Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging

To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pancreas 2012-03, Vol.41 (2), p.278-282
Hauptverfasser: de Jong, Koen, Nio, Chung Y, Mearadji, Banafsche, Phoa, Saffire S, Engelbrecht, Marc R, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, Bruno, Marco J, Fockens, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue 2
container_start_page 278
container_title Pancreas
container_volume 41
creator de Jong, Koen
Nio, Chung Y
Mearadji, Banafsche
Phoa, Saffire S
Engelbrecht, Marc R
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G
Bruno, Marco J
Fockens, Paul
description To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, pancreatic duct communication, and wall thickening (>2 mm). Radiologists were asked whether they considered the PC mucinous and if the PC was suspicious for malignancy. Furthermore, they had to choose a classifying diagnosis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure agreement within the group. Interobserver agreement for septations and nodules was fair (ICC, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively). Agreement for the presence of solid components was fair (ICC, 0.23), agreement for communication with the pancreatic duct was moderate (ICC, 0.53), and agreement for wall thickening was moderate (ICC, 0.44). There was fair agreement for the discrimination between mucinous and nonmucinous PC (ICC, 0.36). Agreement was fair (ICC, 0.26) for a classifying diagnosis and fair for the presence of malignant features (ICC, 0.33). Interobserver agreement was poor to moderate for individual PC features, and there was fair agreement for a classifying diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology alone did not allow for a reliable discrimination between different types of PC.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822899b6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923190866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>923190866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-279973090e2238167683a02e3be822a4624aba58a72621e4154b77c53f8faf613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRS0kREvhDxDyjlWKH4kfy6o8pSJYwDqapJPKKImDnSD1E_hrXFFWV7r3zGjuEHLF2ZIzq29f3lZLVjEuUXIjhLG2UidkzgupstwIMyPnMX4yxrUs7BmZCcF4YTWbk587F2EYvOtH1-9oEgy-ihi-MVDYBcQO-5FC51MaYOt863cujpE2PgG0biFG1-wPw1sHu95HF6lv6AB9HRBGV9N6f-CneGC6hODBDBh9nxikLnkpuiCnDbQRL4-6IB8P9-_rp2zz-vi8Xm2ygedszIS2VktmGQohDVdaGQlMoKwwNYdciRwqKAxooQTHnBd5pXVdyMY00CguF-Tmb-8Q_NeEcSw7F2tsW-jRT7G0QnLLjFKJvD6SU9XhthxCOjXsy__vyV9IP3P5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923190866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>de Jong, Koen ; Nio, Chung Y ; Mearadji, Banafsche ; Phoa, Saffire S ; Engelbrecht, Marc R ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G ; Bruno, Marco J ; Fockens, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Koen ; Nio, Chung Y ; Mearadji, Banafsche ; Phoa, Saffire S ; Engelbrecht, Marc R ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G ; Bruno, Marco J ; Fockens, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, pancreatic duct communication, and wall thickening (&gt;2 mm). Radiologists were asked whether they considered the PC mucinous and if the PC was suspicious for malignancy. Furthermore, they had to choose a classifying diagnosis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure agreement within the group. Interobserver agreement for septations and nodules was fair (ICC, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively). Agreement for the presence of solid components was fair (ICC, 0.23), agreement for communication with the pancreatic duct was moderate (ICC, 0.53), and agreement for wall thickening was moderate (ICC, 0.44). There was fair agreement for the discrimination between mucinous and nonmucinous PC (ICC, 0.36). Agreement was fair (ICC, 0.26) for a classifying diagnosis and fair for the presence of malignant features (ICC, 0.33). Interobserver agreement was poor to moderate for individual PC features, and there was fair agreement for a classifying diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology alone did not allow for a reliable discrimination between different types of PC.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822899b6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22015970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Diagnosis, Differential ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Netherlands ; Observer Variation ; Pancreatic Cyst - classification ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis ; Pancreatic Cyst - pathology ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - classification ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Pancreas, 2012-03, Vol.41 (2), p.278-282</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22015970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nio, Chung Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mearadji, Banafsche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoa, Saffire S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelbrecht, Marc R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fockens, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Pancreas</title><addtitle>Pancreas</addtitle><description>To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, pancreatic duct communication, and wall thickening (&gt;2 mm). Radiologists were asked whether they considered the PC mucinous and if the PC was suspicious for malignancy. Furthermore, they had to choose a