Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009

Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression is a complex and controversial issue, and its real-world practice remains largely unknown. Method Observational analysis of the pharmacotherapy of 2231 psychiatric inpatients with a current episode of bipolar depression. The study w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2012-02, Vol.136 (3), p.534-542
Hauptverfasser: Greil, Waldemar, Häberle, Anne, Haueis, Patrick, Grohmann, Renate, Russmann, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 542
container_issue 3
container_start_page 534
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 136
creator Greil, Waldemar
Häberle, Anne
Haueis, Patrick
Grohmann, Renate
Russmann, Stefan
description Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression is a complex and controversial issue, and its real-world practice remains largely unknown. Method Observational analysis of the pharmacotherapy of 2231 psychiatric inpatients with a current episode of bipolar depression. The study was based on cross-sectional prescription data from European psychiatric hospitals that had been repeatedly collected between 1994 and 2009 through the collaborative Drug Safety in Psychiatry (AMSP) program. Results Overall 81.3% of patients received antidepressants (AD) (7.8% monotherapy), 57.9% antipsychotics (AP), 50.1% anticonvulsants (AC), 47.5% tranquilizers, and 34.6% lithium (Li). Use over time was stable for AD, decreased for Li, and increased for AC, AP and tranquilizers. Pronounced increases were specifically observed for quetiapine, lamotrigine and valproate. Use of tricyclic AD decreased but its prevalence was still 11.8% in 2009. Venlafaxine was used by 19.5% in 2009. We also observed an increase of polypharmacy combining AD, AP, AC and Li. From 2006 to 2009 37.0% received concomitant treatment with three, and 6.4% even with all four of those drug classes. Limitations Observational cross-sectional study without follow-up or additional clinical information. Conclusions Monotherapy with antidepressants and any use of tricyclic AD and venlafaxine still has a considerable prevalence in bipolar depression, but this is controversial due to the reported risk of treatment emergent affective switches. Triple and quadruple therapy is not evidence-based but increasingly used in clinical practice. This may reflect an attempt to overcome treatment failure, and further studies should evaluate efficacy and safety of this common practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922757193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032711006823</els_id><sourcerecordid>922757193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-413346e99168980a30d209108d035a7049baac319d364adf234cfc67ec52a3a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks2KFDEUhQtRnHb0AdxINuKq25ukfjoIwjD4MzBiw-g63E5u0SmrkzJJOfQz-NKm6VbBhauQ5Dsn4ZxbVc85rDjw9vWwGtCuBHBe9iuQ8kG14E0nl6Lh3cNqUZhmCVJ0F9WTlAYAaFUHj6sLIbisoa4X1c_NDuMeTcg7ijjRnJ1hOZK3iTnPhJCcTelgdg5zLFfOT5gd-ZzYvcs7tnVTGDEyS1OklFzwrI9hz4odu_GZoi948Diyq093G7aJYSCT2ZbyPZFnXKmaobdMAKin1aMex0TPzutl9fX9uy_XH5e3nz_cXF_dLk29hrysuZR1S0rxdq3WgBKsAMVhbUE22EGttohGcmVlW6PthaxNb9qOTCNQIsjL6tXJd4rh-0wp671LhsYRPYU5aSVE13RcyULyE2liSClSr6fo9hgPmoM-VqAHXSrQxwqOR6WConlxdp-3e7J_FL8zL8DLM4DJ4NhH9Malv1zTdIKLrnBvThyVLH44ijqZkrwh62LJUNvg_vuNt_-ozei8Kw9-owOlIcylmjFprpPQoO-Os3IcFc7LlKyFlL8ArG63gQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922757193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Greil, Waldemar ; Häberle, Anne ; Haueis, Patrick ; Grohmann, Renate ; Russmann, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Greil, Waldemar ; Häberle, Anne ; Haueis, Patrick ; Grohmann, Renate ; Russmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression is a complex and controversial issue, and its real-world practice remains largely unknown. Method Observational analysis of the pharmacotherapy of 2231 psychiatric inpatients with a current episode of bipolar depression. The study was based on cross-sectional prescription data from European psychiatric hospitals that had been repeatedly collected between 1994 and 2009 through the collaborative Drug Safety in Psychiatry (AMSP) program. Results Overall 81.3% of patients received antidepressants (AD) (7.8% monotherapy), 57.9% antipsychotics (AP), 50.1% anticonvulsants (AC), 47.5% tranquilizers, and 34.6% lithium (Li). Use over time was stable for AD, decreased for Li, and increased for AC, AP and tranquilizers. Pronounced increases were specifically observed for quetiapine, lamotrigine and valproate. Use of