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it argues that the document, while apparently pushing the envelope in its articulation of self-determination and collective rights, also represents the continued power and persistence of an international human rights paradigm that eschews strong forms of indigenous self-determination and privileges individual civil and political rights. In this sense, it signifies the continued limitation of human rights, especially in terms of the recognition of collective rights, in a post-Cold War era in which a particular form of human rights has become the lingua franca of both state and non-state actors. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><doi>10.1093/ejil/chr019</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-5428 |
ispartof | European journal of international law, 2011-02, Vol.22 (1), p.141-163 |
issn | 0938-5428 1464-3596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923193993 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Civil Rights Collectives Human Rights Indigenous Populations International law Native peoples Native rights Political Power Right Wing Politics Self Determination Studies United Nations War |
title | On Fragile Architecture: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Context of Human Rights |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A32%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Fragile%20Architecture:%20The%20UN%20Declaration%20on%20the%20Rights%20of%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20Human%20Rights&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Engle,%20Karen&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=141-163&rft.issn=0938-5428&rft.eissn=1464-3596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejil/chr019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E887500230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863794518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |