DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty‐three consecutive patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2012-03, Vol.67 (3), p.778-785 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 785 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 778 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Barrett, T. Gill, A. B. Kataoka, M. Y. Priest, A. N. Joubert, I. McLean, M. A. Graves, M. J. Stearn, S. Lomas, D. J. Griffiths, J. R. Neal, D. Gnanapragasam, V. J. Sala, E. |
description | Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty‐three consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated by primary ADT were included. Imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months posttreatment with ADT. After 3 months therapy there was a significant reduction in all dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameters measured in tumor regions of interest (Ktrans, kep, vp, IAUGC‐90); P < 0.001. Areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone showed no significant change; P = 0.285–0.879. Post‐ADT, there was no significant change in apparent diffusion coefficient values in tumors, whilst apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly decreased in areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone, from 1.786 × 10−3 mm2/s to 1.561 × 10−3 mm2/s; P = 0.007. As expected the median Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA) significantly reduced from 30 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL posttreatment, and median prostate volume dropped from 47.6 cm3 to 24.9 cm3; P < 0.001. These results suggest that dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI offer different information but that both could prove useful adjuncts to the anatomical information provided by T2‐weighted imaging. dynamic contrast‐enhanced as a marker of angiogenesis may help demonstrate ADT resistance and diffusion‐weighted imaging may be more accurate in determining presence of tumor cell death versus residual tumor. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.23062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922497264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>922497264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3622-f864b6432fe5006dad6f7aa32aac324599fe64b4dc40a5e5dd3ae4191c676a3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9P3DAQxa2qFWwXDv0ClW9VDwH_i4N7QwulSGxbIRBHy2tPwG3iBNtbiPjy9XaBW08jjX7vzbyH0AdKDigh7LCP_QHjRLI3aEZrxipWK_EWzUgjSMWpErvofUq_CCFKNWIH7TJGeeGOZujpZHGKTXD45AYvL8-xD7gfgs9D9OEWR0jjEBLgPGygONxCwA7G6P-Y7IeA8x1EM04b2Vg2EHLCDz7f4TEOKZsM2JpgIX7Bx7gFk_zKdz5POOW1m_bQu9Z0Cfaf5xxdfz29WnyrLn6cnS-OLyrLZQnTHkmxkoKzFmpCpDNOto0xnBljORO1Ui0UQjgriKmhdo4bEFRRKxtpuOVz9GnrW566X0PKuvfJQteZAMM6acWYUA0rJ-bo85a05f0UodUlam_ipCnRm6p1qVr_q7qwH59d16se3Cv50m0BDrfAg-9g-r-TXl4uXyyrrcKnDI-vChN_a9nwptY338_0T0LVVSOWmvK_NMaYfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922497264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Barrett, T. ; Gill, A. B. ; Kataoka, M. Y. ; Priest, A. N. ; Joubert, I. ; McLean, M. A. ; Graves, M. J. ; Stearn, S. ; Lomas, D. J. ; Griffiths, J. R. ; Neal, D. ; Gnanapragasam, V. J. ; Sala, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrett, T. ; Gill, A. B. ; Kataoka, M. Y. ; Priest, A. N. ; Joubert, I. ; McLean, M. A. ; Graves, M. J. ; Stearn, S. ; Lomas, D. J. ; Griffiths, J. R. ; Neal, D. ; Gnanapragasam, V. J. ; Sala, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty‐three consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated by primary ADT were included. Imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months posttreatment with ADT. After 3 months therapy there was a significant reduction in all dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameters measured in tumor regions of interest (Ktrans, kep, vp, IAUGC‐90); P < 0.001. Areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone showed no significant change; P = 0.285–0.879. Post‐ADT, there was no significant change in apparent diffusion coefficient values in tumors, whilst apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly decreased in areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone, from 1.786 × 10−3 mm2/s to 1.561 × 10−3 mm2/s; P = 0.007. As expected the median Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA) significantly reduced from 30 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL posttreatment, and median prostate volume dropped from 47.6 cm3 to 24.9 cm3; P < 0.001. These results suggest that dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI offer different information but that both could prove useful adjuncts to the anatomical information provided by T2‐weighted imaging. dynamic contrast‐enhanced as a marker of angiogenesis may help demonstrate ADT resistance and diffusion‐weighted imaging may be more accurate in determining presence of tumor cell death versus residual tumor. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22135228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>3.0 T ; ADT ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgen Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Anilides - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use ; Contrast Media ; DCE MRI ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; DW MRI ; Feasibility Studies ; Goserelin - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nitriles - therapeutic use ; Organometallic Compounds ; prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Tosyl Compounds - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2012-03, Vol.67 (3), p.778-785</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3622-f864b6432fe5006dad6f7aa32aac324599fe64b4dc40a5e5dd3ae4191c676a3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3622-f864b6432fe5006dad6f7aa32aac324599fe64b4dc40a5e5dd3ae4191c676a3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.23062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.23062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrett, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kataoka, M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priest, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joubert, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnanapragasam, V. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, E.</creatorcontrib><title>DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty‐three consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated by primary ADT were included. Imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months posttreatment with ADT. After 3 months therapy there was a significant reduction in all dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameters measured in tumor regions of interest (Ktrans, kep, vp, IAUGC‐90); P < 0.001. Areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone showed no significant change; P = 0.285–0.879. Post‐ADT, there was no significant change in apparent diffusion coefficient values in tumors, whilst apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly decreased in areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone, from 1.786 × 10−3 mm2/s to 1.561 × 10−3 mm2/s; P = 0.007. As expected the median Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA) significantly reduced from 30 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL posttreatment, and median prostate volume dropped from 47.6 cm3 to 24.9 cm3; P < 0.001. These results suggest that dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI offer different information but that both could prove useful adjuncts to the anatomical information provided by T2‐weighted imaging. dynamic contrast‐enhanced as a marker of angiogenesis may help demonstrate ADT resistance and diffusion‐weighted imaging may be more accurate in determining presence of tumor cell death versus residual tumor. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>3.0 T</subject><subject>ADT</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Androgen Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anilides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>DCE MRI</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>DW MRI</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Goserelin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nitriles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Tosyl Compounds - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9P3DAQxa2qFWwXDv0ClW9VDwH_i4N7QwulSGxbIRBHy2tPwG3iBNtbiPjy9XaBW08jjX7vzbyH0AdKDigh7LCP_QHjRLI3aEZrxipWK_EWzUgjSMWpErvofUq_CCFKNWIH7TJGeeGOZujpZHGKTXD45AYvL8-xD7gfgs9D9OEWR0jjEBLgPGygONxCwA7G6P-Y7IeA8x1EM04b2Vg2EHLCDz7f4TEOKZsM2JpgIX7Bx7gFk_zKdz5POOW1m_bQu9Z0Cfaf5xxdfz29WnyrLn6cnS-OLyrLZQnTHkmxkoKzFmpCpDNOto0xnBljORO1Ui0UQjgriKmhdo4bEFRRKxtpuOVz9GnrW566X0PKuvfJQteZAMM6acWYUA0rJ-bo85a05f0UodUlam_ipCnRm6p1qVr_q7qwH59d16se3Cv50m0BDrfAg-9g-r-TXl4uXyyrrcKnDI-vChN_a9nwptY338_0T0LVVSOWmvK_NMaYfA</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Barrett, T.</creator><creator>Gill, A. B.</creator><creator>Kataoka, M. Y.</creator><creator>Priest, A. N.</creator><creator>Joubert, I.</creator><creator>McLean, M. A.</creator><creator>Graves, M. J.</creator><creator>Stearn, S.</creator><creator>Lomas, D. J.</creator><creator>Griffiths, J. R.</creator><creator>Neal, D.</creator><creator>Gnanapragasam, V. J.</creator><creator>Sala, E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study</title><author>Barrett, T. ; Gill, A. B. ; Kataoka, M. Y. ; Priest, A. N. ; Joubert, I. ; McLean, M. A. ; Graves, M. J. ; Stearn, S. ; Lomas, D. J. ; Griffiths, J. R. ; Neal, D. ; Gnanapragasam, V. J. ; Sala, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3622-f864b6432fe5006dad6f7aa32aac324599fe64b4dc40a5e5dd3ae4191c676a3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>3.0 T</topic><topic>ADT</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Androgen Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anilides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>DCE MRI</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>DW MRI</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Goserelin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nitriles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Tosyl Compounds - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrett, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kataoka, M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priest, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joubert, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnanapragasam, V. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrett, T.</au><au>Gill, A. B.</au><au>Kataoka, M. Y.</au><au>Priest, A. N.</au><au>Joubert, I.</au><au>McLean, M. A.</au><au>Graves, M. J.</au><au>Stearn, S.</au><au>Lomas, D. J.</au><au>Griffiths, J. R.</au><au>Neal, D.</au><au>Gnanapragasam, V. J.</au><au>Sala, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>778</spage><epage>785</epage><pages>778-785</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a key primary treatment for advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is an important neoadjuvant before radiotherapy. We evaluated 3.0 T dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI in monitoring ADT response. Twenty‐three consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated by primary ADT were included. Imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months posttreatment with ADT. After 3 months therapy there was a significant reduction in all dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameters measured in tumor regions of interest (Ktrans, kep, vp, IAUGC‐90); P < 0.001. Areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone showed no significant change; P = 0.285–0.879. Post‐ADT, there was no significant change in apparent diffusion coefficient values in tumors, whilst apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly decreased in areas of normal‐appearing peripheral zone, from 1.786 × 10−3 mm2/s to 1.561 × 10−3 mm2/s; P = 0.007. As expected the median Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA) significantly reduced from 30 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL posttreatment, and median prostate volume dropped from 47.6 cm3 to 24.9 cm3; P < 0.001. These results suggest that dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI and diffusion‐weighted MRI offer different information but that both could prove useful adjuncts to the anatomical information provided by T2‐weighted imaging. dynamic contrast‐enhanced as a marker of angiogenesis may help demonstrate ADT resistance and diffusion‐weighted imaging may be more accurate in determining presence of tumor cell death versus residual tumor. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22135228</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.23062</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2012-03, Vol.67 (3), p.778-785 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922497264 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles; MEDLINE; Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
subjects | 3.0 T ADT Aged Aged, 80 and over Androgen Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use Anilides - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use Contrast Media DCE MRI Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods DW MRI Feasibility Studies Goserelin - therapeutic use Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Male Middle Aged Nitriles - therapeutic use Organometallic Compounds prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Tosyl Compounds - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome |
title | DCE and DW MRI in monitoring response to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: A feasibility study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A14%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DCE%20and%20DW%20MRI%20in%20monitoring%20response%20to%20androgen%20deprivation%20therapy%20in%20patients%20with%20prostate%20cancer:%20A%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Barrett,%20T.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=778&rft.epage=785&rft.pages=778-785&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.23062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922497264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922497264&rft_id=info:pmid/22135228&rfr_iscdi=true |