Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients

Objective. To analyse therapeutic management of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Methods. We reviewed 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven EF. Analyses focused on the therapeutic management, including treatment modalities, responses and associated or predictive factors. Results. Thirty-four patients wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2012-03, Vol.51 (3), p.557-561
Hauptverfasser: Lebeaux, David, Francès, Camille, Barete, Stéphane, Wechsler, Bertrand, Dubourg, Odile, Renoux, Jérôme, Maisonobe, Thierry, Benveniste, Olivier, Gatfossé, Marc, Bourgeois, Pierre, Amoura, Zahir, Cacoub, Patrice, Piette, Jean-Charles, Sène, Damien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 561
container_issue 3
container_start_page 557
container_title Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
container_volume 51
creator Lebeaux, David
Francès, Camille
Barete, Stéphane
Wechsler, Bertrand
Dubourg, Odile
Renoux, Jérôme
Maisonobe, Thierry
Benveniste, Olivier
Gatfossé, Marc
Bourgeois, Pierre
Amoura, Zahir
Cacoub, Patrice
Piette, Jean-Charles
Sène, Damien
description Objective. To analyse therapeutic management of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Methods. We reviewed 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven EF. Analyses focused on the therapeutic management, including treatment modalities, responses and associated or predictive factors. Results. Thirty-four patients were included with a diagnosis age of 53 (15) years. They were featured by cutaneous manifestations (88%) including morphoea (41%), myalgia (86%) and hypereosinophilia (85%). Thirty-two patients (94%) were eligible for treatment evaluation and all received CSs as a first-line therapy. Fifteen patients (47%) received methylprednisolone pulses (MPPs) at treatment initiation and 14 patients (44%) received an immunosuppressive drug (ISD), usually MTX (86%), as a second-line therapy. Complete remission was achieved for 69% of patients, remission with disability 19% and failure 12%. A poor outcome was associated with a diagnosis time delay of >6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] and the lack of MPPs (OR = 12.9). Conclusion. Our study reports new insights into the therapeutic management of EF: (i) CS treatment remains the standard therapy for EF, taken alone or in association with an ISD; (ii) MPPs at initiation of treatment are associated with a better outcome and a lower need of ISD use; (iii) an ISD, usually MTX, might be useful as a second-line therapy, mainly in patients with morphoea-like lesions. Naturally, these practical conclusions should be confirmed by a prospective and multicentre study.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rheumatology/ker366
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922500723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/rheumatology/ker366</oup_id><sourcerecordid>922500723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-73401e0177747f8d42c5056b0a524f56d15175101741edfe8d4a22d973ef20cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKxDAUBuAgiuPtCQTJRtTFOLm2M-5EvIHgQl2XTHsyjbZNzUkR394MM16WLkIO5PtP4CfkkLNzzmZyEmoYWhN94xefkzcIMss2yA5XmRgzKcXmzyzUiOwivjLGNJfTbTISgguWMbFD8Nqj63xfu8aV1BosnYsO6elTPTSt6WjlEAzC2QXt4IO6Dt2ijpiG6GmsYXmC6WGIKZ68WUALXaQ2-JYaihAcIPWWSkV7E116w32yZU2DcLC-98jLzfXz1d344fH2_uryYVwqpeI4l4pxYDzPc5XbaaVEqZnO5sxooazOKq55rnkCikNlIQkjRDXLJVjBSiv3yMlqbx_8-wAYi9ZhCU1jOvADFjMhNGO5kEnKlSyDRwxgiz641oTPgrNiWXbxt-xiVXZKHa33D_MWqp_Md7sJHK9B6tU0NpiudPjrdManUsySO185P_T_-vkL9UydVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922500723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lebeaux, David ; Francès, Camille ; Barete, Stéphane ; Wechsler, Bertrand ; Dubourg, Odile ; Renoux, Jérôme ; Maisonobe, Thierry ; Benveniste, Olivier ; Gatfossé, Marc ; Bourgeois, Pierre ; Amoura, Zahir ; Cacoub, Patrice ; Piette, Jean-Charles ; Sène, Damien</creator><creatorcontrib>Lebeaux, David ; Francès, Camille ; Barete, Stéphane ; Wechsler, Bertrand ; Dubourg, Odile ; Renoux, Jérôme ; Maisonobe, Thierry ; Benveniste, Olivier ; Gatfossé, Marc ; Bourgeois, Pierre ; Amoura, Zahir ; Cacoub, Patrice ; Piette, Jean-Charles ; Sène, Damien</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To analyse therapeutic management of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Methods. We reviewed 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven EF. Analyses focused on the therapeutic management, including treatment modalities, responses and associated or predictive factors. Results. Thirty-four patients were included with a diagnosis age of 53 (15) years. They were featured by cutaneous manifestations (88%) including morphoea (41%), myalgia (86%) and hypereosinophilia (85%). Thirty-two patients (94%) were eligible for treatment evaluation and all received CSs as a first-line therapy. Fifteen patients (47%) received methylprednisolone pulses (MPPs) at treatment initiation and 14 patients (44%) received an immunosuppressive drug (ISD), usually MTX (86%), as a second-line therapy. Complete remission was achieved for 69% of patients, remission with disability 19% and failure 12%. A poor outcome was associated with a diagnosis time delay of &gt;6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] and the lack of MPPs (OR = 12.9). Conclusion. Our study reports new insights into the therapeutic management of EF: (i) CS treatment remains the standard therapy for EF, taken alone or in association with an ISD; (ii) MPPs at initiation of treatment are associated with a better outcome and a lower need of ISD use; (iii) an ISD, usually MTX, might be useful as a second-line therapy, mainly in patients with morphoea-like lesions. Naturally, these practical conclusions should be confirmed by a prospective and multicentre study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22120602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Antirheumatic Agents - administration & dosage ; Azathioprine - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colchicine - administration & dosage ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Eosinophilia ; Female ; Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage ; Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine - administration & dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methotrexate - administration & dosage ; Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases ; Prednisone - administration & dosage ; Prognosis ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis ; Scleroderma, Localized - drug therapy ; Scleroderma, Localized - etiology ; Synovitis - complications ; Synovitis - drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2012-03, Vol.51 (3), p.557-561</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-73401e0177747f8d42c5056b0a524f56d15175101741edfe8d4a22d973ef20cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-73401e0177747f8d42c5056b0a524f56d15175101741edfe8d4a22d973ef20cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25618329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22120602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lebeaux, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francès, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barete, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechsler, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubourg, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renoux, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisonobe, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benveniste, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatfossé, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgeois, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoura, Zahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacoub, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piette, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sène, Damien</creatorcontrib><title>Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients</title><title>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><description>Objective. To analyse therapeutic management of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Methods. We reviewed 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven EF. Analyses focused on the therapeutic management, including treatment modalities, responses and associated or predictive factors. Results. Thirty-four patients were included with a diagnosis age of 53 (15) years. They were featured by cutaneous manifestations (88%) including morphoea (41%), myalgia (86%) and hypereosinophilia (85%). Thirty-two patients (94%) were eligible for treatment evaluation and all received CSs as a first-line therapy. Fifteen patients (47%) received methylprednisolone pulses (MPPs) at treatment initiation and 14 patients (44%) received an immunosuppressive drug (ISD), usually MTX (86%), as a second-line therapy. Complete remission was achieved for 69% of patients, remission with disability 19% and failure 12%. A poor outcome was associated with a diagnosis time delay of &gt;6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] and the lack of MPPs (OR = 12.9). Conclusion. Our study reports new insights into the therapeutic management of EF: (i) CS treatment remains the standard therapy for EF, taken alone or in association with an ISD; (ii) MPPs at initiation of treatment are associated with a better outcome and a lower need of ISD use; (iii) an ISD, usually MTX, might be useful as a second-line therapy, mainly in patients with morphoea-like lesions. Naturally, these practical conclusions should be confirmed by a prospective and multicentre study.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Azathioprine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colchicine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Eosinophilia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxychloroquine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methotrexate - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Prednisone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</subject><subject>Scleroderma, Localized - drug therapy</subject><subject>Scleroderma, Localized - etiology</subject><subject>Synovitis - complications</subject><subject>Synovitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKxDAUBuAgiuPtCQTJRtTFOLm2M-5EvIHgQl2XTHsyjbZNzUkR394MM16WLkIO5PtP4CfkkLNzzmZyEmoYWhN94xefkzcIMss2yA5XmRgzKcXmzyzUiOwivjLGNJfTbTISgguWMbFD8Nqj63xfu8aV1BosnYsO6elTPTSt6WjlEAzC2QXt4IO6Dt2ijpiG6GmsYXmC6WGIKZ68WUALXaQ2-JYaihAcIPWWSkV7E116w32yZU2DcLC-98jLzfXz1d344fH2_uryYVwqpeI4l4pxYDzPc5XbaaVEqZnO5sxooazOKq55rnkCikNlIQkjRDXLJVjBSiv3yMlqbx_8-wAYi9ZhCU1jOvADFjMhNGO5kEnKlSyDRwxgiz641oTPgrNiWXbxt-xiVXZKHa33D_MWqp_Md7sJHK9B6tU0NpiudPjrdManUsySO185P_T_-vkL9UydVQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Lebeaux, David</creator><creator>Francès, Camille</creator><creator>Barete, Stéphane</creator><creator>Wechsler, Bertrand</creator><creator>Dubourg, Odile</creator><creator>Renoux, Jérôme</creator><creator>Maisonobe, Thierry</creator><creator>Benveniste, Olivier</creator><creator>Gatfossé, Marc</creator><creator>Bourgeois, Pierre</creator><creator>Amoura, Zahir</creator><creator>Cacoub, Patrice</creator><creator>Piette, Jean-Charles</creator><creator>Sène, Damien</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients</title><author>Lebeaux, David ; Francès, Camille ; Barete, Stéphane ; Wechsler, Bertrand ; Dubourg, Odile ; Renoux, Jérôme ; Maisonobe, Thierry ; Benveniste, Olivier ; Gatfossé, Marc ; Bourgeois, Pierre ; Amoura, Zahir ; Cacoub, Patrice ; Piette, Jean-Charles ; Sène, Damien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-73401e0177747f8d42c5056b0a524f56d15175101741edfe8d4a22d973ef20cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Azathioprine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colchicine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Eosinophilia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxychloroquine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methotrexate - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Prednisone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</topic><topic>Scleroderma, Localized - drug therapy</topic><topic>Scleroderma, Localized - etiology</topic><topic>Synovitis - complications</topic><topic>Synovitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lebeaux, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francès, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barete, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechsler, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubourg, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renoux, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisonobe, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benveniste, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatfossé, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgeois, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoura, Zahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacoub, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piette, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sène, Damien</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lebeaux, David</au><au>Francès, Camille</au><au>Barete, Stéphane</au><au>Wechsler, Bertrand</au><au>Dubourg, Odile</au><au>Renoux, Jérôme</au><au>Maisonobe, Thierry</au><au>Benveniste, Olivier</au><au>Gatfossé, Marc</au><au>Bourgeois, Pierre</au><au>Amoura, Zahir</au><au>Cacoub, Patrice</au><au>Piette, Jean-Charles</au><au>Sène, Damien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients</atitle><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>557-561</pages><issn>1462-0324</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><abstract>Objective. To analyse therapeutic management of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Methods. We reviewed 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven EF. Analyses focused on the therapeutic management, including treatment modalities, responses and associated or predictive factors. Results. Thirty-four patients were included with a diagnosis age of 53 (15) years. They were featured by cutaneous manifestations (88%) including morphoea (41%), myalgia (86%) and hypereosinophilia (85%). Thirty-two patients (94%) were eligible for treatment evaluation and all received CSs as a first-line therapy. Fifteen patients (47%) received methylprednisolone pulses (MPPs) at treatment initiation and 14 patients (44%) received an immunosuppressive drug (ISD), usually MTX (86%), as a second-line therapy. Complete remission was achieved for 69% of patients, remission with disability 19% and failure 12%. A poor outcome was associated with a diagnosis time delay of &gt;6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] and the lack of MPPs (OR = 12.9). Conclusion. Our study reports new insights into the therapeutic management of EF: (i) CS treatment remains the standard therapy for EF, taken alone or in association with an ISD; (ii) MPPs at initiation of treatment are associated with a better outcome and a lower need of ISD use; (iii) an ISD, usually MTX, might be useful as a second-line therapy, mainly in patients with morphoea-like lesions. Naturally, these practical conclusions should be confirmed by a prospective and multicentre study.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>22120602</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/ker366</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-0324
ispartof Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2012-03, Vol.51 (3), p.557-561
issn 1462-0324
1462-0332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922500723
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents - administration & dosage
Azathioprine - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Colchicine - administration & dosage
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Drug Therapy, Combination
Eosinophilia
Female
Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage
Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases
Humans
Hydroxychloroquine - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Male
Medical sciences
Methotrexate - administration & dosage
Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases
Prednisone - administration & dosage
Prognosis
Remission Induction
Retrospective Studies
Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis
Scleroderma, Localized - drug therapy
Scleroderma, Localized - etiology
Synovitis - complications
Synovitis - drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A44%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eosinophilic%20fasciitis%20(Shulman%20disease):%20new%20insights%20into%20the%20therapeutic%20management%20from%20a%20series%20of%2034%20patients&rft.jtitle=Rheumatology%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Lebeaux,%20David&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=557-561&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/ker366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922500723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922500723&rft_id=info:pmid/22120602&rft_oup_id=10.1093/rheumatology/ker366&rfr_iscdi=true