classifying diagnosis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure agreement within the group. Interobserver agreement for septations and nodules was fair (ICC, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively). Agreement for the presence of solid components was fair (ICC, 0.23), agreement for communication with the pancreatic duct was moderate (ICC, 0.53), and agreement for wall thickening was moderate (ICC, 0.44). There was fair agreement for the discrimination between mucinous and nonmucinous PC (ICC, 0.36). Agreement was fair (ICC, 0.26) for a classifying diagnosis and fair for the presence of malignant features (ICC, 0.33). Interobserver agreement was poor to moderate for individual PC features, and there was fair agreement for a classifying diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology alone did not allow for a reliable discrimination between different types of PC.</description><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - classification</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1536-4828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAQRS0kREvhDxDyjlWKH4kfy6o8pSJYwDqapJPKKImDnSD1E_hrXFFWV7r3zGjuEHLF2ZIzq29f3lZLVjEuUXIjhLG2UidkzgupstwIMyPnMX4yxrUs7BmZCcF4YTWbk587F2EYvOtH1-9oEgy-ihi-MVDYBcQO-5FC51MaYOt863cujpE2PgG0biFG1-wPw1sHu95HF6lv6AB9HRBGV9N6f-CneGC6hODBDBh9nxikLnkpuiCnDbQRL4-6IB8P9-_rp2zz-vi8Xm2ygedszIS2VktmGQohDVdaGQlMoKwwNYdciRwqKAxooQTHnBd5pXVdyMY00CguF-Tmb-8Q_NeEcSw7F2tsW-jRT7G0QnLLjFKJvD6SU9XhthxCOjXsy__vyV9IP3P5</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>de Jong, Koen</creator><creator>Nio, Chung Y</creator><creator>Mearadji, Banafsche</creator><creator>Phoa, Saffire S</creator><creator>Engelbrecht, Marc R</creator><creator>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G</creator><creator>Bruno, Marco J</creator><creator>Fockens, Paul</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>de Jong, Koen ; Nio, Chung Y ; Mearadji, Banafsche ; Phoa, Saffire S ; Engelbrecht, Marc R ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G ; Bruno, Marco J ; Fockens, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-279973090e2238167683a02e3be822a4624aba58a72621e4154b77c53f8faf613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - classification</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nio, Chung Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mearadji, Banafsche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoa, Saffire S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelbrecht, Marc R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fockens, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pancreas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jong, Koen</au><au>Nio, Chung Y</au><au>Mearadji, Banafsche</au><au>Phoa, Saffire S</au><au>Engelbrecht, Marc R</au><au>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G</au><au>Bruno, Marco J</au><au>Fockens, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Pancreas</jtitle><addtitle>Pancreas</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>278-282</pages><eissn>1536-4828</eissn><abstract>To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, pancreatic duct communication, and wall thickening (&gt;2 mm). Radiologists were asked whether they considered the PC mucinous and if the PC was suspicious for malignancy. Furthermore, they had to choose a classifying diagnosis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure agreement within the group. Interobserver agreement for septations and nodules was fair (ICC, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively). Agreement for the presence of solid components was fair (ICC, 0.23), agreement for communication with the pancreatic duct was moderate (ICC, 0.53), and agreement for wall thickening was moderate (ICC, 0.44). There was fair agreement for the discrimination between mucinous and nonmucinous PC (ICC, 0.36). Agreement was fair (ICC, 0.26) for a classifying diagnosis and fair for the presence of malignant features (ICC, 0.33). Interobserver agreement was poor to moderate for individual PC features, and there was fair agreement for a classifying diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology alone did not allow for a reliable discrimination between different types of PC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22015970</pmid><doi>10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822899b6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1536-4828
ispartof Pancreas, 2012-03, Vol.41 (2), p.278-282
issn 1536-4828
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_923190866
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Diagnosis, Differential
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Netherlands
Observer Variation
Pancreatic Cyst - classification
Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis
Pancreatic Cyst - pathology
Pancreatic Neoplasms - classification
Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
title Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disappointing%20interobserver%20agreement%20among%20radiologists%20for%20a%20classifying%20diagnosis%20of%20pancreatic%20cysts%20using%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Pancreas&rft.au=de%20Jong,%20Koen&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=278-282&rft.eissn=1536-4828&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31822899b6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E923190866%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923190866&rft_id=info:pmid/22015970&rfr_iscdi=true