tricyclic AD decreased but its prevalence was still 11.8% in 2009. Venlafaxine was used by 19.5% in 2009. We also observed an increase of polypharmacy combining AD, AP, AC and Li. From 2006 to 2009 37.0% received concomitant treatment with three, and 6.4% even with all four of those drug classes. Limitations Observational cross-sectional study without follow-up or additional clinical information. Conclusions Monotherapy with antidepressants and any use of tricyclic AD and venlafaxine still has a considerable prevalence in bipolar depression, but this is controversial due to the reported risk of treatment emergent affective switches. Triple and quadruple therapy is not evidence-based but increasingly used in clinical practice. This may reflect an attempt to overcome treatment failure, and further studies should evaluate efficacy and safety of this common practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22134044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; AMSP ; Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bipolar depression ; Bipolar Disorder - drug therapy ; Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology ; Bipolar disorders ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Lithium Compounds - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mood disorders ; Pharmacoepidemiology ; Pharmacotherapy ; Polypharmacy ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Tranquilizing Agents - therapeutic use ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2012-02, Vol.136 (3), p.534-542</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-413346e99168980a30d209108d035a7049baac319d364adf234cfc67ec52a3a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-413346e99168980a30d209108d035a7049baac319d364adf234cfc67ec52a3a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25572127$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22134044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greil, Waldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häberle, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haueis, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression is a complex and controversial issue, and its real-world practice remains largely unknown. Method Observational analysis of the pharmacotherapy of 2231 psychiatric inpatients with a current episode of bipolar depression. The study was based on cross-sectional prescription data from European psychiatric hospitals that had been repeatedly collected between 1994 and 2009 through the collaborative Drug Safety in Psychiatry (AMSP) program. Results Overall 81.3% of patients received antidepressants (AD) (7.8% monotherapy), 57.9% antipsychotics (AP), 50.1% anticonvulsants (AC), 47.5% tranquilizers, and 34.6% lithium (Li). Use over time was stable for AD, decreased for Li, and increased for AC, AP and tranquilizers. Pronounced increases were specifically observed for quetiapine, lamotrigine and valproate. Use of tricyclic AD decreased but its prevalence was still 11.8% in 2009. Venlafaxine was used by 19.5% in 2009. We also observed an increase of polypharmacy combining AD, AP, AC and Li. From 2006 to 2009 37.0% received concomitant treatment with three, and 6.4% even with all four of those drug classes. Limitations Observational cross-sectional study without follow-up or additional clinical information. Conclusions Monotherapy with antidepressants and any use of tricyclic AD and venlafaxine still has a considerable prevalence in bipolar depression, but this is controversial due to the reported risk of treatment emergent affective switches. Triple and quadruple therapy is not evidence-based but increasingly used in clinical practice. This may reflect an attempt to overcome treatment failure, and further studies should evaluate efficacy and safety of this common practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>AMSP</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bipolar depression</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bipolar disorders</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithium Compounds - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Tranquilizing Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks2KFDEUhQtRnHb0AdxINuKq25ukfjoIwjD4MzBiw-g63E5u0SmrkzJJOfQz-NKm6VbBhauQ5Dsn4ZxbVc85rDjw9vWwGtCuBHBe9iuQ8kG14E0nl6Lh3cNqUZhmCVJ0F9WTlAYAaFUHj6sLIbisoa4X1c_NDuMeTcg7ijjRnJ1hOZK3iTnPhJCcTelgdg5zLFfOT5gd-ZzYvcs7tnVTGDEyS1OklFzwrI9hz4odu_GZoi948Diyq093G7aJYSCT2ZbyPZFnXKmaobdMAKin1aMex0TPzutl9fX9uy_XH5e3nz_cXF_dLk29hrysuZR1S0rxdq3WgBKsAMVhbUE22EGttohGcmVlW6PthaxNb9qOTCNQIsjL6tXJd4rh-0wp671LhsYRPYU5aSVE13RcyULyE2liSClSr6fo9hgPmoM-VqAHXSrQxwqOR6WConlxdp-3e7J_FL8zL8DLM4DJ4NhH9Malv1zTdIKLrnBvThyVLH44ijqZkrwh62LJUNvg_vuNt_-ozei8Kw9-owOlIcylmjFprpPQoO-Os3IcFc7LlKyFlL8ArG63gQ</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Greil, Waldemar</creator><creator>Häberle, Anne</creator><creator>Haueis, Patrick</creator><creator>Grohmann, Renate</creator><creator>Russmann, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009</title><author>Greil, Waldemar ; Häberle, Anne ; Haueis, Patrick ; Grohmann, Renate ; Russmann, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-413346e99168980a30d209108d035a7049baac319d364adf234cfc67ec52a3a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>AMSP</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bipolar depression</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bipolar disorders</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithium Compounds - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Tranquilizing Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greil, Waldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häberle, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haueis, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greil, Waldemar</au><au>Häberle, Anne</au><au>Haueis, Patrick</au><au>Grohmann, Renate</au><au>Russmann, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>534-542</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression is a complex and controversial issue, and its real-world practice remains largely unknown. Method Observational analysis of the pharmacotherapy of 2231 psychiatric inpatients with a current episode of bipolar depression. The study was based on cross-sectional prescription data from European psychiatric hospitals that had been repeatedly collected between 1994 and 2009 through the collaborative Drug Safety in Psychiatry (AMSP) program. Results Overall 81.3% of patients received antidepressants (AD) (7.8% monotherapy), 57.9% antipsychotics (AP), 50.1% anticonvulsants (AC), 47.5% tranquilizers, and 34.6% lithium (Li). Use over time was stable for AD, decreased for Li, and increased for AC, AP and tranquilizers. Pronounced increases were specifically observed for quetiapine, lamotrigine and valproate. Use of tricyclic AD decreased but its prevalence was still 11.8% in 2009. Venlafaxine was used by 19.5% in 2009. We also observed an increase of polypharmacy combining AD, AP, AC and Li. From 2006 to 2009 37.0% received concomitant treatment with three, and 6.4% even with all four of those drug classes. Limitations Observational cross-sectional study without follow-up or additional clinical information. Conclusions Monotherapy with antidepressants and any use of tricyclic AD and venlafaxine still has a considerable prevalence in bipolar depression, but this is controversial due to the reported risk of treatment emergent affective switches. Triple and quadruple therapy is not evidence-based but increasingly used in clinical practice. This may reflect an attempt to overcome treatment failure, and further studies should evaluate efficacy and safety of this common practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22134044</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.033</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2012-02, Vol.136 (3), p.534-542
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922757193
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
AMSP
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Bipolar depression
Bipolar Disorder - drug therapy
Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology
Bipolar disorders
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Lithium Compounds - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mood disorders
Pharmacoepidemiology
Pharmacotherapy
Polypharmacy
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Tranquilizing Agents - therapeutic use
Young Adult
title Pharmacotherapeutic trends in 2231 psychiatric inpatients with bipolar depression from the International AMSP Project between 1994 and 2009
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacotherapeutic%20trends%20in%202231%20psychiatric%20inpatients%20with%20bipolar%20depression%20from%20the%20International%20AMSP%20Project%20between%201994%20and%202009&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Greil,%20Waldemar&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=534-542&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922757193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922757193&rft_id=info:pmid/22134044&rft_els_id=S0165032711006823&rfr_iscdi=true